One hundred ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations between 2004 and 2014: a single-centre experience.

BACKGROUND: ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOi KTx) expands the living donor transplantation options. However, long-term outcome data, especially in comparison with ABO-compatible kidney transplantation (ABOc KTx), remain limited. Since the first ABOi KTx in Germany on 1 April 2004 at our centre, we have followed 100 ABOi KTx over up to 10 years. METHODS: One hundred ABOi KTx and 248 ABOc KTx from 1 April 2004 until 28 October 2014 were analysed in this observational, single-centre study. Three ABOi KTx and 141 ABOc KTx were excluded because of cyclosporine A-based immunosuppression, and 1 ABOc KTx was lost to follow-up. RESULTS: Median estimated 10-year patient and graft survival in ABOi KTx was 99 and 94%, respectively, and surpassed ABOc-KTx patient and graft survival of 80 and 88%, respectively. The incidence rate of antibody-mediated rejections was 10 and 8%, and that of T-cell-mediated rejections was 17 and 20% in ABOi KTx and ABOc KTx, respectively. Infectious and malignant complications in ABOi KTx were not more common than in ABOc KTx. However, postoperative lymphoceles occurred more frequently in ABOi KTx. Subgroup analysis of ABOi-KTx patients revealed that patients with high-titre isohaemagglutinins before transplantation had equal long-term results compared with low-titre isohaemagglutinin patients. CONCLUSION: Taken together, long-term outcome of ABOi KTx is not inferior to ABOc KTx. Incidences of rejection episodes, infectious complications and malignancies are not increased, despite the more vigorous immunosuppression in ABOi KTx. Our data provide further evidence that ABOi KTx with living donation is a safe, successful and reasonable option to reduce the organ shortage.

Results of a randomized controlled trial analyzing telemedically supported case management in the first year after living donor kidney transplantation - a budget impact analysis from the healthcare perspective.

ᅟ: We analyze one-year costs and savings of a telemedically supported case management program after kidney transplantation from the perspective of the German Healthcare System. Recipients of living donor kidney transplantation (N = 46) were randomly allocated to either (1) standard aftercare or (2) standard aftercare plus additional telemedically supported case management. A range of cost figures of each patient's medical service utilization were calculated at month 3, 6 and 12 and analyzed using two-part regression models. In comparison to standard aftercare, patients receiving telemedically supported case management are associated with substantial lower costs related to unscheduled hospitalizations (mean difference: €3,417.46 per patient for the entire one-year period, p = 0.003). Taking all cost figures into account, patients receiving standard aftercare are associated, on average, with one-year medical service utilization costs of €10,449.28, while patients receiving telemedically supported case management are associated with €5,504.21 of costs (mean difference: € 4,945.07 per patient, p < 0.001). With estimated expenditures of €3,001.5 for telemedically supported case management of a single patient, we determined a mean difference of €1,943.57, but this result is not statistically significant (p = 0.128). Sensitivity analyses show that the program becomes cost-neutral at around ten participating patients, and was beneficial starting at 15 patients. Routine implementation of telemedically supported case management in German medium and high-volume transplant centers would result in annual cost savings of €791,033 for the German healthcare system. Patients with telemedically supported case management showed a lower utilization of medical services as well as better medical outcomes. Therefore, such programs should be implemented in medium and high-volume transplant centers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00007634 ( http://www.drks.de/DRKS00007634 ).