Determining priority for joint replacement: comparing the views of orthopaedic surgeons and other professionals.

OBJECTIVE: To assess which patient characteristics influence the assessments of urgency for surgery by orthopaedic surgeons and non-orthopaedic professionals. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study of 80 patients requiring elective hip or knee replacement attending a public hospital orthopaedic outpatient clinic or orthopaedic surgeon's private rooms. Patients were interviewed after being placed on the surgery waiting list. The interview asked about the severity of their joint disease and its effects on physical capability, psychological distress and social circumstances. Patient interviews were summarised and presented to assessors who ranked groups of eight patients in order of their perceived urgency for surgery. Eleven orthopaedic surgeon assessors completed 360 patient ratings and nine non-orthopaedic assessors from various professions, including physiotherapy, social work, research, management and engineering, completed 720 patient ratings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual analogue scale rating of patient urgency for surgery; patient rankings for surgery; scores for individual domain contributions to urgency rating. RESULTS: A broad spread of perceived urgency was evident among the patients. For each group of eight patients, there was moderate agreement on overall urgency rankings between the two groups of assessors. Linear regression demonstrated that pain was the dominant determinant of urgency score for both assessor groups. Orthopaedic surgeons also took into account limitations to mobility and concurrent medical illness but gave less priority to psychological distress or social circumstances. For the non-orthopaedic assessors, limitations to mobility, social circumstances and psychological distress also contributed to urgency. CONCLUSION: Both orthopaedic surgeons and non-orthopaedic professionals considered pain the most important factor in establishing urgency and priority for joint replacement. Only the non-orthopaedic professionals considered psychosocial factors important when determining priority for surgery. Broader community discussion about prioritisation for elective surgery is needed to facilitate agreement about which patients factors should be considered.

A comparison of 2 continuous passive motion protocols after total knee arthroplasty: a controlled and randomized study.

Effect of continuous passive motion (CPM) protocols on outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. In this prospective randomized controlled study, 147 patients were assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: CPM from 0 degrees to 40 degrees and increased by 10 degrees per day, CPM from 90 degrees to 50 degrees (early flexion) and gradually progressed into full extension over a 3-day period, and a no-CPM group. The CPM was administered twice a day for 3 hours over a 5-day period. All patients participated in the same postoperative physiotherapy program. Patients were assessed preoperatively, day 5, 3 months, and 1 year postoperatively. The early flexion group had significantly more range of flexion than both the standard and control groups at day 5. There was no significant difference between the groups for any other variable tested at any time frame. Key words: total knee arthroplasty, CPM, rehabilitation, outcomes.

Joint replacement surgery.

Joint replacement is the most effective healthcare measure in improving patient quality-of-life outcomes. More than 46000 hip and knee replacements were performed in Australia between July 2000 and July 2001. The need for joint replacements will increase as the population ages. More than 90% of hip and/or knee replacements survive for 10-15 years. Prosthesis selection needs to be tailored to each patient, although rationalisation of types of prosthesis used is required.

Osteotomy of the knee: is there a seat at the table?

Osteotomy is an alternative treatment for unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. In genu varum, a high valgus closing wedge osteotomy is preferred, with overcorrection by 5 degrees. Complications and poor outcomes can be overcome by incomplete osteotomy with careful preoperative planning, precise use of cutting jigs, compression fixation, and early mobilization and weight bearing. Patella baja is related to postoperative immobilization, and unicompartmental arthroplasties are more difficult to revise because of bone loss. Supracondylar femoral osteotomy is preferred for genu valgum using a lateral opening wedge with a toothed plate, allowing easy access to the lateral compartment of the knee. Osteotomy, far from being obsolete, has an increasing role in joint resurfacing procedures.