Arterial dissection during peripheral vascular interventions.

OBJECTIVE: Arterial dissection (AD) is a known complication of peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs), but its incidence and significance have not been well-characterized. This study examines AD in the Vascular Quality Initiative database for patients treated for peripheral arterial disease. Our hypothesis is that AD is associated with decreased patency and worse limb outcomes. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative PVI registry (2016-2021) was reviewed. Patients were divided based on the presence or absence of reported AD during the procedure. Trend of incidence and management of AD was derived. The characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without AD were compared. The primary endpoint was primary patency. RESULTS: There was a total of 177,790 cases, and 3% had AD. The incidence of AD significantly increased over the study period from 2.4% to 3.6% (P = .007). Endovascular therapy was used to treat AD in 83.7% of cases, 14.5% were treated medically, and only 1.8% required open surgery. Patients with AD were significantly more likely to be female (47.4% vs 39.7%; P < .001). Patient with AD were more likely to have a history of smoking (79.7% vs 77.2%; P < .001), but were significantly less likely to be on dialysis (8.2% vs 9.3%; P < .001) compared with patients without AD. Patients with AD were more likely to have femoropopliteal disease (45.2% vs 38.0%; P < .001) and undergo treatment of more complex disease as denoted by higher mean number of lesions treated (1.95 ± 1.01 vs 1.71 ± 0.89; P < .001), longer occlusion length (8 ± 16 vs 7 ± 15 cm; P < .001), and more severe TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus grade (Grade D: 36.2% vs 29.1%; P < .001). The proportion of stenting as a treatment modality was higher in the dissection group (55.4% vs 41.1%; P < .001). After a mean follow-up of 828 days, patients with AD had significantly lower primary patency than patients without AD. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that the AD group had lower primary patency (86.9% vs 91%; P < .001) and reintervention-free survival (79.5 % vs 84.1%; P < .001) at 1 year with difference in amputation-free survival. Cox proportional hazard regression confirmed the independent association of AD with primary patency and reintervention-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: AD is more common in women and is more likely to occur during treatment of the femoropopliteal segment. AD is associated with decreased primary patency and reintervention-free survival after PVI for peripheral arterial disease.

The Degree of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Tilt Associated with Challenging Retrieval.

OBJECTIVE: Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter tilt is associated with technical difficulties at the time of retrieval. However, the degree of tilt that predisposes patients to undergo complex or failed retrieval has not been defined. METHODS: The electronic charts of patients undergoing IVC filter removal between 2010 and 2019 at a single tertiary center were reviewed. Patient and procedural characteristics were recorded. Venograms of placement and retrieval procedures were reviewed, and IVC filter tilt was determined based on its deviation from the IVC axis. IVC diameter and the distance from the lowest renal vein were measured using corresponding filter's length for calibration. All measurements were performed by 3 reviewers and confirmed by 2 reviewers. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those who underwent successful removal procedures requiring standard retrieval methods ("simple retrieval group") and those who required advanced endovascular techniques or had failed completely IVC filter retrievals ("challenging retrieval group"). A regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with challenging retrieval. RESULTS: There were 365 patients who underwent IVC filter retrieval (n=294 (80.6%) and n=71 (19.4%) in the simple and challenging groups, respectively) with no difference in age, sex, comorbidities or indication between the 2 groups. Failed retrieval occurred in 21 patients (5.8%) and was more common among patients requiring advanced endovascular techniques compared to standard techniques (18.0% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001). In the overall cohort, the mean filter tilt at the time of retrieval was 4.9° ± 4.4° [0 - 27°], and 145 patients (39.7%) had a filter tilt ≥ 5.0°. Compared to the simple retrieval group, patients in the challenging group had significantly longer dwell time, greater tilt of IVC filter during placement and retrieval, as well as higher tilt change between the 2 venograms. There was no correlation between the access site during placement and challenging retrieval. However, patients undergoing filter placement via right jugular vein had lower filter tilt as compared to femoral access. Patients with filter tilt ≥ 5.0° were more likely to have a challenging filter retrieval compared to patients with ˂ 5.0° tilt (29.7% vs 12.7%, p<0.001). Regression analysis showed that tilt ≥ 5.0° (OR=1.18 [1.11-1.25]), dwell time (OR=1.04 [1.01-1.07]), and age (OR=0.97 [0.95-0.99]) were independently associated with challenging retrieval. CONCLUSION: IVC filter tilt ≥ 5.0°, dwell time and age are associated with challenging retrieval. Right jugular vein access, multiple imaging projections, and careful filter manipulation during deployment should be considered to maintain tilt at ˂ 5.0° and decrease the likelihood of challenging retrieval.

Anticoagulation in Patients with Premature Peripheral Artery Disease Undergoing Lower Extremity Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Premature peripheral artery disease (PAD), defined by lower extremity revascularization (LER) at age ≤ 50 years, is associated with poor major adverse limb events. The early onset of disease is thought to be influenced by genetic factors that regulate homeostasis of the vascular wall and coagulation. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of anticoagulation as an adjunct to antiplatelet therapy on the outcomes of LER in patients with premature PAD. METHODS: There were 8,804 patients with premature PAD on preoperative and postoperative antiplatelet therapy only and 1,236 patients on preoperative and postoperative anticoagulation plus antiplatelet therapy in the Vascular Quality Initiative peripheral vascular intervention, infrainguinal, and suprainguinal files. Propensity score matching (2:1) was performed between patients with premature PAD who were on antiplatelet therapy and those on anticoagulation plus antiplatelet therapy. Perioperative and 1-year outcomes were analyzed including reintervention, major amputation, and mortality. RESULTS: Patients on anticoagulation were more likely to have coronary artery disease (48.7% vs. 41.2%, P < 0.001), congestive heart failure (20.2% vs. 13.1%, P < 0.001), and have undergone prior LER (73.9% vs. 49.2%, P < 0.001) compared to patients on antiplatelet therapy only. They were also less likely to be independently ambulatory (74.2% vs. 81.8%, P < 0.001) and be on a statin medication (66.8% vs. 74.3%, P < 0.001) compared to patients on antiplatelet therapy only. Patients on anticoagulation were also less likely to be treated for claudication (38.1% vs. 48.6%, P < 0.001), and less likely to be treated with an endovascular procedure (64.8% vs. 73.8%, P < 0.001). After matching for baseline characteristics, there were 1,256 patients on antiplatelet therapy only and 628 patients on anticoagulation. Patients on anticoagulation were more likely to require a return to the operating room (3.7% vs. 1.6%, P < 0.001) and had higher perioperative mortality (1.1% vs. 0.3%, P = 0.032), but major amputation was not significantly different (1.8% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.798) compared to patients on antiplatelet therapy alone. At 1 year, amputation-free survival was higher in patients on antiplatelets only compared to patients on anticoagulation and antiplatelet medications (87.5% vs. 80.9%, log-rank P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulation in addition to antiplatelet therapy in patients with premature PAD undergoing LER is associated with increased reintervention and mortality at 1 year.

Intravascular Ultrasound Use is Associated with Improved Patency in Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Interventions.

BACKGROUND: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) facilitates detailed visualization of endoluminal anatomy not adequately appreciated on conventional angiography. However, it is unclear if IVUS use improves clinical outcomes of peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) for peripheral arterial disease. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of IVUS on 1-year outcomes of PVI in the vascular quality initiative (VQI). METHODS: The VQI-PVI modules were reviewed (2016-2020). All patients with available 1-year follow-up after lower extremity PVI were included and grouped as IVUS-PVI or non-IVUS PVI based on use of IVUS. Propensity matching (1:1) was performed using demographics and comorbidities. One-year major amputation and patency rates were compared. A generalized estimating equation model was used to identify predictors of 1-year outcomes. Subgroup analysis based on Trans-Atlantic Intersociety Consensus (TASC) classification, treatment length and treatment modalities were performed using same modeling approaches. RESULTS: There were 56,633 procedures (non-IVUS PVI = 55,302 vs. IVUS-PVI = 1,331) in 44,042 patients. Propensity matching yielded a total cohort of 1,854 patients matched (1:1), with no baseline differences. Lower extremity revascularization for claudication was performed in 60.4%, while one-third (33.9%) had chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). IVUS was more commonly used for lesions >15 cm in length (46.6% vs. 43.3%) and for aortoiliac disease (31.8% vs. 27.2%). Rates of atherectomy and stenting were significantly higher with IVUS-PVI (21.1% vs. 16.8%), while balloon angioplasty was less common (13.5% vs. 24.4%). One-year patency was better with IVUS-PVI (97.7% vs. 95.2%, P = 0.004). On subgroup analysis, IVUS (odds ratio [OR] 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-3.75) was associated with improved patency in CLTI patients, TASC C or D lesions, and treatment length >15 cm. Adjunctive IVUS use during PVI did not significantly impact 1-year amputation (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.78-3.91). On multivariable regression, adjunctive use of IVUS (OR 2.46 95% CI 1.43-4.25) and aortoiliac interventions (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.09-7.75) were independent predictors of patency. Treatment modalities such as atherectomy, stenting or balloon angioplasty did not significantly impact patency at 1-year. CONCLUSIONS: IVUS during lower extremity PVI is associated with improved 1-year patency, when compared to angiography alone. Certain subgroups, such as CLTI patients, lesions>15 cm, and TASC C or D lesions might benefit from adjunctive use of IVUS.

The Utilization of Protamine during Peripheral Vascular Interventions in the VQI.

BACKGROUND: Protamine administration was shown to reduce bleeding after carotid surgery but the role of protamine during peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) remains unknown. This study evaluates the trend and outcomes of protamine use in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI). Our hypothesis is that the use of protamine is associated with decreased bleeding after PVI. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective PVI in the VQI (2016-2020) for peripheral arterial disease were reviewed and the utilization trend for protamine was described. The characteristics of patients undergoing PVI with and without protamine use were compared. After propensity score matching based on the patient's comorbidities, access site, and procedural characteristics, the perioperative outcomes of both groups were compared using multivariable Poisson regression to estimate adjusted rate ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: The total number of patients was 131,618 and patients who received protamine constituted 29.8% of the sample (N = 38,191). After propensity matching, the total number of patients was 94,582, and patients who received protamine constituted 28.8% of the sample (N = 27,275). Protamine use significantly increased during the study period from 5.2 to 22.9%. Before propensity score matching, patients who received protamine were more likely to be white (79% vs. 76.8, P ≤ 0.001), smokers (80.5% vs. 78.5%, P ≤ 0.001), with medical comorbidities including hypertension (88.9% vs. 88.5%, P = 0.074), congestive heart failure (20.5% vs. 19.8%, P = 0.006), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (28.2% vs. 26.5%). They were also more likely to be on perioperative medications such as P2Y12 inhibitors (44.3% vs. 45, P = 0.013%) and statin (77.4% vs. 76.5%, P = 0.001) compared to patients who did not receive protamine. After propensity matching, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. There was a significant decrease in bleeding during procedures where protamine was administered compared to no protamine (2.0% vs. 2.2%) (aRR, 0.89 [95% CI 0.80, 0.98]). Protamine was more likely to be given in procedures complicated by perforation (0.8% vs. 0.5%) (aRR, 1.48 [95% CI 1.24, 1.76]) and less likely to be given during procedures with distal embolization (0.4% vs. 0.7%) (aRR, 0.59 [95% CI 0.49, 0.73]). However, patients receiving protamine had significantly higher cardiac complications (1.4% vs. 1.1%) (aRR, 1.27 [95% CI 1.12, 1.43]). There was no significant difference in mortality between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Protamine use is associated with decreased perioperative bleeding but increased cardiac complications. Protamine should be selectively administered to patients at high risk of bleeding during PVI.

Clinical Implications of Low Body Mass Index on Endovascular Lower Extremity Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: The epidemic of obesity and associated cardiovascular morbidity continues to grow, attracting public attention and healthcare resources. However, the impact of malnutrition and being underweight continues to be overshadowed by obesity, especially in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). This study assesses the characteristics and outcomes of patients with low body mass index (BMI ≤ 18.5) compared to patients with nonobese BMI undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVI). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing PVI due to PAD registered in the Vascular Quality Initiative database. Patients were categorized into underweight (BMI ≤ 18.5) and nonobese BMI (BMI = 18.5-30). Patients in both groups were matched 3:1 for baseline demographic characteristics, comorbidities, medications, and indications. Kaplan-Meier analysis was done for long-term outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 337,926 patients underwent PVI, of whom 12,935 (4%) were underweight, 215,728 (64%) were nonobese, and 109,263 (32%) were obese. Underweight patients were more likely to be older, female, smokers, with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, and more likely to present with chronic limb-threatening ischemia than nonobese patients. After propensity matching, there were 18,047 nonobese patients and 6,031 underweight patients. There were no significant differences in matched characteristics. Perioperatively, underweight patients were more likely to require a longer hospital length of stay. Underweight patients had statistically significantly higher 30-day mortality compared to patients with nonobese BMI (3% vs. 1.6%, P < 0.001) and a higher rate of thrombotic complications. As for long-term outcomes, underweight patients had a higher rate of reintervention (20% vs. 18%, P < 0.001) and major adverse limb events (27% vs. 22%, P < 0.001). The 4-year rate of amputation-free survival was significantly lower in underweight patients (70% vs. 82%, P < 0.001), and the 2-year freedom from major amputation (90% vs. 94%, P < 0.001) showed similar trends with worse outcomes in patients who were underweight. CONCLUSIONS: Underweight patients with PAD are disproportionally more likely to be African American, females, and smokers and suffer worse outcomes after PVI than PAD patients with nonobese BMI. When possible, increased scrutiny and optimization of nutrition and other factors contributing to low BMI should be addressed prior to PVI.

The Impact of Ejection Fraction on Major Adverse Limb Events after Lower Extremity Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is commonly associated with coronary artery disease, and echocardiography is frequently performed before lower extremity revascularization (LER). However, the incidence of various echocardiographic findings in patients with PAD and their impact on the outcomes of LER has not been well studied. Reduced ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 40% is associated with increased major adverse limb events (MALE) after LER. METHODS: The electronic medical records of patients undergoing LER in a single center were reviewed. Patients were divided based on the presence or absence of reduced EF. Patient, transthoracic echocardiogram, procedural characteristics, and outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 1,114 patients (N = 131, 11.8% with reduced EF) underwent LER between 2013 and 2019. Patients with reduced EF were more likely to be male and have a history of coronary artery disease and heart failure. Furthermore, they were more likely to have diastolic dysfunction with moderate to severe mitral and tricuspid valve regurgitation. Patients with reduced EF were more likely to undergo LER for chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and to be treated with endovascular procedures. Perioperatively, patients with reduced EF were more likely to develop myocardial infarction. Lastly, the 2 groups had no difference in overall MALE or major amputation. However, on Kaplan-Meier curves, MALE-free survival was significantly lower for patients with reduced EF. Regression analysis demonstrated that indication and not EF was associated with MALE and MALE-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced EF is associated with decreased MALE-free survival for patients with PAD undergoing LER.

Long-term limb salvage and functional outcomes for patients undergoing partial calcanectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Partial calcanectomy (PC) can be performed to treat chronic heel ulcers in patients with calcaneal osteomyelitis. Patients undergoing PC often have multiple comorbidities, limited mobility, and face high risk of major limb amputation. This study examined the extent of vascular diagnostic testing and interventions as well as long-term outcomes in patients undergoing PC. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent PC for non-healing calcaneal ulcer over a ten-year period. Demographics, comorbidities, vascular testing, and procedural data were recorded. Additional subgroup analysis was performed according to presence or absence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Primary outcomes were major limb amputation (above or below the knee) and mortality. Secondary outcomes included successful wound healing, time to complete wound healing, re-interventions, and change in ambulatory status. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients underwent partial calcanectomies on 162 limbs. 78.3% of patients had diabetes mellitus and 47.8% were diagnosed with PAD. Ankle brachial index with pulse volume recording (ABI/PVR) was performed for 46.5% (73/157) of patients, arterial duplex in 44.6% (70/157), and 19.7% (31/157) had a computed tomography angiogram. Lower extremity revascularization was performed in 28.4% of limbs (46/162). Independent ambulatory status was reported in 40.1% prior to PC and decreased to 17.9% by the time of last recorded follow-up (p < .00001). Long-term amputation-free survival was significantly higher in patients without PAD at 7 years (78.4% vs 57.1%, p = .02). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that PAD and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) increased the odds of major limb amputation (OR 3.5 and 2.8, respectively), whereas ESRD and adjuvant podiatric procedures were associated with increased mortality (OR 4.8 and 4.8, respectively). CONCLUSION: Non-invasive vascular testing should be obtained in all patients undergoing PC, in order to stratify risk of amputation and identify candidates for revascularization. Over the long-term, patients undergoing PC face significant risk of prolonged wound healing, decline in ambulatory status, and major limb amputation.

Perioperative complications of minor and major reinterventions for peripheral arterial disease.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) frequently require reinterventions after lower-extremity revascularization (LER) to maintain perfusion. Current Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines define reinterventions as major or minor based on the magnitude of the procedure. While prior studies have compared primary LER procedures of different magnitudes, similar studies for reinterventions have not been performed. The objective of this study is to compare perioperative outcomes associated with major and minor reinterventions. METHODS: Patients undergoing LER for PAD at a tertiary care center from 2013 to 2017 were included. A retrospective review of electronic medical records was performed, and reinterventions were categorized as major or minor based on the procedure magnitude. Minor reinterventions included endovascular procedures and open revision with patch angioplasty, while major reinterventions were characterized by open surgical or endovascular LER with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). Perioperative outcomes following LER were captured and compared for major and minor reinterventions. An additional subgroup analysis was performed comparing outcomes associated with major reinterventions stratified into open major surgical reinterventions and CDT. RESULTS: This study included 713 patients over a mean follow-up of 2.5 years. A total of 291 patients underwent 696 ipsilateral reinterventions (range = 1-12 reinterventions). Most reinterventions were minor (72.1%, N = 502) and 27.9% (N = 194) were major. Patients receiving reinterventions had an average age of 67.2 ± 11.5 and most were white (73.5%) males (60.1%) initially treated for claudication (58.2%) and CLTI (41.8%). There was significantly higher post-operative bleeding (9.8% vs 3.4%, p = .001), arterial thrombosis (3.1% vs 1.0%, p = .047), and acute renal failure (6.2% vs 2.4%, p = .014) after major reinterventions than minor. Additionally, major reinterventions had significantly higher return to the OR (17.0% vs 11.3%, p = .046) and longer hospital stays (7.5 vs 4.3 days, p = <.0001). Overall, major reinterventions were associated with significantly increased perioperative morbidity (37.6% vs 19.7%, p ≤ .001) with no difference in perioperative mortality. In the subgroup analysis, open reinterventions resulted in significantly longer hospital stays (8.6 days vs 5.5 days, p ≤ .001) and more wound infections than CDT (11.0% vs 0%, p = .017). However, there was no other significant difference in morbidity or mortality following treatment with open surgical reinterventions or CDT. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, major reinterventions after LER were associated with greater perioperative morbidity than minor reinterventions, with no difference in mortality. Major reinterventions performed via open surgery and CDT had similar morbidity and mortality.

Comparison of lower extremity bypass and peripheral vascular intervention for chronic limb-threatening ischemia in the Medicare-linked Vascular Quality Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: There is a relative lack of comparative effectiveness research on revascularization for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). We examined the association between lower extremity bypass (LEB) vs peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for CLTI and 30-day and 5-year all-cause mortality and 30-day and 5-year amputation. METHODS: Patients undergoing LEB and PVI of the below-the-knee popliteal and infrapopliteal arteries between 2014 and 2019 were queried from the Vascular Quality Initiative, and outcomes data were obtained from the Medicare claims-linked Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network database. Propensity scores were calculated on 15 variables using a logistic regression model to control for imbalances between treatment groups. A 1:1 matching method was used. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and hierarchical Cox proportional hazards regression with a random intercept for site and operator nested in site to account for clustered data compared 30-day and 5-year all-cause mortality between groups. Thirty-day and 5-year amputation were subsequently compared using competing risk analysis to account for the competing risk of death. RESULTS: There was a total of 2075 patients in each group. The overall mean age was 71 ± 11 years, 69% were male, and 76% were white, 18% were black, and 6% were of Hispanic ethnicity. Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics in the matched cohort were balanced between groups. There was no association between all-cause mortality over 30 days and LEB vs PVI (cumulative incidence, 2.3% vs 2.3% by Kaplan Meier; log-rank P-value = .906; hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-1.44; P-value = .80). All-cause mortality over 5 years was lower for LEB vs PVI (cumulative incidence, 55.9% vs 60.1% by Kaplan Meier; log-rank P-value < .001; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.70-0.86; P-value < .001). Accounting for competing risk of death, amputation over 30 days was also lower in LEB vs PVI (cumulative incidence function, 1.9% vs 3.0%; Fine and Gray P-value = .025; subHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.95; P-value = .025). There was no association between amputation over 5 years and LEB vs PVI (cumulative incidence function, 22.6% vs 23.4%; Fine and Gray P-value = .184; subHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79-1.05; P-value = .184). CONCLUSIONS: In the Vascular Quality Initiative-linked Medicare registry, LEB vs PVI for CLTI was associated with a lower risk of 30-day amputation and 5-year all-cause mortality. These results will serve as a foundation to validate recently published randomized controlled trial data, and to broaden the comparative effectiveness evidence base for CLTI.

Carbon dioxide angiography during peripheral vascular interventions is associated with decreased cardiac and renal complications in patients with chronic kidney disease.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who undergo peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) with iodinated contrast are at higher risk of post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI). Carbon dioxide (CO2) angiography can reduce iodinated contrast volume usage in this patient population, but its impact on PC-AKI has not been studied. We hypothesize that CO2 angiography is associated with a decrease in PC-AKI in patients with advanced CKD. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative PVI dataset from 2010 to 2021 was reviewed. Only patients with advanced CKD (estimated glomular filtration rate <45 ml/min/1.73 m2) treated for peripheral arterial disease were included. Propensity matching and multivariate logistic regression based on demographics, comorbidities, CKD stage, and indications were used to compare the outcomes of patients treated with and without CO2. RESULTS: There were 20,706 PVIs performed in patients with advanced CKD, and only 22% utilized CO2 angiography. Compared with patients treated without CO2, patients who underwent CO2 angiography were younger and less likely to be women or White, and more likely to have poor renal function, diabetes, cardiac comorbidities, and present with tissue loss. Propensity matching yielded well-matched groups with 4472 patients in each group. The procedural details after matching demonstrated 50% reduction in the volume of contrast used (32±33 vs 65±48 mL; P < .01). PVI with CO2 angiography was associated with lower rates of PC-AKI (3.9% vs 4.8%; P = .03) and cardiac complications (2.1% vs 2.9%; P = .03) without a significant difference in technical failure or major/minor amputations. Low contrast volumes (≤50 mL for CKD3, ≤20 mL for CKD4, and ≤9 mL for CKD5) are associated with reduced risk of PC-AKI (hazard ratio, 0.59; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: CO2 angiography reduces iodinated contrast volume usage during PVI and is associated with decreased cardiac complications and PC-AKI. CO2 angiography is underutilized and should be considered for patients with advanced CKD who require endovascular therapy.

The management of patients with popliteal artery aneurysms presenting with acute limb ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) repair has acceptable outcomes compared with open repair for elective therapy. Endovascular repair for urgent PAA causing acute limb ischemia (ALI) has not been well-studied. This project compares outcomes of urgent endovascular and open repair of PAA with ALI. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative database for peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) and infrainguinal bypass were reviewed for PAAs with ALI from 2010 to 2021. Only patients entered as having symptoms of ALI in the PVI module and ALI as indication in the infrainguinal bypass module were included. In addition, patients undergoing elective treatment were excluded and the sample analyzed was restricted to patients undergoing urgent and emergent open and endovascular repair. Patient demographics and comorbidities as well as procedural details were compared between the two groups. Perioperative complications up to 30 days were compared as well as long-term outcomes including major amputation and mortality at 1 year. RESULTS: Urgent PAA repair for ALI constituted 10.5% (n = 571) of all PAAs. Most urgent repairs were open (80.6%; n = 460) with 19.4% (n = 111) endovascular. The proportion of endovascular repair significantly increased from 16.7% in 2010 to 85.7% in 2021. Patients undergoing endovascular repair were older (71.2 ± 12.5 vs 68.0 ± 11.8; P = .011) than patients undergoing open repair. They were also more likely to have coronary artery disease (32.4% vs 21.7%; P = .006). Open PAA repair was associated with more bleeding complications (20.8% vs 2.7%; P < .001), longer postoperative length of stay (8.1 ± 9.3 days vs 4.9 ± 5.6 days; P < .001), and less likelihood of discharge to home (64.9% vs 70.3%; P = .051). Perioperative major amputation rate was 7.5% with no difference between the two treatment strategies up to 1 year. However, patients receiving endovascular repair had higher inpatient (1.1% vs 0%; P < .001), 30-day (6.3% vs 0.4%; P < .001), and 1-year (16.5% vs 8.4%; P = .02) mortality. Multivariable regression analysis suggested that endovascular repair was possibly associated with increased 30-day mortality, but not 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular PAA has exponentially increased from 2010 to 2021. Endovascular repair is associated with decreased complications and hospital length of stay. The increased perioperative mortality seen in this group is likely due to selection bias.

Characteristics and 1-year outcomes of patients with rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVES: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) are associated typically with a large sac diameter; however, some patients experience rupture before reaching operative thresholds for elective repair. We aim to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of patients who experience small rAAA. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative database for open AAA repair and endovascular aneurysm repair from 2003 to 2020 were reviewed for all rAAA cases. Based on the 2018 Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines on operative size thresholds for elective repair, patients with infrarenal aneurysms of less than 5.0 cm in women or less than 5.5 cm in men were categorized as a small rAAA. Patients who met operative thresholds or had a concomitant iliac diameter 3.5 cm or greater were categorized as a large rAAA. Patient characteristics and perioperative as well as long-term outcomes were compared via univariate regression. Inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores was used to examine the relationship between rAAA size and adverse outcomes. RESULTS: There were 3962 cases that met inclusion criteria, with 12.2% small rAAA. The mean aneurysm diameter was 42.3 mm and 78.5 mm in the small and large rAAA groups, respectively. Patients in the small rAAA group were significantly more likely to be younger, African American, have a lower body mass index, and had significantly higher rates of hypertension. Small rAAA were more likely to be repaired via endovascular aneurysm repair (P = .001). Hypotension was significantly less likely in patients with small rAAA (P<.001). Rates of perioperative myocardial infarction (P < .001), total morbidity (P < .004) and mortality (P < .001) were significantly higher for large rAAA cases. After propensity matching, there was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups, but smaller rAAA was associated with lower rates of myocardial infarction (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.82). On long-term follow-up, no difference in mortality was noted between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with small rAAA represent 12.2% of all rAAA and are more likely to be African American. Small rAAA is associated with similar risk of perioperative and long-term mortality compared with rupture at larger size after risk adjustment.

Perioperative complications following open or endovascular revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia in the BEST-CLI Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Anticipated perioperative morbidity is an important factor for choosing a revascularization method for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Our goal was to assess systemic perioperative complications of patients treated with surgical and endovascular revascularization in the Best Endovascular vs Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with CLTI (BEST-CLI) trial. METHODS: BEST-CLI was a prospective randomized trial comparing open (OPEN) and endovascular (ENDO) revascularization strategies for patients with CLTI. Two parallel cohorts were studied: Cohort 1 included patients with adequate single-segment great saphenous vein (SSGSV), whereas Cohort 2 included those without SSGSV. Data were queried for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE-composite myocardial infarction, stroke, death), non-serious (non-SAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) (criteria-death/life-threatening/requiring hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization/significant disability/incapacitation/affecting subject safety in trial) 30 days after the procedure. Per protocol analysis was used (intervention received without crossover), and risk-adjusted analysis was performed. RESULTS: There were 1367 patients (662 OPEN, 705 ENDO) in Cohort 1 and 379 patients (188 OPEN, 191 ENDO) in Cohort 2. Thirty-day mortality in Cohort 1 was 1.5% (OPEN 1.8%; ENDO 1.3%) and in Cohort 2 was 1.3% (2.7% OPEN; 0% ENDO). MACE in Cohort 1 was 4.7% for OPEN vs 3.13% for ENDO (P = .14), and in Cohort 2, was 4.28% for OPEN and 1.05% for ENDO (P = .15). On risk-adjusted analysis, there was no difference in 30-day MACE for OPEN vs ENDO for Cohort 1 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-2.64; P = .16) or Cohort 2 (HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 0.48-9.88; P = .31). The incidence of acute renal failure was similar across interventions; in Cohort 1 it was 3.6% for OPEN vs 2.1% for ENDO (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.85-3.12; P = .14), and in Cohort 2, it was 4.2% OPEN vs 1.6% ENDO (HR, 2.86; 95% CI, 0.75-10.8; P = .12). The occurrence of venous thromboembolism was low overall and was similar between groups in Cohort 1 (OPEN 0.9%; ENDO 0.4%) and Cohort 2 (OPEN 0.5%; ENDO 0%). Rates of any non-SAEs in Cohort 1 were 23.4% in OPEN and 17.9% in ENDO (P = .013); in Cohort 2, they were 21.8% for OPEN and 19.9% for ENDO (P = .7). Rates for any SAEs in Cohort 1 were 35.3% for OPEN and 31.6% for ENDO (P = .15); in Cohort 2, they were 25.5% for OPEN and 23.6% for ENDO (P = .72). The most common types of non-SAEs and SAEs were infection, procedural complications, and cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: In BEST-CLI, patients with CLTI who were deemed suitable candidates for open lower extremity bypass surgery had similar peri-procedural complications following either OPEN or ENDO revascularization: In such patients, concern about risk of peri-procedure complications should not be a deterrent in deciding revascularization strategy. Rather, other factors, including effectiveness in restoring perfusion and patient preference, are more relevant.

Variability in Antithrombotic Therapy after Infrainguinal Lower Extremity Bypass.

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet monotherapy is recommended after infrainguinal lower extremity bypass (LEB). However, there is a paucity of high-quality data to guide therapy, and antiplatelet therapy is often prescribed in combination with anticoagulation. We therefore aimed to assess the variability in the use of antithrombotic therapy after infrainguinal LEB. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative dataset (2015-2021) was retrospectively reviewed to determine discharge patterns of antithrombotic therapy for all patients undergoing infrainguinal LEB. Monotherapy on discharge was defined as either single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or single anticoagulant (SAC). Combination therapy was dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), anticoagulant + antiplatelet (ACAP), or triple therapy. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression with random effects for physician and center was used to identify predictors of combination therapy. Median odds ratios (MOR) were derived to quantify degree of variability in antithrombotic therapy. RESULTS: There were 29,507 patients undergoing infrainguinal LEB (monotherapy = 10,634 vs. combination therapy = 18,873). SAPT (90.6%) was the most common form of monotherapy, while DAPT (57.7%) and ACAP (34.6%) were the most common combination therapies. Patients undergoing LEB to popliteal targets were more likely to be prescribed monotherapy (SAC or SAPT) than to infra-popliteal targets (60.6% vs. 56.6%, P < 0.001). Combination therapy (DAPT, ACAP, or triple therapy) was more often used in patients with tibial or plantar arteries as the bypass target. Patients undergoing bypass using autogenous vein were more likely to receive monotherapy compared with those receiving other conduits (64.8% vs. 52.9%, P < 0.001), while patients with prosthetic grafts were more likely to receive combination therapy (37.9% vs. 28.2%, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in postoperative bleeding (P = 0.491) or 30-day mortality (P = 0.302) between the two groups. Prior peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.79-1.99), concomitant PVI (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.66-2.02), prosthetic graft use (OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.64-1.85), prior percutaneous coronary intervention (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.43-1.65), plantar distal target (OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.29-1.65), alternative conduits (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.25-1.53), and tibial distal targets (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.28-1.44) were independent predictors of combination therapy in a multivariable regression model. Upon adjusting for patient-level factors, there was significant physician-level (MOR: 1.65, 95% CI 1.61-1.67) and center-level (MOR: 1.64, 95% CI 1.57-1.69) variability in the selection of antithrombotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Significant physician- and center-level variability in the use of antithrombotic regimens after infrainguinal bypass reflects the paucity of available evidence to guide therapy. Pragmatic trials are needed to assess antithrombotic strategies and guide recommendations aimed at optimizing cardiovascular and graft-specific outcomes after LEB.

Incidence and Significance of Deep Venous Reflux in Patients Treated with Saphenous Vein Ablation.

BACKGROUND: Venous ablation (VA) of the saphenous vein is the most common procedure performed for venous insufficiency. The incidence of concomitant deep venous reflux (DVR) in patients undergoing VA is unknown. Our hypothesis is that patients undergoing saphenous VA with concomitant DVR exhibit a higher clinical, etiology, anatomy, and pathophysiology (CEAP) stage and less relief after VA compared to patients without DVR. METHODS: Electronic medical records of patients treated with saphenous VA at a tertiary care center from March 2012 to June 2016 were reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on presence or absence of DVR on initial ultrasound (US) before saphenous VA. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared. A telephone survey was conducted to assess long-term symptomatic relief, compliance with compression, and pain medication use. Subgroup analysis of patients with post-thrombotic versus primary DVR was performed. RESULTS: 362 patients underwent 497 ablations, and the incidence of DVR (>1 sec) was 20% (N = 71). Patients with DVR were significantly more likely to be male (46.4% vs. 32.1%, P = 0.021) and of Black race (21.2% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.0001) compared to patients without DVR. Patients with DVR were more likely to have a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (15.1% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.045), but there was no difference in other comorbidities. There was no significant difference in presenting symptoms, CEAP stage, or symptom severity based on numeric rating scale (NRS) (0-10) for pain and swelling. Clinical success of saphenous VA was comparable between the 2 groups, but patients with DVR were more likely to develop endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) II-IV (6% vs. 1%, P = 0.002). After a mean follow-up of 26 months, there was still no difference in pain or swelling scores, but patients with DVR were more likely to use compression stockings and used them more frequently. Only 11 of 71 patients with DVR had a history of DVT. Patients with post-thrombotic DVR were significantly older than patients with primary DVR (67.3 vs. 57.2, P = 0.038) and exhibited a trend toward more advanced venous disease (C4-C6: 45.4% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.439). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 20% of patients undergoing saphenous VA demonstrated DVR, which was more common in Black men. Presence of DVR is associated with increased risk of EHIT after saphenous VA but does not seem to impact disease severity or clinical relief after ablation. Larger studies are needed to understand outcome differences between post-thrombotic and primary DVR.

Effect of Doxycycline on Progression of Arterial Calcification in the Noninvasive Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Clinical Trial (N-TA(3)CT).

BACKGROUND: Doxycycline has been shown to prevent arterial calcification via attenuation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) in preclinical models. We assessed the effects of doxycycline on progression of arterial calcification in patients enrolled in the Non-Invasive Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Clinical Trial (N-TA3CT). METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-one patients were randomized to 100 mg doxycycline twice daily or placebo. Arterial calcification was measured in abdominal vessels on noncontrast computed tomography scans. Patients with baseline computed tomography scan and 1 or more follow-up scans within the 2-year study were included for analysis. For individual arteries, mean change in iliofemoral artery calcification over time was calculated via linear regression. Serum MMP-3 and MMP-9 levels were measured at baseline and 6 months. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients in the doxycycline and 66 in the placebo arm were included in this analysis. Baseline characteristics between the groups were similar. The unadjusted mean change in iliofemoral calcium score per year trended toward higher values in patients treated with doxycycline compared with placebo (322 ± 399 units/year vs. 217 ± 307 units/year, P = 0.09). After 6 months, changes in serum MMP-3 and MMP-9 levels were not significantly different between study arms. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with small aortic aneurysm, treatment with doxycycline 100 mg twice daily did not decrease circulating levels of the matrix degrading enzymes MMP-3 and 9 or alter the progression of arterial calcification.

Utility of Hook Sign in the Diagnosis of Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is a clinical syndrome caused by compression of the celiac artery by the median arcuate ligament that often manifests with nonspecific abdominal pain. Identification of this syndrome is often dependent on imaging of compression and upward bending of the celiac artery by lateral computed tomography angiography, the so-called "hook sign." The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship of radiologic characteristics of the celiac artery to clinically relevant MALS. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review from 2,000 to 2,021 of 293 patients at a tertiary academic center diagnosed with celiac artery compression (CAC) was performed. Patient demographics and symptoms of 69 patients who were diagnosed with symptomatic MALS were compared to 224 patients without MALS (but with CAC) per electronic medical record review. Computed tomography angiography images were reviewed and the fold angle (FA) was measured. The presence of a hook sign (defined as a visual FA < 135°), as well as stenosis (defined as >50% of luminal narrowing on imaging) were recorded. Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Chi-squared test were used for comparative analysis. Logistic model was run to relate the presence of MALS with comorbidities and radiographic findings. RESULTS: Imaging was available in 59 patients (25 males, 34 females) and 157 patients (60 males, 97 females) with and without MALS, respectively. Patients with MALS were more likely to have a more severe FA (120.7 ± 33.6 vs. 134.8 ± 27.9, P = 0.002). Males with MALS were also more likely to have a more severe FA compared with males without MALS (111.1 ± 33.7 vs. 130.4 ± 30.4, P = 0.015). In patients with body mass index (BMI) >25, MALS patients also had narrower FA compared with patients without MALS (112.6 ± 30.5 vs. 131.7 ± 30.3, P = 0.001). The FA was negatively correlated with BMI in patients with CAC. The hook sign and stenosis were associated with diagnosis of MALS (59.3% vs. 28.7%, P < 0.001, and 75.7% vs. 45.2%, P < 0.001, respectively). In logistic regression, pain, stenosis, and a narrow FA were statistically significant predictors of the presence of MALS. CONCLUSIONS: The upward deflection of the celiac artery in patients with MALS is more severe compared with patients without MALS. Consistent with prior literature, this bending of the celiac artery is negatively correlated with BMI in patients with and without MALS. When demographic variables and comorbidities are considered, a narrow FA is a statistically significant predictor of MALS. Regardless of MALS diagnosis, a hook sign was associated with narrower FA. While demographics and imaging findings may inform MALS diagnosis, clinicians should not rely on a visual assessment of a hook sign but should quantitatively measure the anatomic bending angle of the celiac artery to assist with the diagnosis and understand the outcomes.

Updated research priorities of the Society for Vascular Surgery.

In 2011, the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) prepared a set of clinical research priorities through a survey of its membership. These priorities were developed with the goal of enhancing clinical research to improve care for vascular patients. In the subsequent decade, several of these priorities served as the focus of clinical trials and significant research efforts. It was understood from the outset that this list of priorities represented a starting point with the intention that they be reevaluated at suitable intervals. In 2021, the SVS Research Council set out to update the research priorities by surveying the SVS membership and engaged a panel of subject matter experts. This process resulted in an updated set of vascular research priorities that more clearly align with current areas of emphasis. Our priorities remain focused on basic areas including aortic disease, carotid disease, lower extremity arterial disease, venous disease, dialysis access, and medical management of vascular disease, along with the topic of health care disparities. The 10 updated priorities reported herein reflect our increasing awareness of the need to understand vascular disease pathogenesis and prevention in the context of a diverse patient population. Importantly, patient-centered outcomes and personalized vascular care are at the core of these updated priorities. Similar to the aims of the original 2011 clinical research priorities, our hope is that this updated list will help to drive large-scale investigations that will improve how we care for our vascular patients.

Trends in Utilization and Outcomes of Orbital, Laser, and Excisional Atherectomy for Lower Extremity Revascularization.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to analyze the utilization pattern of atherectomy modalities and compare their outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing atherectomy in the 2010-2016 Vascular Quality Initiative Database were identified. Utilization of orbital, laser, or excisional atherectomy was obtained. Characteristics and outcomes of patients treated for isolated femoropopliteal and isolated tibial disease by different modalities were compared. RESULTS: Atherectomy use increased from 10.3% to 18.3% of all peripheral interventions (n = 122 938). Orbital atherectomy was most commonly used and increased from 59.4% in 2010 to 63.2% of all atherectomies in 2016, while laser atherectomy decreased from 19.2% to 13.1%. Atherectomy was mostly used for treatment of isolated femoropopliteal disease (51.1%), followed by combined femoropopliteal and tibial disease (25.8%) and isolated tibial disease (11.7%). In isolated femoropopliteal revascularization, excisional atherectomy was associated with higher rate of perforation (1.2%) compared with laser (0.4%) and orbital atherectomy (0.5%). The technical success of orbital atherectomy (96.7%) was lower compared with excisional atherectomy (98.7%). Concomitant stenting was significantly higher with laser atherectomy (43.0%) compared with orbital (27.2%) and excisional (26.1%) atherectomy. Nevertheless, there was no difference in 1-year primary patency, reintervention, major amputation, improvement in ambulatory status, or mortality. Multivariable analysis also demonstrated no difference in 1-year primary patency and major ipsilateral amputation among the modalities. In isolated tibial revascularization, there were no differences in perioperative outcomes among the modalities. Excisional atherectomy was associated with the highest 1-year primary patency (88.1%). After adjusting for confounders, excisional atherectomy remained associated with superior 1-year primary patency compared with orbital atherectomy (odds ratio [OR] = 2.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.18-5.68]), and excisional atherectomy remained associated with a lower rate of 1-year major ipsilateral amputation compared with laser atherectomy (OR = 0.29, 95% CI = [0.09-0.95]). CONCLUSION: Atherectomy use has increased, driven primarily by orbital atherectomy. Despite significant variation in perioperative outcomes, there were no differences in 1-year outcomes among the different modalities when used for treating isolated femoropopliteal disease. In isolated tibial disease treatment, excisional atherectomy was associated with higher 1-year primary patency compared with orbital atherectomy and decreased major ipsilateral amputation rates compared with laser atherectomy. These differences warrant further investigation into the comparative effectiveness of atherectomy modalities in various vascular beds.