Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (RCD) Chemoimmunotherapy for Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia.

High doses of corticosteroids in combination with rituximab remain an alternative in the treatment in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) in the current era of targeted therapies. This study retrospectively evaluates the efficacy of an RCD (rituximab, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone) regimen in the treatment of 51 patients with relapsed CLL (median age, 72 years). Unfavourable prognostic features, such as Rai stage III/IV, unmutated IGHV, del11q, TP53 mutation/deletion, complex karyotype and bulky lymphadenopathy, were frequent. The overall response or complete remission was of 57% and 7%, respectively, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was of 12.3 months, median time to next treatment 23.1 months and median overall survival 39.2 months. Significant independent predictors of shorter PFS were TP53 deletion/mutation, advanced Rai stage and ≥2 previous lines of treatment. The incidence of neutropenia grade ≥ 3 was of 13%. Serious (CTCAE grade 3-5) infections were found in 20% of patients. Steroid-induced diabetes or diabetes decompensation occurred in 20% patients. Treatment-related adverse events resulted in RCD dose reduction in 35% of patients. In comparison with a historical R-Dex patient group, the treatment response and/or toxicity in our group was largely similar. However, the substantial differences in the baseline clinical characteristics of the groups may affect this comparison. In conclusion, the RCD regimen is an active, time-limited therapeutic strategy for elderly patients with relapsed CLL. Further, the results of our analysis indicate that the addition of cyclophosphamide to the R-Dex regimen maintains a similar efficacy, even after 50% reduction in the dexamethasone dose.

Importance of promoter methylation of GATA4 and TP53 genes in endometrioid carcinoma of endometrium.

BACKGROUND: Epigenetic changes are considered to be a frequent event during tumor development. Various methylation changes have been identified and show promise as potential cancer biomarkers. The aim of this study was to investigate promoter methylation of GATA4 and TP53 genes in endometrioid carcinoma of endometrium. METHODS: To search for promoter methylation of GATA4 and TP53 genes we used methylation-specific PCR (MSP) to compare the methylation status of 54 patients with endometrioid carcinoma of endometrium and 18 patients with normal endometrial tissue. RESULTS: In our study MSP revealed GATA4 promoter methylation in 44 of 54 in the carcinoma group (81.5%), and in none of the control group. No methylation was observed in TP53 gene. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our study showed that there is significantly higher methylation in GATA4 gene in the endometrial cancer group compared with samples of non-neoplastic endometrium. The finding suggests the importance of hypermethylation of this gene in endometrial carcinogenesis and could have implications for future diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for endometrial cancer based on epigenetic changes.

MonoMAC syndrome with GATA2 novel mutation: A case report.

GATA2 deficiency was first identified in 2011 and have been reported over 500 individuals with GATA2 mutations. The onset of symptoms ranges from early childhood to late adulthood but very often the diagnosis is made between adolescence and early adulthood. These patients can be relatively asymptomatic or have life threatening diseaseas (myelodysplastic syndrome, acute leukemia). We describe case of 30-years old women with GATA2 novel mutation who present by primary lymphedema, myelodysplastic changes in bone marrow, monocytopenia and history of several recurrent infections (bacterial, mycobacterial). The case illustrates the diagnostic difficulties in identifying GATA2 deficiencies.

Importance of Cadherins Methylation in Ovarian Cancer: a Next Generation Sequencing Approach.

Epigenetic aberrations are well known to play an important role in carcinogenesis, and also have a great potential to serve as biomarkers in many types of cancers, including ovarian cancer in which sensitive and specific biomarkers and detection methods are critically needed. The aim of this study was to investigate methylation of cadherin genes CDH10, CDH13 and CDH18 in ovarian cancer tissue by comparison with control tissue. The study group consisted of 38 patients with ovarian cancer and 25 control patients. For detection of epigenetic events we used next generation sequencing, the most important data were confirmed using high-resolution melting analysis and real-time PCR. We observed significantly higher methylation in CDH13, sporadic methylation in CDH10 and loss of methylation in CDH18 in the ovarian cancer group compared with the control group. These observations suggest that changes in methylation of cadherin genes may be one of the major mechanisms associated with ovarian cancer progression. In addition, because of the high frequency of methylation of the CDH13 gene in the early stages of ovarian cancer, the analyzed CpG sites might be good targets for next study of potential ovarian cancer screening biomarkers.

IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: Suitable targets for minimal residual disease monitoring?

OBJECTIVES: Molecular screening plays a major role in prognostic categorization and subsequent definition of treatment strategies for acute myeloid leukemia. The possibility of using IDH1/2 mutations as a marker for the monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) is still under investigation and remains unclear. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we evaluated 90 patients with de novo AML using Sanger sequencing (exon 4, IDH1 and IDH2). For subsequent MRD monitoring were used both methods, massive parallel sequencing and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). RESULTS: We identified 22 patients (24%) who harboured mutations in IDH1 or IDH2 genes. Fourteen (64%) of them had other commonly used MRD markers (insertion in NPM1 and partial tandem duplication of MLL, MLL-PTD). Eight of the 22 patients had IDH1 mutations, 13 had IDH2 mutations and 1 had both IDH1 and IDH2 mutations. In our cohort, this IDH1/2 marker responded to the treatment in all of the patients and reflected the onset of the relapse very well. NPM1 mutation based MRD monitoring was more sensitive and predicted relapse earlier but IDH1/2 based monitoring was more sensitive than a method based on MLL-PTD. Both massive parallel sequencing and ddPCR were competent to monitor MRD using IDH1/2. Nevertheless, ddPCR was able to achieve a higher sensitivity in some cases and moreover this method can analyse a single sample without significant price increases. CONCLUSION: Given these data, we conclude that IDH1/2 mutations can be used as a reliable and cost-effective marker for MRD monitoring.

The significance of enzyme and transporter polymorphisms for imatinib plasma levels and achieving an optimal response in chronic myeloid leukemia patients.

INTRODUCTION: Imatinib mesylate is the drug of choice for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Imatinib pharmacokinetics is affected by a number of transport proteins and enzymes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the present study we evaluated the association of eight polymorphisms in the seven genes CYP3A5*3 (rs776746), CYP3A4*1 (rs2740574), CYP2C9*3 (rs1057910), SLC22A1 (rs683369), ABCB1 (rs1045642, rs1128503), ABCG2 (rs2231142) and ABCC2 (rs717620) with imatinib plasma level and achieving an optimal clinical response in 112 CML patients (53 men and 59 women). RESULTS: No association was found between the examined polymorphisms in rs776746, rs2740574, rs1057910, rs683369, rs1045642, rs1128503, rs2231142, rs717620 and the achieved imatinib plasma level. The influence of rs776746 (CYP3A5*3) on the achievement of a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 6 months was borderline non-significant (p = 0.06). Furthermore, no association was demonstrated between rs776746 polymorphisms and the achievement of a major molecular response (MMR) at 12 or 18 months. Polymorphisms rs776746, rs2740574, rs1057910, rs683369, rs1045642, rs1128503, rs2231142, rs717620 showed no impact on the optimal therapeutic response. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the results of some other studies, no other polymorphism we analyzed was associated with imatinib plasma level or clinical response. The treatment outcomes cannot be predicted using the candidate gene approach and treatment decisions cannot be made according to the polymorphisms investigated in this study.