Risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse in women aged ≥ 69 referred to colposcopy due to an HPV-positive screening test.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates are high in older women in many developed countries, including Denmark. Therefore, Danish women aged 69 and older were invited for one additional human papilloma virus (HPV) based screening test in 2017. Here, we describe the clinical management and detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2 +) in screen-positive women referred for colposcopy. METHODS: We conducted an observational study in public gynecology departments in Central Denmark Region, Denmark. Women were eligible for enrolment if they were aged 69 + in 2017, HPV positive on a screening test taken between April 20th, 2017, and December 31st, 2017, and had been referred for direct colposcopy. Data on participants' characteristics, colposcopic findings, and histological outcomes were collected from medical records and the Danish Pathology Databank. We estimated the proportion of women with CIN2 + at the first colposcopy visit and at end of follow up including 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 191 women were included with a median age of 74 years (IQR: 71-78). Most women (74.9%) did not have a fully visible transformation zone at colposcopy. At the first visit 170 women (89.0%) had a histological sample collected, 34 of whom (20.0%, 95% CI 14.3-26.8%) had CIN2 + diagnosed, 19 had CIN3 + , and two had cervical cancer). During follow-up additional CIN2 + were detected resulting in a total of 42 women (24.4%, 95% CI: 18.2-31.5%) being diagnosed with CIN2 + , 25 with CIN3 + , and three with cervical cancer. When restricting to women with paired histologic results (i.e., biopsies and a loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) specimen), we found that CIN2 + was missed in 17.9% (95% CI 8.9-30.4%) of biopsies compared to the LEEP. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a potential risk of underdiagnosis in older postmenopausal women referred to colposcopy. Future studies should explore potential risk-markers for discrimination of women at increased risk of CIN2 + from those at low risk, as this would reduce risk of underdiagnosis and overtreatment.

Reproducibility of Endometrial Pathologic Findings Obtained on Hysteroscopy, Transvaginal Sonography, and Gel Infusion Sonography in Women With Postmenopausal Bleeding.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare interobserver variation in endometrial pattern recognition with hysteroscopy (HY) and transvaginal sonography (TVS) and gel infusion sonography (GIS) with regard to the diagnosis of endometrial pathology. DESIGN: Prospective study (Canadian Task Force II-1). SETTING: University clinic. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-two consecutive women with postmenopausal bleeding and an endometrium thickness ≥ 5 mm. INTERVENTION: Two observers using HY and 2 others using TVS and GIS evaluated the endometrial pattern in recorded video clips. Interobserver agreement regarding findings obtained with TVS, GIS, and HY for a diagnosis of cancer, hyperplasia, polyps, and no endometrial pathology was expressed by κ coefficients and compared. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Interobserver agreement (κ) was as follows: identification of normal endometrium: HY (.74), TVS (.68), and GIS (.48); diagnosis of cancer: HY (.56), TVS (.59), and GIS (.34); classification in all categories of endometrial pathology: HY (.70), TVS (.47), and GIS (.41) (p < .05 HY vs GIS). The presence of additional endometrial polyps decreased agreement on HY in patients with hyperplasia or cancer. Observer agreement was poor regarding the diagnosis of hyperplasia by all techniques. CONCLUSION: Observer agreement regarding both HY and TVS was reliable for the diagnosis of a normal endometrium but poor with HY, TVS, and especially GIS for a diagnosis of cancer. In patients with hyperplasia or cancer, agreement between observers was especially low in the presence of additional polyps when HY was used. These findings call attention to the need for systematic methods to improve reliability in endometrial pattern recognition.

Structured Hysteroscopic Evaluation of Endometrium in Women With Postmenopausal Bleeding.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate visual pattern parameters obtained with hysteroscopy for the prediction of endometrial cancer, to evaluate observer variation of these parameters, and to present a scoring system of the parameters for the prediction of malignancy compared with subjective evaluation. DESIGN: A prospective controlled study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1). SETTING: A university clinic. PATIENTS: One hundred forty-nine consecutive women with postmenopausal bleeding and an endometrium thickness ≥ 5 mm. Sixty-one (41%) had endometrial cancer. Forty-six of 149 women were referred based on suspected malignancy. INTERVENTIONS: Endometrial pattern characteristics for endometrial cancer were evaluated in hysteroscopic video clips. The reference standard was pathologic evaluation of resectoscopic samples or hysterectomy. Using multivariate logistic regression, image parameters were correlated with the presence of endometrial cancer. A scoring system of visual parameters for the prediction of malignancy was compared with subjective evaluation of malignancy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A score for lesion surface, necrosis, and vessels had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89, 0.89, and 0.87, respectively. A hysteroscopic cancer (HYCA) scoring system based on unsmooth lesion surface, papillary projections, surface necrosis, "candy floss" necrosis, white hyperintense spots, irregular branching vessels, and irregular distribution of irregular vessels was able to predict cancer (AUC = 0.964) with higher accuracy than subjective evaluation (AUC = 0.859, p < .01). At a score value ≥ 3, sensitivity was 89% and specificity was 92% with moderate agreement between observers (kappa = 0.56 [0.42-0.71]). CONCLUSION: A systematic pattern evaluation of optimal parameters by a HYCA scoring system based on systematically defined terms may increase accuracy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and should be further elaborated and external validity tested in unselected women with postmenopausal bleeding.

Structured imaging technique in the gynecologic office for the diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding.

The aim in the diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is to identify the bleeding cause, which can be classified by the PALM-COEIN (Polyp, Adenomyosis, Leiomyoma, Malignancy (and hyperplasia), Coagulopathy, Ovulatory disorders, Endometrial, Iatrogenic and Not otherwise classified) classification system. In a gynecologic setting, the first step is most often to identify structural abnormalities (PALM causes). Common diagnostic options for the identification of the PALM include ultrasonography, endometrial sampling, and hysteroscopy. These options alone or in combination are sufficient for the diagnosis of most women with AUB. Contrast sonography with saline or gel infusion, three-dimensional ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging may be included. AIM: The aim of this article is to describe how a simple structured transvaginal ultrasound can be performed and implemented in the common gynecologic practice to simplify the diagnosis of AUB and determine when additional invasive investigations are required. Structured transvaginal ultrasound for the identification of the most common endometrial and myometrial abnormalities and the most common ultrasound features are described. Moreover, situations where magnetic resonance imaging may be included are described. This article proposes a diagnostic setup in premenopausal women for the classification of AUB according to the PALM-COEIN system. Moreover, a future diagnostic setup for fast-track identification of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women based on a structured evaluation of the endometrium is described.