Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 17(5): 574-576, 2018 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29742191

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric Spitz nevi can pose significant diagnostic challenges to both clinicians and dermatopathologists when the current image-recognition based gold standard is employed. PRAME (preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma) and/or LINC (long intergeneic non-coding RNA 518) gene expression in adult patients in samples obtained non-invasively via adhesive patches differentiates primary melanomas from atypical nevi and other pigmented lesions with a NPV of over 99%, a sensitivity of 91%, and a specificity of 69%, to help clinicians rule out melanoma and the need for surgical biopsies of atypial pigmented lesions with suspicion for melanoma. Surgically obtained melanomas from adult patients show the same gene expression pattern. METHODS: In this study, we investigate gene expression patterns of pigmented lesions from FFPE tissue block samples (n=23, 9 male, 14 female patients, median age 12) with a focus on differentiating Spitz nevi from melanomas in children and young adults. RESULTS: PRAME levels were significantly (P less than 0.001) increased based on normalized Ct cycle counts (lower cycle counts indicate higher expression levels) in melanomas (mean Ct 33.83 + 0.54, 95% CI 32.85-34.80) when compared to Spitz nevi (mean Ct 37.21 + 0.98, 95% CI 35.41-39.01) or common nevi (mean Ct 36.94 + 0.80, 95% CI 35.47-38.40), respectively. LINC and 4 control genes showed similar expression levels in all 3 pigmented lesion groups investigated. Clinically and histopathologically complex pediatric Spitz nevi demonstrated gene expression signatures almost identical to gene expression signatures of common pediatric nevi but different from melanomas in children and young adults. DISCUSSION: PRAME but not LINC gene expression can be a valuable molecular aid to differentiate melanomas from Spitz nevi, groups of pigmented lesions that can be particularly difficult to assess in children and young adults. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(5):574-576.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Neoplasm/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Melanoma/diagnosis , RNA, Long Noncoding/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Child , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Humans , Male , Melanoma/genetics , Nevus, Epithelioid and Spindle Cell/diagnosis , Nevus, Epithelioid and Spindle Cell/genetics , Predictive Value of Tests , Skin Neoplasms/genetics
2.
J AOAC Int ; 97(5): 1343-58, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25902984

ABSTRACT

The Atlas Listeria monocytogenes LmG2 Detection Assay, developed by Roka Bioscience Inc., was compared to a reference culture method for seven food types (hot dogs, cured ham, deli turkey, chicken salad, vanilla ice cream, frozen chocolate cream pie, and frozen cheese pizza) and one surface (stainless steel, grade 316). A 125 g portion of deli turkey was tested using a 1:4 food:media dilution ratio, and a 25 g portion for all other foods was tested using 1:9 food:media dilution ratio. The enrichment time and media for Roka's method was 24 to 28 h for 25 g food samples and environmental surfaces, and 44 to 48 h for 125 g at 35 ± 2°C in PALCAM broth containing 0.02 g/L nalidixic acid. Comparison of the Atlas Listeria monocytogenes LmG2 Detection Assay to the reference method required an unpaired approach. For each matrix, 20 samples inoculated at a fractional level and five samples inoculated at a high level with a different strain of Listeria monocytogenes were tested by each method. The Atlas Listeria monocytogenes LmG2 Detection Assay was compared to the Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL 993.12 method for dairy products, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook 8.08 method for ready-to-eat meat and environmental samples, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual, Chapter 10 method for frozen foods. In the method developer studies, Roka's method, at 24 h (or 44 h for 125 g food samples), had 126 positives out of 200 total inoculated samples, compared to 102 positives for the reference methods at 48 h. In the independent laboratory studies, vanilla ice cream, deli turkey and stainless steel grade 316 were evaluated. Roka's method, at 24 h (or 44 h for 125 g food samples), had 64 positives out of 75 total inoculated samples compared to 54 positives for the reference methods at 48 h. The Atlas Listeria monocytogenes LmG2 Detection Assay detected all 50 L. monocytogenes strains that encompassed 13 serotypes across the various lineages and none of the 30 exclusive organisms, including seven other Listeria species. The product consistency and kit stability studies revealed no statistical differences between the three lots tested or to the term of the shelf life. Finally, the robustness study demonstrated no statistical differences when samples were incubated at 33 ± 2°C or 37 ± 2°C, when enrichment aliquots were 1.3 mL or 1.7 mL, or when the samples were analyzed the same day or five days later. Overall the Atlas Listeria monocytogenes LmG2 Detection Assay is statistically equivalent to or better than the reference methods and is robust to the tested variations.


Subject(s)
Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Food Microbiology , Listeria monocytogenes/isolation & purification , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Listeria monocytogenes/genetics , Stainless Steel
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL