Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Journal subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 57(12): 1402-1409, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32787637

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify the impact of sociodemographic and health variables on the age at which patients undergo cleft lip repair, cleft palate repair, and primary speech evaluation. DESIGN: A retrospective, noninterventional quality assessment, and quality improvement study was designed. SETTING: This institutional study was performed at Michigan Medicine in Ann Arbor, MI. PATIENTS: All patients born between 2011 and 2014 who received surgical cleft repair, excluded those who were adopted (n = 165). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The age at which patients undergo cleft lip repair, cleft palate repair, and primary speech evaluation. RESULTS: Cleft lip repair was performed significantly later for patients identifying as Asian (18 weeks, P = .01), patients with Child Protective Services contact (19 weeks, P = .01), patients with a significant comorbidity (14 weeks, P = .02), and patients who underwent preliminary lip adhesion surgery (19 weeks, P < .01). Cleft palate repair was performed significantly later for patients identifying racially as Asian (19 weeks, P = .03) and other (22 weeks, P = .03). Preliminary speech and language evaluation were performed significantly later for patients identifying as black (55 weeks, P = .03) and patients diagnosed with an isolated cleft lip (71 weeks, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Timing of cleft lip, cleft palate repair, and primary speech and language evaluation are subject to variation which may be predicted by clinically accessible factors. By identifying race, Child Protective Services contact, and care variables as significant predictors of increased patient age at time of intervention, multidisciplinary cleft care teams can proactively allocate patient support resources.


Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Child , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/surgery , Humans , Michigan , Retrospective Studies
2.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 55(10): 1440-1446, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29570381

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify disparities in compliance of and care for patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) by determining the impact of sociodemographic variables on the rate of missed appointments and Child Protective Services (CPS) involvement. DESIGN: A retrospective, noninterventional quality assessment and quality improvement study were designed. SETTING: This institutional study was performed at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan. PATIENTS: All patients born between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2014, who underwent surgical CL/P repair, excluding those with fewer than 5 appointments (n = 178). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The rate of missed appointments, calculated as the total number of no-show appointments divided by the total number of scheduled appointments. All appointments from CL/P diagnosis to data collection were considered, including those outside of plastic surgery. RESULTS: The average patient was 4.5 years of age and had 49 total scheduled appointments. The overall rate of missed appointments was 9.6%, with 66.8% of patients missing at least 1 scheduled visit. Patients who were black ( P = .04), not affiliated with a religion ( P = .01), Medicaid users ( P = .01), from an unstable social background ( P = .01), or received need-based financial assistance ( P = .00) were significantly more likely to miss appointments. Child Protective Services was involved with 3.9% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities exist in attendance rates among patients with CL/P, and at-risk patient populations have been identified. The allocation of cleft care resources must be efficiently planned in order to enhance the quality of care for at-risk individuals.


Subject(s)
Appointments and Schedules , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/surgery , Patient Compliance , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Michigan , Quality Improvement , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
3.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 9(11): 23259671211052021, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34790832

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation is an important component of care in postsurgical knee patients, especially as it pertains to return to preinjury activity level. Despite the established significance of rehabilitation in improving outcomes after certain surgical procedures, there is a lack of investigation into compliance rates and factors that affect compliance in pediatric patients. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate sociodemographic factors associated with noncompliance in pediatric patients after knee surgery to characterize health disparities in this population. Our hypothesis was that certain sociodemographic factors would be associated with decreased compliance. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records was used to gather data on compliance rate, demographics, and socioeconomic factors for pediatric patients undergoing rehabilitation after knee surgery. Compliance rate was determined by counting the total scheduled appointments, cancellations, and no-shows (defined as visits for which patients did not show up and did not provide notification of cancellation). Various types of knee injuries were included in this study. Data were evaluated using bivariate analyses in addition to hierarchical linear and binary logistic regression to assess for associations between sociodemographic factors and compliance rate. RESULTS: Our total sample size was 186 patients. When compared with patients from non-single-parent households, patients from single-parent households were found to have a lower rate of physical therapy compliance (72.2% vs 80.1%; P < .001), were less likely to reach the 85% compliance threshold (9.1% vs 42.4%; P < .001), and had an increased amount of cancellations and no-shows (16.7 vs 11.7 visits; P = .02). Although a small sample size, Hispanic/Latino patients were shown to have a lower achievement of the 85% compliance threshold compared with non-Hispanic/Latino patients (0% vs 38.2%; P = .04). Increased distance from the rehabilitation clinic was associated with lower achievement of the 85% compliance threshold (P = .033). CONCLUSION: Overall, there were several significant demographic and socioeconomic variables associated with rehabilitation compliance, specifically single-parent status, distance to rehabilitation clinic, and ethnicity. These results suggest potential predictors of decreased compliance that warrant prospective investigation.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL