First-Line Selpercatinib or Chemotherapy and Pembrolizumab in RET Fusion-Positive NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Selpercatinib, a highly selective potent and brain-penetrant RET inhibitor, was shown to have efficacy in patients with advanced RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a nonrandomized phase 1-2 study. METHODS: In a randomized phase 3 trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of first-line selpercatinib as compared with control treatment that consisted of platinum-based chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab at the investigator's discretion. The primary end point was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review in both the intention-to-treat-pembrolizumab population (i.e., patients whose physicians had planned to treat them with pembrolizumab in the event that they were assigned to the control group) and the overall intention-to-treat population. Crossover from the control group to the selpercatinib group was allowed if disease progression as assessed by blinded independent central review occurred during receipt of control treatment. RESULTS: In total, 212 patients underwent randomization in the intention-to-treat-pembrolizumab population. At the time of the preplanned interim efficacy analysis, median progression-free survival was 24.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.9 to not estimable) with selpercatinib and 11.2 months (95% CI, 8.8 to 16.8) with control treatment (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.70; P<0.001). The percentage of patients with an objective response was 84% (95% CI, 76 to 90) with selpercatinib and 65% (95% CI, 54 to 75) with control treatment. The cause-specific hazard ratio for the time to progression affecting the central nervous system was 0.28 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.68). Efficacy results in the overall intention-to-treat population (261 patients) were similar to those in the intention-to-treat-pembrolizumab population. The adverse events that occurred with selpercatinib and control treatment were consistent with those previously reported. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with selpercatinib led to significantly longer progression-free survival than platinum-based chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab among patients with advanced RET fusion-positive NSCLC. (Funded by Eli Lilly and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04194944.).

Lysyl Oxidase 3 Is a Dual-Specificity Enzyme Involved in STAT3 Deacetylation and Deacetylimination Modulation.

In mammalian cells, histone deacetylase (HDAC) and Sirtuin (SIRT) are two families responsible for removing acetyl groups from acetylated proteins. Here, we describe protein deacetylation coupled with deacetylimination as a function of lysyl oxidase (LOX) family members. LOX-like 3 (Loxl3) associates with Stat3 in the nucleus to deacetylate and deacetyliminate Stat3 on multiple acetyl-lysine sites. Surprisingly, Loxl3 N-terminal scavenger receptor cysteine-rich (SRCR) repeats, rather than the C-terminal oxidase catalytic domain, represent the major deacetylase/deacetyliminase activity. Loxl3-mediated deacetylation/deacetylimination disrupts Stat3 dimerization, abolishes Stat3 transcription activity, and restricts cell proliferation. In Loxl3-/- mice, Stat3 is constitutively acetylated and naive CD4+ T cells are potentiated in Th17/Treg cell differentiation. When overexpressed, the SRCR repeats from other LOX family members can catalyze protein deacetylation/deacetylimination. Thus, our findings delineate a hitherto-unknown mechanism of protein deacetylation and deacetylimination catalyzed by lysyl oxidases.

Schwann cell-derived exosomes promote lung cancer progression via miRNA-21-5p.

Schwann cells (SCs), the primary glial cells of the peripheral nervous system, which have been identified in many solid tumors, play an important role in cancer development and progression by shaping the tumor immunoenvironment and supporting the development of metastases. Using different cellular, molecular, and genetic approaches with integrated bioinformatics analysis and functional assays, we revealed the role of human SC-derived exosomal miRNAs in lung cancer progression in vitro and in vivo. We found that exosomal miRNA-21 from SCs up-regulated the proliferation, motility, and invasiveness of human lung cancer cells in vitro, which requires functional Rab small GTPases Rab27A and Rab27B in SCs for exosome release. We also revealed that SC exosomal miRNA-21-5p regulated the functional activation of tumor cells by targeting metalloprotease inhibitor RECK in tumor cells. Integrated bioinformatic analyses showed that hsa-miRNA-21-5p is associated with poor prognosis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma and can promote lung cancer progression through multiple signaling pathways including the MAPK, PI3K/Akt, and TNF signaling. Furthermore, in mouse xenograft models, SC exosomes and SC exosomal hsa-miRNA-21-5p augmented human lung cancer cell growth and lymph node metastasis in vivo. Together our data revealed, for the first time, that SC-secreted exosomes and exosomal miRNA-21-5p promoted the proliferation, motility, and spreading of human lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Thus, exosomal miRNA-21 may play an oncogenic role in SC-accelerated progression of lung cancer and this pathway may serve as a new therapeutic target for further evaluation.

First-line atezolizumab monotherapy versus single-agent chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen (IPSOS): a phase 3, global, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Despite immunotherapy advancements for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), pivotal first-line trials were limited to patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-1 and a median age of 65 years or younger. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of first-line atezolizumab monotherapy with single-agent chemotherapy in patients ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: This trial was a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled study conducted at 91 sites in 23 countries across Asia, Europe, North America, and South America. Eligible patients had stage IIIB or IV NSCLC in whom platinum-doublet chemotherapy was deemed unsuitable by the investigator due to an ECOG PS 2 or 3, or alternatively, being 70 years or older with an ECOG PS 0-1 with substantial comorbidities or contraindications for platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Patients were randomised 2:1 by permuted-block randomisation (block size of six) to receive 1200 mg of atezolizumab given intravenously every 3 weeks or single-agent chemotherapy (vinorelbine [oral or intravenous] or gemcitabine [intravenous]; dosing per local label) at 3-weekly or 4-weekly cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses were conducted in the safety-evaluable population, which included all randomised patients who received any amount of atezolizumab or chemotherapy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03191786. FINDINGS: Between Sept 11, 2017, and Sept 23, 2019, 453 patients were enrolled and randomised to receive atezolizumab (n=302) or chemotherapy (n=151). Atezolizumab improved overall survival compared with chemotherapy (median overall survival 10·3 months [95% CI 9·4-11·9] vs 9·2 months [5·9-11·2]; stratified hazard ratio 0·78 [0·63-0·97], p=0·028), with a 2-year survival rate of 24% (95% CI 19·3-29·4) with atezolizumab compared with 12% (6·7-18·0) with chemotherapy. Compared with chemotherapy, atezolizumab was associated with stabilisation or improvement of patient-reported health-related quality-of-life functioning scales and symptoms and fewer grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (49 [16%] of 300 vs 49 [33%] of 147) and treatment-related deaths (three [1%] vs four [3%]). INTERPRETATION: First-line treatment with atezolizumab monotherapy was associated with improved overall survival, a doubling of the 2-year survival rate, maintenance of quality of life, and a favourable safety profile compared with single-agent chemotherapy. These data support atezolizumab monotherapy as a potential first-line treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC who are ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech Inc, a member of the Roche group.

Combination of EGFR-TKI and Chemotherapy Versus EGFR-TKI Monotherapy as Neoadjuvant Treatment of Stage III-N2 EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy in patients with stage III-N2 EGFR-mutant remains unsatisfactory. This study explored the potential benefits of combining first-generation EGFR-TKI with chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment for patients with stage III-N2 EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of patients with III-N2 EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received neoadjuvant therapy with EGFR-TKI at Shanghai Chest Hospital from October 2011 to October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with stage III-N2 EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received first-generation TKI combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment were included in the combination group, and those who received EGFR-TKI monotherapy were included in the monotherapy group. The study assessed the objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), downstaging rates of pathologic lymph nodes (from stage N2 to N1 or N0), major pathologic response (MPR) rate, pathological complete response (PCR) rate, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 74 631 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC were screened, and 60 patients were included, 7 of whom did not undergo surgery after neoadjuvant targeted therapy. Of the remaining 53 patients, 15 received first-generation EGFR-TKI combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment, and 38 received EGFR-TKI monotherapy. The median follow-up time was 44.12 months. The ORR was 50.0% (9/18) in the combination group and 40.5% (17/42) in the monotherapy group (P = .495). The MPR rate was 20.0% (3/15) and 10.5% (4/38) in the combination and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = .359). No patients achieved PCR in the combination group, while 3 (7.89%) attained PCR in the monotherapy group. The 2 groups did not differ in N2 downstaging rate (P = .459). The median DFS was not reached in the combination group, while it was 23.6 months (95% CI: 8.16-39.02) in the monotherapy group (P = .832). Adverse events observed were consistent with those commonly associated with the 2 treatments. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with first-generation EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy could be considered a neoadjuvant treatment option for patients with stage III-N2 EGFR-mutant NSCLC, exhibiting acceptable toxicity. However, regarding short-term efficacy, combination therapy did not demonstrate superiority over EGFR-TKI monotherapy. Long-term follow-up is warranted for a more accurate assessment of the DFS and OS.

Camrelizumab plus famitinib in previously chemo-immunotherapy treated patients with advanced NSCLC: results from an open-label multicenter phase 2 basket study.

BACKGROUND: The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents has been effective in treating multiple cancers. This was further explored in an open-label, multicenter phase 2 basket study (NCT04346381), which evaluated the antitumor activity and safety of camrelizumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) plus famitinib (a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in patients with advanced solid tumors. We herein report the findings from the cohort of advanced NSCLC patients who progressed after treatment with platinum-doublet chemotherapy and immunotherapy. METHODS: Eligible patients were enrolled and treated with camrelizumab (200 mg once every 3 weeks via intravenous infusion) and oral famitinib (20 mg once daily). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included the disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled in this cohort, with a median follow-up duration of 11.5 months. Three patients (7.5%) achieved a partial response, and 29 patients (72.5%) achieved stable disease. The ORR and DCR with this combination regimen were 7.5% (95% CI, 1.6-20.4) and 80.0% (95% CI, 64.4-90.9), respectively. The median DoR was 12.1 months (95% CI, 10.3-not reached). The median PFS was 5.4 months (95% CI, 4.1-7.5), and the median OS was 12.1 months (95% CI, 9.1-16.7). The estimated 12-month OS rate was 51.5% (95% CI, 34.9-65.9). The most frequent grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurring in more than 5% of patients included hypertension (27.5%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (10%), decreased neutrophil count (10%), and proteinuria (7.5%). CONCLUSION: Camrelizumab plus famitinib demonstrated favorable benefits in PFS and OS, along with manageable safety profiles, in patients with advanced NSCLC who progressed after platinum-doublet chemotherapy and immunotherapy. This finding warrants further exploration.

Blood FOLR3 methylation dysregulations and heterogeneity in non-small lung cancer highlight its strong associations with lung squamous carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for the vast majority of lung cancers. Early detection is crucial to reduce lung cancer-related mortality. Aberrant DNA methylation occurs early during carcinogenesis and can be detected in blood. It is essential to investigate the dysregulated blood methylation markers for early diagnosis of NSCLC. METHODS: NSCLC-associated methylation gene folate receptor gamma (FOLR3) was selected from an Illumina 850K array analysis of peripheral blood samples. Mass spectrometry was used for validation in two independent case-control studies (validation I: n = 2548; validation II: n = 3866). Patients with lung squamous carcinoma (LUSC) or lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), normal controls (NCs) and benign pulmonary nodule (BPN) cases were included. FOLR3 methylations were compared among different populations. Their associations with NSCLC clinical features were investigated. Receiver operating characteristic analyses, Kruskal-Wallis test, Wilcoxon test, logistics regression analysis and nomogram analysis were performed. RESULTS: Two CpG sites (CpG_1 and CpG_2) of FOLR3 was significantly lower methylated in NSCLC patients than NCs in the discovery round. In the two validations, both LUSC and LUAD patients presented significant FOLR3 hypomethylations. LUSC patients were highlighted to have significantly lower methylation levels of CpG_1 and CpG_2 than BPN cases and LUAD patients. Both in the two validations, CpG_1 methylation and CpG_2 methylation could discriminate LUSC from NCs well, with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.818 and 0.832 in validation I, and 0.789 and 0.780 in validation II. They could also differentiate LUAD from NCs, but with lower efficiency. CpG_1 and CpG_2 methylations could also discriminate LUSC from BPNs well individually in the two validations. With the combined dataset of two validations, the independent associations of age, gender, and FOLR3 methylation with LUSC and LUAD risk were shown and the age-gender-CpG_1 signature could discriminate LUSC and LUAD from NCs and BPNs, with higher efficiency for LUSC. CONCLUSIONS: Blood-based FOLR3 hypomethylation was shown in LUSC and LUAD. FOLR3 methylation heterogeneity between LUSC and LUAD highlighted its stronger associations with LUSC. FOLR3 methylation and the age-gender-CpG_1 signature might be novel diagnostic markers for the early detection of NSCLC, especially for LUSC.

Safety and efficacy of multi-target TKI combined with nivolumab in check-point inhibitor-refractory patients with advanced NSCLC: a prospective, single-arm, two-stage study.

BACKGROUND: Resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represents a major unmet medical need in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition may reverse a suppressive microenvironment and recover sensitivity to subsequent ICIs. METHODS: This phase Ib/IIa, single-arm study, comprised dose-finding (Part A) and expansion (Part B) cohorts. Patients with ICIs-refractory NSCLC were enrolled to receive anlotinib (a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor) orally (from days 1 to 14 in a 21-day cycle) and nivolumab (360 mg every 3 weeks, intravenously) on a 21-day treatment cycle. The first 21-day treatment cycle was a safety observation period (phase Ib) followed by a phase II expansion cohort. The primary objectives were recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D, part A), safety (part B), and objective response rate (ORR, part B), respectively. RESULTS: Between November 2020 and March 2022, 34 patients were screened, and 21 eligible patients were enrolled (6 patients in Part A). The RP2D of anlotinib is 12 mg/day orally (14 days on and 7 days off) and nivolumab (360 mg every 3 weeks). Adverse events (AEs) of any cause and treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were reported in all treated patients. Two patients (9.5%) experienced grade 3 TRAE. No grade 4 or higher AEs were observed. Serious AEs were reported in 4 patients. Six patients experienced anlotinib interruption and 4 patients experienced nivolumab interruption due to TRAEs. ORR and disease control rate (DCR) was 19.0% and 76.2%, respectively. Median PFS and OS were 7.4 months (95% CI, 4.3-NE) and 15.2 months (95% CI, 12.1-NE), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that anlotinib combined with nivolumab shows manageable safety and promising efficacy signals. Further studies are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04507906 August 11, 2020.

Multi-target angiogenesis inhibitor combined with PD-1 inhibitors may benefit advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients in late line after failure of EGFR-TKI therapy.

Treatments for NSCLC patients with EGFR-TKI resistance are limited. Given that immunotherapy and antiangiogenic agents may have synergistic antitumor effects, we aimed to analyze the effect of multi-target angiogenesis inhibitor anlotinib and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combination therapy in NSCLC patients who failed EGFR-TKI. The medical records of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients with EGFR-TKI resistance were reviewed. After EGFR-TKI resistance, patients who simultaneously received anlotinib and ICIs were enrolled in the observation group, and those who received platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy were included in the control group. A total of 80 LUAD patients were reviewed and allocated to the anlotinib and ICIs combination therapy (n = 38) and chemotherapy (n = 42) groups. A re-biopsy was performed in all patients in the observation group before the administration of anlotinib and ICIs. The median follow-up was 15.63 months (95% CI: 12.19-19.08). Combination therapy exhibited better PFS (median PFS: 4.33 months [95% CI: 2.62-6.05] vs 3.60 months [95% CI: 2.48-4.73], P = .005), and better OS (median OS: 14.17 months [95% CI: 10.17-18.17] vs 9.00 months [95% CI: 6.92-11.08], P = .029) than chemotherapy. Most patients (73.7%) received combination therapy as fourth and later lines of therapy, with a median PFS of 4.03 months (95% CI: 2.05-6.02) and a median OS of 13.80 months (95% CI: 8.25-19.36). The disease control rate was 92.1%. Four patients discontinued the combination therapy due to adverse events, but the other adverse reactions were manageable and reversible. The combination of anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors is a promising regimen for the late-line treatment of LUAD patients with EGFR-TKI resistance.

Extracellular vesicle long RNA markers of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma.

Lung cancer screening by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) can improve mortality rates among high-risk individuals, especially adenocarcinoma cases with characteristically poor prognosis, although high false-positive rates have limited its clinical application. The objective of our study was to identify biomarkers for early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (ie, tumor diameter <2 cm) through extracellular vesicle long RNA (evlRNA) sequencing. High throughput evlRNA sequencing and support vector machine (SVM) identification of candidate diagnostic marker transcripts were performed using serum samples obtained before lung surgery. A total of 145 upregulated and 363 downregulated differential genes (P value <.05, fold change >1.5) were identified between lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients and benign controls. An SVM model based on a 23-gene signature could distinguish EV samples of LUAD patients from those of control subjects with 86.49% sensitivity, 95.00% specificity and 92.31% accuracy in the training set and 93.75% sensitivity, 85.71% specificity and 88.24% accuracy in the validation set. A 17-gene signature was then identified that could distinguish AIS patient samples from those of MIA/IAD patients with 93.33% sensitivity, 98.00% specificity, and 96.25% accuracy in the trainingset and 83.33% sensitivity, 96.55% specificity, and 94.29% accuracy in the validation set. EvlRNAs in serum show considerable diagnostic value for screening LUAD patients with tumor sizes <2 cm in conjunction with LDCT, potentially reducing false positive rates while improving mortality rates.

Hypomethylation of DYRK4 in peripheral blood is associated with increased lung cancer risk.

Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. It is urgent to identify new biomarkers for the early detection of LC. DNA methylation in peripheral blood has been reported to be associated with cancers. We conducted two independent case-control studies and a nested case-control study (168 LC cases and 167 controls in study Ⅰ, 677 LC cases and 833 controls in study Ⅱ, 147 precancers and 21 controls in the nested case-control study). The methylation levels of DYRK4 CpG sites were measured using mass spectrometry and their correlations with LC were analyzed by logistic regression and nonparametric tests. Bonferroni correction was used for the multiple comparisons. LC-related decreased DYRK4 methylation was discovered in Study I and validated in Study II (the odds ratios [ORs] for the lowest vs. highest quartile of all three DYRK4 CpG sites ranged from 1.64 to 2.09, all p < 0.001). Combining the two studies, hypomethylation of DYRK4 was observed in stage I cases (ORs per -10% methylation ranged from 1.16 to 1.38, all p < 5.9E-04), and could be enhanced by male gender (ORs ranged from 1.77 to 4.17 via interquartile analyses, all p < 0.017). Hypomethylation of DYRK4_A_CpG_2 was significantly correlated with tumor size, length, and stage (p = 0.034, 0.002, and 0.002, respectively) in LC cases. Our study disclosed the association between DYRK4 hypomethylation in peripheral blood and LC, suggesting the feasibility of blood-based DNA methylation as new biomarker for LC detection.

Screening anlotinib responders via blood-based proteomics in non-small cell lung cancer.

Anlotinib has been demonstrated to be effective in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The response stratification of anlotinib remains unclear. In this study, plasma samples from 28 anlotinib-treated NSCLC patients (discovery cohort: 14 responders and 14 non-responders) were subjected to proteomic analysis, and plasma samples from 35 anlotinib-treated NSCLC patients (validation cohort) were subjected to validation analysis. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis was performed on samples with different time points, namely baseline (BL), best response (BR), and progression disease (PD). Bioinformatics analysis was performed to screen for the underlying differential proteins. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed to detect plasma ARHGDIB, FN1, CDH1, and KNG1 levels respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used for biomarker-based responsive stratification. Our results indicated that differential proteins between responders and non-responders showed that proteomic technology potentially contributes to biomarker screening in plasma samples at BL. Furthermore, our results suggested that the detection of plasma ARHGDIB, FN1, CDH1, and KNG1 levels have potential predictive value for anlotinib response both in the discovery cohort and validation cohort. Collectively, this study offers novel insights into the value of plasma biomarker screening via proteomic examination and suggests that plasma ARHGDIB, FN1, CDH1, and KNG1 levels could be used as biomarkers for anlotinib stratification in NSCLC patients.

ctDNA-adjusted bTMB as a predictive biomarker for patients with NSCLC treated with PD-(L)1 inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), higher blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB) was usually associated with better progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). However, the association between bTMB and overall survival (OS) benefit remains undefined. It has been reported that patients harboring a high level of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) had poor survival. We hypothesized that ctDNA-adjusted bTMB might predict OS benefit in NSCLC patients receiving ICIs. METHODS: Our study was retrospectively performed in three cohorts, including OAK and POPLAR cohort (n = 853), Shanghai and Wuhan (SH&WH) cohort (n = 44), and National Cancer Center (NCC) cohort (n = 47). Durable clinical benefit (DCB) was defined as PFS lasting ≥ 6 months. The cutoff value of ctDNA-adjusted bTMB for DCB prediction was calculated based on a receiver operating characteristic curve. Interaction between treatments and ctDNA-adjusted bTMB was assessed. RESULTS: The bTMB score was significantly associated with tumor burden, while no association was observed between ctDNA-adjusted bTMB with tumor burden. In the OAK and POPLAR cohort, significantly higher ORR (P = 0.020) and DCB (P < 0.001) were observed in patients with high ctDNA-adjusted bTMB than those with low ctDNA-adjusted bTMB. Importantly, the interactions between ctDNA-adjusted bTMB and treatments were significant for OS (interaction P = 0.019) and PFS (interaction P = 0.002). In the SH&WH cohort, the interactions between ctDNA-adjusted bTMB and treatment were marginally significant for OS (interaction P = 0.081) and PFS (interaction P = 0.062). Similar result was demonstrated in the NCC cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated that ctDNA-adjusted bTMB might predict OS benefit in NSCLC patients receiving ICIs. The potential of ctDNA-adjusted bTMB as a noninvasive predictor for immunotherapy should be confirmed in future studies.

mTOR pathway gene mutations predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in multiple cancers.

BACKGROUND: mTOR pathway is known to promote cancer malignancy and influence cancer immunity but is unknown for its role in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) therapy. METHODS: Using Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center dataset (MSKCC), we extracted mTOR pathway gene mutations for stepwise Cox regression in 1661 cancer patients received ICI. We associated the mutation of the gene signature resulted from the stepwise Cox regression with the 1661 patients' survival. Other 553 ICI-treated patients were collected from 6 cohorts for validation. We also performed this survival association in patients without ICI treatment from MSKCC as discovery (n = 2244) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) as validation (n = 763). Pathway enrichment analysis were performed using transcriptome profiles from TCGA and IMvigor210 trial to investigate the potential mechanism. RESULTS: We identified 8 genes involved in mTOR pathway, including FGFR2, PIK3C3, FGFR4, FGFR1, FGF3, AKT1, mTOR, and RPTOR, resulted from stepwise Cox regression in discovery (n = 1661). In both discovery (n = 1661) and validation (n = 553), the mutation of the 8-gene signature was associated with better survival of the patients treated with ICI, which was independent of tumor mutation burden (TMB) and mainly attributed to the missense mutations. This survival association was not observed in patients without ICI therapy. Intriguingly, the mutation of the 8-gene signature was associated with increased TMB and PD1/PD-L1 expression. Immunologically, pathways involved in anti-tumor immune response were enriched in presence of this mutational signature in mTOR pathway, leading to increased infiltration of immune effector cells (e.g., CD8 + T cells, NK cells, and M1 macrophages), but decreased infiltration of immune inhibitory M2 macrophages. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that mTOR pathway gene mutations were predictive of better survival upon ICI treatment in multiple cancers, likely by its association with enhanced anti-tumor immunity. Larger studies are warranted to validate our findings.

Different Characteristics and Survival between Surgically Resected Pure and Combined Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung. Little is known about the differences between the pure and combined LCNEC subtypes, and thus we conducted this study to provide more comprehensive insight into LCNEC. METHODS: We reviewed 221 patients with pure LCNEC (P-LCNEC) and 120 patients with combined LCNEC (C-LCNEC) who underwent pulmonary surgery in our hospital to compare their clinical features, driven genes' status (EGFR/ALK/ROS1/KRAS/BRAF), and adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to reduce selection bias. RESULTS: The P-LCNEC group included a higher proportion of males and smokers than the C-LCNEC group. Furthermore, the C-LCNEC group had higher incidences of visceral pleural invasion (VPI), EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement compared with the P-LCNEC group. Expression of neuroendocrine markers (CD56, CGA, and SYN) and recurrence patterns were not significantly different between the two groups. The P-LCNEC group had better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with the C-LCNEC group (median DFS: 67.0 vs. 28.1 months, p = 0.021; median OS: 72.0 vs. 45.0 months, p = 0.001), which was further confirmed by the PSM method (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). Adjuvant chemotherapy was also an independent factor for DFS and OS. Subgroup analysis found that regardless of whether it was for the entire LCNEC group or the P- and C-LCNEC subtypes, the small cell lung cancer (SCLC) regimens presented with superior survival compared with the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) regimens. CONCLUSION: P-LCNEC was associated with more favorable prognosis compared with C-LCNEC. SCLC-based adjuvant chemotherapy was more appropriate for LCNEC patients than NSCLC-based regimens, regardless of whether they were the pure or combined LCNEC subtypes. C-LCNEC patients may be the potential beneficiary of targeted therapy.

Rationale and design of a phase II trial of dacomitinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: a prospective and single arm study (DANCE study).

BACKGROUND: Dacomitinib is a second-generation, irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI). ARCHER-1050 showed that this agent can improve progression-free survival and overall survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with sensitive EGFR mutation compared to gefitinib. However, it is unclear whether dacomitinib is effective in patients with sensitizing uncommon EGFR mutations in exon 18-21. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of dacomitinib in these patients. METHODS: This is a single arm, prospective, open label and phase II trial. Sample size will be calculated by a minimax two-stage design method based on the following parameters: α = 0.075, 1-ß = 0.9, P0 = 0.20, P1 = 0.45 and a dropout rate of 10%. A total of 30 eligible patients will be included. Patients will receive continuous oral therapy with dacomitinib (45 mg/day) until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurs first. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST version 1.1, as assessed by investigators' review. The second endpoint is disease control rate (DCR), PFS, OS, and safety. DISCUSSION: We conduct a single arm, phase II study to investigate the safety and efficacy of dacomitinib in advanced NSCLC patients with sensitizing uncommon EGFR mutations. The results of the DANCE study will provide new data regarding efficacy and safety of these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04504071.

FYB methylation in peripheral blood as a potential marker for the early-stage lung cancer: a case-control study in Chinese population.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in China. Exploring novel biomarkers for the early detection of LC is important. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We quantified DNA methylation levels of three CpG sites of FYB gene in peripheral blood in 163 early-stage LC cases (88.3% at stage I) and 187 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Covariates-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for -10% methylation were calculated by binary logistic regression. RESULTS: With multiple testing corrections, hypomethylation of FYB_CpG_4 was significantly associated with LC (OR = 2.04, p = 4.50E-04) even with LC at stage I (OR = 1.41, p = 0.003) without obvious bias between genders, but it mainly affected the subjects older than 55 years (OR = 2.04, p = 0.015). Hypomethylation of FYB_CpG_2 was also associated with LC, but only for the males (OR = 1.76, p = 0.018). FYB_CpG_3 methylation had no association with LC, but interestingly its methylation level in the males was only half of that in the females. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: We proposed a novel association between blood-based abnormal FYB methylation and very early-stage LC. The age- and gender-related DNA methylation patterns also revealed the diversity and precision of epigenetic regulations.

DUBR suppresses migration and invasion of human lung adenocarcinoma cells via ZBTB11-mediated inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation.

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are involved in a variety of cancers, but the role of LncRNA DUBR in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), the most prevalent form of lung cancer, remains unclear. In this study we investigated the expression of DUBR in LUAD to ascertain its association with the clinical pathology and prognosis of LUAD. Analysis of mRNA expression in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) LUAD database and in-house LUAD cohort (n = 94) showed that DUBR was significantly downregulated in LUAD, and was associated with poor prognosis. In LUAD cell lines (H1975, A549), overexpression of DUBR significantly suppressed the migration and invasion of the LUAD cells. We demonstrated that c-Myc could bind to the promoter of DUBR, and transcriptionally suppressed its expression. Knockdown of c-Myc almost completely blocked the invasion and migration of LUAD cells, whereas knockdown of DUBR partially rescued c-Myc-knockdown suppressed cell migration and invasion. Furthermore, DUBR overexpression significantly increased the expression of a downstream protein of DUBR, zinc finger, and BTB domain containing 11 (ZBTB11), in H1975 and A549 cells; knockdown of ZBTB11 partially rescued the DUBR-overexpression suppressed cell migration and invasion; knockdown of c-Myc significantly upregulated the expression of ZBTB11 in LUAD cells. Finally, we revealed that DUBR/ZBTB11 axis suppressed oxidative phosphorylation in LUAD cells. In short, we demonstrate that c-Myc/DUBR/ZBTB11 axis suppresses migration and invasion of LUAD by attenuating cell oxidative phosphorylation, which provides new insights into the regulatory mechanism of DUBR.

Equivalent efficacy assessment of QL1101 and bevacizumab in nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer patients: A two-year follow-up data update.

Objective: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibodies are an effective means of treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we aim to update the equivalent efficacy assessment between QL1101 and bevacizumab based on two-year follow-up data. Methods: In total, 535 eligible NSCLC patients were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to the QL1101 group and the bevacizumab group. The full end time of this study was defined as 24 months after the last enrolled patient was randomized. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR); equivalence was confirmed if the two-sided 90% confidence interval (90% CI) of the relative risk was within the range of 0.75-1.33. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The two-year updated data showed similar ORR (QL1101 vs. bevacizumab: 53.1% vs. 54.3%; relative risk=0.977; 90% CI: 0.838-1.144), PFS (235 d vs. 254 d, log-rank P=0.311), and OS (577 d vs. 641 d, log-rank P=0.099) results between the QL1101 group and the bevacizumab group. The mean shrinkage ratio of targeted lesions was also similar between the QL1101 group and the bevacizumab group (22.5% vs. 23.5%). For patients who received QL1101 maintenance therapy, similar results were shown between the QL1101 group (n=157) and the bevacizumab group (n=148) (PFS: 253 d vs. 272 d, log-rank P=0.387; OS: 673 d vs. 790 d, log-rank P=0.101; mean tumor shrinkage rate: 26.6% vs. 27.5%). Conclusions: This study reported that QL1101 had similar efficacy in treating nonsquamous NSCLC in terms of ORR, PFS and OS based on two-year updated data, providing a basis for the clinical application of QL1101.

Anlotinib vs placebo as third- or further-line treatment for patients with small cell lung cancer: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib as a third-line and subsequent treatment for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS: We conducted this Phase 2 trial at 11 institutions in China. Patients with pathologically confirmed SCLC who failed at least two lines of chemotherapy were enrolled. Subjects were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either anlotinib 12 mg orally once daily for 14 days every 3 weeks or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Between March 30, 2017 and June 8, 2018, a total of 82 and 38 patients were randomly assigned to receive anlotinib and placebo. The median PFS was significantly longer in the anlotinib group compared with the placebo group (4.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.8-4.2] vs 0.7 months [95% CI, 0.7-0.8]; hazard ratio (HR) 0.19 [95% CI, 0.12-0.32], p < 0.0001). Overall survival (OS) was significantly longer with anlotinib than placebo (7.3 months [95% CI, 6.1-10.3] vs 4.9 months [95% CI, 2.7-6.0]; HR 0.53 [95% CI, 0.34-0.81], p = 0.0029). CONCLUSIONS: Anlotinib as a third-line or subsequent treatment for Chinese patients with SCLC showed improved PFS and OS than placebo with favourable safety profile. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03059797.