Peripherin is a biomarker of axonal damage in peripheral nervous system disease.

Valid, responsive blood biomarkers specific to peripheral nerve damage would improve management of peripheral nervous system (PNS) diseases. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is sensitive for detecting axonal pathology but is not specific to PNS damage, as it is expressed throughout the PNS and CNS. Peripherin, another intermediate filament protein, is almost exclusively expressed in peripheral nerve axons. We postulated that peripherin would be a promising blood biomarker of PNS axonal damage. We demonstrated that peripherin is distributed in sciatic nerve, and to a lesser extent spinal cord tissue lysates, but not in brain or extra-neural tissues. In the spinal cord, anti-peripherin antibody bound only to the primary cells of the periphery (anterior horn cells, motor axons and primary afferent sensory axons). In vitro models of antibody-mediated axonal and demyelinating nerve injury showed marked elevation of peripherin levels only in axonal damage and only a minimal rise in demyelination. We developed an immunoassay using single molecule array technology for the detection of serum peripherin as a biomarker for PNS axonal damage. We examined longitudinal serum peripherin and NfL concentrations in individuals with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS, n = 45, 179 time points), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP, n = 35, 70 time points), multiple sclerosis (n = 30), dementia (as non-inflammatory CNS controls, n = 30) and healthy individuals (n = 24). Peak peripherin levels were higher in GBS than all other groups (median 18.75 pg/ml versus < 6.98 pg/ml, P < 0.0001). Peak NfL was highest in GBS (median 220.8 pg/ml) and lowest in healthy controls (median 5.6 pg/ml), but NfL did not distinguish between CIDP (17.3 pg/ml), multiple sclerosis (21.5 pg/ml) and dementia (29.9 pg/ml). While peak NfL levels were higher with older age (rho = +0.39, P < 0.0001), peak peripherin levels did not vary with age. In GBS, local regression analysis of serial peripherin in the majority of individuals with three or more time points of data (16/25) displayed a rise-and-fall pattern with the highest value within the first week of initial assessment. Similar analysis of serial NfL concentrations showed a later peak at 16 days. Group analysis of serum peripherin and NfL levels in GBS and CIDP patients were not significantly associated with clinical data, but in some individuals with GBS, peripherin levels appeared to better reflect clinical outcome measure improvement. Serum peripherin is a promising new, dynamic and specific biomarker of acute PNS axonal damage.

CSF biomarkers for dementia.

Although cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker testing is incorporated into some current guidelines for the diagnosis of dementia (such as England's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)), it is not widely accessible for most patients for whom biomarkers could potentially change management. Here we share our experience of running a clinical cognitive CSF service and discuss recent developments in laboratory testing including the use of the CSF amyloid-ß 42/40 ratio and automated assay platforms. We highlight the importance of collaborative working between clinicians and laboratory staff, of preanalytical sample handling, and discuss the various factors influencing interpretation of the results in appropriate clinical contexts. We advocate for broadening access to CSF biomarkers by sharing clinical expertise, protocols and interpretation with colleagues working in psychiatry and elderly care, especially when access to CSF may be part of a pathway to disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia.

Validation of the 2023 International Diagnostic Criteria for MOGAD in a Selected Cohort of Adults and Children.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To test the performance of the 2023 myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) criteria in adults and children with inflammatory demyelinating conditions who were tested for MOG antibodies (Abs). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients tested for MOG-Abs from 2018 to 2022 in 2 specialist hospitals. The inclusion criteria comprised ≥1 attendance in an adult or pediatric demyelinating disease clinic and complete clinical and MRI records. The final clinical diagnosis of MOGAD, made by the treating neurologist, was taken as the benchmark against which the new criteria were tested. The international MOGAD diagnostic criteria were applied retrospectively; they stipulate at least 1 clinical or MRI supporting feature for MOGAD diagnosis in positive fixed MOG cell-based assay without a titer. The performance MOG-Ab testing alone for MOGAD diagnosis was also assessed and compared with that of MOGAD criteria using the McNemar test. RESULTS: Of the 1,879 patients tested for MOG-Abs, 539 (135 pediatric and 404 adults) met the inclusion criteria. A clinical diagnosis of MOGAD was made in 86/539 (16%) patients (37 adults, 49 children), with a median follow-up of 3.6 years. The MOGAD diagnostic criteria had sensitivity of 96.5% (adults 91.9%, children 100%), specificity of 98.9% (adults 98.8%, children 98.9%), positive predictive value of 94.3% (adults 89.4%, children 98%), negative predictive value of 99.3% (adults 99.2%, children 100%), and accuracy of 98.5% (adults 98.3%, children 99.2%). When compared with MOG-Ab testing alone, a difference was seen only in adults: a significantly higher specificity (98.9% vs 95.6%, p = 0.0005) and nonstatistically significant lower sensitivity (91.9% vs 100%, p = 0.08). DISCUSSION: The international MOGAD diagnostic criteria exhibit high performance in selected patients with inflammatory demyelinating diseases (who had a high pretest probability of having MOGAD) compared with best clinical judgment; their performance was better in children than in adults. In adults, the MOGAD criteria led to an improvement in specificity and positive predictive value when compared with MOG-Ab testing alone, suggesting that the requirement of at least 1 clinical or MRI supporting feature is important. Future work should address the generalizability of the diagnostic criteria to cohorts of greater clinical diversity seen within neurologic settings.