ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Mycolicibacter kumamotonensis is a slowly growing, non-chromogenic non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) that was initially distinguished from the M. terrae complex in 2006. Since then it has been rarely reported as the cause of pulmonary and soft-tissue infections in both immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of severe pulmonary disease due to Mycolicibacter kumamotonensis in a 57-year-old male who was immunocompetent at time of diagnosis, with a history of interstitial lung disease and a prior diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). After initial treatment for TB in 2017, his condition stabilized until a recurrence in September 2021, leading to an evaluation for lung transplant in the setting of pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema which led to the identification of Mycolicibacter kumamotonensis. A lung transplant was completed, and the patient was successfully treated with a combination of Ethambutol, Azithromycin, and Rifabutin. CONCLUSIONS: This represents the first case reported of M. kumamotonensis in a patient undergoing lung transplant, and the first case with rapid culture growth during identification of the organism (4 days). This report highlights the need for consideration of M. kumamotonensis as a pathogen in humans, with the potential for rapid growth in liquid media, and the importance of early identification to inform empiric therapy.
Subject(s)
Lung Diseases , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous , Tuberculosis , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , New York City , Nontuberculous Mycobacteria , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/diagnosis , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/drug therapy , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/microbiologyABSTRACT
COVID-19 is associated with prolonged hospitalization and a high risk of intubation, which raises concern for bacterial coinfection and antimicrobial resistance. Previous research has shown a wide range of bacterial pneumonia rates for COVID-19 patients in a variety of clinical and demographic settings, but none have compared hospitalized COVID-19 patients to patients testing negative for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) in similar care settings. We performed a retrospective cohort study on hospitalized patients with COVID-19 testing from March 10th, 2020 to December 31st, 2020. A total of 19,219 patients were included, of which 3,796 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. We found a 2.6-fold increase (P < 0.001) in respiratory culture ordering in COVID-19 patients. On a per-patient basis, COVID-19 patients were 1.5-fold more likely than non-COVID patients to have positive respiratory cultures (46.8% versus 30.9%, P < 0.001), which was primarily driven by patients requiring intubation. Among patients with pneumonia, a significantly higher proportion of COVID-19 patients had ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) relative to non-COVID patients (86.3% versus 70.8%, P < 0.001), but a lower proportion had community-acquired (11.2% vs 25.5%, P < 0.01) pneumonia. There was also a significantly higher proportion of respiratory cultures positive for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and antibiotic-resistant organisms in COVID-19 patients. Increased rates of respiratory culture ordering for COVID-19 patients therefore appear to be clinically justified for patients requiring intubation, but further research is needed to understand how SARS-CoV-2 increases the risk of VAP.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Pneumonia, Bacterial , COVID-19 Testing , Coinfection/epidemiology , Hospitals, Urban , Humans , New York City/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Mutations in the genome of SARS-CoV-2 can affect the performance of molecular diagnostic assays. In some cases, such as S-gene target failure, the impact can serve as a unique indicator of a particular SARS-CoV-2 variant and provide a method for rapid detection. Here, we describe partial ORF1ab gene target failure (pOGTF) on the cobas SARS-CoV-2 assays, defined by a ≥2-thermocycle delay in detection of the ORF1ab gene compared to that of the E-gene. We demonstrate that pOGTF is 98.6% sensitive and 99.9% specific for SARS-CoV-2 lineage BA.2.12.1, an emerging variant in the United States with spike L452Q and S704L mutations that may affect transmission, infectivity, and/or immune evasion. Increasing rates of pOGTF closely mirrored rates of BA.2.12.1 sequences uploaded to public databases, and, importantly, increasing local rates of pOGTF also mirrored increasing overall test positivity. Use of pOGTF as a proxy for BA.2.12.1 provides faster tracking of the variant than whole-genome sequencing and can benefit laboratories without sequencing capabilities.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Base Sequence , Humans , Mutation , SARS-CoV-2/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of plasma cell-free DNA has emerged as an attractive diagnostic modality allowing broad-range pathogen detection, noninvasive sampling, and earlier diagnosis. However, little is known about its real-world clinical impact as used in routine practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients for whom plasma mNGS (Karius test) was performed for all indications at 5 United States institutions over 1.5 years. Comprehensive records review was performed, and standardized assessment of clinical impact of the mNGS based on the treating team's interpretation of Karius results and patient management was established. RESULTS: A total of 82 Karius tests were evaluated from 39 (47.6%) adults and 43 (52.4%) children and a total of 53 (64.6%) immunocompromised patients. Karius positivity rate was 50 of 82 (61.0%), with 25 (50.0%) showing 2 or more organisms (range, 2-8). The Karius test results led to positive impact in 6 (7.3%), negative impact in 3 (3.7%), and no impact in 71 (86.6%), and was indeterminate in 2 (2.4%). Cases with positive Karius result and clinical impact involved bacteria and/or fungi but not DNA viruses or parasites. In 10 patients who underwent 16 additional repeated tests, only 1 was associated with clinical impact. CONCLUSIONS: The real-world impact of the Karius test as currently used in routine clinical practice is limited. Further studies are needed to identify high-yield patient populations, define the complementary role of mNGS to conventional microbiological methods, and discern how best to integrate mNGS into current testing algorithms.
