Validation of the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model: The imperative to reduce modifiable risk factors.

AIM: To validate the psychometrics of the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model (HIIFRM) and identify the prevalence of intrinsic fall risk factors in a diverse, multisite population. BACKGROUND: Injurious inpatient falls are common events, and hospitals have implemented programs to achieve "zero" inpatient falls. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patient data from electronic health records at nine hospitals that are part of Ascension. Participants were adult inpatients (N = 214,358) consecutively admitted to the study hospitals from January 2016 through December 2018. Fall risk was assessed using the HIIFRM on admission and one time or more per nursing shift. RESULTS: Overall fall rate was 0.29%. At the standard threshold of HIIFRM score ≥ 5, 492 falls and 76,800 non-falls were identified (fall rate 0.36%; HIIFRM specificity 64.07%, sensitivity 78.72%). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.765 (standard error 0.008; 95% confidence interval 0.748, 0.781; p < 0.001), indicating moderate accuracy of the HIIFRM to predict falls. At a lower cut-off score of ≥4, an additional 74 falls could have been identified, with an improvement in sensitivity (90.56%) and reduction in specificity (44.43%). CONCLUSION: Analysis of this very large inpatient sample confirmed the strong psychometric characteristics of the HIIFRM. The study also identified a large number of inpatients with multiple fall risk factors (n = 77,292), which are typically not actively managed during hospitalization, leaving patients at risk in the hospital and after discharge. This finding represents an opportunity to reduce injurious falls through the active management of modifiable risk factors.

Avoiding potential harm by improving appropriateness of urinary catheter use in 18 emergency departments.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Urinary catheters are often placed in the emergency department (ED) and are associated with an increased safety risk for hospitalized patients. We evaluate the effect of an intervention to reduce unnecessary placement of urinary catheters in the ED. METHODS: Eighteen EDs from 1 health system underwent the intervention and established institutional guidelines for urinary catheter placement, provided education, and identified physician and nurse champions to lead the work. The project included baseline (7 days), implementation (14 days), and postimplementation (6 months, data sampled 1 day per month). Changes in urinary catheter use, indications for use, and presence of physician order were evaluated, comparing the 3 periods. RESULTS: Sampled patients (13,215) admitted through the ED were evaluated, with 891 (6.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.3% to 7.2%) having a catheter placed. Newly placed catheters decreased from 309 of 3,381 (9.1%) baseline compared with 424 of 6,896 (6.1%) implementation (Δ 3.0%; 95% CI 1.9% to 4.1%), and 158 of 2,938 (5.4%) postimplementation periods (Δ 3.8%; 95% CI 2.5% to 5.0%). The appropriateness of newly placed urinary catheters improved from baseline (228/308; 74%) compared with implementation (385/421; 91.4%; Δ 17.4%; 95% CI 11.9% to 23.1%) and postimplementation periods (145/158; 91.8%; Δ 23.9%; 95% CI 18% to 29.3%). Physician order documentation in the presence of the urinary catheter was 785 of 889 (88.3%), with no visible change over time. Improvements were noted for different-size hospitals and were more pronounced for hospitals with higher urinary catheter placement baseline. CONCLUSION: The implementation of institutional guidelines for urinary catheter placement in the ED, coupled with the support of clearly identified physician and nurse champions, is associated with a reduction in unnecessary urinary catheter placement. The effort has a substantial potential of reducing patient harm hospital-wide.

Hospital-Onset Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Is A Better Measure Than MRSA Bacteremia for Assessing Infection Prevention: Evaluation of 50 US Hospitals.

Of 500 hospital-onset Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia events (58% methicillin-susceptible S. aureus [MSSA]; 42% methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]), we found no significant differences in S. aureus bacteremia rates between medium-sized and large hospitals. However, the proportion of S. aureus bacteremia caused by MSSA was greater in medium-sized hospitals and did not correlate with MRSA bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:476-478.

Definitional Change in NHSN CAUTI Was Associated with an Increase in CLABSI Events: Evaluation of a Large Health System.

BACKGROUND The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) definition was revised as of January 2015 to exclude funguria and lower bacteriuria levels. We evaluated the effect of the CAUTI definition change on NHSN-defined central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) outcomes. METHODS We compared CAUTI and CLABSI NHSN-defined outcomes for calendar years 2014 and 2015 in the adult intensive care units (ICUs) of a single large health system. Changes in the event rates, the associated organisms, and the standardized infection ratio (SIR) were evaluated. RESULTS The study included 137 adult ICUs from 65 hospitals. The CAUTI SIR dropped from 1.04 in 2014 to 0.58 in 2015 (-44.2%), while the CLABSI SIR increased from 0.36 in 2014 to 0.47 in 2015 (+30.6%). CAUTI rates dropped 44.8% from 2.09 to 1.15 events per 1,000 device days (P<.001). Gram-positive-associated CAUTI rates dropped 36.7% from 0.34 to 0.22 per 1,000 device days (P=.007). CLABSI rates increased 27.1% from 0.71 to 0.90 per 1,000 device days (P=.027). Candida-associated CLABSI increased by 91.1% from 0.104 to 0.198 per 1,000 device days (P=.012), and Enterococcus-associated CLABSI increased by 121.6% from 0.071 to 0.16 per 1,000 device days (P=.008). CONCLUSIONS The revised CAUTI definition led to a large reduction in CAUTI rates and, in turn, an increase in candidemia and enterococcemia cases classified as CLABSI events. These findings have important implications on the perceived successes or failures to eliminate both infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:685-689.

Taking advantage of public reporting: An infection composite score to assist evaluating hospital performance for infection prevention efforts.

BACKGROUND: The standardized infection ratio (SIR) evaluates individual publicly reported health care-associated infections, but it may not assess overall performance. METHODS: We piloted an infection composite score (ICS) in 82 hospitals of a single health system. The ICS is a combined score for central line-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, colon and abdominal hysterectomy surgical site infections, and hospital-onset methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and Clostridium difficile infections. Individual facility ICSs were calculated by normalizing each of the 6 SIR events to the system SIR for baseline and performance periods (ICSib and ICSip, respectively). A hospital ICSib reflected its baseline performance compared with system baseline, whereas a ICSip provided information of its outcome changes compared with system baseline. RESULTS: Both the ICSib (baseline 2013) and ICSip (performance 2014) were calculated for 63 hospitals (reporting at least 4 of the 6 event types). The ICSip improved in 36 of 63 (57.1%) hospitals in 2014 when compared with the ICSib in 2013. The ICSib 2013 median was 0.96 (range, 0.13-2.94) versus the 2014 ICSip median of 0.92 (range, 0-6.55). Variation was more evident in hospitals with ≤100 beds. The system performance score (ICSsp) in 2014 was 0.95, a 5% improvement compared with 2013. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed ICS may help large health systems and state hospital associations better evaluate key infectious outcomes, comparing them with historic and concurrent performance of peers.