Factors Associated With Fertility Preservation in a Pediatric, Adolescent and Young Adult Population.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the patient characteristics associated with pursuing fertility preservation (FP) before gonadotoxic therapy in a pediatric, adolescent and young adult patient population. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patient data at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. Demographics, clinical diagnoses, and treatment characteristics were compared between participants that selected FP versus those that declined. Variables were analyzed separately for males and females by logistic regression. RESULTS: Patients with a hematologic cancer were less likely to be eligible for preservation: 53.9% of ineligible males, P <0.001, and 51.8% of ineligible females, P <0.0001. Among patients who were candidates for FP, those receiving high-risk therapy were more likely to elect for FP (65.3% males, P <0.0001, and 87.5% of females, P <0.0001). Pubertal males were more likely to undergo preservation than prepubertal males (70.5% vs. 29.5%, P <0.0001; however, this trend was not demonstrated among female patients. In both males and females, race, ethnicity, religion, primary language, and insurance status were not shown to be statistically significant factors in predicting utilization of FP. CONCLUSION: Risk of infertility, type of cancer, and developmental status influenced decisions on pursuing FP in pediatric, adolescent and young adult patients facing iatrogenic infertility.

Young Adult Males' Perspectives of Male Hormonal Contraception.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the willingness of young adult males to use male hormonal contraception and to determine the most desirable formulation. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved survey measuring the willingness to use MHC was dispersed to two distinct populations: University of Cincinnati postgraduate programs and Cincinnati Health Department clinics. Questions on the survey allowed for the collection of demographic characteristics, as well as the preferred method of MHC, and concerns regarding potential adverse effects. This survey was directed at young adult males; therefore, only male participants who were 18 to 35 years old were included for analysis. Results were reported as frequencies in each group and χ2 analyses were performed to compare groups, with a P < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: Of 162 total survey participants, 45% would use MHC, whereas 30.9% were unsure and 23.5% would not use MHC. Overall, the University of Cincinnati survey population was more likely to be interested in using MHC than the Cincinnati Health Department population (P < 0.05). In both populations, most were interested in using the injectable form. Cited concerns deterring participants from using MHC were different between these two populations, with University of Cincinnati participants more frequently expressing concerns about possible failure of the contraceptive method, whereas Cincinnati Health Department participants had concerns about potential adverse effects (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is significant interest among young adult males in using various forms of MHC, especially in injectable form. Differences in views of MHC were seen in two distinct male populations. Specifically, males who achieved a higher level of education, were employed, or in a relationship were found to more frequently be willing to use MHC. With further research and funding, MHC may serve as a significant way to decrease unintended pregnancies in the future.