ABVD (8 cycles) versus BEACOPP (4 escalated cycles ≥ 4 baseline): final results in stage III-IV low-risk Hodgkin lymphoma (IPS 0-2) of the LYSA H34 randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with escalated BEACOPP achieved a superior time to treatment failure over ABVD in patients with disseminated Hodgkin lymphoma. However, recent clinical trials have failed to confirm BEACOPP overall survival (OS) superiority over ABVD. In addition, the gain in low-risk patients is still a matter of debate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomly compared ABVD (8 cycles) with BEACOPP (escalated 4 cycles ≥ baseline 4 cycles) in low-risk patients with an International Prognostic Score (IPS) of 0-2. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). This parallel group, open-label phase 3 trial was registered under #RECF0219 at French National Cancer Institute. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty patients were randomized in this trial (ABVD 80, BEACOPP 70): 28 years was the median age, 50% were male and IPS was 0-1 for 64%. Complete remission rate was 85% for ABVD and 90% for BEACOPP. Progression or relapses were more frequent in the ABVD patients than in the BEACOPP patients (17 versus 5 patients). With a median follow-up period of 5.5 years, seven patients died: six in the ABVD arm and one in the BEACOPP arm (HL 3 and 0, 2nd cancer 2 and 1, accident 1 and 0). The EFS at 5 years was estimated at 62% for ABVD versus 77%, for BEACOPP [hazards ratio (HR) = 0.6, P = 0.07]. The progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 years was 75% versus 93% (HR = 0.3, P = 0.007). The OS at 5 years was 92% versus 99% (HR = 0.18, P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Fewer progressions/relapses were observed with BEACOPP, demonstrating the high efficacy of the more intensive regimen, even in low-risk patients. However, additional considerations, balancing treatment-related toxicity and late morbidity due to salvage may help with decision-making with regard to treatment with ABVD or BEACOPP.

[Muscle lymphoma: a case report]. / Un lymphome musculaire: à propos d'une observation.

Skeletal muscle involvement is uncommon in lymphoma, occurring in less than 1.5% of patients. We report the original case of a 61-year-old man who presented with pseudotumoral muscle lesions of the lower limbs, revealing non-Hodgkin T-cell lymphoma. In our patient, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was useful in clearly revealing the detailed anatomic extent of muscle change; indeed, MRI showed muscle enhancement after intravenous administration of gadolinium on T1-weighted images as well as high-signal intensity on T2-weighted images. Moreover, MRI was helpful in guiding the optimal site for muscle biopsy.

Platelet transfusion: Current challenges.

Since the late sixties, platelet concentrates are transfused to patients presenting with severe thrombocytopenia, platelet function defects, injuries, or undergoing surgery, to prevent the risk of bleeding or to treat actual hemorrhage. Current practices differ according to the country or even in different hospitals and teams. Although crucial advances have been made during the last decades, questions and debates still arise about the right doses to transfuse, the use of prophylactic or therapeutic strategies, the nature and quality of PC, the storage conditions, the monitoring of transfusion efficacy and the microbiological and immunological safety of platelet transfusion. Finally, new challenges are emerging with potential new platelet products, including cold stored or in vitro produced platelets. The most debated of these points are reviewed.

[Adaptation of platelet concentrates delivery to HAS/ANSM requirements evolution in EFS Grand-Est]. / Adaptation de la délivrance des concentrés plaquettaires aux recommandations HAS/ANSM 2015 à l'EFS Grand-Est.

Evolution of French HAS/ANSM guidelines in 2015 about optimal platelet transfusion dose for patients brought us to review about our practices for platelet concentrates delivery in EFS Grand-Est region. In addition, pathogen inactivation in platelet concentrates has been implemented all over the country and transfusion centers have merged. All these changes required harmonization. In this context, our major issue was to answer patient's requirements, according to the new guidelines keeping in mind the cost effectiveness on public finances. We report here on the changes in our practices and their impacts.

[Comparative study on platelet transfusion in Lorraine-Champagne and Alsace in 2015]. / Étude comparative des transfusions de concentrés plaquettaires en Alsace et en Lorraine-Champagne en 2015.

OBJECTIVES: To find explanations for the observed differences of platelets concentrates (PC) deliveries between 2 French regions, Lorraine-Champagne (LOCH) and Alsace (ALSA). METHODS: This is a non-interventional prospective study, performed during 30 days in 2015 in intensive care, cardiovascular surgery and onco-hematological wards of 8 LOCH and ALSA hospitals. Questionnaires listing clinical and biological parameters were attached to the prescription forms and filled in at each PC prescription. RESULTS: In all, 290 patients, 1093 prescriptions and 1093 deliveries of PC were analyzed. The pre-transfusional context (patient weight, prophylactic or curative situation, pre-transfusional platelet count) were homogenous. The phasing of the prescription forms wording had a direct impact on the doses' formulation : 100 % of the LOCH forms were expressed in platelet quantity (PQ), vs 22 % in ALSA. The mean interval between 2 transfusions was 2.9 days in ALSA vs 4.9 days in LOCH. The mean PQ/delivery was higher in ALSA (5.6.1011 vs 4.0.1011 in LOCH). The delivered PQs were compared to the 2003 French recommendations that were in force in 2015. Twenty-seven percent of the LOCH delivered PQs were in the recommended interval, vs Forty-nine percent in ALSA. Due to the systematic delivery of a single PC unit, including weights>80Kg, LOCH presented 63 % insufficient PQ deliveries. Twenty-two percent of the deliveries in ALSA were over the recommended interval, mostly linked with the simultaneous delivery of a second PC. CONCLUSION: This study identifies disparities in terms of prescription and delivery between LOCH and ALSA, which may explain their respective PC consumption levels.