Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Critically Ill Adult Patient.

RATIONALE: Controversies and practice variations exist related to the pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management of the airway during rapid sequence intubation (RSI). OBJECTIVES: To develop evidence-based recommendations on pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic topics related to RSI. DESIGN: A guideline panel of 20 Society of Critical Care Medicine members with experience with RSI and emergency airway management met virtually at least monthly from the panel's inception in 2018 through 2020 and face-to-face at the 2020 Critical Care Congress. The guideline panel included pharmacists, physicians, a nurse practitioner, and a respiratory therapist with experience in emergency medicine, critical care medicine, anesthesiology, and prehospital medicine; consultation with a methodologist and librarian was available. A formal conflict of interest policy was followed and enforced throughout the guidelines-development process. METHODS: Panelists created Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) questions and voted to select the most clinically relevant questions for inclusion in the guideline. Each question was assigned to a pair of panelists, who refined the PICO wording and reviewed the best available evidence using predetermined search terms. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework was used throughout and recommendations of "strong" or "conditional" were made for each PICO question based on quality of evidence and panel consensus. Recommendations were provided when evidence was actionable; suggestions, when evidence was equivocal; and best practice statements, when the benefits of the intervention outweighed the risks, but direct evidence to support the intervention did not exist. RESULTS: From the original 35 proposed PICO questions, 10 were selected. The RSI guideline panel issued one recommendation (strong, low-quality evidence), seven suggestions (all conditional recommendations with moderate-, low-, or very low-quality evidence), and two best practice statements. The panel made two suggestions for a single PICO question and did not make any suggestions for one PICO question due to lack of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Using GRADE principles, the interdisciplinary panel found substantial agreement with respect to the evidence supporting recommendations for RSI. The panel also identified literature gaps that might be addressed by future research.

Choosing Wisely For Critical Care: The Next Five.

OBJECTIVES: To formulate new "Choosing Wisely" for Critical Care recommendations that identify best practices to avoid waste and promote value while providing critical care. DATA SOURCES: Semistructured narrative literature review and quantitative survey assessments. STUDY SELECTION: English language publications that examined critical care practices in relation to reducing cost or waste. DATA EXTRACTION: Practices assessed to add no value to critical care were grouped by category. Taskforce assessment, modified Delphi consensus building, and quantitative survey analysis identified eight novel recommendations to avoid wasteful critical care practices. These were submitted to the Society of Critical Care Medicine membership for evaluation and ranking. DATA SYNTHESIS: Results from the quantitative Society of Critical Care Medicine membership survey identified the top scoring five of eight recommendations. These five highest ranked recommendations established Society of Critical Care Medicine's Next Five "Choosing" Wisely for Critical Care practices. CONCLUSIONS: Five new recommendations to reduce waste and enhance value in the practice of critical care address invasive devices, proactive liberation from mechanical ventilation, antibiotic stewardship, early mobilization, and providing goal-concordant care. These recommendations supplement the initial critical care recommendations from the "Choosing Wisely" campaign.

Empiric aztreonam is associated with increased mortality compared to beta-lactams in septic shock.

PURPOSE: To determine if aztreonam as initial empiric treatment of adult septic shock is associated with increased mortality compared to the use of anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam agents. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 582 adult emergency department patients admitted to 12 acute care facilities within a single health system from January 2014 to December 2017 with septic shock receiving either aztreonam or an anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam for empiric treatment and discharged with an infection-related ICD-9 or ICD-10 code. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Initial exposure to aztreonam was associated with increased hospital mortality compared to treatment with an anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam agent (22.7% vs. 12.9%, OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.27-3.11). When adjusted for APACHE II score, the treatment group effect on mortality remained statistically significant (OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.08-2.80). Aztreonam use was also associated with increased utilization of aminoglycosides (28.9% vs. 12.4%, p < 0.0001) and fluoroquinolones (50.5% vs. 25.8%, p < 0.01). There was no difference in hospital or intensive care unit length of stay in surviving patients between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams, empiric treatment with aztreonam is associated with increased mortality and greater antibiotic exposure among patients with acute septic shock. These findings suggest that treatment with anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams should be prioritized over allergy avoidance whenever feasible.

Presentation and outcomes of end stage liver disease patients presenting with septic shock to the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Patients with end stage liver disease (ESLD) are particularly vulnerable to sepsis. ESLD patients are often excluded from controlled sepsis trials and more data are needed to guide the management of this population. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical factors and outcomes of patients with ESLD presenting to the emergency department (ED) with septic shock. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients registered in our dedicated ED adult septic shock pathway. All patients registered between January 2014 and May 2016 were included. Clinical and treatment variables for ESLD patients were compared with non-ESLD patients. A second analysis assessed ESLD survivors compared to non-survivors. RESULTS: 2,584 septic shock patients were enrolled. ESLD was present in 6.2% (n = 161) of patients. Patients with ESLD had higher mortality compared to patients without ESLD 36.6% vs 21.2% (p < 0.001). ESLD patients were more likely to be younger, female, obese, and have other comorbidities. ESLD patients exhibited lower temperature, higher lactate, and higher incidence of acute kidney injury. There was no difference in antibiotics or fluid resuscitation between groups. ESLD patients received more ED vasopressor support. Among ESLD septic shock patients, maximum lactate and presence of pneumonia were independently associated with death. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ESLD comprise a small but important subgroup of patients with ED septic shock that experience high mortality compared to patients without ESLD. Maximum ED lactate and pneumonia as the source of sepsis are independently associated with adverse outcome and may be used for early recognition of high-risk ESLD sepsis patients.

Predictive Accuracy of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Hospital Mortality Decreases With Increasing Comorbidity Burden Among Patients Admitted for Suspected Infection.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the accuracy of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment tool to predict mortality across increasing levels of comorbidity burden. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Twelve acute care hospitals in the Southeastern United States. PATIENTS: A total of 52,187 patients with suspected infection presenting to the Emergency Department between January 2014 and September 2017. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was hospital mortality. We used electronic health record data to calculate quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment risk scores from vital signs and laboratory values documented during the first 24 hours. We calculated Charlson Comorbidity Index scores to quantify comorbidity burden. We constructed logistic regression models to evaluate differences in the performance of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment greater than or equal to 2 to predict hospital mortality in patients with no documented (Charlson Comorbidity Index = 0), low (Charlson Comorbidity Index = 1-2), moderate (Charlson Comorbidity Index = 3-4), or high (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 5) comorbidity burden. Among the cohort, 2,030 patients died in the hospital (4%). No comorbidities were documented for 5,038 patients (10%), 9,235 patients (18%) had low comorbidity burden, 12,649 patients (24%) had moderate comorbidity burden, and 25,265 patients (48%) had high comorbidity burden. Overall model discrimination for quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment greater than or equal to 2 was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69-0.72). A model including both quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Charlson Comorbidity Index had improved discrimination compared with Charlson Comorbidity Index alone (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.76-0.78 vs area under the curve, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.59-0.62). Discrimination was highest among patients with no documented comorbidities (quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.84; 95% CI; 0.79-0.89) and lowest among high comorbidity patients (quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.65-0.68). The strength of association between quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and mortality ranged from 30.5-fold increased likelihood in patients with no comorbidities to 4.7-fold increased likelihood in patients with high comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment to predict hospital mortality diminishes with increasing comorbidity burden. Patients with comorbidities may have baseline abnormalities in quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment variables that reduce predictive accuracy. Additional research is needed to better understand quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment performance across different comorbid conditions with modification that incorporates the context of changes to baseline variables.

Simulation-based interdisciplinary education improves intern attitudes and outlook toward colleagues in other disciplines.

BACKGROUND: Cooperative interdisciplinary patient care is a modern healthcare necessity. While various medical and surgical disciplines have independent educational requirements, a system-wide simulation-based curriculum composed of different disciplines provides a unique forum to observe the effect of interdisciplinary simulation-based education (IDSE). Our hypothesis: IDSE positively affects intern outlook and attitudes towards other medical disciplines. METHODS: Using an established interdisciplinary simulation curriculum designed for first year interns, we explored the relative effect of IDSE on between-discipline intern attitudes in a convergent, parallel, mixed-methods study. Data sources included novel pre-post anonymous survey measurements (10-point Likert scale), focus groups, direct observations, and reflective field notes. This quasi-experimental pilot study was conducted at an academic, tertiary care medical center with two cohorts of interns: one exposed to IDSE and one exposed to an independent within-discipline simulation curriculum. RESULTS: IDSE exposed interns demonstrated statistically significant improvements when comparing mean pre-test and post-test score differences in five of seven areas: perceived interdisciplinary collegiality ([Formula: see text] = 0.855; p = 0.0002), respect (x̅ = 0.436; p = 0.0312), work interactions ([Formula: see text] = 0.691; p = 0.0069), perceived interdisciplinary attitudes (x̅ = 0.764; p = 0.0031), and comfort in interdisciplinary learning (x̅ = 1.164; p < 0.0001). There were no changes in interdisciplinary viewpoints observed among non-IDSE interns. IDSE interns were comfortable when learning with interns of different disciplines and believed others viewed their discipline positively compared to non-IDSE interns. Qualitative data uncovered the following themes related to the impact of IDSE including: 1) Relationship building, 2) Communication openness, 3) Attitude shifting, and 4) Enhanced learner experience. CONCLUSIONS: IDSE positively influenced intern outlook on and attitudes towards other medical disciplines. This unique learning environment provided interns an opportunity to learn clinical case management while learning about, from, and with each other; subsequently breaking traditional discipline-specific stereotypes and improving interdisciplinary relations. Future explicit focus on IDSE offers opportunity to improve interdisciplinary interactions and patient care.

Clinical Factors and Outcomes of Dialysis-Dependent End-Stage Renal Disease Patients with Emergency Department Septic Shock.

BACKGROUND: Infection is the second leading cause of death in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Prior investigations of acute septic shock in this specific population are limited. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the clinical presentation and factors associated with outcome among ESRD patients with acute septic shock. METHODS: We reviewed patients prospectively enrolled in an emergency department (ED) septic shock treatment pathway registry between January 2014 and May 2016. Clinical and treatment variables for ESRD patients were compared with non-ESRD patients. A second analysis focused on ESRD septic shock survivors and nonsurvivors. RESULTS: Among 4126 registry enrollees, 3564 (86.4%) met inclusion for the study. End-stage renal disease was present in 3.8% (n = 137) of ED septic shock patients. Hospital mortality was 20.4% and 17.1% for the ESRD and non-ESRD septic shock patient groups (p = 0.31). Septic shock patients with ESRD had a higher burden of chronic illness, but similar admission clinical profiles to non-ESRD patients. End-stage renal disease status was independently associated with lower fluid resuscitation dose, even when controlling for severity of illness. Age and admission lactate were independently associated with mortality in ESRD septic shock patients. CONCLUSION: ESRD patients comprise a small but important portion of patients with ED septic shock. Although presentation clinical profiles are similar to patients without ESRD, ESRD status is independently associated with lower fluid dose and compliance with the 30-mL/kg fluid goal. Hyperlactatemia is a marker of mortality in ESRD septic shock.

Urinary obstruction is an important complicating factor in patients with septic shock due to urinary infection.

OBJECTIVE: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common cause of severe sepsis, and anatomic urologic obstruction is a recognized factor for complicated disease. We aimed to identify the incidence of urinary obstruction complicating acute septic shock and determine the characteristics and outcomes of this group. METHODS: Patients prospectively enrolled in a sepsis treatment pathway registry between October 2013 and July 2014 were reviewed for the diagnosis of UTI. Standardized medical record review was performed to confirm sepsis due to UTI and determine clinical variables including the presence of anatomic urinary obstruction. Patients with septic shock due to UTI with obstruction were compared with those without obstruction. The primary outcomes were incidence of urinary obstruction and hospital mortality. RESULTS: Among 1084 registry enrollees, 209 (19.2%) met inclusion criteria for the study. Acute anatomic obstruction was identified in 22 (10.5%) patients. Hospital mortality in patients with obstruction was 27.3% compared with 11.2% in patients without obstruction (absolute difference of 16.1%; P = .03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2%-30.9%). Hospital length of stay among survivors was 12.8 days compared with 8.3 days (absolute difference of 4.5 days; P = .04; 95% CI, 0.2-8.8 days). History of urinary stone disease was independently associated with obstruction (odds ratio, 5.6; 95% CI, 2.2-14.3). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 10 patients presenting with septic shock due to a urinary source is complicated by anatomic urinary obstruction. These patients have significantly higher mortality compared with patients without obstruction. Early imaging of patients with septic shock due to suspected urinary source should be considered to identify obstruction requiring emergency intervention.

Early neurologic examination is not reliable for prognostication in post-cardiac arrest patients who undergo therapeutic hypothermia.

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in post-cardiac arrest (CA) care including therapeutic hypothermia (TH) have improved survival and favorable neurologic outcomes for survivors of CA. Survivors often present with deep coma and lack of brainstem reflexes, which are generally associated with adverse outcomes in many disease processes. Little is known regarding the role of initial emergency department (ED) neurological examination and its potential for prognostication. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine if components of a standardized neurologic examination are reliable prognosticators in patients recently resuscitated from CA. We hypothesize that lack of neurologic function does not reliably predict an adverse outcome and, therefore, should not be used to determine eligibility for TH. METHODS: A standardized neurologic examination was performed in the ED on a prospective, convenience cohort of post-CA patients presenting to a CA resuscitation center who would undergo a comprehensive postarrest care pathway that included TH. Data such as prior sedation or active neuromuscular blockade were documented to evaluate for the presence of possible confounders. Examination findings were then compared with hospital survival and neurologic outcome at discharge as defined by the cerebral performance category (CPC) score as documented in the institutional TH registry. RESULTS: Forty-nine subjects were enrolled, most of whom presented comatose with a Glasgow Coma Scale of 3 (n=41, 83.7%). Nineteen subjects (38.8%) had absence of all examination findings, of which 4 of 19 (21.1%) survived to hospital discharge. Of those with at least 1 positive examination finding, 13 of 30 subjects (43.3%) survived to hospital discharge. Subgroup analysis showed that 9 of the 19 patients with absence of brainstem reflexes did not have evidence of active neuromuscular blockade at the time of the examination; 2 of 9 (22.1%) survived to hospital discharge. Eight of these subjects in this group had not received any prior sedation; 1 of 8 (12.5%) survived to hospital discharge. Only 1 of the 17 subjects who survived was discharged with poor neurologic function with a CPC score=3, whereas all others who survived had good neurologic function, CPC score=1. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients treated in a comprehensive postarrest care pathway that included TH, absence of neurologic function on initial ED presentation was not reliable for prognostication. Given these findings, clinicians should refrain from using the initial ED neurological examination to guide the aggressiveness of care or in counseling of family members regarding anticipated outcome.

Cardiac arrest with initial arrest rhythm of pulseless electrical activity: do rhythm characteristics correlate with outcome?

OBJECTIVES: Cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death in the United States, with pulseless electrical activity (PEA) as a common initial arrest rhythm. We sought to determine if rate of electrical activity and QRS width correlate with survival in patients who present with PEA out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective review of patients with PEA out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with first documented cardiac rhythm of PEA from January 2010 to September 2013. Demographic, arrest and initial rhythm characteristics, and patient outcome were abstracted via systematic chart review. The initial 20 seconds of each rhythm strip were used to ascertain electrical rate and QRS width. Primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Four hundred fourteen patients were eligible for the study. One hundred fifty-two patients did not have sufficient data for analysis. Two hundred sixty-two patients were included in the final analysis with mean age, 66 years. There were 23 (8.8%) survivors and 17 (6.5%) neurologically intact survivors. Mean heart rate was 58 (confidence interval, 54-63) beats per minute, and mean QRS interval was 100 (confidence interval, 95-106) milliseconds. Twenty-nine point seven percent of patients had wide QRS complexes, and 70.3% were narrow. There was no difference in survival in patients based on heart rate (13.1% vs 7.4%, P = .16) or QRS interval (8.7% vs 7.7%, P = .79). CONCLUSIONS: In this single emergency medical services agency study, neither PEA electrical rate nor QRS width correlated with survival or neurologic outcome.

ED prognostication of comatose cardiac arrest patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia is unreliable.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) improves patient survival with good neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. The value of early clinician prognostication in the emergency department (ED) has not been studied in this patient population. OBJECTIVE: To determine if physicians can accurately predict survival and neurologic outcome at hospital discharge of resuscitated, comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients treated in a post-cardiac arrest clinical pathway that included TH. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study conducted at a tertiary referral center. Participants were physicians involved in the resuscitation of OHCA patients treated with a clinical pathway that included TH. Immediately after patient resuscitation in the ED, physicians recorded their prediction of patient survival and neurologic outcome on a standardized questionnaire. Neurologic outcome was assessed by the cerebral performance category. RESULTS: Forty-two physicians completed questionnaires on 17 patients enrolled from October 2009 to March 2010. Sensitivity and specificity of physician prediction of patient survival were 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.83) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.59-0.94), respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.61-0.88), a positive likelihood ratio (+LR) of 3.72 (95% CI, 1.30-11.02), and a -LR of 0.40 (95% CI, 0.21-0.77). Sensitivity and specificity of physician prediction of good neurologic outcome were 0.40 (95% CI, 0.20-0.64) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.50-0.84), respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.55 (95% CI, 0.39-0.70), a +LR of 1.29 (95% CI, 0.56-3.03), and a -LR of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.53-1.41). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians poorly prognosticate both survival and neurologic outcome in comatose OHCA patients undergoing TH. Premature prognostication in the ED is unreliable and should be avoided.

Major hemorrhage from hepatic laceration after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Visceral injury from cardiac arrest resuscitation is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication. We describe and review 2 cases of hepatic laceration complicated by major abdominal hemorrhage manifested as delayed shock following cardiopulmonary resuscitation after cardiac arrest. Two patients enrolled in our institutional post cardiac arrest resuscitation clinical pathway had evidence of major liver laceration presenting as delayed shock due to massive hemoperitoneum. Case analysis revealed coagulopathy due to systemic anticoagulation as a risk factor for major hemorrhage. Both cases were successfully managed via hepatic artery embolization. Visceral abdominal injuries are an uncommon but important complication of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Coagulopathy, including therapeutic systemic anticoagulation, is a risk factor for clinically significant hemorrhage.

Successful use of intra-arrest thrombolysis for electrical storm due to acute myocardial infarction.

Acute vascular thrombotic disease, including acute myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism, accounts for 70% of sudden outpatient cardiac arrest. The role of intra-arrest thrombolytic administration aimed at reversing the underlying cause of cardiac arrest remains an area of debate with recent guidelines advising against routine use. We present a case of prolonged refractory ventricular fibrillation electrical storm in a patient who demonstrated intra-arrest electrocardiographic and sonographic markers confirming acute myocardial infarction. Return of spontaneous circulation was rapidly achieved after rescue intra-arrest bolus thrombolysis.Highlights of this case are discussed in the context of the current evidence for thrombolytic therapy in cardiac arrest with specific attention to the issue of patient selection.

Regionalization of post-cardiac arrest care: implementation of a cardiac resuscitation center.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend standardized treatment of post-cardiac arrest patients to improve outcomes. However, the infrastructure, resources, and personnel required to meet the complex needs of cardiac arrest victims remain a barrier to care. Given that regionalization of time-dependent high-acuity illness is an emerging paradigm, the aim of the present study was to develop and implement a regionalized approach to post-cardiac arrest care. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study on all patients treated in a regionalized clinical pathway from November 2007 through June 2011. All patients were enrolled after admission to an urban academic medical center. Clinical data including arrest and treatment variables, complications, and outcome were collected on consecutive patients with the use of a preformatted standard data collection tool using Utstein criteria. RESULTS: A total of 220 patients were enrolled; 127 (58%) patients were local direct admissions from our community, and 93 (42%) were transferred from 1 of 24 outlying referral hospitals. One hundred six (48%, 95% CI 38%-53%) patients survived to hospital discharge. The primary outcome of hospital survival with good neurologic function was observed in 94 (43%, 95% CI 32%-48%). There was no difference in survival with good neurologic outcome among local and referred patients. Overall 1-year survival was 44% (95% CI 38%-51%). Among patients discharged from the hospital with good neurologic function, 93% (95% CI 85%-97%) remained alive at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Development of a regionalized approach to post-cardiac arrest care using previously established referral relationships is feasible, and implementation of such an approach was clinically effective in our region.

Incidence and risk factors associated with early death in patients with emergency department septic shock.

BACKGROUND: Limited research has explored early mortality among patients presenting with septic shock. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence and factors associated with early death following emergency department (ED) presentation of septic shock. METHODS: A prospective registry of patients enrolled in an ED septic shock clinical pathway was used to identify patients. Patients were compared across demographic, comorbid, clinical, and treatment variables by death within 72 hours of ED presentation. RESULTS: Among the sample of 2,414 patients, overall hospital mortality was 20.6%. Among patients who died in the hospital, mean and median time from ED presentation to death were 4.96 days and 2.28 days, respectively. Death at 24, 48, and 72 hours occurred in 5.5%, 9.5%, and 11.5% of patients, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that the following factors were independently associated with early mortality: age (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.05), malignancy (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.11-2.11), pneumonia (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.02-1.88), urinary tract infection (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.89), first shock index (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.27-2.70), early vasopressor use (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.60-2.92), initial international normalized ratio (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.07-1.27), initial albumin (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44-0.69), and first serum lactate (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.16-1.26). CONCLUSIONS: Adult septic shock patients experience a high rate of early mortality within 72 hours of ED arrival. Recognizable clinical factors may aid the identification of patients at risk of early death.

Etiology of illness in patients with severe sepsis admitted to the hospital from the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Patients identified with sepsis in the emergency department often are treated on the basis of the presumption of infection; however, various noninfectious conditions that require specific treatments have clinical presentations very similar to that of sepsis. Our aim was to describe the etiology of illness in patients identified and treated for severe sepsis in the emergency department. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of patients treated with goal-directed resuscitation for severe sepsis in the emergency department. Inclusion criteria were suspected infection, 2 or more criteria for systemic inflammation, and evidence of hypoperfusion. Exclusion criteria were age of <18 years and the need for immediate surgery. Clinical data on eligible patients were prospectively collected for 2 years. Blinded observers used a priori definitions to determine the final cause of hospitalization. RESULTS: In total, 211 patients were enrolled; 95 (45%) had positive culture results, and 116 (55%) had negative culture results. The overall mortality rate was 19%. Patients with positive culture results were more likely to have indwelling vascular lines (P = .03), be residents of nursing homes (P = .04), and have a shorter time to administration of antibiotics in the emergency department (83 vs 97 min; P = .03). Of patients with negative culture results, 44% had clinical infections, 8% had atypical infections, 32% had noninfectious mimics, and 16% had an illness of indeterminate etiology. CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that >50% of patients identified and treated for severe sepsis in the emergency department had negative culture results. Of patients identified with a sepsis syndrome at presentation, 18% had a noninfectious diagnosis that mimicked sepsis, and the clinical characteristics of these patients were similar to those of patients with culture-positive sepsis.

