Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; : 10781552241264817, 2024 Jul 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39043219

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Real-world safety outcomes between the two flat-dose nivolumab regimens demonstrated to be similar in a study of adjuvant nivolumab recipients for melanoma. However, this study was limited by a single oncology patient population, a small sample size, and insufficient study power. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of immunotherapy-related adverse effects (irAEs) between nivolumab regimens with differing dosing patterns in various solid tumor patient populations. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort study of adult patients with solid tumor malignancies who received nivolumab 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W, or who were transitioned from 240 mg Q2W to 480 mg Q4W from March 1, 2018 to March 31, 2022 were selected for analysis from an electronic health record generated report. The primary endpoint evaluated was the incidence of irAEs. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of significant irAEs and reasons for treatment discontinuation. These endpoints were compared by univariate analysis between all three cohorts. A multivariate analysis was then conducted for the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Nivolumab 240 mg Q2W was associated with a statistically significant increase in the incidence of colitis whereas the 480 mg Q4W regimen was associated with a statistically significant increase in the incidence of pruritis. The incidence of irAEs was not different between the three cohorts, while the incidence of significant irAEs was higher in the 240 mg Q2W and 240 mg Q2W to 480 mg Q4W cohorts. CONCLUSION: Clinicians ought to be aware of differences in the irAE profiles between nivolumab regimens with differing dosing patterns.

2.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 202: 110776, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37311494

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment and more patients are receiving ICIs than before. Although this has improved cancer care but so has the increase in the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) including endocrinopathies. ICI-induced diabetes mellitus (DM) is a rare irAE with an approximate incidence of 1%. Due to paucity of data in literature about ICI-induced DM, we conducted a study to report the incidence and characteristics of new onset and worsening of DM in patients treated with ICIs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who received ICIs during 10-year period. We identified patients with newly diagnosed DM and worsening of preexisting DM. FINDINGS: Among 2,477 patients who received one or multiple ICIs, 14 patients developed new onset DM and 11 patients experienced worsening of pre-existing DM. Median time to new onset or worsening DM from ICI treatment initiation was âˆ¼ 12 weeks. Median hemoglobin A1c was 6.2% at baseline and 8.5% at the onset of ICI-induced DM. Seven patients presented with diabetes ketoacidosis (DKA), all in the new onset group. (p = 0.02) No significant difference was observed between two groups regarding personal history of autoimmune disorder or family history of DM. (p greater than 0.05) Positive autoantibodies were found in three patients [two with Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD65) antibodies and one with insulin autoantibodies (IAA)]. INTERPRETATION: The incidence of new onset and worsening DM in patients treated with ICIs was 1.01%.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Ketoacidosis , Neoplasms , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/chemically induced , Autoantibodies , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology
3.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 18(5): 335-351, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35133862

ABSTRACT

Cutaneous melanoma remains the most lethal of the primary cutaneous neoplasms, and although the incidence of primary melanoma continues to rise, the mortality from metastatic disease remains unchanged, in part through advances in treatment. Major developments in immunomodulatory and targeted therapies have provided robust improvements in response and survival trends that have transformed the clinical management of patients with metastatic melanoma. Additional advances in immunologic and cancer cell biology have contributed to further optimization in (1) risk stratification, (2) prognostication, (3) treatment, (4) toxicity management, and (5) surveillance approaches for patients with an advanced melanoma diagnosis. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the historical and future advances regarding the translational and clinical implications of advanced melanoma and share multidisciplinary recommendations to aid clinicians in the navigation of current treatment approaches for a variety of patient cohorts.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/therapy , Skin Neoplasms/therapy
4.
J Immunother Cancer ; 9(6)2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34172516

ABSTRACT

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard of care for the treatment of several cancers. While these immunotherapies have improved patient outcomes in many clinical settings, they bring accompanying risks of toxicity, specifically immune-related adverse events (irAEs). There is a need for clear, effective guidelines for the management of irAEs during ICI treatment, motivating the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) to convene an expert panel to develop a clinical practice guideline. The panel discussed the recognition and management of single and combination ICI irAEs and ultimately developed evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to assist medical professionals in clinical decision-making and to improve outcomes for patients.


Subject(s)
Guidelines as Topic/standards , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Immunotherapy/methods , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Societies, Medical/standards , Humans , Neoplasms/immunology
5.
Immunotherapy ; 12(2): 141-149, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32064978

ABSTRACT

Aim: Patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) are frequently on other medications for co-morbidities. We explored the impact of concomitant medication use on outcomes. Materials & methods: 210 metastatic cancer patients on CPI were identified and association between concomitant medication use and immune-related adverse events with clinical outcomes was determined. Results: Aspirin, metformin, ß-blockers and statins were not shown to have any statistically significant difference on clinical benefit. 26.3% patients with clinical benefit developed rash versus 11.8% without clinical benefit (p < 0.05) on multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Use of common prescription and nonprescription medications in patients with multiple co-morbidities appears safe and does not have an adverse effect on CPI efficacy. The presence of rash predicted for a better response.


Subject(s)
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Polypharmacy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Immunologic Factors/immunology , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Immunotherapy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
6.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(44): e17769, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31689840

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: The treatment of metastatic melanoma has been revolutionized in the past decade because of the development of immunotherapies and targeted therapies. Despite these developments, there is still an unmet clinical need for more advanced combination therapies for the subset of patients who remain resistant to immunotherapy or targeted therapy alone. To our knowledge, no reports have been published on combinations of PD-1 blockades and c-KIT inhibitors in melanoma patients. Furthermore, data are limited regarding the safety and efficacy of this combination in patients harboring KIT mutations. PATIENT CONCERNS AND DIAGNOSIS: We report a case of an 82-year-old female with metastatic melanoma who was found to have double KIT mutations at V559 and N822I. INTERVENTIONS: She was treated with a combination of c-KIT inhibitor and PD-1 blockade after being resistant to anti-PD-1 monotherapy. OUTCOMES: Patient developed two episodes of grade 2 liver toxicity requiring treatment breaks followed by a dose reduction. Her transaminitis eventually resolved and patient remained on combination treatment for almost two years with good control of her disease prior to progression. LESSONS: Treatment options for patients who progress after PD-1 inhibitors are very limited; therefore, there is a high unmet clinical need for this patient population. Combining Imatinib with checkpoint inhibitors may be efficacious in patients with metastatic melanoma and KIT mutations. This novel combination can cause additional toxicities which seem to be overall manageable.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Imatinib Mesylate/administration & dosage , Melanoma/drug therapy , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/pathology , Mutation , Neoplasm Metastasis/drug therapy , Neoplasm Metastasis/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Oncol Pract ; 15(2): 81-90, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30763198

ABSTRACT

Oral anticancer therapy is increasingly integrated into the care of patients with cancer. Recognition and management of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is critical to providing efficacious and safe anticancer treatment. DDIs with QTc-prolonging agents, anticoagulants, enzyme inducers and inhibitors, antidepressants, and acid suppressants are commonly encountered with anticancer therapies. Here, we review frequently observed DDIs and outline literature-supported suggestions for their management.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Interactions , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Disease Management , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/diagnosis , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/etiology , Humans , Neoplasms/complications
8.
Int J Hyg Environ Health ; 220(8): 1356-1362, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28939184

ABSTRACT

Chlorpyrifos (CPF) is an organophosphourus insecticide applied to cotton fields by adolescents employed by the Egyptian Ministry of Agriculture. Urinary 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCPy) is a biomarker of CPF exposure that has substantial variability among these applicators. In order to identify predictors of CPF exposure, we conducted a longitudinal study of 43 adolescent pesticide applicators in Egypt from April 2010 to January 2011 in Egypt. Urinary TCPy was quantified at 25 time-points, prior to, during, and following application. We used log-linear regression and a best subset selection approach to identify the exposure determinants that were most predictive of cumulative TCPy and participants' highest TCPy values (peak exposure). Applicators had cumulative urinary TCPy levels ranging from 167 to 49,8208µg/g creatinine. Total hours applying CPF (semi-partial r2=0.32), and total hours in the field applying other pesticides (semi-partial r2=0.08) were the strongest predictors of cumulative TCPy. Applicators had peak urinary TCPy levels ranging from 4 to 5715µg/g creatinine. The amount of time applying pesticides prior to blood draw was the strongest predictor of peak TCPy (semi-partial r2=0.30). We also observed evidence that wearing clean clothes to work was associated with lower longitudinal TCPy. Our results suggest there is an opportunity for targeted interventions, particularly related to hygiene or implementation of personal protective equipment usage to reduce CPF exposure among adolescent pesticide workers.


Subject(s)
Chlorpyrifos , Insecticides , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Pyridones/urine , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Clothing , Egypt , Environmental Monitoring , Farmers , Humans , Hygiene , Longitudinal Studies , Young Adult
9.
Cureus ; 8(1): e454, 2016 Jan 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26918222

ABSTRACT

Female breast cancer accounts for 14% of all new cancer cases in the United States. Metaplastic breast carcinomas (MpBC) are less than 1% of all mammary tumors. Limited clinical information exists on the prognosis and treatments for MpBC due to its rarity and the histological diversity of the tumor cells. We report a case of metastatic MpBC with osseous differentiation who had a marked response to liposomal doxorubicin. This 54-year-old female presented with a 2.5 x 2.6 cm oval-shaped irregularly marginated density in the outer lower quadrant of the left breast, cT2N0M0. Biopsy revealed an invasive metaplastic carcinoma, triple negative, with osseous and focal chondroid differentiation. Genetic testing showed a mutation in the BRCA1 gene. Approximately seven months after a left mastectomy, the patient presented with biopsy-proven metastatic disease and was initiated on therapy with a single agent, liposomal doxorubicin, 50 mg/m(2) every 28 days. The patient achieved maximum response after cycle three and continued to have stable disease for 18 months (20 cycles). Based on the pathologic phenotype, we would have predicted that she would have had a poor and short response to anthracycline. This case illustrates an increased sensitivity of BRCA1-mutated cancers to anthracycline therapies, irrespective of pathologic classification.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL