Repeatability of MRI Biomarkers in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: The NIMBLE Consortium.

Background There is a need for reliable noninvasive methods for diagnosing and monitoring nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Thus, the multidisciplinary Non-invasive Biomarkers of Metabolic Liver disease (NIMBLE) consortium was formed to identify and advance the regulatory qualification of NAFLD imaging biomarkers. Purpose To determine the different-day same-scanner repeatability coefficient of liver MRI biomarkers in patients with NAFLD at risk for steatohepatitis. Materials and Methods NIMBLE 1.2 is a prospective, observational, single-center short-term cross-sectional study (October 2021 to June 2022) in adults with NAFLD across a spectrum of low, intermediate, and high likelihood of advanced fibrosis as determined according to the fibrosis based on four factors (FIB-4) index. Participants underwent up to seven MRI examinations across two visits less than or equal to 7 days apart. Standardized imaging protocols were implemented with six MRI scanners from three vendors at both 1.5 T and 3 T, with central analysis of the data performed by an independent reading center (University of California, San Diego). Trained analysts, who were blinded to clinical data, measured the MRI proton density fat fraction (PDFF), liver stiffness at MR elastography (MRE), and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) for each participant. Point estimates and CIs were calculated using χ2 distribution and statistical modeling for pooled repeatability measures. Results A total of 17 participants (mean age, 58 years ± 8.5 [SD]; 10 female) were included, of which seven (41.2%), six (35.3%), and four (23.5%) participants had a low, intermediate, or high likelihood of advanced fibrosis, respectively. The different-day same-scanner mean measurements were 13%-14% for PDFF, 6.6 L for VAT, and 3.15 kPa for two-dimensional MRE stiffness. The different-day same-scanner repeatability coefficients were 0.22 L (95% CI: 0.17, 0.29) for VAT, 0.75 kPa (95% CI: 0.6, 0.99) for MRE stiffness, 1.19% (95% CI: 0.96, 1.61) for MRI PDFF using magnitude reconstruction, 1.56% (95% CI: 1.26, 2.07) for MRI PDFF using complex reconstruction, and 19.7% (95% CI: 15.8, 26.2) for three-dimensional MRE shear modulus. Conclusion This preliminary study suggests that thresholds of 1.2%-1.6%, 0.22 L, and 0.75 kPa for MRI PDFF, VAT, and MRE, respectively, should be used to discern measurement error from real change in patients with NAFLD. ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT05081427 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kozaka and Matsui in this issue.

Deep Learning for Inference of Hepatic Proton Density Fat Fraction From T1-Weighted In-Phase and Opposed-Phase MRI: Retrospective Analysis of Population-Based Trial Data.

BACKGROUND. The confounder-corrected chemical shift-encoded MRI (CSE-MRI) sequence used to determine proton density fat fraction (PDFF) for hepatic fat quantification is not widely available. As an alternative, hepatic fat can be assessed by a two-point Dixon method to calculate signal fat fraction (FF) from conventional T1-weighted in- and opposed-phase (IOP) images, although signal FF is prone to biases, leading to inaccurate quantification. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare hepatic fat quantification by use of PDFF inferred from conventional T1-weighted IOP images and deep-learning convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with quantification by use of two-point Dixon signal FF with CSE-MRI PDFF as the reference standard. METHODS. This study entailed retrospective analysis of data from 292 participants (203 women, 89 men; mean age, 53.7 ± 12.0 [SD] years) enrolled at two sites from September 1, 2017, to December 18, 2019, in the Strong Heart Family Study (a prospective population-based study of American Indian communities). Participants underwent liver MRI (site A, 3 T; site B, 1.5 T) including T1-weighted IOP MRI and CSE-MRI (used to reconstruct CSE PDFF and CSE R2* maps). With CSE PDFF as reference, a CNN was trained in a random sample of 218 (75%) participants to infer voxel-by-voxel PDFF maps from T1-weighted IOP images; testing was performed in the other 74 (25%) participants. Parametric values from the entire liver were automatically extracted. Per-participant median CNN-inferred PDFF and median two-point Dixon signal FF were compared with reference median CSE-MRI PDFF by means of linear regression analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis. The code is publicly available at github.com/kang927/CNN-inference-of-PDFF-from-T1w-IOP-MR. RESULTS. In the 74 test-set participants, reference CSE PDFF ranged from 1% to 32% (mean, 11.3% ± 8.3% [SD]); reference CSE R2* ranged from 31 to 457 seconds-1 (mean, 62.4 ± 67.3 seconds-1 [SD]). Agreement metrics with reference to CSE PDFF for CNN-inferred PDFF were ICC = 0.99, bias = -0.19%, 95% limits of agreement (LoA) = (-2.80%, 2.71%) and for two-point Dixon signal FF were ICC = 0.93, bias = -1.11%, LoA = (-7.54%, 5.33%). CONCLUSION. Agreement with reference CSE PDFF was better for CNN-inferred PDFF from conventional T1-weighted IOP images than for two-point Dixon signal FF. Further investigation is needed in individuals with moderate-to-severe iron overload. CLINICAL IMPACT. Measurement of CNN-inferred PDFF from widely available T1-weighted IOP images may facilitate adoption of hepatic PDFF as a quantitative bio-marker for liver fat assessment, expanding opportunities to screen for hepatic steatosis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Point-of-care magnetic resonance technology to measure liver fat: Phantom and first-in-human pilot study.

PURPOSE: To assess feasibility and accuracy of point-of-care (POC) NMR-proton density fat fraction (PDFF) in phantoms and in a human pilot study in a POC setting. METHODS: POC NMR (LiverScope, Livivos, San Diego CA) PDFF measurements were obtained of certified phantoms with known PDFF values (0%-40%). In an institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant prospective human study, a convenience sample of participants from an obesity clinic was enrolled (November 2020 to June 2021). The inclusion criteria required body mass index (BMI) = 27-40 kg/m2 and willingness to undergo POC NMR and MRI-PDFF measurements. Liver PDFF was measured by POC NMR and, within 35 days after, by a confounder corrected CSE MRI PDFF acquisition and reconstruction method. The adverse events were documented and linear regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: POC NMR-PDFF measurements agreed with known phantom PDFF values (R2  = 0.99). Fourteen participants were enrolled in the pilot human study. MRI-PDFF could not be obtained in 4 participants (claustrophobia reaction, n = 3, exceeded size of MR scanner bore, n = 1). POC NMR was unevaluable in 2 participants (insufficient signal penetration depth, n = 1, failure to comply with instructions, n = 1). Technical success was 11 of 13 (85%) for POC NMR PDFF. In 7 participants (4 female; 31-74 years old; median BMI 35 kg/m2 ), MRI-PDFF (range, 2.8%-18.1%), and POC NMR-PDFF (range, 3%-25.2%), agreed with R2  = 0.94. POC NMR had no adverse events. CONCLUSION: POC NMR measures PDFF accurately in phantoms and, in a first-in-human pilot study, is feasible and accurate in adults with obesity. Further testing to determine precision and accuracy across larger and more diverse cohorts is needed.

MR elastography in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: inter-center and inter-analysis-method measurement reproducibility and accuracy at 3T.

OBJECTIVES: To assess reproducibility and fibrosis classification accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE)-determined liver stiffness measured manually at two different centers, and by automated analysis software in adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), using histopathology as a reference standard. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study included 91 adults with NAFLD who underwent liver MRE and biopsy. MRE-determined liver stiffness was measured independently for this analysis by an image analyst at each of two centers using standardized manual analysis methodology, and separately by an automated analysis. Reproducibility was assessed pairwise by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. RESULTS: ICC of liver stiffness measurements was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.97) between center 1 and center 2 analysts, 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94, 0.97) between the center 1 analyst and automated analysis, and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.96) between the center 2 analyst and automated analysis. Mean bias and 95% limits of agreement were 0.06 ± 0.38 kPa between center 1 and center 2 analysts, 0.05 ± 0.32 kPa between the center 1 analyst and automated analysis, and 0.11 ± 0.41 kPa between the center 2 analyst and automated analysis. The area under the ROC curves for the center 1 analyst, center 2 analyst, and automated analysis were 0.834, 0.833, and 0.847 for distinguishing fibrosis stage 0 vs. ≥ 1, and 0.939, 0.947, and 0.940 for distinguishing fibrosis stage ≤ 2 vs. ≥ 3. CONCLUSION: MRE-determined liver stiffness can be measured with high reproducibility and fibrosis classification accuracy at different centers and by an automated analysis. KEY POINTS: • Reproducibility of MRE liver stiffness measurements in adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is high between two experienced centers and between manual and automated analysis methods. • Analysts at two centers had similar high diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing dichotomized fibrosis stages. • Automated analysis provides similar diagnostic accuracy as manual analysis for advanced fibrosis.

Automated CNN-Based Analysis Versus Manual Analysis for MR Elastography in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Intermethod Agreement and Fibrosis Stage Discriminative Performance.

BACKGROUND. Histologic fibrosis stage is the most important prognostic factor in chronic liver disease. MR elastography (MRE) is the most accurate noninvasive method for detecting and staging liver fibrosis. Although accurate, manual ROI-based MRE analysis is complex, time-consuming, requires specialized readers, and is prone to methodologic variability and suboptimal interreader agreement. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to develop an automated convolutional neural network (CNN)-based method for liver MRE analysis, evaluate its agreement with manual ROI-based analysis, and assess its performance for classifying dichotomized fibrosis stages using histology as the reference standard. METHODS. In this retrospective cross-sectional study, 675 participants who underwent MRE using different MRI systems and field strengths at 28 imaging sites from five multicenter international clinical trials of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis were included for algorithm development and internal testing of agreement between automated CNN-based and manual ROI-based analyses. Eighty-one patients (52 women, 29 men; mean age, 54 years) who underwent MRE using a single 3-T system and liver biopsy for clinical purposes at a single institution were included for external testing of agreement between the two analysis methods and assessment of fibrosis stage discriminative performance. Agreement was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Bootstrapping was used to compute 95% CIs. Discriminative performance of each method for dichotomized histologic fibrosis stage was evaluated by AUC and compared using bootstrapping. RESULTS. Mean CNN- and manual ROI-based stiffness measurements ranged from 3.21 to 3.34 kPa in trial participants and from 3.21 to 3.30 kPa in clinical patients. ICC for CNN- and manual ROI-based measurements was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-0.98) in trial participants and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-0.99) in clinical patients. AUCs for classification of dichotomized fibrosis stage ranged from 0.89 to 0.93 for CNN-based analysis and 0.87 to 0.93 for manual ROI-based analysis (p = .23-.75). CONCLUSION. Stiffness measurements using the automated CNN-based method agreed strongly with manual ROI-based analysis across MRI systems and field strengths, with excellent discriminative performance for histology-determined dichotomized fibrosis stages in external testing. CLINICAL IMPACT. Given the high incidence of chronic liver disease worldwide, it is important that noninvasive tools to assess fibrosis are applied reliably across different settings. CNN-based analysis is feasible and may reduce reliance on expert image analysts.

Linearity and Bias of Proton Density Fat Fraction as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker: A Multicenter, Multiplatform, Multivendor Phantom Study.

Background Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) estimated by using chemical shift-encoded (CSE) MRI is an accepted imaging biomarker of hepatic steatosis. This work aims to promote standardized use of CSE MRI to estimate PDFF. Purpose To assess the accuracy of CSE MRI methods for estimating PDFF by determining the linearity and range of bias observed in a phantom. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, a commercial phantom with 12 vials of known PDFF values were shipped across nine U.S. centers. The phantom underwent 160 independent MRI examinations on 27 1.5-T and 3.0-T systems from three vendors. Two three-dimensional CSE MRI protocols with minimal T1 bias were included: vendor and standardized. Each vendor's confounder-corrected complex or hybrid magnitude-complex based reconstruction algorithm was used to generate PDFF maps in both protocols. The Siemens reconstruction required a configuration change to correct for water-fat swaps in the phantom. The MRI PDFF values were compared with the known PDFF values by using linear regression with mixed-effects modeling. The 95% CIs were calculated for the regression slope (ie, proportional bias) and intercept (ie, constant bias) and compared with the null hypothesis (slope = 1, intercept = 0). Results Pooled regression slope for estimated PDFF values versus phantom-derived reference PDFF values was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.98) in the biologically relevant 0%-47.5% PDFF range. The corresponding pooled intercept was -0.27% (95% CI: -0.50%, -0.05%). Across vendors, slope ranges were 0.86-1.02 (vendor protocols) and 0.97-1.0 (standardized protocol) at 1.5 T and 0.91-1.01 (vendor protocols) and 0.87-1.01 (standardized protocol) at 3.0 T. The intercept ranges (absolute PDFF percentage) were -0.65% to 0.18% (vendor protocols) and -0.69% to -0.17% (standardized protocol) at 1.5 T and -0.48% to 0.10% (vendor protocols) and -0.78% to -0.21% (standardized protocol) at 3.0 T. Conclusion Proton density fat fraction estimation derived from three-dimensional chemical shift-encoded MRI in a commercial phantom was accurate across vendors, imaging centers, and field strengths, with use of the vendors' product acquisition and reconstruction software. © RSNA, 2021 See also the editorial by Dyke in this issue.

Liver fibrosis imaging: A clinical review of ultrasound and magnetic resonance elastography.

Liver fibrosis is a histological hallmark of most chronic liver diseases, which can progress to cirrhosis and liver failure, and predisposes to hepatocellular carcinoma. Accurate diagnosis of liver fibrosis is necessary for prognosis, risk stratification, and treatment decision-making. Liver biopsy, the reference standard for assessing liver fibrosis, is invasive, costly, and impractical for surveillance and treatment response monitoring. Elastography offers a noninvasive, objective, and quantitative alternative to liver biopsy. This article discusses the need for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and reviews the comparative advantages and limitations of ultrasound and magnetic resonance elastography techniques with respect to their basic concepts, acquisition, processing, and diagnostic performance. Variations in clinical contexts of use and common pitfalls associated with each technique are considered. In addition, current challenges and future directions to improve the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of elastography techniques are discussed. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:25-42.

Measurement of spleen fat on MRI-proton density fat fraction arises from reconstruction of noise.

PURPOSE: This study compares splenic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) measured using confounder-corrected chemical shift-encoded (CSE)-MRI to magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in human patients at 3T. METHODS: This was a prospectively designed ancillary study to various previously described single-center studies performed in adults and children with known or suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Patients underwent magnitude-based MRI (MRI-M), complex-based MRI (MRI-C), high signal-to-noise variants (Hi-SNR MRI-M and Hi-SNR MRI-C), and MRS at 3T for spleen PDFF estimation. PDFF from CSE-MRI methods were compared to MRS-PDFF using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Demographics were summarized descriptively. Spearman's rank correlations were computed pairwise between CSE-MRI methods. Individual patient measurements were plotted for qualitative assessment. A significance level of 0.05 was used. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (20 female, 27 male) including 12 adults (median 55 years old) and 35 children (median 12 years old). Median PDFF estimated by MRS, MRI-M, Hi-SNR MRI-M, MRI-C, and Hi-SNR MRI-C was 1.0, 2.3, 1.9, 2.2, and 2.0%. The four CSE-MRI methods estimated statistically significant higher spleen PDFF values compared to MRS (p < 0.0001 for all). Pairwise associations in spleen PDFF values measured by different CSE-MRI methods were weak, with the highest Spearman's rank correlations being 0.295 between MRI-M and Hi-SNR MRI-M; none were significant after correction for multiple comparisons. No qualitative relationship was observed between PDFF measurements among the various methods. CONCLUSION: Overestimation of PDFF by CSE-MRI compared to MRS and poor agreement between related CSE-MRI methods suggest that non-zero PDFF values in human spleen are artifactual.