Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Obstet Gynecol ; 142(5): 1006-1016, 2023 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37713322

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared intrauterine vacuum-induced-hemorrhage control device for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) management. METHODS: Sixteen centers in the United States participated in this observational, postmarket registry medical record review (October 2020 through March 2022). The primary effectiveness outcome was treatment success , defined as bleeding control after insertion with no treatment escalation or bleeding recurrence. Additional outcomes included blood loss, time to device insertion, indwelling time, bleeding recurrence, and time to bleeding control. Treatment success and severe maternal morbidity measures (transfusion of 4 or more units of red blood cell, intensive care unit admission, and hysterectomy) were evaluated by blood loss before insertion. To assess safety, serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse device effects were collected. All outcomes were summarized by mode of delivery; treatment success was summarized by bleeding cause (all causes, any atony, isolated atony, nonatony). RESULTS: In total, 800 individuals (530 vaginal births, 270 cesarean births) were treated with the device; 94.3% had uterine atony (alone or in combination with other causes). Median total blood loss at device insertion was 1,050 mL in vaginal births and 1,600 mL in cesarean births. Across all bleeding causes, the treatment success rate was 92.5% for vaginal births and was 83.7% for cesarean births (95.8% [n=307] and 88.2% [n=220], respectively, in isolated atony). Median indwelling time was 3.1 hours and 4.6 hours, respectively. In vaginal births, 14 SAEs were reported among 13 individuals (2.5%). In cesarean births, 22 SAEs were reported among 21 individuals (7.8%). Three (0.4%) SAEs were deemed possibly related to the device or procedure. No uterine perforations or deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: For both vaginal and cesarean births in real-world settings, rapid and effective bleeding control was achieved with an FDA-cleared intrauterine vacuum-induced hemorrhage-control device. The safety profile was consistent with that observed in the registrational trial (NCT02883673), and SAEs or adverse device effects were of the nature and severity expected in the setting of PPH. This device is an important new tool for managing a life-threatening condition, and timely utilization may help to improve obstetric hemorrhage outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04995887.

2.
Semin Perinatol ; 39(6): 466-70, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26365011

ABSTRACT

Amniotic membrane sweeping or stripping is a safe and effective method of labor induction supported by national obstetrical organizations. While its use dates back to antiquity by both midwives and physicians there are still areas that need further research to define its role in induction of labor. A review of the literature reveals that amniotic membrane sweeping is a safe, effective, and inexpensive method of labor induction. It can be done in the outpatient setting with minimal risks so long as it is avoided in patients with contraindications. Amniotic membrane sweeping can be performed in Group B Streptococcus-positive women with studies showing no increase in untoward outcomes. However, there is no data in women infected with HIV or hepatitis.


Subject(s)
Amnion/physiopathology , Extraembryonic Membranes/physiopathology , Labor, Induced/methods , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/therapy , Pregnancy, Prolonged/therapy , Adult , Amnion/microbiology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Extraembryonic Membranes/microbiology , Female , History, 17th Century , History, 19th Century , History, 21st Century , History, Ancient , Humans , Labor, Induced/history , Labor, Induced/instrumentation , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/history , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/microbiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/physiopathology , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy, Prolonged/history , Pregnancy, Prolonged/physiopathology
3.
Obstet Gynecol ; 130(6): 1383-1384, 2017 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29112670
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL