Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 22(7)2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27191188

ABSTRACT

Preclinical development of and research on potential Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) medical countermeasures remain preliminary; advancements are needed before most countermeasures are ready to be tested in human clinical trials. Research priorities include standardization of animal models and virus stocks for studying disease pathogenesis and efficacy of medical countermeasures; development of MERS-CoV diagnostics; improved access to nonhuman primates to support preclinical research; studies to better understand and control MERS-CoV disease, including vaccination studies in camels; and development of a standardized clinical trial protocol. Partnering with clinical trial networks in affected countries to evaluate safety and efficacy of investigational therapeutics will strengthen efforts to identify successful medical countermeasures.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/veterinary , Disease Models, Animal , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus , Viral Vaccines/immunology , Animals , Camelus , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Humans
3.
Microb Biotechnol ; 5(5): 588-93, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22925432

ABSTRACT

Despite substantial investments since the events of 2001, much work remains to prepare the nation for a chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear (CBRN) attack or to respond to an emerging infectious disease threat. Following a 2010 review of the US Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise, FDA launched its Medical Countermeasures initiative (MCMi) to facilitate the development and availability of medical products to counter CBRN and emerging disease threats. As a regulatory agency, FDA has a unique and critical part to play in this national undertaking. Using a three-pillar approach, FDA is addressing key challenges associated with the regulatory review process for medical countermeasures; gaps in regulatory science for MCM development and evaluation; and issues related to the legal, regulatory and policy framework for an effective public health response. Filling the gaps in the MCM Enterprise is a huge national undertaking, requiring the collaboration of all stakeholders, including federal partners, current and prospective developers of medical countermeasures, relevant research organizations, and state and local responders. Especially critical to success are an appreciation of the long timelines, risks and high costs associated with developing medical countermeasures - and the systems to deliver them - and the requisite support of all stakeholders, including national leadership.


Subject(s)
Civil Defense/methods , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/diagnosis , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/therapy , Disaster Planning/methods , Emergency Medicine/methods , Public Health/methods , Civil Defense/legislation & jurisprudence , Civil Defense/organization & administration , Civil Defense/trends , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/prevention & control , Disaster Planning/legislation & jurisprudence , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Disaster Planning/trends , Emergency Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Emergency Medicine/organization & administration , Emergency Medicine/trends , Health Policy , Public Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Public Health/trends , United States
4.
PLoS One ; 7(8): e43948, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22928049

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The frequency of avian influenza A virus infections among poultry workers is not well understood. METHODS: A seroprevalence study of market poultry workers and persons without occupational poultry exposure was conducted during 2001 in Hanoi, Vietnam. Sera were tested for avian influenza H5 and H9 antibodies by microneutralization and Western blot assays. RESULTS: Seroprevalence of H5 and H9 antibodies was 4% and 3% in poultry workers and 1% and 3.5% in non-poultry workers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Seroprevalence of H5 and H9 antibodies was low among Hanoi market poultry workers in 2001, but can serve as a baseline for additional studies.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Influenza A virus/pathogenicity , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Poultry/virology , Adult , Animals , Female , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza A Virus, H5N2 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H5N2 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza A Virus, H9N2 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H9N2 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza A virus/immunology , Influenza, Human/blood , Male , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Vietnam/epidemiology , Young Adult
5.
J Infect Dis ; 185(8): 1005-10, 2002 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11930308

ABSTRACT

In 1997, outbreaks of highly pathogenic influenza A (H5N1) among poultry coincided with 18 documented human cases of H5N1 illness. Although exposure to live poultry was associated with human illness, no cases were documented among poultry workers (PWs). To evaluate the potential for avian-to-human transmission of H5N1, a cohort study was conducted among 293 Hong Kong government workers (GWs) who participated in a poultry culling operation and among 1525 PWs. Paired serum samples collected from GWs and single serum samples collected from PWs were considered to be anti-H5 antibody positive if they were positive by both microneutralization and Western blot testing. Among GWs, 3% were seropositive, and 1 seroconversion was documented. Among PWs, approximately 10% had anti-H5 antibody. More-intensive poultry exposure, such as butchering and exposure to ill poultry, was associated with having anti-H5 antibody. These findings suggest an increased risk for avian influenza infection from occupational exposure.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype , Influenza A virus , Influenza, Human/etiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Poultry/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Case-Control Studies , Female , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure , Risk Factors , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Time Factors
6.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 8(2): 154-9, 2002 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11897066

ABSTRACT

In April 1999, isolation of avian influenza A (H9N2) viruses from humans was confirmed for the first time. H9N2 viruses were isolated from nasopharyngeal aspirate specimens collected from two children who were hospitalized with uncomplicated, febrile, upper respiratory tract illnesses in Hong Kong during March 1999. Novel influenza viruses have the potential to initiate global pandemics if they are sufficiently transmissible among humans. We conducted four retrospective cohort studies of persons exposed to these two H9N2 patients to assess whether human-to-human transmission of avian H9N2 viruses had occurred. No serologic evidence of H9N2 infection was found in family members or health-care workers who had close contact with the H9N2-infected children, suggesting that these H9N2 viruses were not easily transmitted from person to person.


Subject(s)
Disease Transmission, Infectious/statistics & numerical data , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/statistics & numerical data , Influenza A Virus, H9N2 Subtype , Influenza A virus/isolation & purification , Influenza A virus/pathogenicity , Influenza in Birds/transmission , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Birds , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Influenza A virus/immunology , Influenza in Birds/immunology , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL