ABSTRACT
IntroductionDespite increased use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in Germany, HIV infection rates are not declining and little is known about how this prevention method affects the prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) among men who have sex with men (MSM).AimWe studied, in a large multicentre cohort, STI point prevalence, co-infection rates, anatomical location and influence of PrEP.MethodsThe BRAHMS study was a prospective cohort study conducted at 10 sites in seven major German cities that enrolled MSM reporting increased sexual risk behaviour. At screening visits, MSM were tested for Mycoplasma genitalium (MG), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Treponema pallidum (TP), and given a behavioural questionnaire. With binomial regression, we estimated prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of PrEP and STI.ResultsWe screened 1,043 MSM in 2018 and 2019, with 53.0% currently using PrEP. At screening, 370 participants (35.5%) had an STI. The most common pathogen was MG in 198 (19.0%) participants, followed by CT (n = 133; 12.8%), NG (n = 105; 10.1%) and TP (n = 37; 3.5%). Among the 370 participants with at least one STI, 14.6% (n = 54) reported STI-related symptoms. Infection prevalence was highest at anorectal site (13.4% MG, 6.5% NG, 10.2% CT). PrEP use was not statistically significant in adjusted models for STI (PR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.91-1.32), NG/CT, only NG or only CT.ConclusionsPrevalence of asymptomatic STI was high, and PrEP use did not influence STI prevalence in MSM eligible for PrEP according to national guidelines.
Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections , Gonorrhea , HIV Infections , Mycoplasma genitalium , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Sexually Transmitted Diseases , Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Chlamydia trachomatis , Germany/epidemiology , Gonorrhea/diagnosis , Gonorrhea/epidemiology , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Homosexuality, Male , Humans , Male , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/methods , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/diagnosis , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & controlABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) have shared routes of transmission among men who have sex with men (MSM). Routine testing facilitates early diagnosis and treatment, thereby preventing morbidity and onward transmission. We evaluated factors associated with HIV and HCV testing in a behaviorally vulnerable cohort of predominantly MSM. METHODS: From June 2018 through June 2019, the BRAHMS study enrolled adults at ten German outpatient clinics that serve gender and sexual minority populations. Participants completed behavioral questionnaires that captured prior experience with HIV and HCV testing. Multivariable robust Poisson regression was used to evaluate factors potentially associated with testing in the previous 6 months. RESULTS: Among 1017 participants with median age 33 (interquartile range 28-39) years, 1001 (98.4%) reported any lifetime history of HIV testing and 787 (77.4%) reported any HCV testing, including 16 (1.6%) known to be living with HCV. Testing within the last 6 months was reported by 921 (90.6%) and 513 (50.4%) for HIV and HCV, respectively. Recent HIV testing was more common among participants with higher education level and recent HCV testing. Recent HCV testing was more common among participants with non-cisgender identity, lifetime history of illicit drug use, hepatitis B immunity or infection, and recent HIV testing. CONCLUSION: Prior testing for HIV was common in this cohort, but interventions are needed to improve HCV risk stratification and access to testing. HIV testing infrastructure can be successfully leveraged to support HCV testing, but differentiated preventive care delivery is needed for some vulnerable populations.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Hepatitis C , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Adult , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Germany/epidemiology , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Homosexuality, Male , Humans , Male , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Early onset of treatment efficacy is especially important for severe mania syndromes. Lithium has usually a delayed onset of response, which is disadvantageous for inpatient treatment of severe mania. Valproate is effective in treating acute mania and has sedative properties. It has, however, a response rate of approximately only two thirds. Therefore, the initial combination of valproate and lithium was evaluated in a prospective case series of 12 patients, and a retrospective analysis was carried out for 5 patients in comparison with a pretreatment period when lithium therapy was applied without valproate. Outcome criterion for analysis was the latency of response and remission, as well as the amount of neuroleptics used for additional sedation. Patients had a mania syndrome-severity score comparable with the mean mania score of the bipolar manic patients treated in the same unit. All patients under the combination treatment responded. The response occurred within a shorter time compared with the lithium pretreatment episode, which is statistically marginally significant, and the use of neuroleptic medication could be markedly reduced from 18,601.6 mg chlorpromazine equivalents to 3,927.6 mg (p < 0.025). The initial valproate-lithium combination therapy seems to be a safe and effective way to treat severe mania syndromes in the clinic.