What should be next in lifelong posterior hypospadias: Conclusions from the 2023 ERN eUROGEN and EJP-RD networking meeting.

BACKGROUND: A congenital disease is for life. Posterior hypospadias, the severe form of hypospadias with a penoscrotal, scrotal, or perineal meatus, is a challenging condition with a major impact on lifelong quality of life. AIM: Our network meeting is aimed to identify what is currently missing in the lifelong treatment of posterior hypospadias, to improve care, quality of life, and awareness for these patients. METHODS: The network meeting "Lifelong Posterior Hypospadias" in Utrecht, The Netherlands was granted by the European Joint Programme on Rare Diseases-Networking Support Scheme. There was a combination of interactive sessions (hackathons) and lectures. This paper can be regarded as the last phase of the hackathon. RESULTS: Surgery for hypospadias remains challenging and complications may occur until adulthood. Posterior hypospadias affects sexual function, fertility, and hormonal status. Transitional care from childhood into adulthood is currently insufficiently established. Patients should be more involved in defining desired treatment approach and outcome measures. For optimal outcome evaluation standardization of data collection and registration at European level is necessary. Tissue engineering may provide a solution to the shortage of healthy tissue in posterior hypospadias. For optimal results, cooperation between basic researchers from different centers, as well as involving clinicians and patients is necessary. CONCLUSIONS: To improve outcomes for patients with posterior hypospadias, patient voices should be included and lifelong care by dedicated healthcare professionals guaranteed. Other requirements are joining forces at European level in uniform registration of outcome data and cooperation in basic research.

A HTA of what? Reframing through including patient perspectives in health technology assessment processes.

OBJECTIVES: Despite increasing emphasis on the inclusion of patient input in health technology assessment (HTA) in Europe in particular, questions remain as to the integration of patient insight alongside other HTA inputs. This paper aims to explore how HTA processes, while ensuring the scientific quality of assessments, "make do" with patient knowledge elicited through patients' involvement mechanisms. METHODS: The qualitative study analyzed institutional HTA and patient involvement in four European country contexts. We combined documentary analysis with interviews with HTA professionals, patient organizations, and health technology industry representatives, complemented with observational findings made during a research stay at an HTA agency. RESULTS: We present three vignettes which showcase how different parameters of assessment become reframed upon the positioning of patient knowledge alongside other forms of evidence and expertise. Each vignette explores patients' involvement during an assessment of a different type of technology and at a different stage of the HTA process. First, cost-effectiveness considerations were reframed during an appraisal of a rare disease medicine based on patient and clinician input regarding its treatment pathway; in the second vignette reframing amounted to what counts as a meaningful outcome measure for a glucose monitoring device; in the third, evaluating pediatric transplantation services involved reframing an option's appropriateness from a question of moral to one of legal acceptability. CONCLUSIONS: Making do with patient knowledge in HTA involves reframing of what is being assessed. Conceptualizing patients' involvement in this way helps us to consider the inclusion of patient knowledge not as complementary to, but as something that can transform the assessment process.

A value hierarchy for inclusive design of heart valve implants in regenerative medicine.

Aim: This paper investigates the conditions for inclusive design of regenerative medicine interventions from a bioethical perspective, taking regenerative valve implants as a showcase.Methods: A value hierarchy is construed to translate the value of justice into norms and design requirements for inclusive design of regenerative valve implants.Results: Three norms are proposed and translated into design requirements: regenerative valve implants should be designed to promote equal opportunity to good health for all potential users; equal respect for all potential users should be shown; and the implants should be designed to be accessible to everyone in need.Conclusion: The norms and design requirements help to design regenerative valve implants that are appropriate, respectful and available for everyone in need.

Scientists in the field of regenerative medicine are developing a new type of heart valve implant. After implantation, the synthetic implant slowly breaks down and is replaced by a new living heart valve. These so-called regenerative implants promise a complete cure. However, they also raise ethical questions. For example, questions related to justice and inclusion. In this paper, we explore how regenerative implants can be designed to be inclusive, meaning suitable, respectful and available for everyone. We argue that the design of regenerative implants should be adapted to relevant differences between users. The implants should be affordable in the short and long term. The implants should be suitable for use worldwide. The implants should be designed by teams of diverse age, gender and ethnicity. Users should be engaged in the design. And the communication about the implants to researchers and users should be inclusive. Overall, this paper provides ethical guidance to researchers and clinicians developing regenerative implants.

Valuing patient engagement: Reflexive learning in evidence generation practices for health technology assessment.

Much attention in health technology assessment (HTA), a health system governance mechanism used for determining the value of health technologies, is being paid to improving the quality and patient-relevance of the evidence used in assessment pratices. Whilst the direct involvement of patient actors throughout HTA processes has become a more routine element of institutional practice, the 'impacts' of patient engagement (PE) initiatives have proven difficult to determine and enhance. In reflexive governance theories, reflexive learning is a critical mechanism of multi-stakeholder arrangements that better handles the complexities of technologies and how they are understood through governance practices. This paper explores how reflexive learning can be used to build a richer conceptualisation of PE in HTA, in order to generate suggestions for enhancing PE practices and their impact. We critically apply reflexive learning insights on qualitative data derived from the co-creation process of a PE evaluation framework, organised through an EU project focused on strengthening PE practices across medicines development (2018-2020), including 24 interactive case studies, 3 multi-stakeholder workshops, and our observations throughout the project. The findings characterise two dimensions of reflexive learning in PE: First, reflexive learning refers to the adaptive reorganisation of evidence generating practices, including the revision of medicines' evaluation criteria and the conditions under which evidence 'relevant' to HTA is constructed. Second, reflexive learning spotlights the sociopolitics which shape technology evaluation. Four themes affecting meaningful and sustained PE in medicines development were analysed: institutional boundaries due to established evaluation criteria; timing of engagements; network relations between institutional actors; and the politics of patient representation. Extending beyond discrete PE activities and their reported impacts, reflexive forms of learning are crucial to yielding more 'meaningful' PE for HTA and medicines development, facilitating a HTA practice that more meaningfully deals with the complexities of medicines evidence generation.