Strengthening the Role of Unmarried Fathers: Findings from the Co-Parent Court Project.

While the importance of fathers in unmarried coparent families is a strong area of social and political interest, a dearth of community-based interventions exists for supporting the role of fathers in at-risk families. The Co-Parent Court (CPC) was a 3-year demonstration project evaluating the effectiveness of a collaborative intervention to support unmarried coparents establishing paternity and improving their coparenting relationships and paternal involvement in their child's life. A randomized-control experimental design was employed. The paper will explore father involvement and coparent relationship outcomes.

Rural adults' perceived role of family members in prescription opioid misuse prevention: Implications for family-based approaches.

PURPOSE: This study explored and documented rural adults' perceptions of family roles in prescription opioid misuse prevention and the predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling factors that influence family members from taking those roles. METHODS: Nine focus groups with rural adults (n = 55) were conducted to evoke discussion about family roles in prescription opioid misuse prevention. Transcripts were coded based on common ideas that arose during the focus groups, previous literature, and the PRECEDE-PROCEED program planning model. FINDINGS: Findings suggest that rural adults perceive the opioid epidemic as partially a family problem. Additionally, rural adults perceive themselves as having a critical role in preventing prescription opioid misuse among family members. Participants identified specific predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling factors that influence whether or not family members take responsibility in preventing prescription opioid misuse within their families. Rural adults also perceive that family-based education is important in preventing prescription opioid misuse. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that there is an interest in family-based approaches that enable or foster the skills and resources necessary to engage in prescription opioid misuse prevention behaviors. Specifically, family-based prevention programming should include efforts to shape knowledge and attitudes about prescription opioid misuse, increase resources to facilitate prevention behaviors, and build skills related to prevention.

Increasing Uptake of Prescription Drug Take-Back Boxes: Eliciting Preferences and Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict Use.

This study assesses adults' perceptions of and predictors of intention to use prescription drug take-back boxes. This mixed methods study utilized focus groups and an online survey to examine factors related to intention to use a prescription drug take-back box. This study was conducted in [State] during the spring and summer of 2018. Themes identified in focus group data included the importance of take-back box location, benefits of take-back box use (such as reducing opportunities for medication misuse), and barriers to take-back box use (such as lack of awareness, stigma associated with law enforcement). Survey results indicate that pharmacies are the most preferred take-back box location and that attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control are statistically significant predictors of intention to use a take-back box. Results suggest that individuals are open to using take-back boxes in secure, convenient locations, but many are unaware of take-back boxes as an option for safe disposal. These findings have implications for health communication and policy efforts designed to increase the use of take-back boxes for prescription drug disposal.

Qualitative Evaluation of Drivers of Eating Decisions among SNAP Participants in Mississippi.

OBJECTIVE: To explore food-related decision patterns among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients in Mississippi. DESIGN: A qualitative design was used to conduct focus groups (n = 18) based on the Health Belief Model with low-income female caregivers of children aged under 13 years. SETTING: Mississippi. PARTICIPANTS: Cluster sampling was used to recruit participants (n = 126) from the 4 regional divisions of Mississippi State University Extension. PHENOMENON OF INTEREST: Drivers of eating decisions among SNAP participants. ANALYSIS: Focus groups were recorded, transcribed, and coded by 2 independent coders using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Drivers of food selection often overlapped with barriers to healthy eating. Participants used many strategies to manage costs and viewed healthy foods as out of reach and quick to perish. Cost, taste preferences, habits, and family factors were primary drivers of food selection and preparation; each of these presented barriers to healthier eating. Health was most often shared as a driver of food selection once disease was established. Participants reported a variety of strategies used in striving for healthier eating. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Focusing on ways to manage the costs of healthy foods, honor taste preferences, and work within habits/families may enhance efforts to support healthy eating among SNAP participants.