Unifying Resident Education: 12 Interdisciplinary Critical Care Simulation Scenarios.

Introduction: Unified critical care training within residency education is a necessity. We created a simulation-based curriculum designed to educate residents on core topics and procedural skills, which crossed all adult disciplines caring for critically ill patients. Methods: Residents from seven adult disciplines participated in this annual program during intern year. Learners were grouped into mixed discipline cohorts. Each cohort attended three distinct 4-hour simulation-based sessions, each consisting of four scenarios followed by postevent debriefing. The curriculum included 12 total clinical scenarios. Scenarios covered a broad array of complex critical care topics facing all adult specialties and reinforced important system-specific initiatives. Assessments evaluated clinical performance metrics, self-reported confidence in curricular topics, procedural and communication skills, resident satisfaction, and interdisciplinary attitudes. Results: Quantitative and qualitative data analyzed in three published works over the past 9 years of curricular programming has demonstrated highly satisfied learners along with improved: clinical performance; self-reported confidence in clinical topics, procedural, and communication skills; and interdisciplinary collegiality. Discussion: Purposeful focus on curricular development that integrates basic, clinical, and procedural content, while promoting the development of interdisciplinary relationships and the practice of critical thinking skills, is vital for successful education and patient care. This curriculum was well received by interns, covered difficult to obtain GME milestones, and provided an opportunity for interdisciplinary education. In an era of limited time for devoted bedside teaching and variable training exposures to certain disease processes, the development and implementation of this curriculum has filled a void within our system for unified resident education.

The Effect of Outcome Selection on the Performance of Prediction Models in Patients at Risk for Sepsis.

IMPORTANCE: Risk prediction models for patients with suspected sepsis have been derived on and applied to various outcomes, including readily available outcomes such as hospital mortality and ICU admission as well as longer-term mortality outcomes that may be more important to patients. It is unknown how selecting different outcomes influences model performance in patients at risk for sepsis. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the impact of outcome selection on risk model performance and weighting of individual predictor variables. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We retrospectively analyzed adults hospitalized with suspected infection from January 2014 to September 2017 at 12 hospitals. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We used routinely collected clinical data to derive logistic regression models for four outcomes: hospital mortality, composite ICU length of stay greater than 72 hours or hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and 90-day mortality. We compared the performance of the models using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration plots. RESULTS: Among 52,184 admissions, 2,030 (4%) experienced hospital mortality, 6,659 (13%) experienced the composite of hospital mortality or ICU length of stay greater than 72 hours, 3,417 (7%) experienced 30-day mortality, and 5,655 (11%) experienced 90-day mortality. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves decreased when hospital-based models were applied to predict 30-day (hospital mortality = 0.88-0.85; -0.03, composite ICU length of stay greater than 72 hours or hospital mortality = 0.90-0.81; -0.09) and 90-day mortality (hospital mortality = 0.88-0.81; -0.07, composite ICU length of stay greater than 72 hours or hospital mortality = 0.90-0.76; -0.14; all p < 0.01). Models were well calibrated for derived (root-mean-square error = 5-15) but not alternate outcomes (root-mean-square error = 8-35). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Risk models trained to predict readily available hospital-based outcomes in suspected sepsis show poorer discrimination and calibration when applied to 30- and 90-day mortality. Interpretation and application of risk models for patients at risk of sepsis should consider these findings.