Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 139
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 103(1): 160-168, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38059295

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: New vascular closure devices (VCD) are being introduced for achieving hemostasis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, no safety or efficacy data have been published compared to other contemporary VCD. AIM: To compare the safety and efficacy of suture-based Perclose Prostyle as compared to plug-based MANTA device. METHODS: A total of 408 consecutive TAVI patients from two high volume TAVI centers were included in the present study. Patients were grouped according to VCD: Prostyle versus MANTA. Propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable analysis were utilized to compare clinical endpoints between the two groups. The primary endpoint was any vascular complication (VC) according to VARC-3 criteria. RESULTS: After PSM, a total of 264 patients were analyzed, of them 132 in each group. Overall baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. Primary end-point was similar between MANTA as compared to Prostyle (16.7% vs. 15.3% respectively, p = 0.888). The main driver for VC among MANTA group were minor vascular complications (15.2%). Conversely, minor and major VC contributed equally to the primary endpoint among Prostyle group (7.6%) (p = 0.013). No outcome predictors were identified in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: VCD for transfemoral TAVI using the new-generation Prostyle device or the MANTA device achieved comparable VARC-3 VC rates.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Catheterization, Peripheral , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Vascular Closure Devices , Humans , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Artery/surgery , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Hemostatic Techniques/adverse effects
2.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 100(5): 832-838, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36116033

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Patients with rapidly deteriorating clinical status due to severe aortic stenosis are often referred for expedited transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Data regarding the outcome of such interventions is limited. We aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients undergoing expedited TAVR. DESIGN AND SETTING: Data were derived from the Israeli Multicenter Registry. SUBJECTS: Subjects were divided into two groups based on procedure urgency: patients who were electively hospitalized for the procedure (N = 3140) and those who had an expedited TAVR (N = 142). Procedural and periprocedural complication rates were significantly higher among patients with an expedited indication for TAVR compared to those having an elective procedure: valve malposition 4.6% versus 0.6% (p < 0.001), procedural cardiopulmonary resuscitation 4.3% versus 1.0% (p = 0.007), postprocedure myocardial infarction 2.0% versus 0.4% (p = 0.002), and stage 3 acute kidney injury 3.0% versus 1.1%, (p < 0.001). Patients with expedited indication for TAVR had significantly higher in hospital mortality (5.6% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.003). Kaplan-Meier's survival analysis showed that patients undergoing expedited TAVR had higher 3-year mortality rates compared to patients undergoing an elective TAVR procedure (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis found that patients with expedited indication had fourfolds increased risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio: 4.07, p = 0.001), and nearly twofolds increased risk of mortality at 3-year (hazard ratio: 1.69, p = 0.001) compared to those having an elective procedure. CONCLUSION: Patients with expedited indications for TAVR suffer from poor short- and long-term outcomes. It is important to characterize and identify these patients before the deterioration to perform TAVR in a fast-track pathway to minimize their procedural risk.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Severity of Illness Index , Risk Factors , Catheters
3.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 98(7): E990-E999, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34347381

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) rates among patients undergoing Trans-catheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) with first generation (G1) versus second generation (G2) valves and the impact of PPMI on long-term mortality. BACKGROUND: PPMI is a known adverse event after TAVI. Recently, two novel iterations of valve designs of both the balloon expandable valves (BEV) and self-expanding valves (SEV) were introduced as a second generation valves. METHODS: All patients included in the Israeli multicenter TAVI registry were grouped according to valve type (BEV vs. SEV) and generation (G1 vs. G2). A comparison was made for clinical and outcome indices of patients undergoing TAVI with G1 and G2 in each of the valve systems. RESULTS: A total of 1377 patients were included. The incidence of PPMI did not differ between G1-BEV versus G2-BEV (15.3% vs. 17.4%; p = 0.598) nor between G1-SEV versus G2-SEV (23.4% vs. 20.3%; p = 0.302). Depth of implantation and complete right bundle branch block were independently associated with PPMI post-TAVI in both valve systems. PPMI was not associated with an increased risk for 2-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PPMI remains a relevant adverse event post-TAVI even when the newer generation valves are used. Since the predictors for PPMI are well established, a standardized approach for the management of conduction disorders is much needed.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Pacemaker, Artificial , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
4.
Cardiology ; 146(3): 375-383, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33582661

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous device closure was shown to effectively prevent recurrent strokes in patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO). Whether this protective effect is relevant for patients with hypercoagulable states (HCSs) is unknown as they were not represented in prior studies. METHODS: Data on 136 consecutive patients with a PFO and clinically significant HCS were retrospectively collected. PFO closure and antithrombotic regimen were decided on an individual basis by the treating physicians, and adherence to therapy was routinely evaluated. The outcome was the occurrence of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA). RESULTS: HCS types consisted of antiphospholipid syndrome (31%), factor-5 Leiden mutation (22%), prothrombin mutation (18%), protein S deficiency (15%), protein C deficiency (7%), methyl-tetra-hydro folate reductase mutation (5%), and essential thrombocytosis (2%). 102 patients (75%) were maintained on anticoagulants and the remaining on antiplatelet therapy. PFO closure was undertaken in 85 (63%); antithrombotic therapy was not interrupted prior to or after the procedures. At a mean follow-up of 46 ± 8 months, 23 patients (17%; 95% confidence interval, 9.3-22%) experienced an outcome event, mainly in the form of CVAs (n = 15, 65%). In multivariable analysis, PFO closure was associated with a 5-fold decrease in the risk of CVA/TIA (p = 0.02). This effect was independent of the type of HCS or antithrombotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with HCSs maintained on anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies, PFO closure was associated with a significantly lower risk of CVA or TIA.


Subject(s)
Foramen Ovale, Patent , Ischemic Attack, Transient , Stroke , Cardiac Catheterization , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Foramen Ovale, Patent/complications , Foramen Ovale, Patent/surgery , Humans , Ischemic Attack, Transient/prevention & control , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Stroke/drug therapy , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome
5.
Am Heart J ; 223: 87-97, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32203684

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The evolution and clinical impact of cardiac remodeling after large ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is not well delineated in the current therapeutic era. METHODS: The PRESERVATION I trial longitudinally assessed cardiac structure and function in STEMI patients receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Echocardiograms were performed immediately post-PCI and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after STEMI. The extent of cardiac remodeling was assessed in patients with ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 40% after PCI. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of reverse remodeling, defined as an increase in end-diastolic volume (EDV) of ≤10 mL or decrease in EDV at 1 month, and evaluated for an association with adverse events at 1 year. RESULTS: Of the 303 patients with large STEMI enrolled in PRESERVATION I, 225 (74%) had at least moderately reduced systolic function (mean EF 32 ±â€¯5%) immediately after primary PCI. In the following year, there were significant increases in EF and LV volumes, with the greatest magnitude of change occurring in the first month. At 1 month, 104 patients (46%) demonstrated reverse remodeling, which was associated with a significantly lower rate of death, recurrent myocardial infarction and repeat cardiovascular hospitalization at 1 year (HR 0.44; 95% CI: 0.19-0.99). CONCLUSION: Reduced EF after large STEMI and primary PCI is common in the current therapeutic era. The first month following primary reperfusion is a critical period during which the greatest degree of cardiac remodeling occurs. Patients demonstrating early reverse remodeling have a significantly lower rate of adverse events in the year after STEMI.


Subject(s)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/pathology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Ventricular Remodeling , Aged , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors
6.
Am Heart J ; 220: 184-191, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31862472

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In contrast to surgical aortic valve replacement, left ventricle (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) had not been clearly associated with mortality following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in the Israeli multicenter TAVR registry for whom preprocedural LV mass index (LVMI) data were available. Patients were divided into categories according to LVMI: normal LVMI and mild, moderate, and severe LVH. Mild LVH was regarded as the reference group. Additionally, LV geometry patterns were examined (concentric and eccentric LVH, and concentric remodeling). RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 1,559 patients, 46.5% male, with a mean age of 82.2 (±6.8) years and mean LVMI of 121 (±29) g/m2. Rates of normal LVMI and mild, moderate, and severe LVH were 31% (n = 485), 21% (n = 322), 18% (n = 279), and 30% (n = 475), respectively. Three-year mortality rates for normal LVMI and mild, moderate, and severe LVH were 19.8%, 18.3%, 23.7%, and 24.4%, respectively. Compared to mild LVH, moderate LVH and severe LVH were independently associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.58, 95% CI 1.15-2.18, P = .005; HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.1-1.95, P = .009; respectively). Concentric LVH was independently associated with a decreased risk for mortality compared to normal LV geometry (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.89, P = .001). Compared to concentric LVH, eccentric LVH was independently associated with a 33% increased risk for mortality (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.11-1.60, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Mild concentric LVH confers a protective effect among patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR. However, hypertrophy becomes maladaptive, and an increased baseline LVMI, eccentric pattern particularly, may be associated with all-cause mortality in this population.


Subject(s)
Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/mortality , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Cause of Death , Echocardiography , Female , Humans , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/classification , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/etiology , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/pathology , Israel , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Preoperative Period , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods
7.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 96(2): 473-478, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31912994

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vascular complications during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) still pose a significant concern regarding procedural safety. Designated closure devices for large-bore vascular access are needed. METHODS: Patients undergoing TAVR were prospectively enrolled into the study. The InSeal vascular closure device (VCD) achieves hemostasis by utilizing a crescent-shaped nitinol scaffold covered by a biodegradable membrane, which is delivered at the arterial puncture site. The coprimary endpoints were predefined as hemostasis within 15 min following vessel access site closure and after activated clotting time falls below 200 s and the rate of related major vascular adverse events in first month. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were prospectively enrolled into the study, with an average age of 80.8 ± 7.4 years and 62% males. Hemostasis with the Inseal VCD was achieved in 94% of the patients with average time-to-hemostasis of 51 ± 97 s. The rates of in-hospital vascular complications were 12% mostly driven by minor vascular complications (10%). Femoral artery stents were used in three patients due to failed hemostasis. CONCLUSIONS: Initial clinical experience indicates that a novel, nitinol-based, large-bore vascular closure device is safe and effective in achieving hemostasis after TAVR.


Subject(s)
Alloys , Arteries , Catheterization, Peripheral/instrumentation , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Hemostatic Techniques/instrumentation , Vascular Access Devices , Vascular Closure Devices , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Equipment Design , Female , Germany , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemostasis , Hemostatic Techniques/adverse effects , Humans , Israel , Male , Prospective Studies , Punctures , Treatment Outcome
8.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 96(7): E695-E702, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32022390

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for aortic stenosis (AS) risk assessment is still developing and mostly concerned with mortality in the periprocedural period. We therefore sought to develop and then validate a score to predict 1-year adverse outcome. METHODS: Patients that underwent TAVI for severe AS in the Israeli registry. Patients with unsuccessful/suboptimal implantation were excluded. The cohort was split to derivation/validation cohorts by a ratio of 70:30. The outcome was defined as 1-year composite of mortality, stroke, and no improvement in NYHA class (vs. baseline). Logistic regression was used to fit the prediction model. RESULTS: Out of 2,440 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 276 were excluded, leaving 2,160 patients for both cohorts. At 1 year, 299 (14%) patients experienced the adverse ("futile") outcome. The derived prediction model included mean aortic valve (AV) gradient, previous pacemaker, previous oncological disease, need for diuretics, baseline NYHA class, hemoglobin and creatinine levels, and nonfemoral access site. The model's area under the curve (AUC) was 0.69 in the derivation and 0.70 in the validation cohort. Performance of other scores in the validation cohort were lower (0.60 for STS, 0.55 for Euroscore2, 0.56 for TVT score, and 0.53 for TAVI2-score, p = .03). Based on three risk tiers, patients had a low risk (20/306, 7% futility), a medium risk (50/304, 17%), and high risk (18/37, 49%) for futility. CONCLUSIONS: The TAVI futility risk model can be used to provide further insight regarding prediction measures and/or patients' outcomes outside of the periprocedural period (NCT02023060).


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Clinical Decision Rules , Medical Futility , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Female , Hemodynamics , Humans , Israel , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Registries , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/mortality , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Treatment Outcome
9.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 93(7): 1361-1366, 2019 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30489692

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of periprocedural beta-blocker (BB) discontinuation among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and high degree atrioventricular block (HD-AVB) and/or atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: The study population comprised 743 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR between 2009 and 2017 in two high-volume tertiary centers. All patients received chronic BB therapy, and were divided into two groups: (1) BB continuation and (2) BB discontinued 24 hr prior to the procedure. The primary endpoint was the development of composite brady and tachy-arrhytmic events (including HD-AVB and/or NOAF) following the procedure. RESULTS: Among 743 study patients, 366 (49%) continued BB prior to the procedure and in 377 (51%) chronic BB therapy was discontinued. The rate of the composite periprocedural arrhythmic event was significantly higher among patients who stopped BB (20% vs. 13%, respectively, P = 0.018). Consistently, multivariate analysis showed that discontinuation of BB was associated with two-fold (P = 0.003) increase in the risk for periprocedural arrhythmic events (OR = 2.0; 95% CI 1.24-3.23; P = 0.004). The association between BB discontinuation and periprocedural arrhythmic events was consistent for the separate endpoints for HDAV and NOAF. Furthermore, the need for permanent pacemaker was significantly higher among patients who discontinued BB (20% vs. 13%; P = 0.018, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing TAVR who receive chronic BB therapy, BB discontinuation prior to the procedure is independently associated with a significant increase in the rate of adverse arrhythmic events, including HDAVB, NOAF, and the need for pacemaker implantation.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/administration & dosage , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Atrioventricular Block/etiology , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Atrioventricular Block/diagnosis , Atrioventricular Block/physiopathology , Atrioventricular Block/therapy , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Israel , Male , Pacemaker, Artificial , Registries , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
10.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 94(1): E44-E53, 2019 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30549227

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare procedural outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients who were implanted with older versus newer generation valves. BACKGROUND: The current evidence base for improved safety of the newer commercially available TAVI valves is limited. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the Israeli multicenter TAVI registry was performed. Patients were stratified by valve generation of four commercially available devices: Edwards Sapien (ESX) Edwards Sapien S3 (ES3), Medtronic CoreValve (MCV), and Medtronic Evolut R (MER). RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 737 patients with new generation valves (NGVs; ES3 n = 223; MER n = 514) and 1,869 with old generation valves (OGVs; MCV n = 1,181; ESX n = 688). Device success rates were significantly higher in NGV (97.5 versus 95.4%), with less post-procedural paravalvular leak (3 versus 5.8%), and valve mal-positioning (1.2 versus 3.4%); all P-values<0.05. There were no differences in rates of permanent pacemaker implantation, stroke or acute kidney injury (AKI) of any stage between the groups, although stage ≥2 AKI was more prevalent in NGV. After adjustment to significant differences in baseline patient and procedural characteristics, device success was higher (OR 1.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-3.18, P = 0.023) and the 1-month safety outcome was significantly lower (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.96, P = 0.025) for NGV. Device success was driven mainly by improved rates of PVL of ES3, while the safety outcome was mainly driven by improved rates of life-threatening bleeding and valve mal-positioning of MER. CONCLUSION: As compared to OGV, use of NGV for TAVI was associated with higher rates of device success and lower rates of adverse events.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Prosthesis Design , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/instrumentation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Israel , Male , Patient Safety , Prosthesis Failure , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
11.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 29(12): 1733-1740, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30297312

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report long-term results of iliofemoral stent placement after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: TAVR access-related complications treated with iliofemoral stent placement were recorded in 56 patients (mean age, 81 years; range; 53-93 years; 48% male) of 648 patients who underwent TAVR at a single center. Fifty-six patients treated with stent placement (40 patients with stent grafts and 16 patients with bare metal stents) underwent clinical and ultrasonographic follow-up after a mean of 676 days (range, 60-1840 days). RESULTS: During follow-up, none of the 56 patients who had stent placement underwent a vascular reintervention of the affected limb, and none suffered from limb claudication. No decrease was observed in ankle-brachial index (ABI) values to an abnormal value, except in 1 patient (mean preprocedural and postprocedural ABI of 1.2 ± 0.14, range, 0.97-1.4 and 1.19 ± 0.24, range, 0.65-1.54, respectively). Arterial duplex assessment showed normal stent flow velocity (mean, 168.7 ± 63.2 cm/sec; range, 80-345 cm/sec) in all but 1 patient. CONCLUSION: Iliofemoral stent implantation is a safe and efficacious treatment for vascular access site and access-related complications during transfemoral TAVR.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Catheterization, Peripheral/methods , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Femoral Artery/surgery , Iliac Artery/surgery , Stents , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Vascular System Injuries/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angiography , Ankle Brachial Index , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Catheterization, Peripheral/instrumentation , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Female , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Artery/injuries , Humans , Iliac Artery/diagnostic imaging , Iliac Artery/injuries , Male , Middle Aged , Punctures , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/instrumentation , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex , Vascular System Injuries/diagnosis , Vascular System Injuries/etiology , Vascular System Injuries/physiopathology
12.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 20(4): 245-249, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29629733

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the added diagnostic value of using exercise hemodynamics during RHC in assessment of patients with symptomatic SSc. METHODS: We performed 22 RHCs in 17 SSc patients with dyspnea and/or pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Exercise was performed in 15 RHCs using isotonic arm exercises while holding a 1 kg weight in each hand. Measurements of pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP), pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP), and cardiac output (CO) were taken at rest and during peak exercise. RESULTS: Normal resting RHC (PAP 22  3 mmHg, PAWP 11  3 mmHg) was found in seven cases. Of these, exercise induced elevation in PAP was found in three (38  7 mmHg), and exercise induced elevation in PAWP was found in four (24  6 mmHg). Elevated resting PAP was found in 15 (41  11 mmHg) with minor changes in exercise. Of the 22 RHCs, elevation of the PAWP was found in 11 (50%), half of which were in response to exercise. CONCLUSIONS: In symptomatic SSc patients, exercise hemodynamics provides important information on diastolic dysfunction that is not available with non-invasive testing. Findings on exercise RHC can explain patient symptoms in up to 50% of cases. Earlier and more accurate diagnosis of patient symptoms can aid in tailoring the correct therapy for each.


Subject(s)
Dyspnea/etiology , Exercise Test/methods , Heart Diseases/diagnosis , Hypertension, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Scleroderma, Systemic/physiopathology , Adult , Arterial Pressure , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Cardiac Output/physiology , Dyspnea/diagnosis , Female , Heart Diseases/etiology , Hemodynamics/physiology , Humans , Hypertension, Pulmonary/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Artery , Pulmonary Wedge Pressure , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
13.
Lancet ; 387(10016): 349-356, 2016 01 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26547100

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: REG1 is a novel anticoagulation system consisting of pegnivacogin, an RNA aptamer inhibitor of coagulation factor IXa, and anivamersen, a complementary sequence reversal oligonucleotide. We tested the hypothesis that near complete inhibition of factor IXa with pegnivacogin during percutaneous coronary intervention, followed by partial reversal with anivamersen, would reduce ischaemic events compared with bivalirudin, without increasing bleeding. METHODS: We did a randomised, open-label, active-controlled, multicentre, superiority trial to compare REG1 with bivalirudin at 225 hospitals in North America and Europe. We planned to randomly allocate 13,200 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in a 1:1 ratio to either REG1 (pegnivacogin 1 mg/kg bolus [>99% factor IXa inhibition] followed by 80% reversal with anivamersen after percutaneous coronary intervention) or bivalirudin. Exclusion criteria included ST segment elevation myocardial infarction within 48 h. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and unplanned target lesion revascularisation by day 3 after randomisation. The principal safety endpoint was major bleeding. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01848106. The trial was terminated early after enrolment of 3232 patients due to severe allergic reactions. FINDINGS: 1616 patients were allocated REG1 and 1616 were assigned bivalirudin, of whom 1605 and 1601 patients, respectively, received the assigned treatment. Severe allergic reactions were reported in ten (1%) of 1605 patients receiving REG1 versus one (<1%) of 1601 patients treated with bivalirudin. The composite primary endpoint did not differ between groups, with 108 (7%) of 1616 patients assigned REG1 and 103 (6%) of 1616 allocated bivalirudin reporting a primary endpoint event (odds ratio [OR] 1·05, 95% CI 0·80-1·39; p=0·72). Major bleeding was similar between treatment groups (seven [<1%] of 1605 receiving REG1 vs two [<1%] of 1601 treated with bivalirudin; OR 3·49, 95% CI 0·73-16·82; p=0·10), but major or minor bleeding was increased with REG1 (104 [6%] vs 65 [4%]; 1·64, 1·19-2·25; p=0·002). INTERPRETATION: The reversible factor IXa inhibitor REG1, as currently formulated, is associated with severe allergic reactions. Although statistical power was limited because of early termination, there was no evidence that REG1 reduced ischaemic events or bleeding compared with bivalirudin. FUNDING: Regado Biosciences Inc.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Aptamers, Nucleotide/therapeutic use , Factor IXa/antagonists & inhibitors , Peptide Fragments/therapeutic use , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Aged , Coagulants/administration & dosage , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Early Termination of Clinical Trials , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Hirudins , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , North America/epidemiology , Oligonucleotides/administration & dosage , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use
14.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 90(7): 1175-1182, 2017 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28544120

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of baseline aortic valve gradient (AVG) both as a continuous and a categorical variable on mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), focusing on the high-gradient severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients. BACKGROUND: Identifying new predictors of mortality in the TAVR population can help refine risk stratification and improve the patient selection process for this procedure. So far, AVG has mainly been studied as a categorical variable and there is a paucity of data on its prognostic value as a continuous variable, especially in patients with high AVG AS, who constitute the majority of patients referred for TAVR. METHODS: We analyzed data on 1,224 consecutive symptomatic severe AS patients, who underwent TAVR at 3 centers. The relation between pre-TAVR AVG and mortality was evaluated among all patients and in patients with high AVGs (mean AVG ≥40 mm Hg) using the Cox proportional hazard model adjusting for multiple variables. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 1.8 years, baseline AVG was inversely associated with mortality in the entire cohort and in patients with high AVG AS. By multivariable analysis, patients with mean AVG 40-60 mm Hg and >60 mm Hg had a respective 38% (P = 0.010) and 61% (P < 0.001) reduction in mortality compared to patients with mean AVG <40 mm Hg. Every 10 mm Hg increase in mean AVG was associated with 20% reduction in mortality (P < 0.001). Analyses among patients with high (mean AVG >40 mm Hg) and very high AVG AS (mean AVG >60 mm Hg) yielded similar results (HR = 0.88, P = 0.031, and HR = 0.80, P = 0.019, per 10 mm Hg increase in AVG, respectively). Using peak AVGs and an analysis restricted to patients without reduced ejection fraction yielded consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline AVGs show an inverse association with mortality post-TAVR. These results were consistent also in patients with high-gradient AS, suggesting that AVG can be used to identify patients most likely to benefit from TAVR.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Hemodynamics , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Humans , Israel , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Proportional Hazards Models , Registries , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Treatment Outcome
15.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 87(3): 523-31, 2016 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26268940

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) was demonstrated to adversely affect outcome in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We compared predictors for AKI and associated outcomes according to various definitions among patients undergoing TAVI in a tertiary medical center. METHODS: Two-hundred and seventeen TAVI patients were evaluated for the occurrence of AKI according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)/Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) and Risk Injury Failure Loss End-Stage (RIFLE) definitions. Multivariate analysis was conducted to assess predictors of AKI. Cox hazard ratio was used to evaluate long-term mortality in this patient population. RESULTS: AKI occurred in 23 and 21% of patients (n = 49, n = 46) according to KDIGO/VARC-2 and RIFLE definitions, respectively, with an approximate 10% of disagreement between both systems. Predictors of AKI according to KDIGO/VARC-2 were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; OR = 2.66, P = 0.01), PVD (OR = 3.45, P = 0.02) and a lower baseline eGFR (OR = 1.03 per 1 mL/min/1.73 m(2) decrease, P = 0.02). While BMI (OR = 1.12, P = 0.01), prior ischemic heart disease (OR = 2.35, P = 0.04) and COPD (OR = 2.18, P = 0.04) were associated with AKI as defined by the RIFLE definition. AKI defined by either classification was independently associated with long-term mortality (HR = 1.63, for the KDIGO/VARC-2 definition and HR = 1.60 for RIFLE definition, P = 0.04 for both models), with borderline superiority of the KDIGO/VARC-2 classification. CONCLUSIONS: Different clinical characteristics predict the occurrence of AKI after TAVI when RIFLE and KDIGO/VARC-2 classifications are used. Both classification systems of AKI identify patients with increased risk for long-term mortality, with superiority of the KDIGO/VARC-2 definition, which should be used for AKI grading.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Aortic Valve , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Acute Kidney Injury/classification , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Acute Kidney Injury/mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Cardiac Catheterization/mortality , Chi-Square Distribution , Comorbidity , Female , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Logistic Models , Male , Odds Ratio , Predictive Value of Tests , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Terminology as Topic , Tertiary Care Centers , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
16.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 87(2): 341-6, 2016 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26010839

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate of Vascular complications in steroid treated patients undergoing transfemoral aortic valve implantation (TAVI). BACKGROUND: Steroid therapy has been associated with increased post-surgical bleeding. Vascular complications are a major concern in patients undergoing TAVI. However, the effect of corticosteroids on vascular complications has not been assessed in these patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 220 consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI at our institute between 2009 and 2013. Patients who were on steroids at the time of the procedure (n = 25) were compared with those who were not (n = 195). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics between groups were similar except for greater incidence of chronic renal failure (52 vs. 25%, P = 0.05) and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (50.3 vs. 55.8%, P = 0.037) in the steroid group. The rate of procedural success and nonvascular complication were similar in both groups with the exception of more temporary AV block in the steroid group (24 vs. 8%, P = 0.016). Patients treated with steroids had significantly more minor vascular complication (44 vs. 23%, P = 0.024), and significantly more femoral artery stenosis (16 vs. 5%, P = 0.036), occlusion (8 vs. 1%, P = 0.014), need for femoral artery percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) (32 vs. 12%, P = 0.009), and femoral artery PTA or stenting (32% vs. 15%, P = 0.031). On multivariate analysis steroid treatment was the only predictor of minor vascular complications (RR=2.65, 95% CI 1.04-6.8, P = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent corticosteroid treatment is associated with a higher rate of minor vascular complication following transfemoral TAVI. Operators should be aware of this risk when assessing patients for the procedure.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/therapy , Aortic Valve , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Femoral Artery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Steroids/adverse effects , Vascular Diseases/etiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Cardiac Catheterization/mortality , Catheterization, Peripheral/methods , Catheterization, Peripheral/mortality , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Logistic Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Diseases/diagnosis , Vascular Diseases/mortality
17.
Eur Heart J ; 36(47): 3370-9, 2015 Dec 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26314688

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The majority of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures are currently performed by percutaneous transfemoral approach. The potential contribution of the type of vascular closure device to the incidence of vascular complications is not clear. AIM: To compare the efficacy of a Prostar XL- vs. Perclose ProGlide-based vascular closure strategy. METHODS: The ClOsure device iN TRansfemoral aOrtic vaLve implantation (CONTROL) multi-center study included 3138 consecutive percutaneous transfemoral TAVI patients, categorized according to vascular closure strategy: Prostar XL- (Prostar group) vs. Perclose ProGlide-based vascular closure strategy (ProGlide group). Propensity-score matching was used to assemble a cohort of patients with similar baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Propensity matching identified 944 well-matched patients (472 patient pairs). Composite primary end point of major vascular complications or in-hospital mortality occurred more frequently in Prostar group when compared with ProGlide group (9.5 vs. 5.1%, P = 0.016), and was driven by higher rates of major vascular complication (7.4 vs. 1.9%, P < 0.001) in the Prostar group. However, in-hospital mortality was similar between groups (4.9 vs. 3.5%, P = 0.2). Femoral artery stenosis occurred less frequently in the Prostar group (3.4 vs. 0.5%, P = 0.004), but overall, Prostar use was associated with higher rates of major bleeding (16.7 vs. 3.2%, P < 0.001), acute kidney injury (17.6 vs. 4.4%, P < 0.001) and with longer hospital stay (median 6 vs. 5 days, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Prostar XL-based vascular closure in transfemoral TAVI procedures is associated with higher major vascular complication rates when compared with ProGlide; however, in-hospital mortality is similar with both devices.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Vascular Closure Devices/adverse effects , Vascular Diseases/etiology , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiology/standards , Clinical Competence/standards , Constriction, Pathologic/etiology , Female , Femoral Artery , Humans , Learning Curve , Male , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Postoperative Hemorrhage/etiology , Stroke/etiology , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/instrumentation
18.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 18(1): 13-7, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26964273

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Background: The rate of mitral bioprosthesis implantation in clinical practice is increasing. Transcatheter valve-in- valve implantation has been described for high risk patients requiring redo valve surgery. OBJECTIVES: To report our experience with transapical valve-in-valve implantation for failed mitral bioprosthesis. METHODS: Since 2010, 10 patients have undergone transapical valve-in-valve implantation for failed bioprosthesis in our center. Aortic valve-in-valve implantation was performed in one of them and mitral valve-in-valve implantation in nine. Mean age was 82 ± 4 years and 6 were female (67%). Mean time from original mitral valve (MV) replacement to valve-in-valve procedure was 10.5 ± 3.7 years. Follow-up was completed by all patients with a mean duration of 13 ± 12 months. RESULTS: Preoperatively, all patients presented with significant mitral regurgitation, two with mitral stenosis due to structural valve failure. All nine patients underwent successful transapical valve-in-valve implantation with an Edwards Sapien balloon expandable valve. There was no in-hospital mortality. Mean and median hospital duration was 15 ± 18 and 7 days respectively. Valve implantation was successful in all patients and there were no major complications, except for major femoral access bleeding in one patient. At last follow-up, all patients were alive and in NYHA functional class I or II. Echocardiography follow-up demonstrated that mitral regurgitation was absent or trivial in seven patients and mild in two. At follow-up, peak and mean gradients changed from 26 ± 4 and 8 ± 2 at baseline to 16.7 ± 3 and 7.3 ± 1.5, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation for failed bioprosthesis is feasible in selected high risk patients. Our early experience with this strategy is encouraging. Larger randomized trials with long-term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up are recommended.


Subject(s)
Bioprosthesis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Mitral Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Echocardiography , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Mitral Valve/surgery , Prosthesis Failure
19.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 14: 131, 2015 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26427368

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) and aortic stenosis (AS) are frequent findings in the elderly population. Data regarding the influence of DM on the outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to AS are limited. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of DM on TAVR outcomes. METHODS: We investigated 443 patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR. Subjects were divided into insulin-dependent diabetic mellitus (IDDM) patients (N = 44), non-dependent insulin diabetic mellitus (NIDDM) patients (N = 114) and non-diabetics (N = 285) of whom 31 (74%), 86 (79%) and 209 (76%) respectively had trans-femoral TAVR. Peri-procedural complications and outcomes were recorded according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. RESULTS: Patients with IDDM as well as NIDDM demonstrated similar complication rates compared with non-diabetic patients, except for acute kidney injury (AKI) grade 3 [4 (2%) and 3 (3%) vs. 1 (0.4%) respectively, p = 0.032]. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that DM, regardless of the type of treatment, was not associated with increased 2 years mortality (Log-rank p value 0.44). Multivariate cox regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, coronary artery disease, DM, AKI3, hypertension, chronic renal failure and peripheral vascular disease found that AKI3 was associated with increased risk of 2 years mortality [HR = 7.35, 95% CI 2.16-25.07, p = 0.001] whereas female gender was found as a protective factor [HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.28-0.8, p = 0.005], and DM was not associated with increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: Following TAVR, DM patients seem to have similar peri-procedural and mid-term outcomes compared with patients without DM, while IDDM patients seem to suffer greater incidence of AKI. Further research in larger cohorts of patients is needed to validate our results.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Female , Humans , Incidence , Insulin/therapeutic use , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
20.
Cardiology ; 132(3): 163-71, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26279459

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The implementation of an early invasive approach and the increased use of potent anti-thrombotic drugs have resulted in higher rates of major bleeding events (MBE) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). There are limited data on the temporal trends for the rates of MBE over the last decade and associated outcomes. METHODS: Rates, characteristics, risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with MBE were assessed among 11,538 patients enrolled in the biennial Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Surveys (ACSIS) 2000-2010. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients (1.2%) experienced MBE during the index hospitalization for ACS. There was a significant increase in the risk of MBE in the late (2006-2010) versus the early (2000-2004) surveys (0.9 and 1.6% respectively, adjusted OR 1.86, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with a significant increase in the risk of MBE included undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (OR 2.21, p < 0.005), experiencing renal failure (OR 4.19, p < 0.001) and systolic blood pressure level at admission (OR 1.12, per 10- mm Hg decrement, p = 0.011). Patients who experienced MBE had a >3.5-fold increased risk for 1-year mortality (adjusted HR = 3.52, p < 0.001). Interestingly, the mortality risk associated with MBE was evident only among those who experienced non-access-site bleeding (HR = 1.9; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the past decade, there has been a significant increase in the rate of MBE. However, we found that only major bleeding that was not related to the vascular access site affected subsequent mortality.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/mortality , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality/trends , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure , Female , Hemorrhage/etiology , Humans , Israel , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Registries , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL