Clinicopathologic analysis of pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation: a multi-institutional cohort study by the Kyushu Neuro-Oncology Study Group.

PURPOSE: Pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTIDs), which were recognized in the 2007 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, are rare, accounting for less than 1% of all central nervous system tumors. This rarity and novelty complicate the diagnosis and treatments of PPTID. We therefore aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological significance of this tumor. METHODS: At 11 institutions participating in the Kyushu Neuro-Oncology Study Group, data for patients diagnosed with PPTID were collected. Central pathology review and KBTBD4 mutation analysis were applied to attain the diagnostically accurate cohort. RESULTS: PPTID was officially diagnosed in 28 patients: 11 (39%) with WHO grade 2 and 17 (61%) with WHO grade 3 tumors. Median age was 49 years, and the male:female ratio was 1:2.1. Surgery was attempted in all 28 patients, and gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 46% (13/28). Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy were administered to, respectively, 82% (23/28) and 46% (13/28). The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were 64.9% and 70.4% respectively. Female sex (p = 0.018) and GTR (p < 0.01) were found to be independent prognostic factors for PFS and female sex (p = 0.019) was that for OS. Initial and second recurrences were most often leptomeningeal (67% and 100% respectively). 80% (20/25) of patients harbored a KBTBD4 mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Female sex and GTR were independent prognostic factors in our patients with PPTID. Leptomeningeal recurrence was observed to be particularly characteristic of this tumor. The rate of KBTBD4 mutation observed in our cohort was acceptable and this could prove the accuracy of our PPTID cohort.

Improvement in treatment results of glioblastoma over the last three decades and beneficial factors.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to elucidate the trend of glioblastoma outcome and scrutinize the factors contributing to better outcome over three decades. METHODS: Survival time and the influencing factors were retrospectively analyzed in 223 newly diagnosed primary glioblastoma patients during 1980-2010. Appraised factors included age, sex, tumor site, year of surgery, extent of resections, use of surgery supporting system, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), chemotherapy, conventional external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and CyberKnife stereotactic radiotherapy (CK-SRT) use. RESULTS: The median survival time (MST) in all patients was 13.6 months. The MSTs for 4 periods were 9.8 (1980-1990), 13.7 (1991-2000), 12.9 (2001-2005), and 15.8 months (2006-2010), respectively (p=0.0047). Total resection, subtotal resection, partial resection, and biopsy had MSTs of 31.8, 13.9, 11.4, and 7.0 months, respectively (p<0.0001). Regarding chemotherapy, MSTs of the temozolomide base group and nimustine hydrochloride (ACNU) base group were 16.9 and 14.6 months, respectively, whereas the MST of patients without chemotherapy was only 9.8 months (p<0.0001). The MSTs for 40-Gy EBRT plus CK-SRT and 60-Gy EBRT were 19.1 and 10.7 months, respectively (p<0.0001). But in sub-selected patients, treated during 2001-2010, whose resection rate was total resection or subtotal resection, EBRT was completed and postoperative KPS was greater than or equal to 70, the MST with and without CK-SRT was 26.6 and 18.3 months, respectively (p=0.1529). According to the Cox proportional hazards model, degree of resection, KPS, ACNU use, temozolomide use, bevacizumab use, EBRT dose, and CK-SRT use were good prognostic factors. Use of neuronavigation and use of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging were related to higher resection rate, but not determined as prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a gradual improvement in glioblastoma outcome, presumably because of improvements in therapeutic modalities for surgery, anticancer agents, and radiation, but the efficacy of CK-SRT remains unclear.

Immunoreactivity of Wnt5a, Fzd2, Fzd6, and Ryk in glioblastoma: evaluative methodology for DAB chromogenic immunostaining.

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of Wnt5a and its receptors on the survival of glioblastoma patients and to determine reliable evaluation methods for immunohistochemistry. Diagnostic specimens from 41 histopathologically confirmed primary glioblastoma patients whose Gd-enhanced tumors had been totally removed were immunohistochemically stained for Wnt5a, Fzd2, Fzd6, and Ryk. The immunoreactivity was evaluated using the following methods: (A) grayscale optical density after color deconvolution, (B) percentage of stained cells, (C) density of stained cells, (D) staining amount (multiplication product of B and C), and (E) staining rank. The data sets of A to E were statistically evaluated by correlation matrix analysis and regression analysis. The influence of the expression of the markers on survival was analyzed using a proportional hazard model. The results of color deconvolution (A) were well correlated with the results of the staining rank (E). In the semiquantitative results (B, C, and D), the staining amount (D) tended to show a better correlation with results of color deconvolution (A). Among all data sets, color deconvolution (A) demonstrated the most preferable fit in a proportional hazard model, and the expression of Fzd2 and Fzd6 was associated with poor prognosis in glioblastoma patients.