ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nurse understaffing may have several adverse consequences for patients in hospitals, such as health care-associated infections (HAIs), but there is little longitudinal evidence available on staffing levels and HAIs with consideration of incubation times to confirm this. Using daily longitudinal data, we analyzed temporal associations between nurse understaffing and limited work experience, and the risk of HAIs. METHODS: The study was based on administrative data of 40 units and 261,067 inpatient periods for a hospital district in Finland in 2013-2019. Survival analyses with moving time windows were used to examine the association of nurse understaffing and limited work experience with the risk of an HAI 2 days after exposure, adjusting for individual risk factors. We reported hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Neither nurse understaffing nor limited work experience were associated with the overall risk of HAIs. The results were inconsistent across staffing measures and types of HAIs, and many of the associations were weak. Regarding specific HAI types, 1-day exposure to low proportion of nurses with >3 years of in-hospital experience and low proportion of nurses more than 25 years old were associated with increased risk of bloodstream infections (HR=1.30; 95% CI: 1.04-1.62 and HR=1.40; 95% CI: 1.07-1.83). Two-day exposure to low nursing hours relative to target hours was associated with an increased risk of surgical-site infections (HR=2.64, 95% CI: 1.66-4.20). CONCLUSIONS: Data from time-varying analyses suggest that nursing staff shortages and limited work experience do not always increase the risk of HAI among patients.
Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Humans , Adult , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Prospective Studies , Inpatients , Workforce , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Hospitals , Delivery of Health CareABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To examine the association of shift work with and without night work with breast cancer among women in the public sector. METHODS: Using the Finnish Public Sector cohort study (N=33 359, mean age of 40.6 years at baseline), we investigated the associations of shift work and potential confounders with incident breast cancer. Exposure to permanent day work or shift work was defined from first two consecutive surveys from 2000, 2004, 2008 or 2012 and past information on exposure in a subcohort (n=20 786). Incident cases of breast cancer (n=1129) were retrieved from the National Cancer Register and the cohort members were followed to the end of 2016. HR and 95% CI from Cox proportional hazard regression models were calculated. RESULTS: Shift work with and without night shifts was not overall associated with breast cancer. When stratified according to age, both shift work without nights (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.60) and shift work with nights (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.01) were associated with an increased risk after a period of 10 years or more follow-up among women aged 50 years or older, when adjusted for age, socioeconomic status, children, smoking, alcohol and body mass index. In a subgroup with past information on exposure to shift work, the increased risk by longer exposure to shift work was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides support for an increased risk of breast cancer among elderly shift workers. However, insufficient information on exposure and intensity of night work may attenuate the risk estimates.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Aged , Child , Humans , Female , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Cohort Studies , Finland/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Work Schedule ToleranceABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Night work has been classified as probably carcinogenic to humans by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, but epidemiological evidence was considered limited due to variability in findings and potential bias. This study aimed to investigate the risk of breast cancer in a cohort with detailed and registry-based data on night work. METHODS: The cohort comprised 25 585 women (nurses and nursing assistants) employed 1 year or more between 2008 and 2016 in the healthcare sector in Stockholm. Information on work schedules was obtained from employment records. Breast cancer cases were identified from the national cancer register. HRs were estimated by a discrete time proportional hazards model, adjusting for age, country of birth, profession and childbirth. RESULTS: There were 299 cases of breast cancer, 147 in premenopausal and 152 in postmenopausal women. The adjusted HR of postmenopausal breast cancer in association with ever versus never working nights was 1.31 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.85). Eight or more years of night work was associated with an increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer, HR=4.33 (95% CI 1.45 to 10.57), based on five cases only, though. CONCLUSIONS: This study is limited by a short period of follow-up and a lack of information on night work before 2008. Most exposure metrics showed no association with breast cancer risk, but there was an elevated risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in women after 8 or more years of night work.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Sweden/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Work Schedule Tolerance , Delivery of Health CareABSTRACT
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between sleep duration and sleep difficulties with different types and causes of workplace and commuting injuries. METHODS: The data were derived from the Finnish Public Sector study including 89.543 participants (178.309 person-observations). Participants reported their sleep duration and sleep difficulties between 2000 and 2012. These were linked to occupational injury records from the national register maintained by the Federation of Accident Insurance Institutions. Risk of injuries was followed up 1 year after each study wave. Logistic regression analysis with generalised estimating equations (GEEs) was used to examine the association between sleep duration/difficulties and risk of injuries, and multinomial logistic regression with GEE was used to examine the association with injury types and causes. RESULTS: Both sleep duration and difficulties were associated with injuries. Employees with short sleep (≤6.5 hours) had 1.07-fold odds of workplace injuries (95% CI 1.00 to 1.14) and 1.14 times higher odds of commuting injuries (95% CI 1.04 to 1.26) compared with employees with normal sleep duration. For employees with disturbed sleep, the corresponding ORs were 1.09-fold (95% CI 1.02 to 1.17) and 1.14-fold (95% CI 1.04 to 1.26) compared with those without sleep difficulties, respectively. The risk of commuting injuries was higher among those who had difficulty in falling asleep (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.55), woke up too early (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.23) or had non-restorative sleep (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.33). CONCLUSIONS: Short sleep duration and sleep difficulties are associated with slightly increased risk of workplace and commuting injuries.
Subject(s)
Occupational Injuries , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Sleep Wake Disorders , Cohort Studies , Humans , Occupational Injuries/epidemiology , Occupational Injuries/etiology , Sleep , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/epidemiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hospital physicians' work includes on-call duties to provide 24/7 health care. Previous studies using self-reported survey data have associated long working hours and on-call work with sleep difficulties. To reduce recall bias, we complemented survey data with payroll-based objective data to study whether hospital physicians' realized working hours are associated with sleep. METHODS: The study was nested within the Finnish Public Sector study. We used survey data on 728 hospital physicians (mean age 43.4 years, 62% females) from 2015 linked to realized daily working hour data from 3 months preceding the survey. The associations of working hour characteristics with sleep quantity and quality were studied with multinomial logistic regression analysis adjusted for demographics, overall stressfulness of life situation, control over scheduling of shifts, and hospital district. RESULTS: One fourth (26%) of the participants reported short (≤6.5 h) average sleep duration. Frequent night work (> 6 shifts/91 days) was associated with short sleep (OR 1.87 95%CI 1.23-2.83) compared to no night work. Approximately one third (32%) of the physicians reported insufficient sleep. Physicians with long weekly working hours (> 48 hours) had higher odds for insufficient sleep (OR 1.78 95%CI 1.15-2.76) than physicians with short weekly working hours (< 40 hours). Insufficient sleep was also associated with frequent on-call duties (> 12 shifts/3 months OR 2.00 95%CI 1.08-3.72), frequent night work (OR 1.60 95%CI 1.09-2.37), and frequent short shift intervals (≤11 hours; > 12 times/3 months OR 1.65 95%CI 1.01-2.69) compared to not having these working hour characteristics. Nearly half of the physicians (48%) reported at least one sleep difficulty at least two times a week and frequent night work increased odds for difficulties in initiating sleep (OR 2.43 95%CI 1.04-5.69). Otherwise sleep difficulties were not associated with the studied working hour characteristics. CONCLUSION: We used realized working hour data to strengthen the evidence on on-call work and sleep quality and our results advice to limit the frequency of night work, on-call shifts, short shift intervals and long weekly working hours to promote hospital physicians' sufficient sleep.
Subject(s)
Physicians , Sleep Wake Disorders , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Sleep Deprivation/epidemiology , Sleep Quality , Work Schedule ToleranceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In health care, the shift work is arranged as irregular work shifts to provide operational hours for 24/7 care. We aimed to investigate working hour trends and turnover in health care via identification of time-related sequences of work shifts and absences among health care employees. The transitions between the work shifts (i.e., morning, day, evening, and night shifts), and absences (days off and other leaves) over time were analyzed and the predictors of change in irregular shift work were quantified. METHODS: A longitudinal cohort study was conducted using employer-owned payroll-based register data of objective and day-to-day working hours and absences of one hospital district in Finland from 2014 to 2019 (n = 4931 employees). The working hour data included start and end of work shifts, any kind of absence from work (days off, sickness absence, parental leave), and employee's age, and sex. Daily work shifts and absences in 2014 and 2019 were used in sequence analysis. Generalized linear model was used to estimate how each identified sequence cluster was associated with sex and age. RESULTS: We identified four sequence clusters: "Morning" (60% in 2014 and 56% in 2019), "Varying shift types" (22% both in 2014 and 2019), "Employee turnover" (13% in 2014 and 3% in 2019), and "Unstable employment (5% in 2014 and 19% in 2019). The analysis of transitions from one cluster to another between 2014 and 2019 indicated that most employees stayed in the same clusters, and most often in the "Varying shift types" (60%) and "Morning" (72%) clusters. The majority of those who moved, moved to the cluster "Morning" in 2019 from "Employee turnover" (43%), "Unstable employment" (46%) or "Varying shift types" (21%). Women were more often than men in the clusters "Employee turnover" and "Unstable employment", whereas older employees were more often in "Morning" and less often in the other cluster groups. CONCLUSION: Four clusters with different combinations of work shifts and absences were identified. The transition rates between work shifts and absences with five years in between indicated that most employees stayed in the same clusters. The likelihood of a working hour pattern characterized by "Morning" seems to increase with age.
ABSTRACT
We examined whether working rotating shifts, with or without night work, is associated with the purchase of prescribed sleep medication, and whether the association is dependent on age. Data were obtained from a longitudinal cohort study of Finnish public sector employees who responded to questions on work schedule and background characteristics in 2000, 2004 and 2008. The data were linked to national register data on redeemed prescriptions of hypnotic and sedative medications, with up to 11 years of follow-up. Age stratified Cox proportional hazard regression models were computed to examine incident use of medication comparing two groups of rotating shift workers (those working shifts that included night shifts and those whose schedules did not include night shifts) with day workers who worked in a similar range of occupations. Shift work with night shifts was associated with increased use of sleep medication in all age groups, after adjustments for sex, occupational status, marital status, alcohol consumption, smoking and physical activity levels (hazard ratio [HR], [95% confidence interval, CI] 1.14 [1.01-1.28] for age group ≤39 years; 1.33 [1.19-1.48] for age group 40-49 years; 1.28 [1.13-1.44] for age group ≥50 years). Shift work without nights was associated with medication use in the two older age groups (HR [95% CI] 1.14 [1.01-1.29] and 1.17 [1.05-1.31] for age groups 40-49 years and >50 years, respectively). These findings suggest that circadian disruption and older age puts rotating shift workers, and especially those who work nights, at increased risk of developing clinically significant levels of sleep problems.
Subject(s)
Shift Work Schedule , Adult , Aged , Circadian Rhythm , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Shift Work Schedule/adverse effects , Sleep , Work Schedule ToleranceABSTRACT
We studied whether implementing binding ergonomic shift-scheduling rules change ageing (≥45 years) social and healthcare employees' (mean age 52.5 years, 95% women) working-hour characteristics (e.g. weekly working hours, number and length of night shifts, and short shift intervals) and sleep. We compared an intervention group (n = 253) to a control group (n = 1,234) by survey responses (baseline 2007/2008, follow-up 2012) and objective working-hour characteristics (intervention group n = 159, control group n = 379) from 91 days preceding the surveys. Changes in working-hour characteristics were analysed with repeated measures general linear models. The fully adjusted model (sociodemographics and full-/part-time work) showed that proportion of short shift intervals (<11 hr, p = .033) and weekend work (p = .01) decreased more in the intervention than in the control group. Changes in sleep outcomes were analysed with generalised logit model to binomial and multinomial variables. The fully adjusted model (sociodemographics, full-/part-time work, job strain, health behaviours, and perceived health) revealed higher odds in the intervention group for long sleep (≥9 hr; odds ratio [OR] 5.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.21-13.80), and lower odds of short sleep (<6 hr; OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.57-0.92), having at least two sleep difficulties often (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.43-0.70), and more specifically difficulties in falling asleep (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.41-0.77), waking up several times per night (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.34-0.55), difficulties in staying asleep (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49-0.82), and non-restorative sleep (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.54-0.90) than the control group. In conclusion, implementation of ergonomic shift-scheduling rules resulted in minor changes in ageing employees' objective working hours and a consistent buffering effect against worsening of sleep.
Subject(s)
Aging , Ergonomics , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/physiopathology , Sleep , Work Schedule Tolerance/psychology , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Studies concerning the association between shift work and drinking problems showed inconsistent results. We used data from a large occupational cohort to examine the association between shift work and different types of drinking behaviour. METHODS: A total of 93 121 non-abstinent workers from the Finnish Public Sector Study were enrolled in the study. Six waves of survey data were collected between 2000 and 2017. Work schedules were categorised as regular day, non-night shift and night shift work, and shift intensities were calculated from registered working hour data. Two indicators of adverse drinking behaviour were measured: at-risk drinking (>7 and >14 drinks per week in women and men, respectively) and high-intensity drinking (measured as pass-out experience). Intraindividual analysis was conducted using fixed-effects regression to examine the association between shift work and drinking behaviours. RESULTS: Compared with regular day work, night shift work was associated with an increased risk of high-intensity drinking (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.52) but a lower risk of at-risk drinking (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.99). Shift workers who worked long shifts had a lower risk of at-risk drinking compared with those who rarely worked long shifts (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Associations between shift work and alcohol use vary according to drinking patterns. Workers engaged in high-intensity drinking more often during night shift schedules compared with day work, but did not drink averagely higher volume.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the association of recovery from work and sleep with workers' dietary habits. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. Need for recovery (NFR) from work was assessed with a validated questionnaire. Sleep was assessed with five questions from the Nordic Sleep Questionnaire and sleep quality question. Dietary habits were estimated using a validated sixteen food groups-containing questionnaire. Ordered logistic regression was used to explore the associations of NFR and sleep with dietary habits adjusted for age, education, marital status, work schedule, working full or part time and occupation. SETTING: Follow-up visits of type 2 diabetes prevention study cohort in a Finnish airline company. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 737 men and 605 women. RESULTS: Poor recovery from work was associated with a higher eating frequency (OR = 1·03, 95 % CI 1·00, 1·06), higher intake of fast food (OR = 1·05, 95 % CI 1·02, 1·08) and sweets (OR = 1·05, 95 % CI 1·02, 1·08) as well as lower intake of vegetables (OR = 0·96, 95 % CI 0·93, 0·98) and fruits (OR = 0·96, 95 % CI 0·93, 0·98) among men. In women, poor recovery from work was associated with higher fast food (OR = 1·06, 95 % CI 1·02, 1·09) and desserts consumption (OR = 1·04, 95 % CI 1·00, 1·07). Among men and women, sleep problems were associated with higher eating frequency (men: OR = 1·04, 95 % CI 1·00, 1·07, women: OR = 1·06, 95 % CI 1·02, 1·11), consumption of fast food (men: OR = 1·07, 95 % CI 1·04, 1·11, women: OR = 1·06, 95 % CI 1·02, 1·10) and sweets (men: OR = 1·05, 95 % CI 1·01, 1·08, women: OR = 1·04, 95 % CI 1·00, 1·08). CONCLUSIONS: Poor recovery from work and sleep problems were associated with unfavourable dietary habits especially in men.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Sleep Wake Disorders , Cross-Sectional Studies , Feeding Behavior , Humans , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , VegetablesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is inconsistent evidence that long working hours and night work are risk factors for sickness absence, but few studies have considered variation in the length of exposure time window as a potential source of mixed findings. We examined whether the association of long working hours and night work with sickness absence is dependent on the length of exposure to the working hour characteristics. METHODS: We analysed records of working hours, night work and sickness absence for a cohort of 9226 employees in one hospital district in Finland between 2008 and 2019. The exposure time windows ranged from 10 to 180 days, and we used Cox's proportional hazards models with time-dependent exposures to analyse the associations between working-hour characteristics and subsequent sickness absence. RESULTS: Longer working hours for a period of 10 to 30 days was not associated with the risk of sickness absence whereas longer working hours for a period of 40 to 180 days was associated with a lower risk of sickness absence. Irrespective of exposure time window, night work was not associated with sickness absence. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to consider the length of exposure time window when examining associations between long working hours and sickness absence, whereas the association between night work and sickness absence is not similarly sensitive to exposure times.
Subject(s)
Sick Leave , Work Schedule Tolerance , Cohort Studies , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
The prevalence of shift work disorder (SWD) has been studied using self-reported data and the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, Second Edition (ICSD-2) criteria. We examined the prevalence in relation to ICSD-2 and ICSD-3 criteria, work schedules and the number of non-day shifts (work outside 06:00-18:00 hours) using objective working-hours data. Secondly, we explored a minimum cut-off for the occurrence of SWD symptoms. Hospital shift workers without (n = 1,813) and with night shifts (n = 2,917) and permanent night workers (n = 84) answered a survey (response rate 69%) on SWD and fatigue on days off. The prevalence of SWD was calculated for groups with ≥1, ≥3, ≥5 and ≥7 monthly non-day shifts utilizing the working hours registry. ICSD-3-based SWD prevalence was 2.5%-3.7% (shift workers without nights), 2.6%-9.5% (shift workers with nights) and 6.0% (permanent night workers), depending on the cut-off of non-day shifts (≥7-1/month, respectively). The ICSD-2-based prevalence was higher: 7.1%-9.2%, 5.6%-33.5% and 16.7%, respectively. The prevalence was significantly higher among shift workers with than those without nights (p-values <.001) when using the cut-offs of ≥1-3 non-day shifts. Shift workers with nights who had ≥3 days with ICSD-3-based SWD symptoms/month more commonly had fatigue on days off (49.3%) than those below the cut-off (35.8%, p < .05). The ICSD-3 criteria provided lower estimates for SWD prevalence than ISCD-2 criteria, similarly to exclusion of employees with the fewest non-day shifts. The results suggest that a plausible cut-off for days with ICSD-3-based SWD symptoms is ≥3/month, resulting in 3%-6% prevalence of SWD.
Subject(s)
Personnel, Hospital/psychology , Shift Work Schedule/adverse effects , Work Schedule Tolerance/psychology , Adult , Circadian Rhythm , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
In the original publication of the article, the first name and last name of the authors were interchanged.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy interventions for insomnia (CBT-I) to that of a sleep hygiene intervention in a randomized controlled design among shift workers. We also studied whether the features of shift work disorder (SWD) affected the results. METHODS: A total of 83 shift workers with insomnia disorder were partially randomized into a group-based CBT-I, self-help CBT-I, or sleep hygiene control intervention. The outcomes were assessed before and after the interventions and at 6-month follow-up using questionnaires, a sleep diary, and actigraphy. RESULTS: Perceived severity of insomnia, sleep-related dysfunctional beliefs, burnout symptoms, restedness, recovery after a shift, and actigraphy-based total sleep time improved after the interventions, but we found no significant differences between the interventions. Mood symptoms improved only among the group-based CBT-I intervention participants. Non-SWD participants had more mental diseases and symptoms, used more sleep-promoting medication, and had pronounced insomnia severity and more dysfunctional beliefs than those with SWD. After the interventions, non-SWD participants showed more prominent improvements than those with SWD. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed no significant differences between the sleep improvements of the shift workers in the CBT-I interventions and of those in the sleep hygiene control intervention. Alleviation of mood symptoms seemed to be the main added value of the group-based CBT-I intervention compared to the control intervention. The clinical condition of the non-SWD participants was more severe and these participants benefitted more from the interventions than the SWD participants did. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02523079.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/therapy , Actigraphy , Adult , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Female , Finland , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Health Services/methods , Psychotherapy, Group/methods , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/psychology , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/therapy , Sleep Hygiene , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/psychology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
AIM: To investigate age group differences in objective working-hour characteristics and their associations with short (1-3 days) sickness absence. BACKGROUND: Irregular working hours, that is shift work with non-standard schedule, may influence sickness absence rates in hospital workers. METHODS: We collected daily working hours and the first incidence of short sickness absence from the employers' electronic records from 2008 to 2017. A case-crossover study compared the characteristics of the working hours 28 days preceding the sickness absence (exposure window) and 28 days earlier (control window) across 10-year age groups (conditional logistic regression for odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI)). RESULTS: Younger employees had longer working hours and more night and consecutive shifts. Extended weekly working hours were associated with short sickness absence in all age groups. Age-related differences were few: extended working hours among oldest age group (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.01) and daily working hours in the youngest and middle-age groups (Ors: 1.14-1.17) were associated with increased sickness absence. CONCLUSIONS: Length of working hours, and night and consecutive shifts differed between age, but the associations with short sickness absence were similar across all age groups. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Among older employees, the length of working hours should be paid special attention.
Subject(s)
Absenteeism , Age Factors , Work Schedule Tolerance , Analysis of Variance , Cross-Over Studies , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Odds Ratio , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
We examined shift work with or without night work as a risk factor for fatigue and short or long sleep. In a prospective cohort study with 4- and 6-year follow-ups (the Finnish Public Sector study), we linked survey responses of 3,679 full-time hospital employees on sleep duration and fatigue to records on daily working hours in 2008 (baseline), 2012 and 2014. We used logistic regression to estimate risk ratios and their confidence intervals to examine whether continuous exposure to shift work or changes between shift work and day work were associated with short (≤6.5 hr) or long (≥9.0 hr) sleep over 24 hr and fatigue at work and during free days. Compared with continuous day work and adjusting for age, gender, education and fatigue/sleep duration at baseline, continuous shift work with night shifts was associated with increased fatigue during free days (risk ratio = 1.38, 95% confidence interval 1.17-1.63) and long sleep (risk ratio = 8.04, 95% confidence interval 2.88-22.5, without adjustment for education) after 6-year follow-up. Exposure to shift work without night shifts increased only long sleep after 6 years (risk ratio = 5.87, 95% confidence interval 1.94-17.8). A change from day work to shift work with or without night shifts was associated with an increased risk for long sleep, and a change from shift work to day work with a decreased risk for long sleep and fatigue. This study suggests that irregular shift work is a modifiable risk factor for long sleep and increased fatigue, probably reflecting a higher need for recovery.
Subject(s)
Fatigue/complications , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/complications , Sleep/physiology , Work Schedule Tolerance/physiology , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between different working shifts (i.e. morning, evening, night shifts) and headache, musculoskeletal and abdominal pain, and the extent to which reduced sleep duration could account for these associations. METHODS: Nurses (N = 679, 649 female, aged 22-53 years) were followed up for a period of 28 consecutive days, responding to a diary about sleep, shift type and pain complaints (measured on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 3). Generalised structural equation modelling mediation analysis (GSEM) was performed to test whether shift type was associated with higher incidence or higher intensity of pain (headache, pain in neck/shoulders/upper back, upper extremity, low back, lower extremity and abdominal pain), and if this effect was mediated by sleep duration (continuous variable), after controlling for age, work and lifestyle factors. RESULTS: Pain scores in lower extremities were decreased following night shifts in general. However, when night shifts were followed by short sleep duration, the risk of pain in the lower extremities and abdominal pain were increased. Headache and pain in the upper extremity were increased after night shifts, but were not associated with sleep duration. Pain in the neck/shoulder/upper back and lower back was not related to shift work. CONCLUSIONS: Among nurses in a three-shift rotating schedule, night shifts increased the risk of pain in several regions, but only pain in the lower extremities and abdomen was related to reduced sleep duration.
Subject(s)
Nurses , Pain/etiology , Shift Work Schedule/adverse effects , Sleep/physiology , Abdominal Pain/epidemiology , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Actigraphy , Adult , Female , Headache/epidemiology , Headache/etiology , Hospitals, Public , Humans , Leg , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Pain/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Pain/etiology , Norway/epidemiology , Pain/epidemiology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Although shift work disorder (SWD) affects a major part of the shift working population, little is known about its manifestation in real life. This observational field study aimed to provide a detailed picture of sleep and alertness among shift workers with a questionnaire-based SWD, by comparing them to shift workers without SWD during work shifts and free time. METHODS: SWD was determined by a questionnaire. Questionnaires and 3-week field monitoring, including sleep diaries, actigraphy, the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS), EEG-based sleep recordings, and Psychomotor Vigilance Tasks (PVT), were used to study 22 SWD cases and 9 non-SWD workers. RESULTS: The SWD group had a shorter subjective total sleep time and greater sleep debt before morning shifts than the non-SWD group. Unlike the non-SWD group, the SWD group showed little compensatory sleep on days off. The SWD group had lower objective sleep efficiency and longer sleep latency on most days, and reported poorer relaxation at bedtime and sleep quality across all days than the non-SWD group. The SWD group's average KSS-sleepiness was higher than the non-SWD group's sleepiness at the beginning and end of morning shifts and at the end of night shifts. The SWD group also had more lapses in PVT at the beginning of night shifts than the non-SWD group. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that SWD is related to disturbed sleep and alertness in association with both morning and night shifts, and to less compensatory sleep on days off. SWD seems to particularly associate with the quality of sleep.
Subject(s)
Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/physiopathology , Sleep/physiology , Work Schedule Tolerance/physiology , Actigraphy , Adult , Attention/physiology , Aviation , Electroencephalography , Female , Finland , Humans , Leisure Activities/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate trajectories of mobility limitations (MLs) over a period of 24 years. In addition, we aimed to study how shift work and leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) in midlife predict assignment to MLs trajectories separately for those retired on statutory pensions (SPs) and on disability pensions (DPs). METHODS: Subjects who responded MLs questionnaires (1985-2009, N = 3048) in Finnish Longitudinal Study on Aging Municipal Employees were included in this prospective cohort study. LTPA and shift work were measured during baseline. International Classification of Functioning was used to code MLs. Growth mixture modeling was used to identify the trajectories of MLs. Odds ratio (OR) and their 95% Confidence interval (CI) were assessed by using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified four trajectories of MLs, namely low persistent, low increasing, high decreasing and high persistent. Among the SP recipients, shift work with night shifts was associated with an increased risk (adjusted OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.03-2.14) of belonging to the high persistent MLs trajectory. The inactive LTPA (SP: OR 5.99, 95% CI 3.39-10.58, DP: OR 6.81, 95% CI 2.52-18.43) was similarly associated with high persistent MLs trajectory. CONCLUSION: Nearly two-thirds of the people retired due to disability belonged to high MLs trajectory. High persistent MLs trajectory was associated with physical inactivity in midlife among those retired on SP and on DP. Shift work with night shift predicted high persistent MLs in SP strata. Active involvement in LTPA during midlife could be beneficial to spend MLs free later life.
Subject(s)
Exercise , Leisure Activities , Mobility Limitation , Shift Work Schedule/adverse effects , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Logistic Models , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Shift Work Schedule/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Organisation of working hour schedules in the Northern European countries are rather similar. EU countries are obliged to adopt national legislation regarding duration of weekly working hours and rest periods. Yet, working hour characteristics and schedules are likely to differ with respect to starting times and duration depending e.g. on culture and tradition. Yet, very little is known about potential differences between shifts and schedules across countries among nursing personel. This knowledge is relevant, since the potential differences in working hour characteristics may influence and possibly explain some of the differences observed in studies of health and safety.The aim of the study was to compare characteristics of working hours and work schedules among nursing personel in three Nordic countries: Denmark, Finland and Norway. METHODS: The study populations included nursing personnel holding a ≥ 50% position at public hospitals in Denmark (n = 63,678), Finland (n = 18,257) or Norway (n = 1538) in 2013. Objective payroll based registry data with information on daily starting and ending times were used to compare working hour characteristics e.g. starting time, duration of shift, and quick returns (< 11 h between two shifts), as well as work schedules e.g. permanent or 3-shift work between the three countries. RESULTS: Night shifts generally started earlier and lasted longer in Finland (10-11 h starting at 20:00-22:59) than in Norway (10 h starting at 21:00-21:59) and in Denmark (8 h starting at 23:00-23:59). Very long shifts (≥12 h) were more common in Denmark (12%) compared to Finland (8%) and Norway (3%). More employees had many (> 13/year) quick returns in Norway (64%) and Finland (47%) compared to Denmark (16%). The frequency of 3-shift rotation workers was highest in Norway (41%) and lower in Denmark (22%) and Finland (22%). There were few differences across the countries in terms of early morning shifts and (very) long weekly working hours. CONCLUSION: Despite similar distribution of operational hours among nurses in the three countries, there were differences in working hour characteristics and the use of different types of work schedules. The observed differences may affect health and safety.