Evaluation and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis with Advanced Imaging.

A high clinical suspicion in the setting of appropriate history, physical exam, laboratory, and imaging parameters is often required to set the groundwork for diagnosis and management. Echocardiography may show septal thinning, evidence of systolic and diastolic dysfunction, along with impaired global longitudinal strain. Cardiac MRI reveals late gadolinium enhancement along with evidence of myocardial edema and inflammation on T2 weighted imaging and parametric mapping. 18F-FDG PET detects the presence of active inflammation and the presence of scar. Involvement of the right ventricle on MRI or PET confers a high risk for adverse cardiac events and mortality.

Gender-specific outcomes after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: A nationwide readmission database analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Thromboembolism-associated stroke is the most feared complication of atrial fibrillation (AF). Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (pLAAC) is indicated for stroke prevention in patients with AF who can not tolerate long-term anticoagulation. We aim to study gender differences in peri-procedural and readmissions outcomes in pLAAC patients. METHODS: Using the national readmission database from January 2016 to December 2018, AF patients undergoing the pLAAC procedure were identified. We used multivariate logistic regression analyses and time-to-event Cox regression analyses to conduct the study. Propensity matching with the Greedy method was done for the accuracy of results. RESULT: A total of 28 819 patients were included in our study. Among them 11 946 (41.5%) were women and 16 873 (58.6%) were men. The mean age of overall population was 76.1 ± 8.5 years, with women ~1 year older than men. The overall rate of complications was higher in women (8.6% vs. 6.6%, p < .001), primarily driven by bleeding-related complications, that is, major bleed (odds ratio [OR]: 1.32 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.69, p = .029), blood transfusion (OR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.06-1.97, p = .019), and cardiac tamponade (OR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.13-2.89, p = .014). Women had two times higher peri-procedural ischemic stroke. There was no difference in peri-procedural mortality. Women remained at 20% and 13% higher risk for readmission at 30 days and 6 months of discharge. CONCLUSION: Women had higher peri-procedural complications and were at higher risk of readmissions at 30 days and 6 months. However, there was no difference in mortality during the index hospitalization. Further studies are necessary to determine causality.

Outcomes of rotational atherectomy followed by cutting balloon versus plain balloon before drug-eluting stent implantation for calcified coronary lesions: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of rotational atherectomy and cutting balloon (RACB) versus rotational atherectomy and plain balloon (RAPB) before drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in calcified coronary lesions. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies comparing RACB with RAPB were identified through a systematic search of published literature across multiple databases. Random effect meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcome between the two groups. RESULTS: Four studies were included in the meta-analysis (three observational and one RCT) involving a total of 315 patients. 166 patients had RACB, and 149 patients had RAPB before DES placement with a median follow-up of 11.5 months. Compared with patients who had RAPB there was no difference in MACE (composite of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-2.18], slow flow/no reflow (OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.23-2.16), all-cause mortality (OR: 2.02; 95% CI: 0.28-14.60), and device success rate (OR: 1.79; 95% CI: 0.28-11.18) in the RACB approach. There was a benefit towards less target lesion revascularization in the RACB group; however, this outcome was reported in two studies (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.08-0.99). On meta-regression there was no association between age, sex, diabetes, or lesion location with MACE and all-cause mortality. The studies were homogenous across all outcomes. CONCLUSION: RACB, as compared with RAPB, had a similar risk of MACE, all-cause mortality, device success, and complication, but a lower risk of target lesion revascularization.

Readmission following urgent transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus urgent balloon aortic valvuloplasty in patients with decompensated heart failure or cardiogenic shock.

BACKGROUND: Urgent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a feasible option for aortic stenosis (AS) patients with decompensated heart failure (HF) and cardiogenic shock (CS) as compared to the more traditional urgent balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV). OBJECTIVES: We conducted a retrospective analysis to compare risk and cause of readmission in these two high-risk groups. METHODS: Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) 2011-2014 was retrospectively analyzed to identify patients with AS having either urgent TAVI or urgent BAV using appropriate ICD-9 codes. Propensity scores were used to match patients with urgent TAVI as compared to patients with urgent BAV. Statistical analysis was performed using the Stata 15.1 software. RESULTS: We identified a weighted sample of 6,670 patients with urgent BAV and 6,964 patients with urgent TAVI. The all-cause 30- and 90-day readmission was lower in the urgent TAVI group compared to urgent BAV (15.4 vs. 22.5%, (aHR): 0.92 [0.90-0.95] p < .001). 30-day readmission due to CV cause and HF was also lower in the urgent TAVI group (aHR, 0.93: p < .001 and aHR, 0.98: p = .040, respectively). The 30-day gastrointestinal (GI) bleed readmission rate was three times higher in urgent TAVI group (aHR, 3.00:95% CI (1.23-7.33), p = .016), but was not statistically significant at 90-days. Cardiac causes of readmission were the predominant cause of readmission in both groups, but more pronounced in urgent BAV group (60.3 vs. 40.5%, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Urgent TAVI appears beneficial in patients with AS and decompensated HF or CS driven by roughly 10 and 25% reductions in overall readmissions at 30 and 90 days, and marked reductions in reintervention, although offset partially by higher risk of readmission due to GI bleeding at 30 days.

30-day readmission following urgent and elective transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A Nationwide Readmission Database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is being increasingly used for decompensated severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Data on urgent and elective TAVR readmission is scarce in the literature. Here, we have performed a retrospective cohort study with the Nationwide Readmission Database of 2016 to identify the rate of 30-day all-cause readmission, common causes of readmission, and distribution of morbidity in index admission and readmission after urgent and elective TAVR. METHODS: We used International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes (02R.F38H, 02R.F38Z, 02R.F48Z) for identification of all TAVR procedures done in 2016 in patients >18 years old. We found 8379 patients who underwent urgent TAVR and 32,006 patients who underwent elective TAVR in 2016. RESULT: The mean age of patients undergoing urgent TAVR was 79 ± 9.97 years with 44.6% women. The mean age of patients undergoing elective TAVR was 80.7 ± 8.25 years with 46.2% women. We found the 30-day all-cause readmission rate of 15.5% and 9.5% in patients undergoing urgent and elective TAVR, respectively (p < 0.001). The cardiac cause was the predominant cause of readmission in both groups (43.77% vs. 42.11%, p = 0.57), followed by pulmonary cause, gastrointestinal (GI) cause, and renal cause. Among cardiac causes, congestive heart failure (CHF) was predominant cause of readmission and was similar in both groups (18.73 in urgent TAVR vs. 15.73 in elective TAVR, p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: We found that the all-cause 30-day readmission rate was higher in patients who had undergone urgent TAVR. Further studies are needed to better understand this difference.

Impact of right ventricular failure on the outcomes of acute inferior wall myocardial infarction.

Aim: Right ventricular failure (RVF) complicates 30-50% of cases with inferior wall myocardial infarctions (IWMI). Large-scale studies exploring the recent trends in morbidity and mortality of IWMI with RVF in the context of improved reperfusion strategies are currently lacking. Materials & methods: The International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes were used to query the National Inpatient Sample of 2018-2019 to yield IWMI admissions and stratified based on presence of RVF. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Results: Out of the 182,485 weighed hospital admissions for IWMI, 1005 patients (0.6%) also had RVF. Patients with both IWMI and RVF had significantly higher mortality than patients with IWMI and no RVF (p < 0.001). Conclusion: RVF in patients with IWMI is an independent predictor of poor outcomes.

What is this article about? Right ventricular failure (RVF) refers to a condition in which the right ventricle is unable to pump blood to the left side of the heart. Up to 30­50% of patients with heart attacks, commonly known as acute myocardial infarction, affecting the back or the inferior wall of the heart (IWMI) can develop RVF. Research studies assessing the outcomes of patients with IWMI and RVF were done either in a small number of patients or done during the time when the current standard of acute myocardial infarction care was not the standard of care. Therefore, we conducted a study to assess the clinical outcomes of patients with IWMI and RVF in contemporary times.What are the results? We found that among all patients with IWMI, only about 0.6% had evidence of RVF. However, these patients were older and much more likely to have a higher burden of chronic medical problems and were less likely to have received angioplasty to open blocked arteries when compared with patients with IWMI and no RVF. Patients with IWMI and RVF were noticed to have a higher rate of death during hospitalization.What do the results mean? Patients with IWMI and RVF, when compared with patients with IWMI and no RVF, had significantly higher rates of various complications and death.

Catheter Ablation for Channelopathies: When Is Less More?

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is a common cause of sudden cardiac death in patients with channelopathies, particularly in the young population. Although pharmacological treatment, cardiac sympathectomy, and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) have been the mainstay in the management of VF in patients with channelopathies, they are associated with significant adverse effects and complications, leading to poor quality of life. Given these drawbacks, catheter ablation has been proposed as a therapeutic option for patients with channelopathies. Advances in imaging techniques and modern mapping technologies have enabled increased precision in identifying arrhythmia triggers and substrate modification. This has aided our understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of ventricular arrhythmias in channelopathies, highlighting the roles of the Purkinje network and the epicardial right ventricular outflow tract in arrhythmogenesis. This review explores the role of catheter ablation in managing the most common channelopathies (Brugada syndrome, congenital long QT syndrome, short QT syndrome, and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia). While the initial results for ablation in Brugada syndrome are promising, the long-term efficacy and durability of ablation in different channelopathies require further investigation. Given the genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity of channelopathies, future studies are needed to show whether catheter ablation in patients with channelopathies is associated with a reduction in VF, and psychological distress stemming from recurrent ICD shocks, particularly relative to other available therapeutic options (e.g., quinidine in high-risk Brugada patients).

Expanding Indications of Nonvitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Beyond Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism: A Review of Emerging Clinical Evidence.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have emerged as a new therapy for patients who need and can tolerate oral anticoagulation. DOACs were initially approved for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and treatment for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Ease of administration, no requirement of bridging with other anticoagulants, and less frequent dosing have made DOACs preferable choice for anticoagulation. Studies are showing promising results regarding use of DOACs beyond the common indications. Studies have been done to show the potential benefit of DOACs in valvular atrial fibrillation, heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease. Data have shown safety as well as comparable bleeding incidences with DOACs compared to vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants. Naturally interest is growing to see the use of DOACs apart from the NVAF, DVT, or PE. Authors have highlighted various study results to show the potential beneficial role of DOACs in the above-mentioned situations.

Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of right ventricular failure: A state of the art review of mechanical support devices.

The function of the right ventricle (RV) is to drive the forward flow of blood to the pulmonary system for oxygenation before returning to the left ventricle. Due to the thin myocardium of the RV, its function is easily affected by decreased preload, contractile motion abnormalities, or increased afterload. While various etiologies can lead to changes in RV structure and function, sudden changes in RV afterload can cause acute RV failure which is associated with high mortality. Early detection and diagnosis of RV failure is imperative for guiding initial medical management. Echocardiographic findings of reduced tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (<1.7) and RV wall motion (RV S' <10 cm/s) are quantitatively supportive of RV systolic dysfunction. Medical management commonly involves utilizing diuretics or fluids to optimize RV preload, while correcting the underlying insult to RV function. When medical management alone is insufficient, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) may be necessary. However, the utility of MCS for isolated RV failure remains poorly understood. This review outlines the differences in flow rates, effects on hemodynamics, and advantages/disadvantages of MCS devices such as intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, centrifugal-flow right ventricular assist devices, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and includes a detailed review of the latest clinical trials and studies analyzing the effects of MCS devices in acute RV failure.

SGLT2 inhibitors in hypertension: Role beyond diabetes and heart failure.

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a pandemic that affects millions of patients worldwide. Diabetes affects multiple organ systems leading to comorbidities including hypertension. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) recently have been approved for the treatment of T2DM and heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction. Retrospective analyses of clinical trials have noted SGLT2 inhibitors to have a promising effect on blood pressure. Moreover, the observed blood pressure reduction is not just an acute effect of treatment initiation but has been shown to have a long-term impact on both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The mechanism of action leading to the blood pressure reduction is still unclear; however, proposed mechanisms are related to the natriuretic effect, modification of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, and/or the reduction in the sympathetic nervous system, SGLT2i should be considered as second-line medication in those patients with diabetes or heart disease and concomitant hypertension. This article reviews the pharmacology, side effect profile, and clinical trials surrounding the use of SGLT2i for the treatment of hypertension.

Impact of COVID-19 on Patients Hospitalized With Deep Vein Thrombosis and/or Pulmonary Embolism: A Nationwide Analysis.

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection predisposes patients to develop deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). In this study, we compared the in-hospital outcomes of patients with DVT and/or PE with concurrent COVID-19 infection vs those with concurrent flu infection. The National Inpatient Sample from 2019 to 2020 was analyzed to identify all adult admissions diagnosed with DVT and PE. These patients were then stratified based on whether they had concomitant COVID-19 or flu. We identified 62,895 hospitalizations with the diagnosis of DVT and/or PE with concomitant COVID-19, and 8155 hospitalizations with DVT and/or PE with concomitant flu infection. After 1:1 propensity score match, the incidence of cardiac arrest and inpatient mortality were higher in the COVID-19 group. The incidence of cardiogenic shock was higher in the flu group. Increased age, Hispanic race, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, arrhythmia, liver disease, coagulopathy, and rheumatologic diseases were the independent predictors of mortality in patients with DVT and/or PE with concomitant COVID-19.

COVID-19, Heart Failure Hospitalizations, and Outcomes: A Nationwide Analysis.

Heart Failure (HF) patients are at a higher risk of adverse events associated with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Large population-based reports of the impact of COVID-19 on patients hospitalized with HF are limited. The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for HF admissions during 2020 in the United States (US), with and without a diagnosis of COVID-19 based on ICD-10-CM U07. Propensity score matching was used to match patients across age, race, sex, and comorbidities. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of mortality. A weighted total of 1,110,085 hospitalizations for HF were identified of which 7,905 patients (0.71%) had a concomitant diagnosis of COVID-19. After propensity matching, HF patients with COVID-19 had higher rate of in-hospital mortality (8.2% vs 3.7%; odds ratio [OR]: 2.33 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.69, 3.21]; P< 0.001), cardiac arrest (2.9% vs 1.1%, OR 2.21 [95% CI: 1.24,3.93]; P<0.001), and pulmonary embolism (1.0% vs 0.4%; OR 2.68 [95% CI: 1.05, 6.90]; P = 0.0329). During hospitalizations for HF, COVID-19 was also found to be an independent predictor of mortality. Further, increasing age, arrythmias, and chronic kidney disease were independent predictors of mortality in HF patients with COVID-19. COVID-19 is associated with increased in-hospital mortality, longer hospital stays, higher cost of hospitalization and increased risk of adverse outcomes in patients admitted with HF.

Present Knowledge on Direct Oral Anticoagulant and Novel Oral Anti Coagulants and Their Specific Antidotes: A Comprehensive Review Article.

Thromboembolic diseases are one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. For a long time, heparin and Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) drugs were used for treatment and prophylaxis of the thromboembolic diseases. The development of newer direct and novel oral anticoagulant medications (DOACs/NOACs) has changed clinical practice significantly. Lesser monitoring, ease with dosing, less drug interactions have made these drugs useful to the providers and the patients. But these drugs have bleeding as a side effect. There is ongoing research on the specific antidotes of these anticoagulants in case of life-threatening bleeding. Though the use of the DOACs and NOACs have increased, there is still not enough clinical evidence about the specific antidotes of these medications. Unlike heparin or VKA, reversal of life-threatening bleeding in the setting of DOAC use is still a clinical challenge. We need more data on the dose, pharmacokinetics, and clinical efficacy of those antidotes. Authors have reviewed articles on DOACs and their antidotes in Pubmed and also in the clinical trial website. Specific antidotes including Idarucizumab for Dabigatran, Andexanet alfa for factor Xa inhibitors are being used to reverse the actions of the anticoagulants. Ciraparantag is a universal antidote for the DOACs, which is still under investigation. FXaI16L is currently being investigated as a potential universal antidote for multiple anticoagulants, including dabigatran and rivaroxaban. Though mostly safe, the use of DOACs can still carry a risk of severe bleeding in patients. More data on the use of the antidotes is required to reverse the side effect of DOACs if clinically indicated.

Biomarkers as Prognostic Markers for Aortic Stenosis: A Review.

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most frequent valvular heart disease among the older individuals. Current guidelines indicate intervention for patients with symptomatic or fast progressive severe AS and asymptomatic patients with a reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction by 50%. Interestingly, myocardial damage may have already happened by the time symptoms appear or LV function deteriorates. Serum biomarkers can be an early indicator to show LV function decline and AS progression even before clinical symptom onset. Studies have shown that cardiac biomarkers have prognostic value in patients with AS. Hence, cardiac biomarkers can be helpful in determining the optimum time to intervene. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is a less invasive alternative to conventional surgical aortic valve replacement. The elevation of cardiac biomarkers at discharge has been associated with 2-year mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. The correlation between biomarkers and AS-associated morbidity and mortality is an area to explore further. The authors of this review article have discussed the role of cardiac biomarkers in patients with AS for better risk stratification and identification of patients who would benefit from early intervention.

Trends in the Prevalence of Infiltrative Cardiomyopathy Among Patients With in-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Sarcoidosis, amyloidosis, hemochromatosis and scleroderma are the most forms of infiltrative/nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) associated with sudden cardiac death. In patients who undergo in-hospital cardiac arrest, a high index of suspicion is required to rule out NICM as an underlying contributor. We aimed to analyze the prevalence of NICM among patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest and identify factors associated with increased mortality. We analyzed data from the National Inpatient Sample, and identified patients who were hospitalized across 10 years from 2010 to 2019 with a diagnosis of cardiac arrest and NICM. The total number of patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest was 19,34,260. The total number with NICM was 14,803 (0.77%). Mean age was 63 years. Overall prevalence of NICM across the years ranged between 0.75% to 0.9%, with a significant temporal increase (P < 0.01). Incidence of in-hospital mortality ranged between 61% to 76% for females and 30% to 38% for males. The following comorbidities were more prevalent in patients with NICM than those without: heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease, anemia, malignancy, coagulopathy, ventricular tachycardia, acute kidney injury and stroke. The following factors were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality-age, female gender, Hispanic race, history of COPD and presence of malignancy (P = 0.042). The prevalence of infiltrative cardiomyopathy in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest is increasing. Females, older patients and Hispanic population are at an increased risk of mortality. Sex and race-based disparities in the prevalence of NICM in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest is an area of further research.

A Comparison of COVID-19 and Influenza-Associated Myocarditis: A Nationwide Study in the United States.

We aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of adult patients hospitalized with myocarditis and either concomitant corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) or influenza, and elucidate clinical predictors associated with adverse outcomes in both groups. The study used the national inpatient sample (NIS) from 2019 to 2020 to identify 27,725 adult myocarditis hospitalizations, of which 5840 had concomitant COVID-19 and 1045 had concomitant influenza. After propensity score matching, the in-hospital mortality from myocarditis was significantly higher in COVID-19 compared to influenza. Patients with myocarditis and COVID-19 were more likely to have cardiovascular comorbidities and be older than those with influenza-associated myocarditis. Predictors of mortality were also different in both groups.

Incidence, predictors and outcomes of new onset systolic heart failure following orthotopic liver transplant: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: New onset Systolic heart failure (SHF), characterized by new onset left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction with a reduction in ejection fraction (EF) of <40%, is a common cause of morbidity and mortality among Orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence, the pre-transplant predictors, and the prognostic impact of SHF post-OLT. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature using electronic databases MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase for studies reporting acute systolic heart failure post-liver transplant from inception to August 2021. RESULT: Of 2604 studies, 13 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final systematic review. The incidence of new-onset SHF post OLT ranged from 1.2% to 14%. Race, sex, or body mass index did not significantly impact the post-OLT SHF incidence. Alcoholic liver cirrhosis, pre-transplant systolic or diastolic dysfunction, troponin, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) elevation, and hyponatremia were noted to be significantly associated with the development of SHF post-OLT. The significance of MELD score in the development of post-OLT SHF is controversial. Pre-transplant beta-blocker and post-transplant tacrolimus use were associated with a lower risk of developing SHF. The average 1-year mortality rate in patients with SHF post-OLT ranged from 0.00% to 35.2%. CONCLUSION: Despite low incidence, SHF post-OLT can lead to higher mortality. Further studies are required to fully understand the underlying mechanism and risk factors.

Incidence and Prognostic Implications of Cardiac-Implantable Device-Associated Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression Analysis.

New-onset or worsening tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a well-established complication encountered after cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). However, there are limited and conflicting data on the true incidence and prognostic implications of this complication. This study aimed to bridge this current gap in the literature. Electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception to March 2023, for studies reporting the incidence and/or prognosis of CIED-associated new or worsening TR. Potentially eligible studies were screened and selected according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A random effect model meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis were performed, and I-squared statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. A total of 52 eligible studies, with 130,759 patients were included in the final quantitative analysis with a mean follow-up period of 25.5 months. The mean age across included studies was 69.35 years, and women constituted 46.6% of the study population. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 50.15%. The incidence of CIED-associated TR was 24% (95% confidence interval [CI] 20% to 28%, p <0.001) with an odds ratio of 2.44 (95% CI 1.58 to 3.77, p <0.001). CIED-associated TR was independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.52, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.69, p <0.001), heart failure (HF) hospitalizations (aHR 1.82, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.78, p = 0.006), and the composite of mortality and HF hospitalizations (aHR 1.96, 95% CI 1.33 to 2.87, p = 0.001) in the follow-up period. In conclusion, CIED-associated TR occurred in nearly one-fourth of patients after device implantation and was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalizations.

Recent Advances and Future Prospects of Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension.

Pulmonary hypertension is one of the difficult situations to treat. Complex pathophysiology, association of the multiple comorbidities make clinical scenario challenging. Recently it is being shown that patients who had recovered from coronavirus disease infection, are at risk of developing pulmonary hypertension. Studies on animals have been going on to find out newer treatment options. There are recent advancements in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Role of anticoagulation, recombinant fusion proteins, stem cell therapy are emerging as therapeutic options for affected patients. SGLT2 inhibitors have potential to have beneficial effects on pulmonary hypertension. Apart from the medical managements, advanced interventions are also getting popular. In this review article, the authors have discussed pathophysiology, recent advancement of treatments including coronavirus disease patients, and future aspect of managing pulmonary hypertension. We have highlighted treatment options for patients with sleep apnea, interstitial lung disease to discuss the challenges and possible options to manage those patients.