Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE) for Risk Stratification and Prognostication of Patients with Pulmonary Embolism.

BACKGROUND: The categorization of pulmonary embolism (PE) as non-massive, sub-massive, and massive helps guide acute management. The presence of right ventricular (RV) strain differentiates sub-massive from non-massive PEs. Unlike laboratory markers and electrocardiogram changes, the classic parameters used in the echocardiographic diagnosis of RV strain have a technical component that is operator-dependent. OBJECTIVE: This narrative review will describe the physiologic effects of a PE on the RV and how this affects prognosis. It will summarize the literature evaluating the accuracy and prognostic ability of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) in the echocardiographic assessment of RVfunction. The review will describe the appeal of TAPSE for this purpose, provide cutoff measurements, and then illustrate how to perform the technique itself, while offering associated pearls and pitfalls in this bedside evaluation. DISCUSSION: RV function and dynamics undergo acute changes in the setting of a PE. RV dysfunction predicts poor outcomes in both the short and long term. However, RV strain is difficult to capture on echocardiography due to the chamber's complex geometric shape and contraction. From the apical four-chamber window, TAPSE offers a quantitative measure that is more easily performed with high interobserver reliability for evaluating systolic RV contraction. This measurement carries prognostic value in patients diagnosed with PE. CONCLUSIONS: Along with other more qualitative echocardiographic parameters, TAPSE can be used as a simple quantitative measure of RV dysfunction for differentiating sub-massive from non-massive PEs. This categorization helps guide acute management and disposition.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm or Dissection: Treatment Planning and Follow-Up.

As the incidence of thoracoabdominal aortic pathology (aneurysm and dissection) rises and the complexity of endovascular and surgical treatment options increases, imaging follow-up of patients remains crucial. Patients with thoracoabdominal aortic pathology without intervention should be monitored carefully for changes in aortic size or morphology that could portend rupture or other complication. Patients who are post endovascular or open surgical aortic repair should undergo follow-up imaging to evaluate for complications, endoleak, or recurrent pathology. Considering the quality of diagnostic data, CT angiography and MR angiography are the preferred imaging modalities for follow-up of thoracoabdominal aortic pathology for most patients. The extent of thoracoabdominal aortic pathology and its potential complications involve multiple regions of the body requiring imaging of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in most patients. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.