Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 69
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 61(7): 1167-1198, 2023 06 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36989417

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are important for the diagnosis of various autoimmune diseases. ANA are usually detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using HEp-2 cells (HEp-2 IFA). There are many variables influencing HEp-2 IFA results, such as subjective visual reading, serum screening dilution, substrate manufacturing, microscope components and conjugate. Newer developments on ANA testing that offer novel features adopted by some clinical laboratories include automated computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) systems and solid phase assays (SPA). METHODS: A group of experts reviewed current literature and established recommendations on methodological aspects of ANA testing. This process was supported by a two round Delphi exercise. International expert groups that participated in this initiative included (i) the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group "Autoimmunity Testing"; (ii) the European Autoimmune Standardization Initiative (EASI); and (iii) the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP). RESULTS: In total, 35 recommendations/statements related to (i) ANA testing and reporting by HEp-2 IFA; (ii) HEp-2 IFA methodological aspects including substrate/conjugate selection and the application of CAD systems; (iii) quality assurance; (iv) HEp-2 IFA validation/verification approaches and (v) SPA were formulated. Globally, 95% of all submitted scores in the final Delphi round were above 6 (moderately agree, agree or strongly agree) and 85% above 7 (agree and strongly agree), indicating strong international support for the proposed recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations are an important step to achieve high quality ANA testing.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antinuclear , Autoimmune Diseases , Humans , Autoimmune Diseases/diagnosis , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/methods , Reference Standards , Cell Line, Tumor
2.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 60(9): 1373-1383, 2022 08 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35749077

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: No reference data are available on repositories to measure precision of autoantibody assays. The scope of this study was to document inter- and intra-run variations of quantitative autoantibody assays based on a real-world large international data set. METHODS: Members of the European Autoimmunity Standardisation Initiative (EASI) group collected the data of intra- and inter-run variability obtained with assays quantifying 15 different autoantibodies in voluntary participating laboratories from their country. We analyzed the impact on the assay performances of the type of immunoassay, the number of measurements used to calculate the coefficient of variation (CVs), the nature and the autoantibody level of the internal quality control (IQC). RESULTS: Data were obtained from 64 laboratories from 15 European countries between February and October 2021. We analyzed 686 and 1,331 values of intra- and inter-run CVs, respectively. Both CVs were significantly dependent on: the method of immunoassay, the level of IQC with higher imprecision observed when the antibody levels were lower than 2-fold the threshold for positivity, and the nature of the IQC with commercial IQCs having lower CVs than patients-derived IQCs. Our analyses also show that the type of autoantibody has low impact on the assay' performances and that 15 measurements are sufficient to establish reliable intra- and inter-run variations. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides for the first time an international repository yielding values of intra- and inter-run variation for quantitative autoantibody assays. These data could be useful for ISO 15189 accreditation requirements and will allow clinical diagnostic laboratories to assure quality of patient results.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies , Clinical Laboratory Services , Humans , Laboratories , Quality Control , Reference Standards
3.
Lasers Surg Med ; 52(1): 77-83, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31579971

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Laser hair removal is the most common laser therapy and the third most commonly performed procedure with more than one million treatments in United States in 2016. This retrospective study was conducted to assess long-term efficacy and safety of the 755 nm laser for hair removal. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nearly, 3,606 laser treatments were performed with the long-pulsed 755 nm wavelength laser equipped with an epidermal cooling device between 1997 and 2005 and were followed till 2013. Standardized assessments were conducted by two treating physicians and patients at two follow-up intervals. At first follow-up, clearance was assessed by two physicians and clearance and satisfaction by patients. At the second follow-up, patients were assessed if hair clearance sustained compared with the first follow-up. RESULTS: Nine hundred and forty-eight patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I-IV were treated with a total of 3,606 laser treatments in this study. The mean age at the beginning of the study was 35 years (±11), 95.1% of patients were female (n = 902) and 4.9% male (n = 46). Five hundred and seventy-four patients received a minimum of three treatments and an average of 5.31 (3-16) treatments on axilla, back, bikini, breast, abdomen, face, lower extremity, or upper extremity region. First, follow-up was conducted 3.9 (±1.5) years after the final laser treatment. Seventy-four percent of these patients received 75-100% clearance as reported by the physician and 48% clearance as reported by the patient. Fifty-two percent of patients reported slower hair growth and 42% change in hair texture. Ninety percent of patients treated on axilla, 82% treated on the bikini area, and 79% treated on lower extremities experienced 75% or more clearance after three treatments. Facial, as well as breast and abdomen treatments, only showed a 66% and 62%, respectively, after three treatments. For these locations, five and more treatments were needed to achieve a quote of 79% (face) or 80% (breast and abdomen) for a 75-100% clearance. Upper extremity and back treatments did not have enough physician ratings to draw conclusions. Long-term adverse events were minimal and were all located on the face (one patient scar, four patients herpes infection). Second follow-up of 173 patients was conducted after 11.5 years (±2.0) and 87.9% of patients reported that their improvement sustained. CONCLUSIONS: The long-pulsed 755 nm alexandrite laser is a safe and efficacious treatment for the reduction of unwanted body hair with permanent results and high patient satisfaction. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Subject(s)
Hair Removal/methods , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Low-Level Light Therapy , Adult , Female , Hair Removal/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
4.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 78(7): 879-889, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30862649

ABSTRACT

The indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA) on HEp-2 cells is widely used for detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA). The dichotomous outcome, negative or positive, is integrated in diagnostic and classification criteria for several systemic autoimmune diseases. However, the HEp-2 IIFA test has much more to offer: besides the titre or fluorescence intensity, it also provides fluorescence pattern(s). The latter include the nucleus and the cytoplasm of interphase cells as well as patterns associated with mitotic cells. The International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) initiative has previously reached consensus on the nomenclature and definitions of HEp-2 IIFA patterns. In the current paper, the ICAP consensus is presented on the clinical relevance of the 29 distinct HEp-2 IIFA patterns. This clinical relevance is primarily defined within the context of the suspected disease and includes recommendations for follow-up testing. The discussion includes how this information may benefit the clinicians in daily practice and how the knowledge can be used to further improve diagnostic and classification criteria.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antinuclear/analysis , Autoimmune Diseases/diagnosis , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/standards , Autoimmune Diseases/immunology , Biomarkers/analysis , Humans , International Cooperation
5.
J Hepatol ; 79(5): e206-e207, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37453611
7.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 17(1): 358, 2016 08 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27550175

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to check the validity of data collected in BIOREG, the Austrian register for biological treatment in rheumatology, and to elucidate eventual differences with respect to disease activity (DA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on established biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) before inclusion into the register (EST) and beginners at the time point of inclusion (NEW) after 1 year of treatment. METHODS: RA patients with a complete follow-up of 1 year in BIOREG were divided into EST and NEW and compared with respect to DA, remission rates, concomitant synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) and glucocorticoid therapy (GC) at baseline and after 1-year follow-up. Safety concerns are listed. Descriptive statistics are applied. RESULTS: For 346 RA patients (284 EST, 62 NEW) out of 970 RA patients included into BIOREG, a full data set for a 1-year follow-up was available. No differences in DA were observed after 1 year as expressed by DAS28 or RADAI-5, and small differences as expressed by remission rates according to DAS28, RADAI-5 or Boolean criteria (namely approximately 1/2, 1/3 to 1/4 and 1/4 to 1/5 of the patients respectively). Sixty-four adverse events (AEs) were noted in 56 (20 %) of EST and 20 in 19 (31 %) of NEW patients. Malignancy occurred in four patients. After 1 year, 48 % of EST patients but only 16 % of NEW patients were on bDMARD monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Regarding DA, the date collected in BIOREG appeared to be valid. After 1 year of bDMARD therapy, all patients, whether EST or NEW, achieved a similar level of DA. AEs occurred more frequently during the early phase of bDMARD treatment. Austrian rheumatologists initiate bDMARD therapy in patients with lower disease levels than in other European countries, leading to high remission rates.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Aged , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Austria , Biological Products/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Germany , Glucocorticoids/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Treatment Outcome
8.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 33(2): 201-8, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25664404

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate factors influencing injection patterns and patient evaluations of an autoinjector device in biologic-naïve patients beginning golimumab (GLM) treatment. METHODS: GO-MORE was an open-label, multinational, prospective study in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (28-joint disease activity score based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28-ESR] ≥3.2). Patients injected 50 mg subcutaneous GLM once monthly for 6 months. Patients reported use preferences and autoinjector evaluations by questionnaire. Responses were analysed descriptively. Effects of patient variables were evaluated with chi-square tests or t-tests. RESULTS: Of 3,280 efficacy-evaluable patients, 67.7% self-injected with the autoinjector. Compared with patients who self-injected, patients who had someone else administer injections had greater baseline disease activity (e.g., DAS28-ESR 5.84 vs. 6.23, respectively), but not more tender/swollen joints in hands/wrists. Month 6 efficacy was greater for patients who self-injected. In those who self-injected, injection site (thigh [75.2%; 1,563/2,077], abdomen [17.4%; 363/2,077], upper arm [7.2%; 151/2,077]) was not associated with wrist swelling or tender/swollen joints in the hand used for injection. Autoinjector ratings were similar across injection sites, yet less pain/discomfort was associated with abdomen injection. Patient autoinjector ratings were favourable overall (e.g. ease of use, pain). Patients with baseline functional impairment had slightly less favourable ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Biologic-naïve patients who self-injected had less baseline disease activity and higher response rates than patients who did not self-inject. Although patients prefer to inject in the thigh, injection in the belly may be less painful. Most patients who self-injected had favourable autoinjector evaluations; patients with functional impairment had slightly less favourable ratings.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Patient Preference , Patients/psychology , Syringes , Adult , Aged , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/psychology , Automation , Chi-Square Distribution , Drug Administration Schedule , Equipment Design , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Injections, Subcutaneous , Male , Medication Adherence , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Self Administration , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
9.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 16: 109, 2015 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25943629

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A survey was conducted to evaluate whether a steady improvement in the quality of life of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients as frequently reported in clinical studies, does actually occur. The focus of this study laid on the personal perception of RA patients. How do patients who have been treated along accepted guidelines see the state of their health and their joint pain at different points in time? METHODS: RA patients were asked to complete a questionnaire and return it to an opinion research centre. The questionnaire, which was developed by the authors, was divided into the areas: demography, symptom description and medical care, as well as the illness in a personal context. Three telephone interviews followed in monthly intervals when the patients' feelings about their illness, their every-day coping mechanisms and their social lives were rated. Intra-subject correlation and the level of agreement among patients when assessed at three different points within a two month period, was determined. RESULTS: 127 patients replied to the questionnaire. RA exerts a significant impact on a patient's daily life. Average ratings of current state of health and joint pain (answered on a 5-part scale extending from 1 (very good) to 5 (very bad)) range between 2.6 and 2.9 all three times. However, intra-subject correlation between the different assessment times, is in general quite modest. Concerning the question: "How is your join pain today?" only 14 of 127 participants express identical ratings all three times , while in one third of the participants, a difference of two digits on the 5-part scale, at least twice had to be noticed. Intra-class correlation coefficients between answers at different points are often much smaller than 0.5. Results were similar in all subgroups analysed (men vs. women; patients receiving biologics vs. those not receiving biologics; disease duration ≤3 years vs. 4 to 10 years vs. ≥11 years). CONCLUSION: On an individual level personal assessments of health, well-being and joint pain are nevertheless unsteady even within the timeframe of two months. This is why, even now, RA patients still cannot plan their lives as non-affected people can.


Subject(s)
Arthralgia/therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/therapy , Health Status , Patients/psychology , Quality of Life , Activities of Daily Living , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Arthralgia/diagnosis , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Arthralgia/psychology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/physiopathology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/psychology , Austria , Cost of Illness , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Perception , Social Behavior , Surveys and Questionnaires , Telephone , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
10.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 73(1): 17-23, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24126457

ABSTRACT

Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) are fundamental for the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases, and have been determined by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA) for decades. As the demand for ANA testing increased, alternative techniques were developed challenging the classic IIFA. These alternative platforms differ in their antigen profiles, sensitivity and specificity, raising uncertainties regarding standardisation and interpretation of incongruent results. Therefore, an international group of experts has created recommendations for ANA testing by different methods. Two groups of experts participated in this initiative. The European autoimmunity standardization initiative representing 15 European countries and the International Union of Immunologic Societies/World Health Organization/Arthritis Foundation/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention autoantibody standardising committee. A three-step process followed by a Delphi exercise with closed voting was applied. Twenty-five recommendations for determining ANA (1-13), anti-double stranded DNA antibodies (14-18), specific antibodies (19-23) and validation of methods (24-25) were created. Significant differences between experts were observed regarding recommendations 24-25 (p<0.03). Here, we formulated recommendations for the assessment and interpretation of ANA and associated antibodies. Notably, the roles of IIFA as a reference method, and the importance of defining nuclear and cytoplasmic staining, were emphasised, while the need to incorporate alternative automated methods was acknowledged. Various approaches to overcome discrepancies between methods were suggested of which an improved bench-to-bedside communication is of the utmost importance. These recommendations are based on current knowledge and can enable harmonisation of local algorithms for testing and evaluation of ANA and related autoantibodies. Last but not least, new more appropriate terminologies have been suggested.


Subject(s)
Allergy and Immunology/standards , Antibodies, Antinuclear , Autoantigens , Rheumatic Diseases/diagnosis , Rheumatology/standards , Humans , Immunologic Tests/standards , Rheumatic Diseases/immunology , Terminology as Topic
11.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 32(4): 539-46, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24983380

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: One of the main goals of the European Autoimmunity Standardisation Initiative (EASI) is the harmonisation of test-algorithms for autoantibodies related to systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD). METHODS: A questionnaire was used to gather information on methodology, interpretation, and the algorithm for detection of anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) in relation to their antigen-specificity. The questionnaire was sent to 1200 laboratories in 12 European countries. RESULTS: The response rate was 47.2%. The results reveal not only apparent differences between countries, but also within countries. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of these differences may as such already stimulate harmonisation, but the observed differences may also direct recommendations that may further contribute to achieving the EASI goal of harmonisation of autoimmune diagnostics for SARD.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antinuclear/blood , Autoimmune Diseases/diagnosis , Laboratories/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Rheumatic Diseases/diagnosis , Rheumatology/standards , Serologic Tests/standards , Algorithms , Autoimmune Diseases/blood , Autoimmune Diseases/immunology , Biomarkers/blood , Europe , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Laboratory Proficiency Testing , Observer Variation , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Rheumatic Diseases/blood , Rheumatic Diseases/immunology , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 24(2): 192-200, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24407573

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ovarian carcinoma spreads by implantation of tumor cells onto the peritoneal mesothelium. We established a 3-dimensional coculture model to simulate the interactions of ovarian carcinoma cell aggregates with human peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMC). METHODS: Multicellular tumor spheroids (MCTS) of the human ovarian cancer cell line SK-OV-3 were directly inoculated onto either confluent HPMC monolayers or their submesothelial matrix or were cocultured with mesothelium without direct cellular contact. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS: Inoculation of MCTS onto submesothelial matrix resulted in rapid attachment (within 30 minutes) of the tumor cell aggregates followed by rapid dissemination (within 12 hours) and growth of tumor cells. Intact mesothelium increased the time required for MCTS attachment (up to 180 minutes) and led to almost complete inhibition of tumor cell dissemination and to 47% tumor growth suppression. Bromodeoxyuridine incorporation into tumor cell nuclei was almost completely abolished in cocultured MCTS. Growth also was inhibited in MCTS treated with supernatants of HPMC. Analysis of coculture supernatants revealed that HPMC-derived transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß) was almost completely bound by MCTS. Addition of a function-blocking anti-TGF-ß antibody (30 µg/mL) to the cocultures abrogated the growth inhibitory effect of the mesothelium by 50%. CONCLUSIONS: The present model provides a dynamic system to study the complex interactions of ovarian carcinoma cells with HPMC over extended periods and suggests that the mesothelium constitutes a mechanical and partly TGF-ß-mediated paracrine barrier to the progression of ovarian cancer.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma/secondary , Neoplasm Metastasis , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Paracrine Communication , Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary , Peritoneum/pathology , Carcinoma/pathology , Cell Enlargement , Coculture Techniques , Epithelium/metabolism , Epithelium/pathology , Female , Humans , Peritoneal Neoplasms/pathology , Peritoneum/metabolism , Spheroids, Cellular/pathology , Transforming Growth Factor beta1/metabolism , Tumor Cells, Cultured
13.
Oncogene ; 43(4): 235-247, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38017134

ABSTRACT

Despite significant therapeutic advances in recent years, treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) remains palliative, owing to the inevitable occurrence of drug resistance. There is increasing evidence that epithelial glucocorticoid receptor (GR) signaling and changes in the tumor-microenvironment (TME) play important roles in this process. Since glucocorticoids (GCs) are used as concomitant medications in the course of PCa treatment, it is essential to investigate the impact of GCs on stromal GR signaling in the TME. Therefore, general GR mRNA and protein expression was assessed in radical prostatectomy specimens and metastatic lesions. Elevated stromal GR signaling after GC treatment resulted in altered GR-target gene, soluble protein expression, and in a morphology change of immortalized and primary isolated cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). Subsequently, these changes affected proliferation, colony formation, and 3D-spheroid growth of multiple epithelial PCa cell models. Altered expression of extra-cellular matrix (ECM) and adhesion-related proteins led to an ECM remodeling. Notably, androgen receptor pathway inhibitor treatments did not affect CAF viability. Our findings demonstrate that GC-mediated elevated GR signaling has a major impact on the CAF secretome and the ECM architecture. GC-treated fibroblasts significantly influence epithelial tumor cell growth and must be considered in future therapeutic strategies.


Subject(s)
Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts , Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Glucocorticoids/pharmacology , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/metabolism , Prostate/pathology , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/genetics , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/metabolism , Tumor Microenvironment , Cell Line, Tumor , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Fibroblasts/metabolism , Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts/metabolism
14.
Arthritis Res Ther ; 26(1): 44, 2024 02 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38331930

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Machine learning models can support an individualized approach in the choice of bDMARDs. We developed prediction models for 5 different bDMARDs using machine learning methods based on patient data derived from the Austrian Biologics Registry (BioReg). METHODS: Data from 1397 patients and 19 variables with at least 100 treat-to-target (t2t) courses per drug were derived from the BioReg biologics registry. Different machine learning algorithms were trained to predict the risk of ineffectiveness for each bDMARD within the first 26 weeks. Cross-validation and hyperparameter optimization were applied to generate the best models. Model quality was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). Using explainable AI (XAI), risk-reducing and risk-increasing factors were extracted. RESULTS: The best models per drug achieved an AUROC score of the following: abatacept, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54-0.78); adalimumab, 0.70 (95% CI, 0.68-0.74); certolizumab, 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.89); etanercept, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.55-0.87); tocilizumab, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69-0.77). The most risk-increasing variables were visual analytic scores (VAS) for abatacept and etanercept and co-therapy with glucocorticoids for adalimumab. Dosage was the most important variable for certolizumab and associated with a lower risk of non-response. Some variables, such as gender and rheumatoid factor (RF), showed opposite impacts depending on the bDMARD. CONCLUSION: Ineffectiveness of biological drugs could be predicted with promising accuracy. Interestingly, individual parameters were found to be associated with drug responses in different directions, indicating highly complex interactions. Machine learning can be of help in the decision-process by disentangling these relations.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Biological Products , Humans , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Etanercept/therapeutic use , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Abatacept/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Austria , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Certolizumab Pegol/therapeutic use , Registries , Artificial Intelligence
15.
Ann Hematol ; 92(9): 1263-70, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23580149

ABSTRACT

Idiopathic Bence-Jones proteinuria (BJP) is a rare plasma cell dyscrasia, of which the clinical and biological characteristics are yet unclear. Historical data suggested that they are at higher risk of progression to multiple myeloma or other related neoplasms, while recent findings are contradictory. To address these open questions, we evaluated a series of both BJP and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) with production of an intact immunoglobulin plus Bence-Jones proteinuria (MGUS+BJP) with long-term follow-up, regarding their clinical characteristics and progression to multiple myeloma, amyloidosis or other related B cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Two hundred and twenty-nine persons fulfilling the 2004 criteria of MGUS were included in the final analyses: 31 had BJP and 198 had MGUS+BJP. At the time of diagnosis, significantly more persons in the BJP group had renal impairment, anaemia and polyneuropathy. A more detailed analysis revealed discrepancies between the serum and urine light chain type in nine cases, reflecting clonal heterogeneity. The number of disease progressions was higher in MGUS+BJP (n = 30) when compared to BJP (n = 1), with a rate of 1.6 and 0.4 progressions per 100 person-years, respectively. In conclusion, BJP has distinct clinical characteristics and a lower risk of progression when compared to MGUS+BJP. Our data suggest that MGUS+BJP being closer to malignant transformation may be due to the higher portion of genetically heterogeneous, pre-malignant plasma cell subclones.


Subject(s)
Amyloidosis/urine , Bence Jones Protein/urine , Disease Progression , Multiple Myeloma/urine , Proteinuria/urine , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Amyloidosis/diagnosis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Proteinuria/diagnosis , Survival Rate/trends
19.
Wien Med Wochenschr ; 162(21-22): 454-63, 2012 Nov.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22890524

ABSTRACT

Autoimmune diseases are a clinically heterogeneous group of disorders that represent a challenge for the general practitioner in daily routine. Except for rheumatoid arthritis, which is one of the most frequent autoimmune diseases with a prevalence of approximately 1 % of the population, systemic autoimmune disorders are rare. Thus outside specialized wards it might be a challenge to diagnose the underlying autoimmune disease considering the often kaleidoscopic clinical manifestations. Together with careful anamnesis and suspicious clinical symptoms determination of specific autoantibodies can support the suspected diagnosis. The Austrian group of the European autoimmune standardization initiative (EASI) firstly published this guide 2009 with the aim to provide a map through the jungle of the biomarkers for autoimmune diseases for the general practitioner.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies/blood , Autoimmune Diseases/diagnosis , Biomarkers/blood , Rheumatic Diseases/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , Austria , Autoimmune Diseases/epidemiology , Autoimmune Diseases/immunology , Child , Cooperative Behavior , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diagnosis, Differential , Follow-Up Studies , General Practice , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Rheumatic Diseases/epidemiology , Rheumatic Diseases/immunology
20.
Drug Discov Today ; 27(4): 1142-1155, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34838730

ABSTRACT

Vasculitis affecting the nervous system is a rare disease that can not only present with nonspecific initial symptoms, but also run a severe course without accurate treatment. Although improvements have been achieved, diagnosis of vasculitis remains challenging, because many classification criteria are unspecific or inconclusive with regard to central nervous system (CNS) manifestations. Currently, beside an isolated primary CNS vasculitis, several systemic types of vasculitis are known to affect the nervous system. In this review, we provide an overview of the pathophysiology, current therapeutic guidelines, and highlight novel treatment strategies for CNS vasculitis.


Subject(s)
Vasculitis, Central Nervous System , Central Nervous System , Humans , Vasculitis, Central Nervous System/diagnosis , Vasculitis, Central Nervous System/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL