ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with the tubed anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap is burdened by possible strictures and pharyngocutaneous fistulae (PCF). We present our experience with the U-shaped insetting of perforator-based chimeric ALT flap focusing on surgical technique, complications and functional outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively included 10 patients with a total circumferential defect of the hypopharynx undergoing reconstruction with ALT flap. A perforator-based chimeric ALT flap with two independent skin paddles was harvested: the trapezoid paddle with the greater base cranially and the height oriented vertically was used for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction while the second paddle was exteriorized and used for flap monitoring and reducing tension on skin closure. Mean age was 56.4 years. Eight patients were affected by squamous cell carcinoma. Modified barium swallow radiogram and fiberoptic laryngoscopy were performed to assess strictures and PCFs. Swallowing and speech outcomes were evaluated through the Deglutition Handicap Index (DHI), M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) and Voice Handicap Index (VHI) questionnaires. RESULTS: Mean flap dimension was 7.9 × 6 × 9.2 cm. Mean ischemia time was 58.2 min (range 42-80). No flap loss nor flap-related complications were reported. Two PCFs were observed. Fiberoptic laryngoscopy documented a complete integration of the flap with no strictures or stenosis. Mean follow-up was 13.6 months (range 1-45 months). Mean DHI score was 33.8, mean MDADI score was 62.5, mean VHI score was 32.2. CONCLUSIONS: The ALT flap U-shaped insetting is a reliable option for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction yielding a high success rate, low number of strictures and fistulae and good swallowing and voice outcomes.
Subject(s)
Perforator Flap , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Humans , Middle Aged , Thigh/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Lower Extremity/surgery , Perforator Flap/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The number of revision surgeries to improve breast asymmetry after deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction is still high worldwide with impact on both patients and healthcare systems. These procedures include fat grafting, contralateral breast symmetrization, scar revision, flap repositioning and remodeling. A previously published DIEP flap insetting algorithm has proven to be effective in selecting patient-tailored strategies to achieve excellent aesthetic outcomes. This study investigated whether this insetting algorithm was effective in reducing revision surgeries in patients undergoing SSM and immediate DIEP flap breast reconstruction to achieve the goal of a one-stage reconstruction. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study included 60 patients (group A) treated without the DIEP flap standardized insetting algorithm and 60 patients (group B) treated with the standardized insetting algorithm, which considers among its variables the type of breast to be reconstructed, abdominal tissue thickness, rotation due to harvesting side. Demographic data, operative data, complications and number of revision surgeries were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty primary and 106 revision surgeries were performed. Groups were homogenous for age (p = .32), body mass index (p = .77), flap weight (p = .7), operative time (p = .87) and early complications (p = .78). When excluding isolated nipple reconstruction from the revision surgeries, one-stage reconstruction was successfully performed in 26 patients in group A (43.3%) and 39 patients (65.0%) in group B, with a statistically significant difference between the groups (p = .003). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a standardized insetting algorithm for immediate unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction can be effective in reducing the number of revision surgeries for breast asymmetry, making a one-stage reconstruction an achievable and reliable target.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mammaplasty , Perforator Flap , Humans , Female , Mastectomy/methods , Perforator Flap/blood supply , Epigastric Arteries/transplantation , Retrospective Studies , Case-Control Studies , Reoperation , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mammaplasty/methodsABSTRACT
When performing breast reconstruction, reduction of the contralateral breast is often required to achieve symmetry. The tissue that would otherwise be discarded from the reduced breast has been utilized as a free flap. This has the benefit of minimizing donor site morbidity, and combining the principles of "spare-part-surgery" and replacing "like-with-like." The purpose of this paper is to report the procedure, outcome, and potential controversies of using a free lateral thoracic artery perforator flap for contralateral breast reconstruction. We present a 32-year-old with congenital breast asymmetry previously corrected with an implant. The patient required tertiary breast reconstruction for capsular contracture, and a simultaneous left breast reduction. There was no history of breast cancer. The reconstruction proceeded as follows; the right sided breast implant was removed. On the left breast, a wise pattern reduction with a superomedial pedicle was instigated. Intraoperatively, four perforating arteriovenous pedicles perfusing the reduced tissue were identified; of which the lateral thoracic artery perforator was selected. The flap weight was 296 g. The lateral thoracic pedicle was anastomosed to the right internal mammary vessels. The flap survived completely. The post-operative course was uneventful and without complication. The patient was followed up for 1 year and was pleased with the final result. The application of the LTAP free flap may cautiously be extended to oncological breast reconstruction. For patients to be suitable, they would need a large remaining breast to provide adequate tissue for reconstruction, up-to-date breast screening and a low risk of developing breast cancer in the future.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mammaplasty , Perforator Flap , Adult , Breast/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Thoracic ArteriesABSTRACT
When autologous breast reconstruction is planned but abdominal tissue is not available, the lumbar artery perforator flap provides an alternative choice with minimal donor site morbidity. The lumbar and posterior intercostal arteries supply adjacent perforasomes on the posterolateral flank. The purpose of this report is to highlight the salvage of an autologous breast reconstruction free flap using a dorsal perforator of the posterior intercostal artery, when the planned lumbar artery perforators were not suitable. The patient was a 74-year-old with recurrent left-sided breast cancer requiring immediate breast reconstruction. A lumbar perforator flap was planned as an oblique ellipse 19 × 10 cm. Intraoperatively, the two identified perforators traveled superiorly up to the 12th rib and therefore originated from the intercostal rather than lumbar arteries. The internal mammary artery and the vena comitants were used as recipient vessels, anastomosed to an interposition graft. Postoperatively, the patient was discharged home after 7 days without complication. Six months later, the patient was pleased with the reconstruction and had negligible donor site morbidity. The dorsal intercostal artery perforator flap therefore provides a salvage option when presumed lumbar artery perforators are dissected and found to be intercostal in origin.
Subject(s)
Mammaplasty , Mammary Arteries , Perforator Flap , Aged , Humans , Lumbosacral Region/surgery , Mammary Arteries/surgery , VeinsSubject(s)
Laparoscopy , Pelvic Exenteration , Rectal Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In lower limb reconstruction the cosmetic outcome is influenced by the contouring of the flap at the recipient site as well as by the donor site closure. It is also important to minimise compression of the flap pedicle. We discuss the outcomes of a versatile ALT flap design that allows freedom in skin paddle tailoring without elongating the scar, reduction of the tension over the pedicle and improved cosmetic results of both donor and recipient sites. METHODS: Between January 2009 and October 2015, 27 patients underwent reconstruction using tear drop ALTs. The age ranged between 20 and 89 years. Seventeen were elective procedures and 10 were urgent. The locations of the defects were: knee (1 case), achilles tendon (2 cases), os calcis (1 case), lateral malleolus (1 case), fibula (3 cases), tibia (6 cases), tibia/fibula (5 cases), and ankle (8 cases). The sizes of the defects ranged from 4 × 3 cm to 9 × 7 cm. RESULTS: The size of the flap ranged from 6 × 4 cm to 11 × 7 cm. One venous congestion and a wound dehiscence occurred, no flap loss. Two defatting procedures were performed. The mean follow-up was 16.44 months. Final outcomes showed good functional and cosmetic results in both the donor and recipient sites. CONCLUSIONS: The tear drop ALT is a useful tool in lower limb reconstruction allowing to improve skin paddle tailoring without elongating the donor site scar. It allows minimal tension over the pedicle while optimizing the contour of both the donor and recipient sites.
Subject(s)
Free Tissue Flaps/transplantation , Lower Extremity/injuries , Lower Extremity/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , ThighABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The demand for bilateral breast reconstructions is rising worldwide. In the UK, approximately 30% of breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy choose autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Although the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is gaining popularity, bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction remains a complex procedure and reliable outcome data are lacking. In the absence of clinical trials, evidence from cohort studies is needed to better inform clinicians and patients. METHODS: Over a 6-year period, all consecutive patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction were prospectively included and categorized as unilateral or bilateral reconstruction for comparative analyses of outcomes and complications, with the patient as the unit of analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 565 DIEP flaps were performed on 468 women (371 unilateral and 97 bilateral reconstructions [194 flaps]). Postoperative complications requiring reoperation were twice as likely for bilateral reconstructions (risk ratio [RR] 2.1, 95% CI 1.4-3.4, p = 0.002) and were mainly due to venous congestion (RR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2-7.5, p = 0.011). The risk of total flap loss was six times greater in bilateral reconstruction (RR 6.4, 95% CI 1.6-26, p = 0.011). The rates of revision breast and abdominal surgery were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both unilateral and bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions are safe, with a low risk of complications; however, bilateral reconstruction was associated with a higher risk of complications and total flap loss. This information should be highlighted to patients requesting bilateral breast reconstruction, particularly those requesting risk-reducing mastectomy and reconstruction.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Mastectomy/adverse effects , Perforator Flap/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Surgical Flaps/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , ReoperationABSTRACT
In the original article Justin C. R. Wormald's middle initials were incorrect. They are correct as reflected in this erratum. The original article has also been corrected.
Subject(s)
Pelvic Exenteration , Rectal Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Venous congestion burdens up to 15% of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstructions. For these cases, venous augmentation by superficial outside shunt (SOS) is associated with 100% success in secondary salvage surgeries. Intraoperative venous augmentation using other techniques yields a 0.3% rate of return to theater due to venous congestion, but there is no evidence assessing the effectiveness of the SOS technique applied preventively. Comparing this preventive approach to data prior to its implementation, we expect to find a reduced number of venous congested flaps with reduced flap losses and revision surgeries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study involved DIEP flap breast reconstructions performed between 2011 and 2020. The control group included patients receiving additional venous anastomosis as a secondary salvage procedure. The "preventive SOS group" included patients who received preventive SOS during the main surgery. Age, body mass index (BMI), pregnancies, perioperative treatments (neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemo or radiotherapy), follow-up complications (arterial ischemia, venous congestion, hematomas, partial/total flap loss), and revision surgeries (breast debridement, flap remodeling) were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Within 695 flaps performed, 397 flaps were included in the control group, and 298 flaps were included in the preventive SOS group. The groups were homogeneous for age (p = 0.418), BMI (p = 0.747), and flap weight (p = 0.064). Fifty-one flaps (12.8%) in the control group compared to zero (0.0%) in the preventive SOS group required return to theater (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We reported encouraging preliminary results for SOS to prevent DIEP flap venous congestion. These results must be validated prospectively.
Subject(s)
Hyperemia , Mammaplasty , Perforator Flap , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Hyperemia/etiology , Hyperemia/surgery , Hyperemia/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Incidence , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Mammaplasty/methods , Perforator Flap/blood supply , Epigastric Arteries/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas are a rare and heterogenous group of malignancies that are derived from the mesenchymal cell lines. In the last few decades, the management of these lesions has been improved by the introduction of dedicated Multi Disciplinary Teams (MDTs) where most bone and soft tissue tumours are now treated.(1) Following the recent changes to management outlined by the NICE/IOGs, we believe it is pertinent to review the current thinking on soft tissue tumour management.(2) We also discuss the principles of diagnosis and treatment and the role of adjuvant therapy. METHODS: This is a retrospective review. In the preparation of this paper, we have referred to recent NICE guidelines in this field and have performed a Medline search of the existing literature. RESULTS: The key to the success is early and appropriate patient referral. Whilst the responsibility for performing surgery has shifted away from the generalist and towards the super specialist, improvements in survivability can be achieved by promoting basic knowledge within the medical profession as a whole. CONCLUSIONS: Both excision and biopsy of a soft tissue sarcoma by a non-specialist surgeon have been shown to increase the risk of tumour recurrence and all invasive procedures should now be performed within the MDT setting.
Subject(s)
Sarcoma , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Patient Care Team , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prognosis , Referral and Consultation , Sarcoma/diagnosis , Sarcoma/mortality , Sarcoma/pathology , Sarcoma/therapy , United KingdomABSTRACT
The outcomes of Coban™ compression bandage in three cases following lower limb extremity free-flap surgery are reported. Two patients sustained open tibial fractures with extensive soft tissue loss, one case underwent a squamous cell carcinoma excision. Postoperatively, each patient commenced compression therapy on the lower limb prior to beginning mobilization, and continued for the first three postoperative months when mobilizing. No complications such as thrombosis, anastomosis failure, flap congestion, infection or healing issues were reported during the first six postoperative months, with 100% patient adherence to the compression bandage. Lower limb circumference measurements initially reduced in all cases, suggesting early effective oedema control. At the final 6 month review, two patients' circumference had increased when compared to baseline measurements attributed to an increase in muscle bulk at this late stage. The cosmetic appearance of the flaps at 6 months was acceptable in all cases, with no evidence of hypertrophic scarring.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Compression Bandages , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Adult , Equipment Design , External Fixators , Female , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary , Free Tissue Flaps , Humans , Male , Postoperative CareABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: This is an interesting case of a prepubescent female diagnosed and treated for gigantomastia, of unknown cause. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Gigantomastia treated with surgical intervention with the final pathology being that of Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia. DISCUSSION: Hormonal manipulation, as a treatment, was considered before surgical intervention. It was discarded as deemed, in accordance to published cases, to be slow and inconsistent and would not allow the breast tissue to regress. CONCLUSION: We describe our approach and successful surgical management, in such an unusual case, to add our experience to the limited reporting in the literature.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: When a deep inferior epigastric artery flap is not suitable, the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap can be a good alternative for autologous breast reconstruction. Popularity of the PAP flap is expanding, but it is still only slowly being adopted worldwide. We report our experience with 116 consecutive PAP flaps showing refinements and evolution of the technique towards improvement in outcomes and patients' satisfaction. METHODS: We prospectively collected data from consecutive PAP flap breast reconstructions performed from 2016 to 2019. Patients' demographics, pre-, intra-, postoperative data, and revision procedures were analyzed. The BREAST-Q and a specific questionnaire investigating outcomes at the donor site were completed preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: One-hundred and sixteen PAP flaps were performed in 86 patients, 64 unilateral and 22 bilateral breast reconstructions. Mean body mass index was 24.72 kg/m2 (range 18.9-29.2) and mean flap weight was 251.30 g (range 152-455 g). Complications included donor site hematoma (1.7%), seroma (2.6%), fat necrosis (1.7%), and wound dehiscence (2.6%). No arterial/venous thrombosis nor flap losses were recorded. Patients reported high satisfaction in all BREAST-Q domains, with mean postoperative scores being higher than preoperative ones, suggesting a positive effect in quality of life and satisfaction. Scores were significant in the satisfaction with breast domain (p = 0.0016). CONCLUSIONS: Breast reconstruction with PAP flap yields a high success, low complications, and excellent cosmetic outcomes in the breast and donor sites. It improves patients' satisfaction and quality of life; hence, it can be considered an excellent option for autologous breast reconstruction.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mammaplasty , Perforator Flap , Arteries/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Mammaplasty/methods , Patient Satisfaction , Perforator Flap/blood supply , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Quality of Life , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has disrupted the provision of breast reconstructive services throughout the UK. Autologous free flap breast reconstruction was restarted in our unit on 3 June 2020. We aimed to compare the unit's performance of microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction in the "post-COVID" period compared with the exact time period in the preceding year. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data in the "pre-COVID" (from 3 June 2019 to 31 December 2019) and "post-COVID" period (from 3 June 2020 to 31 December 2020). Patient demographics included age, body mass index, co-morbidities, Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade and smoking status. Surgical factors included neoadjuvant chemotherapy, previous chest wall radiotherapy, unilateral or bilateral reconstruction, reconstruction timing, number of pedicles, contralateral symmetrisation and other procedures. dependant variables were ischaemic time, operative time, mastectomy weight, flap weight, length of stay, return to theatre and complication rates. The number of trainers and trainees present in theatre was recorded and analysed. RESULTS: Fewer DIEP flaps were performed in the "post-COVID" period (45 vs. 29). No significant difference was observed in mastectomy resection weight, but flap weight was significantly increased. No significant difference was found in ischaemic time as well. The postoperative length of stay was significantly reduced. No significant difference was found in rates of return to theatre, unplanned admission, infection, haematoma, seroma or wound dehiscence. No cases of venous thromboembolism or flap failures were recorded. The mean number of trainers and trainees, and the trainee-to-trainer ratio was not found to be significantly different between cohorts. CONCLUSION: Although fewer cases were performed, autologous breast reconstruction was safely delivered throughout the COVID-19 pandemic in the first wave without affecting training.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , COVID-19/epidemiology , Free Tissue Flaps/transplantation , Mammaplasty/methods , Microsurgery/methods , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Mastectomy , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplantation, Autologous , United Kingdom/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: When patients are unsuitable for deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction, the inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) flap has been used as an alternative option. However, the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap is also gaining popularity as an alternative to the DIEP flap for several reasons. This retrospective cohort study compares baseline characteristics, peri- and post-operative outcomes following IGAP flap and PAP flap breast reconstructions after mastectomy for cancer. METHODS: In a single center in the UK, from September 2008 through December 2016, 43 women underwent IGAP Flap(s) breast reconstruction and 51 received PAP flap(s) breast reconstructions. Statistical analysis was performed to compare baseline, peri-operative and post-operative variables between the two reconstruction methods. RESULTS: Perioperative complications requiring reoperation were experienced in women undergoing IGAP flap breast reconstructions only (21% versus 0%, p = 0.001), principally due to the risk of total flap failure (12% versus 0%, p = 0.01). Women undergoing IGAP flap breast reconstructions were at significantly higher odds of revision surgery (OR 17 [95% CI: 5.5-53], p < 0.001), which was unchanged after adjusting for bilateral reconstructions (adjusted OR 18 [95% CI: 5.3-58], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PAP flaps appear to be associated with significantly fewer complications and revision surgeries than IGAP flaps for breast reconstruction in women undergoing mastectomy for cancer and who are unsuitable for a DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mammaplasty , Perforator Flap , Arteries , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Mammaplasty/methods , Mastectomy , Perforator Flap/blood supply , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Seat belt breast deformity can result in significant aesthetic, functional and psychosocial sequelae. Although seat belt breast deformity is well documented, there is a lack of literature describing their reconstructive management. We describe the surgical management of a 63-year-old woman presenting with stage 2b seat belt breast deformity, who underwent scar revision, repositioning of the nipple-areola complex and contralateral breast reduction using Wise-pattern incisions based on superior pedicles. She made an excellent recovery with an improved aesthetic result.
Subject(s)
Breast Diseases , Mammaplasty , Thoracic Injuries , Accidents, Traffic , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Nipples/surgery , Seat BeltsABSTRACT
The result of an extra-levator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (ELAPE) is a composite three-dimensional defect. This is performed for locally advanced anorectal cancer, and may involve partial excision of the vagina. The aim of reconstruction is to achieve wound healing, restore the pelvic floor and to allow micturition and sexual function. We aim to evaluate the concurrent use of profunda artery perforator (PAP) and bilateral gracilis flaps for vaginal and pelvic floor reconstruction. We performed a retrospective case note review of patients undergoing pelvo-perineal reconstruction with combined gracilis and PAP flaps between July 2018 and December 2019. Eighteen pedicled flaps were performed on six patients with anal or vulval malignancies. All underwent pre-operative radiotherapy. Four patients had extended abdominoperineal tumour resections, while two patients underwent total pelvic exenteration. The median age was 57 (range 47-74) years, inpatient stay was 22 (11-47) days and the follow-up was 10 (5-21) months. Four patients developed partial perineal wound dehiscence, of which one was re-sutured. One patient had a post-operative bleed requiring radiological embolisation of an internal iliac branch and had subsequent 1cm PAP flap loss. All other flaps survived completely. Median time to heal was 4 (1-6) months. This is the first series reporting combined bilateral gracilis and PAP flaps for pelvic reconstruction. The wound dehiscence rate and healing times were expected in the context of irradiation and radical pelvic tumour resection. This is a reliable technique for perineal and vaginal reconstruction with minimal donor site morbidity.