Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Ann Hematol ; 98(12): 2749-2760, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31745601

ABSTRACT

After analyzing treatment patterns in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (objective 1), we investigated the relative effectiveness of ibrutinib versus other commonly used treatments (objective 2) in patients with treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory CLL, comparing patient-level data from two randomized registration trials with two real-world databases. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics. Rituximab-containing regimens were often prescribed in clinical practice. The most frequently prescribed regimens were fludarabine + cyclophosphamide + rituximab (FCR, 29.3%), bendamustine + rituximab (BR, 17.7%), and other rituximab-containing regimens (22.0%) in the treatment-naïve setting (n = 604), other non-FCR/BR rituximab-containing regimens (38.7%) and non-rituximab-containing regimens (28.5%) in the relapsed/refractory setting (n = 945). Adjusted HRs (95% CI) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), respectively, with ibrutinib versus real-world regimens were 0.23 (0.14-0.37; p < 0.0001) and 0.40 (0.22-0.76; p = 0.0048) in the treatment-naïve setting, and 0.21 (0.16-0.27; p < 0.0001) and 0.29 (0.21-0.41; p < 0.0001) in the relapsed/refractory setting. When comparing real-world use of ibrutinib (n = 53) versus other real-world regimens in relapsed/refractory CLL (objective 3), adjusted HRs (95% CI) were 0.37 (0.22-0.63; p = 0.0003) for PFS and 0.53 (0.27-1.03; p < 0.0624) for OS. This adjusted analysis, based on nonrandomized patient data, suggests ibrutinib to be more effective than other commonly used regimens for CLL.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Databases, Factual , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell , Pyrazoles/administration & dosage , Pyrimidines/administration & dosage , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bendamustine Hydrochloride/administration & dosage , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Piperidines , Rituximab/administration & dosage , Survival Rate , Vidarabine/administration & dosage , Vidarabine/analogs & derivatives
2.
Curr Med Res Opin ; : 1-10, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38885086

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the overall survival (OS) of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) receiving either ibrutinib monotherapy as a first-line (1L) treatment or chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy-based (CT/CIT) regimens in 1L followed by ibrutinib in the second line (1L CT/CIT-2L ibrutinib) after disease progression by emulating a randomized trial comparing both treatment sequences. METHODS: Patient-level data from the RESONATE-2 trial (NCT01722487) and real-world PHEDRA databases were analyzed. Three scenarios were considered using the following data sources: (1) RESONATE-2, (2) combined RESONATE-2/PHEDRA, (3) combined RESONATE-2/PHEDRA for 1L ibrutinib and PHEDRA for 1L CT/CIT-2L ibrutinib. Propensity score-based weights and inverse probability of censoring weighting were used to adjust for baseline (Scenarios 2 and 3) and time-dependent confounding (all scenarios), and to address potential biases. A weighted Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the OS hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for 1L ibrutinib versus 1L CT/CIT-2L ibrutinib. RESULTS: Results from Scenario 1 showed a significantly lower risk of death with 1L ibrutinib compared with 1L chlorambucil followed by 2L ibrutinib (HR 0.35 [95% CI 0.20-0.62]). Results from Scenarios 2 and 3 demonstrated a reduced risk of death with 1L ibrutinib compared with 1L CT/CIT-2L ibrutinib (HR 0.35 [0.21-0.61] and 0.64 [0.39-1.04], respectively). CONCLUSION: The analyses consistently showed a reduced risk of death when ibrutinib was used as a 1L treatment in CLL compared with delaying its use until 2L after CT/CIT regimens, which suggests that initiating ibrutinib in 1L is advantageous for improving survival outcomes.

4.
Cancer Res ; 79(10): 2619-2633, 2019 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30885980

ABSTRACT

The PDLIM2 protein regulates stability of transcription factors including NF-κB and STATs in epithelial and hemopoietic cells. PDLIM2 is strongly expressed in certain cancer cell lines that exhibit an epithelial-to-mesenchymal phenotype, and its suppression is sufficient to reverse this phenotype. PDLIM2 supports the epithelial polarity of nontransformed breast cells, suggesting distinct roles in tumor suppression and oncogenesis. To better understand its overall function, we investigated PDLIM2 expression and activity in breast cancer. PDLIM2 protein was present in 60% of tumors diagnosed as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and only 20% of other breast cancer subtypes. High PDLIM2 expression in TNBC was positively correlated with adhesion signaling and ß-catenin activity. Interestingly, PDLIM2 was restricted to the cytoplasm/membrane of TNBC cells and excluded from the nucleus. In breast cell lines, PDLIM2 retention in the cytoplasm was controlled by cell adhesion, and translocation to the nucleus was stimulated by insulin-like growth factor-1 or TGFß. Cytoplasmic PDLIM2 was associated with active ß-catenin and ectopic expression of PDLIM2 was sufficient to increase ß-catenin levels and its transcriptional activity in reporter assays. Suppression of PDLIM2 inhibited tumor growth in vivo, whereas overexpression of PDLIM2 disrupted growth in 3D cultures. These results suggest that PDLIM2 may serve as a predictive biomarker for a large subset of TNBC whose phenotype depends on adhesion-regulated ß-catenin activity and which may be amenable to therapies that target these pathways. SIGNIFICANCE: This study shows that PDLIM2 expression defines a subset of triple-negative breast cancer that may benefit from targeting the ß-catenin and adhesion signaling pathways. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/canres/79/10/2619/F1.large.jpg.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Cell Adhesion , LIM Domain Proteins/metabolism , Microfilament Proteins/metabolism , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology , beta Catenin/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Cytoplasm/metabolism , Female , HEK293 Cells , Humans
5.
Mol Biol Cell ; 16(4): 1811-22, 2005 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15659642

ABSTRACT

By comparing differential gene expression in the insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-IR null cell fibroblast cell line (R- cells) with cells overexpressing the IGF-IR (R+ cells), we identified the Mystique gene expressed as alternatively spliced variants. The human homologue of Mystique is located on chromosome 8p21.2 and encodes a PDZ LIM domain protein (PDLIM2). GFP-Mystique was colocalized at cytoskeleton focal contacts with alpha-actinin and beta1-integrin. Only one isoform of endogenous human Mystique protein, Mystique 2, was detected in cell lines. Mystique 2 was more abundant in nontransformed MCF10A breast epithelial cells than in MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells and was induced by IGF-I and cell adhesion. Overexpression of Mystique 2 in MCF-7 cells suppressed colony formation in soft agarose and enhanced cell adhesion to collagen and fibronectin. Point mutation of either the PDZ or LIM domain was sufficient to reverse suppression of colony formation, but mutation of the PDZ domain alone was sufficient to abolish enhanced adhesion. Knockdown of Mystique 2 with small interfering RNA abrogated both adhesion and migration in MCF10A and MCF-7 cells. The data indicate that Mystique is an IGF-IR-regulated adapter protein located at the actin cytoskeleton that is necessary for the migratory capacity of epithelial cells.


Subject(s)
Cell Movement , Insulin-Like Growth Factor I/metabolism , Microfilament Proteins/metabolism , Actins/metabolism , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Cell Adhesion , Cell Line , Cell Proliferation , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic , Collagen/metabolism , Contact Inhibition , Cytoskeletal Proteins/metabolism , Cytoskeleton/genetics , Cytoskeleton/metabolism , Fibronectins/metabolism , Gene Silencing , Humans , Integrin beta1/metabolism , LIM Domain Proteins , Mice , Microfilament Proteins/chemistry , Microfilament Proteins/deficiency , Microfilament Proteins/genetics , Molecular Sequence Data , Paxillin , Phosphoproteins/metabolism , Phosphotyrosine/metabolism , Protein Isoforms/chemistry , Protein Isoforms/deficiency , Protein Isoforms/genetics , Protein Isoforms/metabolism , Protein Structure, Tertiary , Sequence Alignment
6.
J Comp Eff Res ; 7(1): 29-38, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28766976

ABSTRACT

AIM: PHEDRA (Platform for Haematology in EMEA: Data for Real World Analysis) is a unique, noninterventional project based on secondary data collection from real-world (RW) patient-level (health record) databases to understand treatment patterns in hematological malignancies. It compares ibrutinib's effectiveness with alternative treatments using RW data (RWD) and randomized clinical trials data. MATERIALS & METHODS: RWD are cleaned, validated, harmonized into a Common Data Model, and analyzed statistically alongside randomized clinical trial data. Treatment outcomes include overall and progression-free survival. RESULTS: To date, RWD (four databases) are available for 2840 patients in three indications, collected between 1990 and 2017. CONCLUSION: PHEDRA is an innovative approach to generate evidence to inform optimal treatment decisions in RW settings.


Subject(s)
Comparative Effectiveness Research/methods , Hematologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Data Collection , Databases, Factual , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Piperidines , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
7.
Mol Biol Cell ; 25(1): 184-95, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24196835

ABSTRACT

Epithelial cell differentiation and polarized migration associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in cancer requires integration of gene expression with cytoskeletal dynamics. Here we show that the PDZ-LIM domain protein PDLIM2 (Mystique/SLIM), a known cytoskeletal protein and promoter of nuclear nuclear factor κB (NFκB) and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) degradation, regulates transcription factor activity and gene expression through the COP9 signalosome (CSN). Although repressed in certain cancers, PDLIM2 is highly expressed in invasive cancer cells. Here we show that PDLIM2 suppression causes loss of directional migration, inability to polarize the cytoskeleton, and reversal of the EMT phenotype. This is accompanied by altered activity of several transcription factor families, including ß-catenin, Ap-1, NFκB, interferon regulatory factors, STATs, JUN, and p53. We also show that PDLIM2 associates with CSN5, and cells with suppressed PDLIM2 exhibit reduced nuclear accumulation and deneddylation activity of the CSN toward the cullin 1 and cullin 3 subunits of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases. Thus PDLIM2 integrates cytoskeleton signaling with gene expression in epithelial differentiation by controlling the stability of key transcription factors and CSN activity.


Subject(s)
Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/metabolism , LIM Domain Proteins/physiology , Microfilament Proteins/physiology , COP9 Signalosome Complex , Cell Differentiation , Cell Movement , Cell Polarity , Epithelial Cells/physiology , Humans , MCF-7 Cells , Multiprotein Complexes/metabolism , NF-kappa B/metabolism , Peptide Hydrolases/metabolism , Protein Transport , beta Catenin
8.
J Leukoc Biol ; 85(3): 481-90, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19052146

ABSTRACT

PDLIM2 (Mystique/SLIM) is a postsynaptic density-95/discs large/zonula occludens-1-Lin-11, Isl-1, Mec-3 (PDZ-LIM) domain protein expressed in the nucleus of T lymphocytes, where it promotes degradation of the p65 subunit of NF-kappaB. It is also expressed at the cytoskeleton in epithelial cells, where it is essential for cell migration. It is not known whether PDLIM2 function at the nucleus and cytoskeleton is linked and whether PDLIM2 subcellular location is regulated in hematopoietic cells. To investigate this, we used the human monocytic leukemia cell line THP-1 that can differentiate into adherent macrophages and the adherent murine macrophage cell line RAW264.7. PMA-induced differentiation of THP-1 cells resulted in increased accumulation of PDLIM2. In differentiated cells, PDLIM2 exhibited retarded mobility indicative of serine phosphorylation, which could be reversed by phosphatases and by inhibition of protein kinase C or ERK kinases. In nondifferentiated THP-1 cells, PDLIM2 was located predominantly in the nucleus, whereas in differentiated cells, PDLIM2 was located predominantly in the cytoplasm. Suppression of PDLIM2 expression in THP-1 and RAW 264.7 cells resulted in decreased adhesion, increased NF-kappaB transcription reporter activity, and increased LPS-induced TNF-alpha production. Overexpression of PDLIM2 in THP-1 cells enhanced cell adhesion. Overall, these findings indicate that PDLIM2 sequestration in the cytoplasm is associated with cell adhesion and increased nuclear activity of NF-kappaB p65. The data suggest that sequestration of PDLIM2 at the cytoskeleton regulates its nuclear function.


Subject(s)
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/analysis , Cytoplasm/chemistry , Microfilament Proteins/analysis , NF-kappa B/metabolism , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/biosynthesis , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases/analysis , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/metabolism , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/physiology , Animals , Cell Adhesion , Cell Differentiation , Cell Line , Cell Nucleus/physiology , Cytoskeleton , Humans , LIM Domain Proteins , Macrophages , Mice , Microfilament Proteins/metabolism , Microfilament Proteins/physiology , Monocytes , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases/metabolism , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL