ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: European guidelines recommend treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection (CHB) with the nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) entecavir or tenofovir. However, many European CHB patients have been exposed to other NAs, which are associated with therapy failure and resistance. The CAPRE study was performed to gain insight in prevalence and characteristics of NA resistance in Europe. METHODS: A survey was performed on genotypic resistance testing results acquired during routine monitoring of CHB patients with detectable serum hepatitis B virus DNA in European tertiary referral centers. RESULTS: Data from 1568 patients were included. The majority (73.8%) were exposed to lamivudine monotherapy. Drug-resistant strains were detected in 52.7%. The most frequently encountered primary mutation was M204V/I (48.7%), followed by A181T/V (3.8%) and N236T (2.6%). In patients exposed to entecavir (n = 102), full resistance was present in 35.3%. Independent risk factors for resistance were age, viral load, and lamivudine exposure (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support resistance testing in cases of apparent NA therapy failure. This survey highlights the impact of exposure to lamivudine and adefovir on development of drug resistance and cross-resistance. Continued use of these NAs needs to be reconsidered at a pan-European level.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Viral/genetics , Hepatitis B virus/drug effects , Hepatitis B virus/genetics , Hepatitis B, Chronic/epidemiology , Hepatitis B, Chronic/virology , Adult , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Genotype , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , PrevalenceABSTRACT
Early differentiation between infection and aseptic inflammation is difficult and is a challenge often faced in the rheumatology practice. Procalcitonin (PCT) is a biomarker that is preferentially induced in patients with bacterial infections, and a growing body of evidence supports its use for improving diagnosis of bacterial infections and guiding antibiotic therapy. In this article, we review the evidence for the use of PCT measurement in rheumatology practice. Several studies have examined the use of PCT to assist in the differentiation between septic and non-septic arthritis in patients with an inflamed joint and found it to be a sensitive and specific marker of infection. A number of studies in patients with diverse inflammatory rheumatic diseases have provided useful information regarding the usefulness of PCT in these patients. In summary, PCT when used in the appropriate clinical setting can be a useful adjunct to currently available laboratory infection markers, though further studies are warranted. Furthermore, PCT results should be interpreted in parallel with the clinical assessment.
Subject(s)
Arthritis/diagnosis , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Calcitonin/blood , Protein Precursors/blood , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Infectious/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Biomarkers/blood , Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide , Diagnosis, Differential , Early Diagnosis , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Still's Disease, Adult-Onset/diagnosis , Systemic Vasculitis/diagnosisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries are severely impacted by antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Due to gaps in access to diagnostics in SSA, the true extent of AMR remains unknown. This diagnostic gap affects patient management and leads to significant antimicrobial overuse. This review explores how point-of-care (POC) testing for pathogen identification and AMR may be used to close the diagnostic gap in SSA countries. METHODS: A narrative review exploring current clinical practice and novel developments in the field of POC testing for infectious diseases and AMR. RESULTS: POC assays for identification of various pathogens have been successfully rolled out in SSA countries. While implementation studies have mostly highlighted impressive test performance of POC assays, there is limited data on the impact of implementation on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. We did not encounter local studies of host-directed POC assays relevant to AMR. Novel POC assays using real-time polymerase chain reaction, isothermal amplification, microfluidics, and other technologies are in various stages of development. CONCLUSIONS: Available literature shows that POC testing for AMR applications is implementable in SSA and holds the potential to reduce the diagnostic gap. Implementation will require effective regulatory pathways, incorporation of POC testing in clinical and laboratory guidelines, and adequate value capture in existing health financing models.