Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 25(6): 1632-1637, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36781820

ABSTRACT

AIM: Liraglutide treatment is associated with gallbladder-related disorders and has been shown to delay postprandial gallbladder refilling. The gut hormones cholecystokinin (CCK), fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) and glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2), are known to regulate gallbladder motility and may be implicated in gallbladder-related disorders associated with liraglutide treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a double-blind, 12-week trial, 52 participants [50% male, age 47.6 ± 10.0 years, body mass index 32.6 ± 3.4 kg/m2 (mean ± standard deviation)] with obesity were randomized 1:1 to once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide (escalated from 0.6 mg to 3.0 mg once-daily) or placebo. During liquid meal tests performed at baseline, after the first dose and following 12 weeks of treatment, we evaluated postprandial gallbladder dynamics and plasma responses of CCK, FGF19 and GLP-2. RESULTS: Liraglutide reduced postprandial FGF19 after the first dose [area under the curve (AUC)0-240 min 24.8 vs. 48.0 min × ng/ml, treatment ratio (TR) (95% confidence interval) 0.52 (0.39; 0.69)] and following 12 weeks of treatment [AUC0-240 min 33.7 vs. 48.5 ng/ml × min, TR 0.69 (0.52; 0.93)]. Liraglutide also reduced postprandial GLP-2 responses (AUC0-240 min 3650 vs. 4894 min × pmol/L, TR 0.75 (0.62; 0.90)] following the first dose as well as after 12 weeks [AUC0-240 min 3760 vs. 4882 min × pmol/L, TR 0.77 (0.60; 0.99)]. Liraglutide increased postprandial responses of CCK after the first dose [AUC0-240 min 762 vs. 670 min × pmol/L; TR 1.14 (0.97; 1.33)] and following 12 weeks of treatment [AUC0-240 min 873 vs. 628 min × pmol/L; TR 1.39 (1.12; 1.73)]. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, treatment with liraglutide decreased postprandial FGF19 and GLP-2 concentrations and increased postprandial CCK concentrations, which may explain the delayed postprandial gallbladder refilling observed in individuals with obesity treated with liraglutide.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Liraglutide , Humans , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Female , Liraglutide/pharmacology , Liraglutide/therapeutic use , Gallbladder/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Obesity/complications , Body Mass Index , Postprandial Period , Double-Blind Method , Blood Glucose/metabolism
2.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 24(11): 2192-2202, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35775631

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the effect of curcumin treatment on hepatic fat content in obese individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a double-blind, parallel-group trial, 37 obese, non-diabetic individuals were randomized to placebo or curcumin treatment for 6 weeks. Curcumin was dosed as lecithin-formulated tablet; 200 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was hepatic fat content as assessed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Other endpoints included anthropometric measurements, hepatic biomarkers including FibroScan measurements, metabolic variables, inflammation markers, appetite measures and ad libitum food intake. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics (mean ± SD) were age 46 ± 14 years, hepatic fat content 12.2% ± 8.8% points, body mass index 38.8 ± 6.1 kg/m2 and waist circumference 125.8 ± 12.3 cm. After 6 weeks of treatment with curcumin, hepatic fat content was changed by -0.86% points (95% CI -3.65; 1.94) compared with 0.71% points (95% CI - 2.08; 3.51) with placebo, thus resulting in a non-significant estimated treatment difference of -1.57% points (95% CI -5.36; 2.22, P = .412). Compared with placebo, curcumin treatment caused small reductions in fasting plasma glucose (estimated treatment difference [ETD] - 0.24 mmol/L [95% CI -0.45; -0.03]), triglycerides (ETD [percentage change] -20.22% [95% CI -33.21; -6.03]) and gamma glutamyltransferase (ETD [percentage change] -15.70% [95% CI -23.32; -7.32]), but except for gamma glutamyltransferase, none of these differences remained statistically significant after adjusting for multiple testing. Treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo, curcumin treatment for 6 weeks had no significant effect on MRS-assessed hepatic fat content in obese individuals with primarily mild steatosis. Curcumin was well tolerated.


Subject(s)
Curcumin , Adult , Blood Glucose , Curcumin/pharmacology , Curcumin/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Lecithins , Middle Aged , Obesity/complications , Obesity/drug therapy , Triglycerides/metabolism , gamma-Glutamyltransferase
3.
Eur J Endocrinol ; 191(2): 192-203, 2024 Aug 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39049802

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Although metformin is widely used for treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D), its glucose-lowering mechanism remains unclear. Using the glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor (GLP-1R) antagonist exendin(9-39)NH2, we tested the hypothesis that postprandial GLP-1-mediated effects contribute to the glucose-lowering potential of metformin in T2D. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study, 15 individuals with T2D (median HbA1c 50 mmol/mol [6.7%], body mass index 30.1 kg/m2, age 71 years) underwent, in randomized order, 14 days of metformin and placebo treatment, respectively. Each treatment period was preceded by 14 days without any glucose-lowering medicine and concluded by two 4 h mixed meal tests performed in randomized order and separated by >24 h with either continuous intravenous exendin(9-39)NH2 or saline infusion. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, metformin treatment lowered fasting plasma glucose (mean of differences [MD] 1.4 mmol/L × min [95% CI 0.8-2.0]) as well as postprandial plasma glucose excursions during both saline infusion (MD 186 mmol/L × min [95% CI 64-307]) and exendin(9-39)NH2 infusion (MD 268 mmol/L × min [95% CI 108-427]). The metformin-induced improvement in postprandial glucose tolerance was unaffected by GLP-1R antagonization (MD 82 mmol/L × min [95% CI -6564-170]). Metformin treatment increased fasting plasma GLP-1 (MD 1.7 pmol/L × min [95% CI 0.39-2.9]) but did not affect postprandial GLP-1 responses (MD 820 pmol/L × min [95% CI -1750-111]). CONCLUSIONS: Using GLP-1R antagonization, we could not detect GLP-1-mediated postprandial glucose-lowering effect of metformin in individuals with T2D. We show that 2 weeks of metformin treatment increases fasting plasma GLP-1, which may contribute to metformin's beneficial effect on fasting plasma glucose in T2D. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03246451.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose , Cross-Over Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 , Hypoglycemic Agents , Metformin , Postprandial Period , Humans , Metformin/therapeutic use , Metformin/administration & dosage , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Postprandial Period/drug effects , Male , Female , Aged , Glucagon-Like Peptide 1/blood , Double-Blind Method , Blood Glucose/drug effects , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemic Agents/pharmacology , Middle Aged , Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor/agonists , Peptide Fragments
4.
Endocr Connect ; 12(4)2023 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36800259

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Preclinically, curcumin has been shown to protect against glucocorticoid-induced insulin resistance. We evaluated the effect of curcumin administered with prednisolone in healthy overweight or obese men. Methods: In a double-blind, parallel-group trial, 24 overweight/obese non-diabetic men were randomised to one of three intervention groups (A) prednisolone placebo+curcumin placebo, (B) prednisolone (50 mg/day)+curcumin placebo or (C) prednisolone and curcumin (400 mg/day). Curcumin or curcumin placebo treatment started 1 day prior to 10-day prednisolone or prednisolone placebo treatment. The primary endpoint was change in prednisolone-induced insulin resistance assessed by homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR). Other endpoints included anthropometric measurements, magnetic resonance spectroscopy-assessed hepatic fat content, blood pressure, circulating metabolic markers and continuous glucose monitoring measures. Results: Baseline characteristics (mean ± s.d): age 44.2 ± 13.7 years, BMI 30.1 ± 3.5 kg/m2, HbAlc 33.3 ± 3.2 mmol/mol, HOMA2-IR 1.10 ± 0.45 and fasting plasma glucose 5.2 ± 0.4 mmol/L. Prednisolone significantly increased HOMA2-IR (estimated treatment difference 0.36 (95% CI 0.16; 0.57)). Co-treatment with curcumin had no effect on HOMA2-IR (estimated treatment difference 0.08 (95% CI -0.13; 0.39)). Prednisolone increased HbAlc, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, blood pressure, mean interstitial glucose, time spent in hyperglycaemia and glucose variability, but no protective effect of curcumin on any of these measures was observed. Conclusions: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group study involving 24 overweight or obese men randomised to one of three treatment arms, curcumin treatment had no protective effect on prednisolone-induced insulin resistance or other glucometabolic perturbations.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL