ABSTRACT
The Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology was established over 30 years ago. Despite that, surgical oncology was finally recognized as a Board-Certified medical specialty in 2017 and has strengthened its role in the standardization of surgical and multimodal approaches in our country. This article aims to describe the process and the main challenges of the specialists training who are qualified for job opportunities and who meet the expectations of the recently created competence matrix for surgical oncologists in Brazil. Thus, we hope to expose the challenges of teaching surgical oncology, describe its history and experiences in important country services, and outline the minimum requirements for creating a more humanistic surgical oncologist who is updated and fully committed with multidisciplinary treatment for cancer patients. We conclude that the main characteristic that the surgical oncologist must have is the ability to offer holistic treatments to the patient, based on the highest level of evidence, love, and compassion, to direct the treatment and understand all of the afflictions that arise with a cancer diagnosis. Moreover, the surgical oncologist in training and in the field must be continuously updating himself to offer the best options of treatment to patients.
Subject(s)
Curriculum , Education, Medical, Graduate/organization & administration , Surgical Oncology/education , Brazil , Certification , Clinical Competence/standards , Humans , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Societies, Medical , Specialization , Specialty BoardsABSTRACT
The majority of endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (EEC) is diagnosed at stage I. Among these, 30% present myometrial invasion (stage IB), which is associated with tumor spread and relapse after primary treatment. Although an increased expression of RUNX1/AML1 and ERM/ETV5 in EEC have been suggested to be associated with early events of myometrial infiltration, there is no data regarding its expression along the evolution of EEC and possible associations with other clinicopathological parameters. Therefore, ERM/ETV5 and RUNX1/AML1 protein and gene expression profiles were assessed in different EEC stages to evaluate their role in endometrial carcinogenesis. RUNX1/AML1 and ERM/ETV5 proteins were analyzed by immunohistochemistry in 219 formalin fixed paraffin embedded endometrioid tumors and in 12 normal atrophic and proliferative endometrium samples. RUNX1/AML1 and ERM/ETV5 genes expression were analyzed by RT-qPCR. RUNX1/AML1 and ERM/ETV5 expression were decreased with increasing EEC stage, with a positive correlation between protein and gene expression for ERM/ETV5, but not for RUNX1/AML1. Both proteins were present in the nucleus of the tumor cells, whereas RUNX1/AML1, but not ERM/ETV5, was expressed in 7 out of 12 normal endometrial samples, with its expression being restricted to the cytoplasm of the positive cells. We concluded that there is a higher expression of ERM/ETV5 in early stages of EEC, whereas there seems to be a RUNX1/AML1 translocation from cytoplasm to nucleus in EEC neoplastic transformation.