Impact of concomitant systemic treatments on toxicity and intracerebral response after stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in combination with systemic therapies (ST) for brain metastases (BM). METHODS: Ninety-nine patients (171 BM) received SRT and concurrent ST (group 1) and 95 patients (131 BM) received SRT alone without concurrent ST (group 2). SRT was planned on a linear accelerator, using volumetric modulated arc therapy. All ST were allowed including chemotherapy (CT), immunotherapy (IT), targeted therapy (TT) and hormonotherapy (HT). Treatment was considered to be concurrent if the timing between the drug administration and SRT did not exceed 1 month. Local control (LC), freedom for distant brain metastases (FFDBM), overall survival (OS) and radionecrosis (RN) were evaluated. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 11.9 months (range 0.7-29.7), there was no significant difference between the two groups. However, patients who received concurrent IT (n = 30) had better 1-year LC, OS, FFDBM but a higher RN rate compared to patients who did not: 96% versus 78% (p = 0.02), 89% versus 77% (p = 0.02), 76% versus 53% (p = 0.004) and 80% versus 90% (p = 0.03), respectively. In multivariate analysis, concurrent IT (p = 0.022) and tumor volume < 2.07 cc (p = 0.039) were significantly correlated with improvement of LC. The addition of IT to SRT compared to SRT alone was associated with an increased risk of RN (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: SRT delivered concurrently with IT seems to be associated with improved LC, FFDBM and OS as well as with a higher rate of RN.

Does Breast Surgery Type Alter Incidental Axillary Irradiation? A Dosimetric Analysis of the "Sentinel Envahi et Randomisation du Curage" SERC Trial.

BACKGROUND: An incidental axillary dose of adjuvant radiotherapy using tangential beams is usually given after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. The goal of this sub-study was to evaluate this incidental dose in the setting of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) according to two different radiotherapy techniques. METHODS: Patients participating in a randomized SERC trial who received PMRT in a single center were included. We collected the incidental axillary dose delivered to the Berg level 1 using different dosimetric parameters and compared two techniques using Student's t-test: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). RESULTS: We analyzed radiotherapy plans from 52 patients who received PMRT from 2012 to 2021. The mean dose delivered to the Berg level 1 was 37.2 Gy. It was significantly higher with VMAT than with 3D-CRT-43.6 Gy (SD = 3.1 Gy) versus 34.8 Gy (SD = 8.6 Gy) p < 0.001. Eighty-four percent of the Berg level 1 was covered by 40 Gy isodose in the VMAT group versus 55.5% in the 3D-CRT group p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: On the Berg level 1, PMRT gives a dose at least equivalent to the one given by post-breast-conserving surgery radiotherapy, making it possible to limit completion axillary lymph node dissections in select pN1a patients treated with a mastectomy. Modern radiotherapy techniques like VMAT tend to increase this incidental dose.

The prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression on tumor and immune cells in Merkel cell carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors in patients with non-metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), with a particular focus on immunological markers such as TILs subtyping (CD3, CD8, CD68, FoxP3, PD-L1 and PD-1) and MCPyV. METHODS: Patients treated for a non-metastatic MCC with oncologic surgical resection followed or not by adjuvant radiotherapy between 01/2007 and 12/2018 were analyzed. Local and regional control (LC, RC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Clinical variables analyzed included age, gender, performance status, comorbidity, tumor size, location and presentation type, extension, oncologic resection and adjuvant radiotherapy. Pathological variables analyzed included type of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, CD3, CD8, CD68, PD-L1 expression on immune cells and tumors cells, PD-1, FoxP3 and MCPyV, assessed with immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: 77 patients were included. After a median follow-up of 18 months (range 0.2-144), the 1-year LC, RC, DMFS and OS were 83%, 60%, 82% and 75%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a percentage of PD-L1 expression by immune cells ≥ 1% was significantly correlated with improvement of RC (p = 0.012), DMFS (p = 0.003) and OS (p = 0.006). Adjuvant radiotherapy significantly improved DMFS (p = 0.021) and OS (0.041) rates. There was a correlation between the presence of MCPyV + and the expression of PD-L1 on IC (p = 0.05) and TC (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: PD-L1 expression by immune and tumor cells in non-metastatic MCC seems to significantly improve outcome in patients who did not received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Prospective studies are needed to confirm our hypothesis.

Foci of Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive Tumor Areas With Tumor-infiltrating Leukocytes (TILs) Evocative of a PD-1/PD-L1-related Adaptive Immune Resistance are Frequent in Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis have revolutionized the treatment of patients with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). To date, no biomarker conditions access to these ICIs in MCC. We compared the tumor microenvironment of PD-L1 and PD-L1 areas in a case series of MCC searching for foci evocative of PD-1/PD-L1 adaptive immune resistance. Among 58 tumors studied on digitalized serial tissue sections, 11 (19%) were concluded as "PD-L1 tumors" [≥1% positive tumor cells (TCs) using PD-L1 immunohistochemistry in the whole tumor slide]. In addition, among the remaining 47 (81%) "PD-L1 tumors," we nevertheless also identified "PD-L1 FOV" (ie, "field of view" of about 3 mm² containing ≥1% positive TCs) in 22 (38%) additional tumors. Comparison between paired "PD-L1 field of view (FOV)" and "PD-L1 FOV" within tumors, and between "PD-L1 tumors" and "PD-L1 tumors", revealed correlations between PD-L1 positivity and the abundance of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes, arguing for areas of PD-1/PD-L1-related adaptive immune resistance at least in some foci of "PD-L1 tumors" and also in "PD-L1 tumors." Tumor heterogeneity consists in a challenge searching for biomarkers able to predict the response/nonresponse to ICIs. Progress in digital pathology and multiplex immunolabeling may permit to overcome this challenge by better analyzing the interactions between TCs and immune and nonimmune non-TCs in the same tissue section. This approach of tumor heterogeneity may contribute to elucidate and to predict why some patients respond impressively to ICIs, whereas others do not.