ABSTRACT
On May 24, 2016, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene notified CDC of two cases of Exophiala dermatitidis bloodstream infections among patients with malignancies who had received care from a single physician at an outpatient oncology facility (clinic A). Review of January 1-May 31, 2016 microbiology records identified E. dermatitidis bloodstream infections in two additional patients who also had received care at clinic A. All four patients had implanted vascular access ports and had received intravenous (IV) medications, including a compounded IV flush solution containing saline, heparin, vancomycin, and ceftazidime, compounded and administered at clinic A.
Subject(s)
Cross Infection/etiology , Drug Contamination , Fungemia/etiology , Injections, Intravenous/adverse effects , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Cancer Care Facilities , Drug Compounding , Humans , New York CityABSTRACT
An outbreak of severe respiratory illness associated with enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) infection was reported in mid-August 2014 in the United States. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic utility of an EV-D68-specific real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) that was recently developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in clinical samples. Nasopharyngeal (NP) swab specimens from patients in a recent outbreak of respiratory illness in the lower Hudson Valley, New York State, were collected and examined for the presence of human rhinovirus or enterovirus using the FilmArray Respiratory Panel (RP) assay. Samples positive by RP were assessed using EV-D68 rRT-PCR, and the data were compared to results from sequencing analysis of partial VP1 and 5' untranslated region (5'-UTR) sequences of the EV genome. A total of 285 RP-positive NP specimens (260 from the 2014 outbreak and 25 from 2013) were analyzed by rRT-PCR; EV-D68 was detected in 74 of 285 (26.0%) specimens examined. Data for comparisons between rRT-PCR and sequencing analysis were obtained from 194 NP specimens. EV-D68 detection was confirmed by sequencing analysis in 71 of 74 positive and in 1 of 120 randomly selected negative specimens by rRT-PCR. The EV-D68 rRT-PCR showed diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 98.6% and 97.5%, respectively. Our data suggest that the EV-D68 rRT-PCR is a reliable assay for detection of EV-D68 in clinical samples and has a potential to be used as a tool for rapid diagnosis and outbreak investigation of EV-D68-associated infections in clinical and public health laboratories.
Subject(s)
Enterovirus D, Human/genetics , Enterovirus Infections/diagnosis , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Outbreaks , Enterovirus Infections/virology , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Molecular Typing , Nasopharynx/virology , New York , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
We conducted a Markov decision analysis to assess the cost savings associated with a preoperative Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization program on 365 hip and knee arthroplasties and 287 spine fusions. A 2-way sensitivity analysis was also used to calculate the needed reduction in surgical site infections to make the program cost saving. If cost of treating an infected hip or knee arthroplasty is equal to the cost of a primary knee arthroplasty, then the screening program needs to result in a 35% reduction in the revision rate, or a relative revision rate of 65% for patients in the screening program, to be cost saving. For spine fusions, the reduction in the revision rate to make the program cost saving is only 10%. Universal Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization for hip and knee arthroplasty and spinal fusion patients needs to result in only a modest reduction in the surgical site infection rate to be cost saving.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/economics , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/economics , Mass Screening/economics , Spinal Fusion/economics , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Cohort Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Support Techniques , Humans , Joints/microbiology , Markov Chains , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Reoperation/economics , Risk Factors , Staphylococcal Infections/economicsABSTRACT
Surgical site infections are a devastating complication of orthopaedic procedures and result in increased morbidity and mortality as well as higher costs. Universally, patients with surgical site infections have a worse outcome than uninfected patients. Payers of health care and regulatory organizations, such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Joint Commission, are demanding both accountability and a reduction in the occurrence of surgical site infections. To effectively prevent such infections, the clinician must address preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors, along with interventions. In the areas where evidence-based literature demonstrates a clear best practice, such as prophylactic antibiotic use and surgical scrub techniques, physicians and health care professionals will be held accountable for compliance with these standards. This accountability will be quantified and will be made available to the public. It is also evident that payers will reward and/or penalize physicians for failure to comply with established standards of care. For the health and safety of patients, surgeons are obligated to become familiar with the known best practices and standards of care with respect to the reduction of surgical site infections.
Subject(s)
Infection Control/organization & administration , Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects , Perioperative Care/organization & administration , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Humans , Mandatory Reporting , Risk Factors , Surgical Wound Infection/diagnosis , Surgical Wound Infection/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is one of the most important interventions in the quest to eliminate healthcare-associated infections, and rates in healthcare facilities are markedly low. Since hand hygiene observation and feedback are critical to improve adherence, we created an easy-to-use, platform-independent hand hygiene data collection process and an automated, on-demand reporting engine. METHODS: A 3-step approach was used for this project: 1) creation of a data collection form using Google Forms, 2) transfer of data from the form to a spreadsheet using Google Spreadsheets, and 3) creation of an automated, cloud-based analytics platform for report generation using R and RStudio Shiny software. RESULTS: A video tutorial of all steps in the creation and use of this free tool can be found on our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFatMR1rXqU&t. The on-demand reporting tool can be accessed at: https://crsp.louisville.edu/shiny/handhygiene. CONCLUSIONS: This data collection and automated analytics engine provides an easy-to-use environment for evaluating hand hygiene data; it also provides rapid feedback to healthcare workers. By reducing some of the data management workload required of the infection preventionist, more focused interventions may be instituted to increase global hand hygiene rates and reduce infection.
Subject(s)
Data Collection , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Hand Hygiene/statistics & numerical data , Internet , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of Staphylococcus warneri on the hands of nurses and the clinical relevance of this organism among neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study that examined the microbial flora on the hands of nurses and clinical isolates recovered from neonates during a 23-month period (March 1, 2001, through January 31, 2003). SETTING: Two high-risk NICUs in New York City. PARTICIPANTS: All neonates hospitalized in the NICUs for more than 24 hours and all full-time nurses from the same NICUs who volunteered to participate. INTERVENTION: At baseline and then every 3 months, samples for culture were obtained from each nurse's cleaned dominant hand. Pulsed-field electrophoresis compared S. warneri isolates from neonates and staff. RESULTS: Samples for culture (n=834) were obtained from the hands of 119 nurses; 520 (44%) of the 1,195 isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci recovered were identified as S. warneri. Of the 647 clinically relevant isolates recovered from neonates, 17 (8%) of the 202 isolates that were identified to species level were S. warneri. Pulsed-field electrophoresis revealed a common strain of S. warneri that was shared among the nurses and neonates. Furthermore, 117 (23%) of 520 S. warneri isolates from nurses' hands had minimum inhibitory concentrations for vancomycin of 4 mu g/mL, which indicate decreasing susceptibility. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings that S. warneri can be pathogenic in neonates, is a predominant species of coagulase-negative staphylococci cultured from the hands of nurses, and has decreased vancomycin susceptibility underscore the importance of continued surveillance for vancomycin resistance and pathogenicity in pediatric care settings.
Subject(s)
Hand/microbiology , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcus/pathogenicity , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Coagulase , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Molecular Epidemiology , New York City/epidemiology , Prevalence , Species Specificity , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus/classification , Staphylococcus/drug effects , Staphylococcus/genetics , Vancomycin/pharmacology , Vancomycin ResistanceABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To summarize findings from a systematic exploration of existing literature and views regarding interdisciplinarity, to discuss themes and components of such work, and to propose a theoretically based definition of interdisciplinary research. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Two major data sources were used: interviews with researchers from various disciplines, and a systematic review of the education, business, and health care literature from January 1980 through January 2005. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of literature, one-on-one interviews, field test (survey). DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We reviewed 14 definitions of interdisciplinarity, the characteristics of 42 interdisciplinary research publications from multiple fields of study, and 14 researcher interviews to arrive at a preliminary definition of interdisciplinary research. That definition was then field tested by 12 individuals with interdisciplinary research experience, and their responses incorporated into the definition of interdisciplinary research proposed in this paper. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Three key definitional characteristics were identified: the qualitative mode of research (and its theoretical underpinnings), existence of a continuum of synthesis among disciplines, and the desired outcome of the interdisciplinary research. CONCLUSION: Existing literature from several fields did not provide a definition for interdisciplinary research of sufficient specificity to facilitate activities such as identification of the competencies, structure, and resources needed for health care and health policy research. This analysis led to the proposed definition, which is designed to aid decision makers in funding agencies/program committees and researchers to identify and take full advantage the interdisciplinary approach, and to serve as a basis for competency-based formalized training to provide researchers with interdisciplinary skills.
Subject(s)
Interdisciplinary Communication , Research/organization & administration , Cooperative Behavior , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Study of the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control (SENIC) conducted in 1975-1976 is the gold standard for judging the resource needs of infection control departments; however, the scope of responsibilities of infection control and the patient populations served have changed dramatically over the last 30 years. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this paper is to explore the state of the science for performance measurement of infection control departments. METHODS: A search of English language literature was conducted using the PubMed, Medline, and CINAHL databases. The terms "infection control" and "department" along with the words "performance," "measurement," "staffing," "effectiveness," and "requirements" were used to search for relevant articles. Reference lists of selected articles were also searched for other papers of interest. RESULTS: Twelve articles were deemed relevant to infection control department performance since the SENIC study. These fell into four main categories: time management studies, expert opinion, outcome studies, and reports about international infection control departments. CONCLUSION: The SENIC study remains the most thorough assessment of the relationship between infection control department activities and patient outcomes. However, the scope of infection control practice has broadened, and the health care delivery system has changed dramatically since that study was performed. Few new studies have assessed infection control department performance and its relationship to patient outcomes, compliance with accepted standards of patient care, or cost of care. A current assessment of infection control department resources, functions and scope of responsibility linked to patient outcomes and cost is needed to give health care institutions a relevant benchmark for infection control resource needs and the return to be expected from that investment.
Subject(s)
Cross Infection/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/standards , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Expert Testimony , Humans , Infection Control Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Time ManagementABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between registered nurse staffing and healthcare-associated bloodstream infections in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Two level III-IV NICUs in New York, NY, from March 1, 2001, through January 31, 2003. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2675 infants admitted to the NICUs for more than 48 hours and all registered nurses who worked in the same NICUs during the study period. Intervention Hours of care provided by registered nurses. Main Outcome Measure Time to first episode of healthcare-associated bloodstream infection. RESULTS: A total of 224 infants had an infection that met the study definition of healthcare-associated bloodstream infection. In a multivariate analysis, after controlling for infants' intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors, a greater number of hours of care provided by registered nurses in NICU 2 was associated with a decreased risk of bloodstream infection in these infants (hazard ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.79). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that registered nurse staffing is associated with the risk of bloodstream infection in infants in the NICU.
Subject(s)
Cross Infection/prevention & control , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Nursing Staff, Hospital/supply & distribution , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Sepsis/epidemiology , Birth Weight , Catheterization, Central Venous , Cohort Studies , Female , Hand Disinfection/methods , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Nursing Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , Parenteral Nutrition , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , WorkforceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Few recent reports describe the epidemiology and risk factors for health care-associated conjunctivitis among neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients in developed countries. Reporting may be inaccurate in this population given that the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System (NNIS) definition is largely dependent on a positive culture, whereas clinical practice often consists of empiric treatment. OBJECTIVES: We describe the epidemiology of conjunctivitis among neonates in 2 level III-IV NICUs and compare the NNIS definition with our study definition: eye drainage and empiric treatment with or without a culture. METHODS: Patient demographics, clinical, device usage and conjunctivitis data collected prospectively from March 2001 through January 2003 were analyzed. RESULTS: Conjunctivitis occurred in 5% (n = 154/2935) of infants, of whom 51% (n =79) were in NICU 1 and 49% (n =75) in NICU 2. Predominant pathogens included coagulase-negative staphylococci (25%), Staphylococcus aureus (19%) and Klebsiella spp. (10%). Significant predictors of conjunctivitis included low birth weight, use of ventilator or nasal cannula continuous positive airway pressure and study year. Ophthalmologic examination was an additional predictor of infection in NICU 1. Eye examination data were unavailable for NICU 2. Only 62% of cases that met the study definition for conjunctivitis met the NNIS definition, because many infants received empiric treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical conjunctivitis was associated with low birth weight and patient care factors that could lead to contamination of the eye with respiratory tract secretions. The NNIS definition failed to detect 38% of clinical infections. Consideration should be given to revising the definition of conjunctivitis for the NICU population.
Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis, Bacterial , Cross Infection , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Infant, Premature, Diseases , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/epidemiology , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/microbiology , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Cocci/isolation & purification , Humans , Incidence , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Infant, Premature, Diseases/diagnosis , Infant, Premature, Diseases/epidemiology , Infant, Premature, Diseases/microbiology , Population Surveillance , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The genetic relatedness of Staphylococcus epidermidis associated with infections in infants and cultured from the hands of nurses was assessed. METHODS: From March 2001 to January 2002, infections caused by S. epidermidis were prospectively monitored. Participating nurses had hand cultures performed quarterly following hand hygiene. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was performed to determine genetic relatedness of strains from infants and nurses. RESULTS: During the study period, S. epidermidis caused 42 of 143 (29%) and 26 of 100 (26%) infant infections and was cultured from the clean hands of 51 of 61 (84%) and 53 of 58 (91%) nurses in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)-1 and NICU-2, respectively. Fifty-eight clones of S. epidermidis were identified among 173 isolates typed: 38 of 173 isolates (22%) were unique clones detected in a single infant (n=10) or nurse (n=28); 42 of 173 (24%) isolates were defined as belonging to small cluster clones (n=15), ie, were detected in 2 to 4 nurses and/or infants; and 93 of 173 (54%) isolates belonged to large cluster clones (n=4), ie, detected in 7 to 64 nurses and/or infants. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggested that most S. epidermidis isolates were shared between infants and nurses. Hand hygiene alone is inadequate to prevent S. epidermidis infections, and additional strategies are needed to prevent cross transmission in NICU populations.
Subject(s)
Cross Infection/microbiology , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus epidermidis/genetics , Carrier State/microbiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Genetic Variation , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus epidermidis/drug effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pneumonia surveillance is difficult and time-consuming. The definition is complicated, and there are many opportunities for subjectivity in determining infection status. OBJECTIVE: To compare traditional infection control professional (ICP) surveillance for pneumonia among neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients with computerized surveillance of chest x-ray reports using an automated detection system based on a natural language processor. METHODS: This system evaluated chest x-rays from 2 NICUs over a 2-year period. It flagged x-rays indicative of pneumonia according to rules derived from the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System definition as applied to radiology reports. Data from the automated system were compared with pneumonia data collected prospectively by an ICP. RESULTS: Sensitivity of the computerized surveillance in NICU 1 was 71%, and specificity was 99.8%. The positive predictive value was 7.9%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was >99%. Data from NICU 2 were incomplete. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-assisted surveillance has the potential to decrease ICP workload and make pneumonia surveillance feasible. The high NPV means the system can safely screen out many chest x-rays of noninfected patients. However, all data must be available to the computer system and must be analyzed the same way for results to be comparable.
Subject(s)
Cross Infection/diagnosis , Infection Control/methods , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Medical Informatics Applications , Natural Language Processing , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Computers , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Population Surveillance , Predictive Value of Tests , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga, recommend use of waterless alcohol hand products in lieu of traditional handwashing for patient care, but there are few data demonstrating the impact of this recommendation on health care-associated infections. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of 2 hand hygiene regimens on infection rates and skin condition and microbial counts of nurses' hands in neonatal intensive care units. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Clinical trial using a crossover design in 2 neonatal intensive care units in Manhattan, NY, from March 1, 2001, to January 31, 2003, including 2932 neonatal hospital admissions (51 760 patient days) and 119 nurse participants. INTERVENTION: Two hand hygiene products were tested: a traditional antiseptic handwash and an alcohol hand sanitizer. Each product was used for 11 consecutive months in each neonatal intensive care unit in random order. RESULTS: After adjusting for study site, birth weight, surgery, and follow-up time, there were no significant differences in neonatal infections between the 2 products; odds ratios for alcohol compared with handwashing were 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-1.25) for any infection, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.77-1.33) for bloodstream infections, 1.61 (95% CI, 0.57-5.54) for pneumonia, 1.78 (95% CI, 0.94-3.37) for skin and soft tissue infections, and 1.26 (95% CI, 0.42-3.76) for central nervous system infections. The skin condition of participating nurses was significantly improved during the alcohol phase (P = .02 and P = .049 for observer and self-assessments, respectively), but there were no significant differences in mean microbial counts on nurses' hands (3.21 and 3.11 log(10) colony-forming units for handwashing and alcohol, respectively; P = .38). CONCLUSIONS: Infection rates and microbial counts on nurses' hands were equivalent during handwashing and alcohol phases, and nurses' skin condition was improved using alcohol. However, assessing the impact on infection rates of a single intervention is challenging because of multiple contributory factors such as patient risk, unit design, and staff behavior. Other practices such as frequency and quality of hand hygiene are likely to be as important as product in reducing risk of cross-transmission.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Ethanol/administration & dosage , Hand Disinfection/methods , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Adult , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/adverse effects , Chlorhexidine/adverse effects , Epidemiologic Methods , Ethanol/adverse effects , Female , Hand/microbiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , MaleABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Bloodstream infections caused by Gram-negative bacilli are a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality in infants in neonatal intensive care units. This study describes the species of Gram-negative bacilli causing bloodstream infections in two neonatal intensive care units, compares characteristics of catheter-related and non-catheter-related bloodstream infections, and compares species and antibiotic resistance patterns of these organisms with those isolated from the hands of nurses working in the same neonatal intensive care units. DESIGN: Interventional study. SETTING: Two high-risk neonatal intensive care units. PATIENTS: Neonates hospitalized for >or =24 hrs. INTERVENTIONS: Prospective surveillance for bloodstream infections was performed in two neonatal intensive care units from March 2001 to January 2003. Hand cultures were obtained quarterly from participating nurses immediately after they performed hand hygiene. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 298 episodes of bloodstream infections among 2,935 admissions (5.75 episodes per 1,000 patient-days); 77 of 298 (26%) episodes were caused by Gram-negative bacilli. Among these, 47 (61.0%) were catheter-related bloodstream infections (2.61 episodes per 1,000 catheter-days). Eleven and 24 Gram-negative bacilli species were isolated from neonates and nurses, respectively. The most common Gram-negative bacilli causing bloodstream infections were Klebsiella pneumoniae (38.7%), Escherichia coli (21.2%), Enterobacter cloacae (11.2%), and Serratia marcescens (11.2%). In contrast, Acinetobacter lwoffi (18.1%), K. pneumoniae (11.7%), E. cloacae (10.6%), K. oxytoca (10.6%), and Pseudomonas spp. (7.4%) were most commonly isolated from hands of nurses. E. coli, P. aeruginosa, E. cloacae, and E. aerogenes were significantly more likely to cause bloodstream infections than to be isolated from nurses' hands (all p < .001). Although 39% of bloodstream infections were non-catheter-related, there were no significant differences in types of organisms or antimicrobial resistance patterns between catheter-related bloodstream infections and non-catheter-related bloodstream infections (all p > or = .35). Resistance patterns were similar between Gram-negative bacilli isolates from neonates and nurses' hands except for a significantly higher proportion of resistance to cefotaxime and gentamicin among neonatal isolates of K. pneumoniae (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Gram-negative bacilli species isolated from neonatal bloodstream infections and nurses' hands varied significantly. Clean hands of providers are an unlikely source of endemic Gram-negative bacilli, suggesting that prevention strategies should focus more on control of endogenous neonatal flora or environmental sources.
Subject(s)
Bacteremia/etiology , Catheterization/adverse effects , Cross Infection/etiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/etiology , Hand/microbiology , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/prevention & control , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Hand Disinfection , Humans , Infant, Newborn , New York City/epidemiology , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The study's objective was to assess predictors of surgical site infection (SSI) after cardiac surgery and the relationship of perioperative nasal carriage of Staphylococcus species with the development of SSI. METHODS: Surveillance for infections was performed, and anterior nares cultures of patients who underwent cardiac surgery were obtained. Preoperative risk factors were analyzed, and staphylococcal isolates from nares and SSI were compared using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. RESULTS: Twelve patients had 14 SSIs (5.7 infections/100 surgeries). Two risk factors were significantly associated with SSI: smoking (P = .002, confidence interval(95) 1.1-1.4, relative risk = 1.3) and increased body mass index (P = .003, confidence interval(95) 2.8-99.8, relative risk = 16.8). A total of 5 of 8 infected patients (62.5%) for whom nares cultures were available had identical strains in their nares and SSI. CONCLUSION: Smoking and body mass index were predictors of SSI. Approximately 2 of 3 infected patients for whom nares cultures were obtained had an SSI that was likely from an endogenous source.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Nose/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus/isolation & purification , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Aged , Body Mass Index , Carrier State/microbiology , Confidence Intervals , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & controlABSTRACT
This glossary of terms is a primer on the vocabulary information technology professionals use and with which infection preventionists should be familiar. The author's comments are in italics.
Subject(s)
Medical Informatics , Terminology as Topic , Humans , Infection Control Practitioners/educationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We previously reported a significant decrease in hospital-acquired (HA) Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) coincident with the introduction of pulsed xenon ultraviolet light for room disinfection (UVD). The purpose of this study was to evaluate CDI cases in greater detail to understand the effect of UVD. METHODS: CDI rates (HA and community acquired [CA]), CDI patient length of stay, room occupancy, and number of days between a CDI case in a room and an HA CDI case in the same room were studied for the first year of UVD compared with the 1-year period pre-UVD. RESULTS: Compared with pre-UVD, during UVD, HA CDI was 22% less (P = .06). There was a 70% decrease for the adult intensive care units (ICUs) (P < .001), where the percentage of room discharges with UVD was greater (P < .001). During UVD, CA CDI increased by 18%, and length of stay of all CDI cases was lower because of the greater proportion of CA CDI. No significant difference was found in days to HA CDI in rooms with a prior CDI occupant. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that UVD contributed to a reduction in ICU-acquired CDI where UVD was used for a larger proportion of discharges. Evaluation of UVD should include data for hospitalized CA CDI cases because these cases may impact the HA CDI rate.