Subject(s)
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids , Communicable Diseases , Adult , Child , Communicable Diseases/diagnosis , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Metagenomics , Plasma , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
During the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital provided HIV prevention patients with gonorrhea/chlamydia testing kits at home. This report describes the program implementation to provide other sexual health clinics with a roadmap in adapting to a "new normal" in providing comprehensive sexual health care virtually to patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Self-Testing , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/diagnosis , Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Chlamydia Infections/prevention & control , Female , Gonorrhea/diagnosis , Gonorrhea/epidemiology , Gonorrhea/prevention & control , Humans , Male , New York City/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/transmission , Specimen Handling , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Polymyxins are antimicrobials of last resort for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, but resistance in 5% to >40% isolates has been reported. We conducted a genomic survey of clinical polymyxin-resistant (PR) Klebsiella pneumoniae to determine the molecular mechanisms of PR and the role of polymyxin exposure versus transmission in PR emergence. METHODS: We included 88 patients with PR K. pneumoniae from 2011-2018 and collected demographic, antimicrobial exposure, and infection data. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on 388 isolates, including 164 PR isolates. Variant calling and insertion sequence detection were performed, focusing on key genes associated with PR (mgrB, crrAB, phoPQ, and pmrAB). We conducted phylogenetic analyses of key K. pneumoniae multi-locus sequence types (ST258, ST17, ST307, and ST392). RESULTS: Polymyxin exposure was documented in 53/88 (60%) patients prior to PR detection. Through an analysis of key PR genes, we detected 129 individual variants and 72 unique variant combinations in PR isolates. This included multiple, distinct changes in 36% of patients with serial PR isolates. Insertion sequence disruption was limited to mgrB (P < .001). Polymyxin minimum inhibitory concentrations showed stepwise increases with the number of PR genes affected (P < .001). When clusters containing PR isolates in ≥2 patients were analyzed, 10/14 had multiple genetic events leading to PR. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular mechanisms leading to PR in clinical K. pneumoniae isolates are remarkably heterogenous, even within clusters or individual patients. Polymyxin exposure with de novo PR emergence led to PR in the majority of patients, rather than transmission. Optimizing polymyxin use should be a key strategy in stopping the spread of PR.
Subject(s)
Klebsiella Infections , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Colistin , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics , Genomics , Humans , Klebsiella Infections/drug therapy , Klebsiella Infections/epidemiology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Phylogeny , Polymyxins/pharmacology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Despite the increasing reliance on polymyxin antibiotics (polymyxin B and colistin) for treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections, many clinical laboratories are unable to perform susceptibility testing due to the lack of accurate and reliable methods. Although gradient agar diffusion is commonly performed for other antimicrobials, its use for polymyxins is discouraged due to poor performance characteristics. Performing gradient agar diffusion with calcium enhancement of susceptibility testing media has been shown to improve the identification of polymyxin-resistant isolates with plasmid-mediated resistance (mcr-1). We therefore sought to evaluate the broad clinical applicability of this approach for colistin susceptibility testing by assessing a large and diverse collection of resistant and susceptible patient isolates collected from multiple U.S. medical centers. Among 217 isolates, the overall categorical and essential agreement for calcium-enhanced gradient agar diffusion were 73.7% and 65.5%, respectively, compared to the results for reference broth microdilution. Performance varied significantly by organism group, with agreement being highest for Enterobacterales and lowest for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Nevertheless, even for Enterobacterales, there was a high rate of very major errors (9.2%). Performance was similarly poor for calcium-enhanced broth microdilution. While calcium enhancement did allow for more accurate categorization of mcr-1-resistant isolates, there were unacceptably high rates of errors for both susceptible and non-mcr-1-resistant isolates, raising serious doubts about the suitability of these calcium-enhanced methods for routine colistin susceptibility testing in clinical laboratories.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Calcium/pharmacology , Colistin/pharmacology , Culture Media/chemistry , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Agar , Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Humans , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effectsABSTRACT
Molecular testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the gold standard for diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but the clinical performance of these tests is still poorly understood, particularly with regard to disease course, patient-specific factors, and viral shedding. From 10 March to 1 May 2020, NewYork-Presbyterian laboratories performed 27,377 SARS-CoV-2 molecular assays from 22,338 patients. Repeat testing was performed for 3,432 patients, of which 2,413 had initial negative and 802 had initial positive results. Repeat-tested patients were more likely to have severe disease and low viral loads. The negative predictive value of the first-day result among repeat-tested patients was 81.3% The clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 molecular assays was estimated between 58% and 96%, depending on the unknown number of false-negative results in single-tested patients. Conversion to negative was unlikely to occur before 15 to 20 days after initial testing or 20 to 30 days after the onset of symptoms, with 50% conversion occurring at 28 days after initial testing. Conversion from first-day negative to positive results increased linearly with each day of testing, reaching 25% probability in 20 days. Sixty patients fluctuated between positive and negative results over several weeks, suggesting that caution is needed when single-test results are acted upon. In summary, our study provides estimates of the clinical performance of SARS-CoV-2 molecular assays and suggests time frames for appropriate repeat testing, namely, 15 to 20 days after a positive test and the same day or next 2 days after a negative test for patients with high suspicion for COVID-19.
Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Betacoronavirus/genetics , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Child , Child, Preschool , Coronavirus Infections/pathology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , New York , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/pathology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Predictive Value of Tests , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity , Viral Load , Young AdultABSTRACT
Plasmid-mediated colistin resistance (PMCR) is a global public health concern, given its ease of transmissibility. The purpose of this study was to evaluate two methods for the detection of PMCR from bacterial colonies: (i) the NG-Test MCR-1 lateral flow immunoassay (LFA; NG Biotech, Guipry, France) and (ii) the EDTA-colistin broth disk elution (EDTA-CBDE) screening test method. These methods were evaluated using a cohort of contemporary, clinical Gram-negative bacillus isolates from 3 U.S. academic medical centers (126 isolates of the Enterobacterales, 50 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, and 50 Acinetobacter species isolates; 1 isolate was mcr positive) and 12 mcr-positive CDC-FDA Antibiotic Resistance (AR) Isolate Bank isolates for which reference broth microdilution colistin susceptibility results were available. Eleven (4.6%) isolates were strongly positive by the MCR-1 LFA, with an additional 8 (3.4%) isolates yielding faintly positive results. The positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) for MCR-1 detection were 100% and 96.1%, respectively. Upon repeat testing, only a single false-positive MCR-2 producer remained, as the isolates with initially faintly positive results were negative. The EDTA-CBDE screening method had an overall PPA and NPA of 100% and 94.3%, respectively. The NPA for the EDTA-CBDE method was slightly lower at 94.2% with Enterobacterales, whereas it was 96.0% with P. aeruginosa The MCR-1 LFA and EDTA-CBDE methods are both accurate and user-friendly methods for the detection of PMCR. Despite the rarity of PMCR among clinical isolates in the United States, these methods are valuable tools that may be implemented in public health and clinical microbiology laboratories to further discern the mechanism of resistance among colistin-resistant Gram-negative isolates and to detect PMCR for infection prevention and control purposes.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Colistin , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Colistin/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Edetic Acid/pharmacology , France , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Plasmids/geneticsABSTRACT
A surge of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presenting to New York City hospitals in March 2020 led to a sharp increase in blood culture utilization, which overwhelmed the capacity of automated blood culture instruments. We sought to evaluate the utilization and diagnostic yield of blood cultures during the COVID-19 pandemic to determine prevalence and common etiologies of bacteremia and to inform a diagnostic approach to relieve blood culture overutilization. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 88,201 blood cultures from 28,011 patients at a multicenter network of hospitals within New York City to evaluate order volume, positivity rate, time to positivity, and etiologies of positive cultures in COVID-19. Ordering volume increased by 34.8% in the second half of March 2020 compared to the level in the first half of the month. The rate of bacteremia was significantly lower among COVID-19 patients (3.8%) than among COVID-19-negative patients (8.0%) and those not tested (7.1%) (P < 0.001). COVID-19 patients had a high proportion of organisms reflective of commensal skin microbiota, which, when excluded, reduced the bacteremia rate to 1.6%. More than 98% of all positive cultures were detected within 4 days of incubation. Bloodstream infections are very rare for COVID-19 patients, which supports the judicious use of blood cultures in the absence of compelling evidence for bacterial coinfection. Clear communication with ordering providers is necessary to prevent overutilization of blood cultures during patient surges, and laboratories should consider shortening the incubation period from 5 days to 4 days, if necessary, to free additional capacity.
Subject(s)
Bacteremia/diagnosis , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Blood Culture/statistics & numerical data , Coinfection/diagnosis , Coinfection/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Hospitals , Humans , New York City/epidemiology , Pandemics , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Enteroviruses (EV) are responsible for a large number of meningoencephalitis cases, especially in children. The objective of this study was to identify modes of diagnosis including the significance of respiratory and cerebrospinal fluid samples, associated clinical characteristics, inpatient management, and outcome of individuals with EV infections of the central nervous system (CNS). Electronic medical records of individuals with enterovirus infections of the CNS who presented to the Columbia University Irving Medical Center and Children's Hospital of New York between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017 were reviewed retrospectively for demographic, epidemiological, and clinical data. The median age overall was 1.7 months (interquartile range 14 years) and most (62.4%) were male. The majority of CNS infections presented as meningitis (95.7%) and occurred in the summer (45.2%) and fall seasons (37.6%). Eighty-five cases (91.4%) demonstrated EV positivity in cerebrospinal fluid, thirty cases (32.3%) exhibited both cerebrospinal fluid and respiratory positivity, and eight cases (8.6%) exhibited respiratory positivity with coinciding neurological findings. Eighty-nine individuals overall (95.7%) received antibiotics and 37 (39.8%) received antiviral treatment. All surviving individuals had favorable Modified Rankin Scores (MRS) within the zero to two ranges upon discharge. Testing respiratory samples in addition to cerebrospinal fluid was found to be an important diagnostic tool in EV-associated cases. While clinical outcomes were favorable for an overwhelming majority of cases, etiological understanding of CNS infections is essential for identifying ongoing and changing epidemiological patterns and aid in improving the diagnosis and treatment.
Subject(s)
Enterovirus Infections , Meningoencephalitis/virology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
mcr-1, a plasmid-associated gene for colistin resistance, was first described in China in 2015, but its spread in the United States is unknown. We report detection of mcr-1-carrying Escherichia coli ST117 in a cluster of three liver transplant recipients.
Subject(s)
Colistin/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli Proteins/genetics , Escherichia coli Proteins/metabolism , Liver Transplantation , Plasmids/genetics , Whole Genome Sequencing/methodsABSTRACT
PCR-based multiplex gastrointestinal (GI) pathogen panels have started to replace stool culture and ova and parasite exam as a rapid and accurate means of diagnosing acute gastroenteritis. However, there are limited data on the impact of panel testing on patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the management and health care utilization of patients following GI panel compared with conventional stool testing. We performed a retrospective comparative analysis of 9,402 patients who underwent testing with the FilmArray GI panel from March 2015 through May 2017 and 5,986 patients who underwent conventional stool testing from December 2012 through February 2015. GI panel was positive in 2,746 exams (29.2%) compared with 246 exams (4.1%) with conventional testing. Within 30 days following stool testing, compared with patients who received a conventional stool test, patients who received a GI panel were less likely to undergo any endoscopic procedure (8.4% GI panel versus 9.6% stool culture, P = 0.008) or any abdominal radiology (29.4% GI panel versus 31.7%, P = 0.002). Within 14 days following stool testing, patients who received a GI panel were less likely to be prescribed any antibiotic (36.2% GI panel versus 40.9%, P < 0.001). The implementation of multiplex PCR stool testing was associated with a reduction in the utilization of endoscopy, abdominal radiology, and antibiotic prescribing.
Subject(s)
Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Gastroenteritis/diagnosis , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Feces/microbiology , Feces/parasitology , Feces/virology , Female , Gastroenteritis/microbiology , Gastroenteritis/parasitology , Gastroenteritis/virology , Gastrointestinal Tract/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Tract/parasitology , Gastrointestinal Tract/virology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
Susceptibility testing of the polymyxins (colistin and polymyxin B) is challenging for clinical laboratories. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee evaluated two methods to enable accurate testing of these agents. These methods were a colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) and a colistin agar test (CAT), the latter of which was evaluated using two inoculum volumes, 1 µl (CAT-1) and 10 µl (CAT-10). The methods were evaluated using a collection of 270 isolates of Enterobacterales, 122 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, and 106 Acinetobacter spp. isolates. Overall, 94.4% of CBDE results were in essential agreement and 97.9% in categorical agreement (CA) with reference broth microdilution MICs. Nine very major errors (VME; 3.2%) and 3 major errors (ME; 0.9%) were observed. With the CBDE, 98.6% CA was observed for Enterobacterales (2.5% VME, 0% ME), 99.3% CA was observed for P. aeruginosa (0% VME, 0.7% ME), and 93.1% CA was observed for Acinetobacter spp. (5.6% VME, 3.3% ME). Overall, CA was 94.9% with 6.8% VME using CAT-1 and improved to 98.3% with 3.9% VME using CAT-10. No ME were observed using either CAT-1 or CAT-10. Using the CAT-1/CAT-10, the CA observed was 99.4%/99.7% for Enterobacterales (1%/0.5% VME), 98.7%/100% for P. aeruginosa (8.3%/0% VME), and 88.5%/92.3% for Acinetobacter spp. (21.4%/14.3% VME). Based on these data, the CLSI antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) subcommittee endorsed the CBDE and CAT-10 methods for colistin testing of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa.
Subject(s)
Agar/chemistry , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteria/drug effects , Clinical Laboratory Services/organization & administration , Colistin/pharmacology , Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests/standards , Acinetobacter/drug effects , Clinical Laboratory Services/standards , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/standards , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
A review of 15 patients who tested positive for human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) on the FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis panel revealed that the majority were unlikely to have HHV-6 encephalitis. Criteria to assist interpretation of HHV-6 positive results are presented.
Subject(s)
Herpesvirus 6, Human/isolation & purification , Meningitis/virology , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Roseolovirus Infections/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Encephalitis, Viral/virology , Female , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Meningitis/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Roseolovirus Infections/diagnosisABSTRACT
Rapid antigen tests for influenza, here referred to as rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs), have been widely used for the diagnosis of influenza since their introduction in the 1990s due to their ease of use, rapid results, and suitability for point of care (POC) testing. However, issues related to the diagnostic sensitivity of these assays have been known for decades, and these issues gained greater attention following reports of their poor performance during the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic. In turn, significant concerns arose about the consequences of false-negative results, which could pose significant risks to both individual patient care and to public health efforts. In response to these concerns, the FDA convened an advisory panel in June 2013 to discuss options to improve the regulation of the performance of RIDTs. A proposed order was published on 22 May 2014, and the final order published on 12 January 2017, reclassifying RIDTs from class I to class II medical devices, with additional requirements to comply with four new special controls. This reclassification is a landmark achievement in the regulation of diagnostic devices for infectious diseases and has important consequences for the future of diagnostic influenza testing with commercial tests, warranting the prompt attention of clinical laboratories, health care systems, and health care providers.
Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/classification , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislation & jurisprudence , Diagnostic Test Approval/standards , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/instrumentation , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/standards , False Negative Reactions , Humans , Immunoassay/instrumentation , Immunoassay/standards , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Sensitivity and Specificity , United StatesABSTRACT
Rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria (RG-NTM), which can contaminate inadequately sterilized medical instruments, have been known to cause serious postsurgical skin and soft tissue infections that often are characterized by a prolonged incubation period and a disfiguring clinical course. Historically, these infections have been associated with surgical procedures performed outside the United States. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently reported an outbreak of RG-NTM infections among women who underwent cosmetic surgery in the Dominican Republic. Because of the large Dominican American community in upper Manhattan, we have recently observed a number of these cases at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center. We highlight the case of a 55-year-old woman who developed a postsurgical RG-NTM infection after bilateral breast reduction in the Dominican Republic; she experienced progressive deformity of her left breast until the causative pathogen was identified 20 months after her initial surgery. To assist in the timely diagnosis and treatment of these infections, we aim to promote greater awareness among physicians who are likely to encounter such patients. We present the pathologic findings of a review of 7 cases of RG-NTM infections seen at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center and discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges associated with these infections, such as prolonged incubation periods, the need for acid-fast stains and mycobacterial cultures, and the combination of surgical therapy and lengthy antibiotic courses that are often required for treatment.
Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Disease Outbreaks , Medical Tourism , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/epidemiology , Nontuberculous Mycobacteria/isolation & purification , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Dominican Republic , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/diagnosis , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/etiology , New York/epidemiology , Nontuberculous Mycobacteria/growth & development , Surgical Wound Infection/diagnosisSubject(s)
Diptera , Gammaproteobacteria , Sepsis , Animals , Debridement , Humans , Larva , Sepsis/diagnosisABSTRACT
Multiplex tests for respiratory tract infections include up to 20 targets for common pathogens, predominantly viruses. A specific therapeutic intervention is available for individuals testing positive for influenza viruses (oseltamivir), and it is potentially beneficial to identify non-influenza viruses to avoid unnecessary antibiotic use. We evaluated antimicrobial prescriptions following respiratory pathogen testing among outpatients at a large Veterans Administration (VA) medical center. Results of the FilmArray respiratory panel (BioFire, Salt Lake City, UT) from 15 December 2014 to 15 April 2015 were evaluated among 408 outpatients, and patient medical records were reviewed. Differences in antibiotic and oseltamivir prescription rates were analyzed. Among 408 patients tested in outpatient centers (emergency departments, urgent care clinics, and outpatient clinics), 295 (72.3%) were managed as outpatients. Among these 295 outpatients, 105 (35.6%) tested positive for influenza virus, 109 (36.9%) tested positive for a non-influenza virus pathogen, and 81 (27.5%) had no respiratory pathogen detected. Rates of oseltamivir and antibiotic prescriptions were significantly different among the three test groups (chi-squared values of 167.6 [P < 0.0001] and 10.48 [P = 0.005], respectively), but there was no significant difference in antibiotic prescription rates between the non-influenza virus pathogen group and those who tested negative (chi-square value, 0; P = 1.0). Among adult outpatients, testing positive for influenza virus was associated with receiving fewer antibiotic prescriptions, but no such effect was seen for those who tested positive for a non-influenza virus. These data suggest that testing for influenza viruses alone may be sufficient and more cost-effective than multiplex pathogen testing for outpatients.