The National Emergency Medicine Fourth-year Student (M4) Examinations: Updates and Performance.

BACKGROUND: Version 1 (V1) of the National Emergency Medicine Fourth-year Student (EM M4) Examination was released in 2011 and revised along with release of V2 in 2012. Each examination contains 50 multiple-choice questions designed to assess knowledge in the EM M4 clerkship curriculum. Development and initial performance data were described previously. OBJECTIVE: To provide updated V1 performance data, describe development and revision of V2, and to compare performance between academic years and examination forms, and within academic years. METHODS: Examinations are administered at www.saemtests.org with ongoing performance data provided. After 1 year of use, nine questions on V2 were revised, five because of low discriminatory ability and four because of excessive difficulty. Revision or replacement was done in accordance with the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Item Writing Guidelines. Mean scores were compared for V1 between academic years (i.e., July 2011-June 2012 vs. July 2012-June 2013), V2 compared with V1, and for each examination version for early and late test takers. RESULTS: V1 has been administered >10,000 times since its release, and the current form mean is 81.5% (SD 3.7). Average discriminatory value (rpb) is 0.204. V2 has been administered >1500 times, with a mean score of 78.4% (SD 4.4) and average rpb 0.253. V1 and V2 current means differ statistically. Scores from examinees completing V1 or V2 early vs. late in the academic year differ statistically. CONCLUSIONS: Performance data for V1 remain stable after 2 years. Revisions of poorly performing questions improved question performance on V2. Questions with low rpb or low pdiff will continue to be revised annually. While examination forms differ statistically, the practical utility of the differences is not defined.

Ketamine-induced catalepsy during adult sedation in the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Ketamine continues to rise in popularity for procedural sedation in the Emergency Department (ED) for both adult and pediatric patients. The medication has a good safety profile and is well tolerated in the majority of patients. However, the Emergency Physician should be aware of the full range of side-effects that may be encountered, so as to best anticipate and prepare for potential complications. OBJECTIVES: We describe two cases of catalepsy (muscle hypertonia with dissociation) in patients undergoing sedation with ketamine. CASE REPORT: In the first case, a patient presented to the ED after a prehospital awake nasal intubation for an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. After sedation with ketamine, he was extubated and transitioned to bi-level positive pressure ventilation. Shortly after receiving ketamine, he exhibited severe muscular hypertonia of the upper extremities with facial grimacing. A second patient underwent ketamine sedation for reduction of a shoulder dislocation. After medication administration, he exhibited full body muscular hypertonicity, interfering briefly with the procedure. In both patients, catalepsy resolved spontaneously. CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine-induced catalepsy is a self-limited side-effect that has the potential to interfere with procedures performed under sedation.

Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Educational Research: The Best Publications of 2015.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives were to critically appraise the medical education research literature of 2015 and review the highest-quality quantitative and qualitative examples. METHODS: A total of 434 emergency medicine (EM)-related articles were discovered upon a search of ERIC, PsychINFO, PubMED, and SCOPUS. These were both quantitative and qualitative in nature. All were screened by two of the authors using previously published exclusion criteria, and the remaining were appraised by all authors using a previously published scoring system. The highest scoring articles were then reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty-one manuscripts were scored, and 10 quantitative and two qualitative papers were the highest scoring and are reviewed and summarized in this article. CONCLUSIONS: This installment in this critical appraisal series reviews 12 of the highest-quality EM-related medical education research manuscripts published in 2015.

Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Educational Research: The Best Publications of 2015.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives were to critically appraise the medical education research literature of 2015 and review the highest-quality quantitative and qualitative examples. METHODS: A total of 434 emergency medicine (EM)-related articles were discovered upon a search of ERIC, PsychINFO, PubMED, and SCOPUS. These were both quantitative and qualitative in nature. All were screened by two of the authors using previously published exclusion criteria, and the remaining were appraised by all authors using a previously published scoring system. The highest scoring articles were then reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty-one manuscripts were scored, and 10 quantitative and two qualitative papers were the highest scoring and are reviewed and summarized in this article. CONCLUSIONS: This installment in this critical appraisal series reviews 12 of the highest-quality EM-related medical education research manuscripts published in 2015.

Performance of the maximum modified early warning score to predict the need for higher care utilization among admitted emergency department patients.

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether ED-calculated risk scores can predict required intensity of care upon hospital admission. This investigation examines whether versions of the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) predict high level of care utilization among patients admitted from the ED. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 299 admissions was implemented. Exclusions prior to abstraction included pediatrics, cardiology, or trauma admissions. Using a data-gathering instrument, abstractors recorded physiologic parameters and clinical variables. Risk scores were calculated electronically. In contrast to the original MEWS, the MEWS Max was calculated using data from the entire ED visit. The primary outcome composite included all-cause mortality and higher care utilization within 24 hours. RESULTS: The final analysis contained 280 participants. 76 (27%) met the composite endpoint of death (n = 1) or higher care utilization (n = 76). The MEWS Max was associated with the composite outcome (OR=l.6 [95% CI 1.3-1.8] for each one point increase). The MEWS Max had moderate predictive ability (C statistic: MEWS Max 0.73 [0.66-0.79]) but classified 82% of participants as intermediate (10-40%) risk. Inclusion of additional variables slightly improved the predictive ability (C statistic 0.76 [0.69-0.82]) and correctly reclassified 17% of patients as <10% risk. CONCLUSIONS: The MEWS Max has moderate ability to predict the need for higher level of care. Addition of ED length of stay and other variables to MEWS Max may identify patients at both low and high risk of requiring a higher level of care.