Ceramic Bearings Are Associated With a Significantly Reduced Revision Rate in Primary Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication. Studies have suggested reduction in PJI with the use of ceramic bearings. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) using an uncemented acetabular component with ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC), ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP), or metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) bearing surfaces between 2002 and 2016 were extracted from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man. A competing risk regression model to investigate predictors of each revision outcome was used. Time-to-event was determined by duration of implantation since primary surgery with competing risks being death or revision. The results were adjusted for age, gender, American Association of Anaesthesiologists grade, body mass index, surgical indication, intraoperative complications, and implant data. RESULTS: In total, 456,457 THAs (228,786 MoP, 128,403 CoC, and 99,268 CoP) were identified. Multivariable modeling showed that the risk of revision for PJI was significantly lower with CoC (risk ratio 0.748, P < .001) and CoP (risk ratio 0.775, P < .001) compared to MoP. Significant reduction in risk of aseptic and all-cause revision was also seen. The significant protective effect of ceramic bearing was predominantly seen 2 years after implantation. Aseptic revision beyond 2 years reduced by 18.1% and 24.8% for CoC and CoP (P < .001), respectively. All-cause revision rate beyond 2 years reduced by 21.6% for CoC and 27.1% for CoP (P < .001) CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates an association between the use of ceramic as part of the bearing, with lower rates of revision for all causes, revision for infection, and revision for aseptic causes, supporting ceramic bearings in THA.

Staphylococcal resistance profiles in deep infection following primary hip and knee arthroplasty: a study using the NJR dataset.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to (1) report the rates of resistance against a variety of antibiotics for pure Staphylococcal infections, and (2) examine the impact of ALBC use at primary surgery has on resistance patterns for patients undergoing first-time revision of primary hip and knee arthroplasty for indication of infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the National Joint Registry database for England and Wales were linked to microbiology data held by Public Health England to identify a consecutive series of 258 primary hip and knee arthroplasties performed between April 2003 and January 2014 that went on to have a revision for Staphylococcal deep periprosthetic infection. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to study predictors of microorganism resistance to a range of antimicrobials. RESULTS: After adjusting for patient and surgical factors, multivariate analysis showed the use of gentamicin-loaded bone cement at the primary surgery was associated with a significant increase in the risk of Staphylococcal gentamicin resistance (odds ratio 8.341, 95% CI 2.297-30.292, p = 0.001) and methicillin resistance (odds ratio 3.870, 95% CI 1.319-11.359, p = 0.014) at revision for infection. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians must anticipate the possibility of antibiotic resistance to ALBC utilised at primary surgery.

Does pre-operative sampling predict intra-operative cultures and antibiotic sensitivities in knee replacements revised for infection?: a study using the NJR dataset.

PURPOSE: This study examined a cohort of primary knee arthroplasties revised for peri-prosthetic infection to (1) determine whether the microorganisms isolated by sampling (up to 6 months pre-operatively) are representative of the microorganisms encountered at the time of knee revision, (2) determine whether the antibiotic sensitivity profiles of matching organisms correlate and (3) determine whether the proportion of organism and antibiotic sensitivity matches is influenced by the type of infection, timing of sample collection and the type of microorganism isolated. METHODS: From the National Joint Registry database for England and Wales, a consecutive series of primary knee arthroplasties performed between 2003 and 2014 that went on to have a revision for peri-prosthetic infection were identified. Each case was then linked to a national microbiology database held by Public Health England. Following data linkage, intra-operative and pre-operative cultures were identified and compared in a group of 75 patients. RESULTS: Pre-operative genus matched intra-operative genus in 56 of 75 cases (75 %). Of those 56, the corresponding antimicrobial sensitivities matched in 37 (66 % of cases). Overall, 37 of 75 cases (49 %) matched for both microorganism and antimicrobial sensitivity. The proportion of matches was highest in the pure Staphylococcal genus infections (genus match 88 %, sensitivity match 62 %, genus and sensitivity match 55 %) and lowest in those patients with mixed organism infections (genus match 29 %, sensitivity match 14 %). CONCLUSION: Pre-operative joint sampling obtained by either aspiration or tissue biopsy is advocated in cases where peri-prosthetic infection is suspected and provides the only means of determining infecting organism prior to revision. Overall, only half of all pre-operative cultures matched completely the findings of intra-operative samples in terms of both the microorganism(s) encountered and their corresponding antimicrobial sensitivity profile. Clinicians should be vigilant regarding the possibility of the patient acquiring further microorganisms or the development of new antibiotic resistance by the time of revision, especially in historic pre-operative cultures. Broad spectrum antibiotic therapies should therefore be employed until final microorganisms and antimicrobial sensitivities are confirmed from intra-operative samples. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Microorganisms responsible for periprosthetic knee infections in England and Wales.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to delineate epidemiology of infecting microorganism genus in first-time revision knee arthroplasty for indication of periprosthetic joint infection in England and Wales using linked registry data. METHODS: From the National Joint Registry database for England and Wales, a consecutive series of primary knee arthroplasties performed between April 2003 and January 2014 that went on to have a revision for periprosthetic infection were identified (n = 2810). Each case was then linked to microbiology data held by Public Health England in order to identify infecting microorganism at time of revision surgery established from intra-operative cultures. Following data linkage, 403 culture results at time of revision surgery were identified in a group of 331 patients. The demographic characteristics of five microorganism groups were compared: pure staphylococcus (single genus), pure streptococcus (single genus), other gram-positive infections (single genus), gram-negative infections (single genus) and mixed genus infections. RESULTS: Staphylococcus species was the most common organism genus isolated after revision of a primary implant for infection and present in 72 % of cases overall (71.3 % of patients with a single-genus infection and 76.8 % of patients with mixed genus infection). A pure staphylococcal infection was present in 59 % of all cases. A single-genus infection was responsible for infection in 83.1 % of cases, and mixed genera were responsible in 16.9 % of cases. A significant difference was observed for mean age at primary procedure in the cohort of patients where there was an isolated pure streptococcal infection (73.2 years) when compared to gram-negative infections (65.0 years). No other significant differences were observed between microorganism groups in terms of BMI, gender, ASA grade, indication for primary procedure and primary implant characteristics. CONCLUSION: Staphylococci were the most commonly isolated organism species responsible for periprosthetic infection of primary arthroplasty in England and Wales. This information can be used by surgeons to benchmark and audit their own practice against national, publicly available data. Furthermore, this study has shown that even when using the largest national databases available, there is a substantial volume of missing data. Antimicrobial resistance represents a growing clinical problem with significant health and social costs. In order to counteract this threat, this study would advocate the consolidation of national microbial data in order to guide effective strategies towards targeting and combating the threat of antimicrobial resistance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Changes in surface topography at the TKA backside articulation following in vivo service: a retrieval analysis.

PURPOSE: With the advent of modular total knee arthroplasty (TKA) systems, backside wear at the articulation between the ultra-high-molecular-weight-polyethylene (UHMWPE) component undersurface and the tibial baseplate has received increasing attention as a source of clinically significant polyethylene wear debris. The aim of this study was to investigate the reciprocating interface at the TKA undersurface articulation using profilometry after in vivo service. Our null hypothesis was that there would be no discernible pattern or relationship between the metal tibial baseplate and UHMWPE surface profile. METHODS: A nanoscale analysis of thirty retrieved fixed-bearing TKA explants was performed. Surface roughness (Sa) and skewness (Ssk) were measured on both the UHMWPE component undersurface and the tibial baseplate of explants using a non-contacting profilometer (1 nm resolution). Four pristine unimplanted components of two different designs (Stryker Kinemax and DePuy PFC) were examined for control purposes. RESULTS: Mean explant baseplate surface roughness was 1.24 µm (0.04-3.01 µm). Mean explant UHMWPE undersurface roughness was 1.16 µm (0.23-2.44 µm). Each explant had an individual roughness pattern with unique baseplate and undersurface UHMWPE surface roughness that was different from, but closely related to, surface topography observed in control implants of the same manufacturer and design. Following in vivo service, UHMWPE undersurface showed changes towards a negative skewness, demonstrating that wear is occurring at the backside interface. CONCLUSION: In vivo loading of the TKA prosthesis leads to measurable changes in surface profile at the backside articulation, which appear to be dependent on several factors including implant design and in vivo duration. These findings are consistent with wear occurring at this surface. Findings of this study would support the use of a polished tibial tray over an unpolished design in total knee arthroplasty with the goal of reducing PE wear by means of providing a smoother backside countersurface for the UHMWPE component.

Consultant revision hip arthroplasty volumes and new consultant volume trajectories in England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man.

Aims: This study describes the variation in the annual volumes of revision hip arthroplasty (RHA) undertaken by consultant surgeons nationally, and the rate of accrual of RHA and corresponding primary hip arthroplasty (PHA) volume for new consultants entering practice. Methods: National Joint Registry (NJR) data for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man were received for 84,816 RHAs and 818,979 PHAs recorded between April 2011 and December 2019. RHA data comprised all revision procedures, including first-time revisions of PHA and any subsequent re-revisions recorded in public and private healthcare organizations. Annual procedure volumes undertaken by the responsible consultant surgeon in the 12 months prior to every index procedure were determined. We identified a cohort of 'new' HA consultants who commenced practice from 2012 and describe their rate of accrual of PHA and RHA experience. Results: The median annual consultant RHA volume, averaged across all cases, was 21 (interquartile range (IQR) 11 to 34; range 0 to 181). Of 1,695 consultants submitting RHA cases within the study period, the top 20% of surgeons by annual volume performed 74.2% of total RHA case volume. More than half of all consultants who had ever undertaken a RHA maintained an annual volume of just one or fewer RHA, however, collectively contributed less than 3% of the total RHA case volume. Consultant PHA and RHA volumes were positively correlated. Lower-volume surgeons were more likely to undertake RHA for urgent indications (such as infection) as a proportion of their practice, and to do so on weekends and public holidays. Conclusion: The majority of RHAs were undertaken by higher-volume surgeons. There was considerable variation in RHA volumes by indication, day of the week, and between consultants nationally. The rate of accrual of RHA experience by new consultants is low, and has important implications for establishing an experienced RHA consultant workforce.

The impact of COVID-19 on mortality after hip fracture : a population cohort study from England.

AIMS: Hip fracture commonly affects the frailest patients, of whom many are care-dependent, with a disproportionate risk of contracting COVID-19. We examined the impact of COVID-19 infection on hip fracture mortality in England. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of patients with hip fracture recorded in the National Hip Fracture Database between 1 February 2019 and 31 October 2020 in England. Data were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics to quantify patient characteristics and comorbidities, Office for National Statistics mortality data, and Public Health England's SARS-CoV-2 testing results. Multivariable Cox regression examined determinants of 90-day mortality. Excess mortality attributable to COVID-19 was quantified using Quasi-Poisson models. RESULTS: Analysis of 102,900 hip fractures (42,630 occurring during the pandemic) revealed that among those with COVID-19 infection at presentation (n = 1,120) there was a doubling of 90-day mortality; hazard ratio (HR) 2.09 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.89 to 2.31), while the HR for infections arising between eight and 30 days after presentation (n = 1,644) the figure was greater at 2.51 (95% CI 2.31 to 2.73). Malnutrition (1.45 (95% CI 1.19 to 1.77)) and nonoperative treatment (2.94 (95% CI 2.18 to 3.95)) were the only modifiable risk factors for death in COVID-19-positive patients. Patients who had tested positive for COVID-19 more than two weeks prior to hip fracture initially had better survival compared to those who contracted COVID-19 around the time of their hip fracture; however, survival rapidly declined and by 365 days the combination of hip fracture and COVID-19 infection was associated with a 50% mortality rate. Between 1 January and 30 June 2020, 1,273 (99.7% CI 1,077 to 1,465) excess deaths occurred within 90 days of hip fracture, representing an excess mortality of 23% (99.7% CI 20% to 26%), with most deaths occurring within 30 days. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 infection more than doubles the rate of early hip fracture mortality. Those contracting infection between 8 and 30 days after initial presentation are at even higher mortality risk, signalling the potential for targeted interventions during this period to improve survival.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(10):1156-1167.

Analysis of causative microorganism in 248 primary hip arthroplasties revised for infection: a study using the NJR dataset.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to describe the epidemiology of the causative organism in a series of primary hip arthroplasties revised for a diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in England and Wales. METHODS: Patient data from the National Joint Registry (NJR) was linked to microbiology data held by Public Health England (PHE) which identified a series of 248 primary hip arthroplasties revised for PJI between 2003 and 2014. Definitive cultures, isolated at time of revision surgery, were available for all cases. Total hip arthroplasty (n = 239, 96%) and hip resurfacing (n = 5, 2%) were the most commonly performed primary procedures. A two-stage revision was the most common operative management (n = 174, 70%). RESULTS: 202 (81%) cases were infected with a single genus microorganism and the most commonly implicated genus was Staphylococcus species (70% of all single genus infections). Staphylococcus species were also the most commonly identified microorganism in mixed genus infections (74% of patient's cultures). There was a significant difference in microorganism distribution when comparing uncemented vs cement implant fixation, with a higher incidence of Gram-negative infection observed in the uncemented group (p = 0.048, Chi-square). CONCLUSIONS: Both prophylactic and therapeutic antibiotic regimes should be focused on targeting Staphylococci.