Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 105
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Cas Lek Cesk ; 156(1): 17-18, 2017.
Article in Czech | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28264576

ABSTRACT

Since 1988, this world leading center provided treatment of tobacco dependence to tens of thousands of tobacco-dependent patients, educated thousands of health professionals and has rich research activities. Its system was a model for such similar centers including those in the Czech Republic.


Subject(s)
Smoking Cessation , Tobacco Use Disorder , Czech Republic , Health Personnel , Humans , Tobacco Use Disorder/therapy
2.
CA Cancer J Clin ; 59(5): 314-26, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19706827

ABSTRACT

The US Public Health Service Guideline for Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence 2008 Update emphasizes tobacco use as a chronic medical disorder; highlights both behavioral counseling and the use of 1 or more of the 7 approved medications; and points out the utility, efficacy, and reach of telephone quitlines. The treatment of users of smokeless tobacco continues to be less than optimal. Although providing evidence-based treatment for tobacco- dependent patients is a challenge for busy physicians, a team approach including trained and certified tobacco treatment specialists (TTS) provides an efficient treatment model. TTS represent a new and growing part of the health care team and hold great potential for expanding the collective tobacco treatment expertise in the medical setting. The effective treatment of tobacco dependence frequently requires tailoring, and often intensifying, interventions (both counseling and pharmacotherapy) to meet the needs of the individual patient.


Subject(s)
Nicotine , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Tobacco Use Cessation/methods , Tobacco Use Disorder/drug therapy , Animals , Benzazepines/therapeutic use , Bupropion/therapeutic use , Cotinine/blood , Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Humans , Nicotine/administration & dosage , Quinoxalines/therapeutic use , Receptors, Nicotinic/drug effects , Smoking Cessation/methods , Tobacco Use Disorder/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome , United States , United States Public Health Service , Varenicline
3.
BMC Pulm Med ; 15: 6, 2015 Jan 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25608660

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With the goal of reducing exposure to secondhand smoke, the state of Minnesota (MN), enacted a smoke-free law (i.e., Freedom to Breathe Act) in all workplaces, restaurants, and bars in 2007. This retrospective cohort study analyzes emergency department (ED) visits in Olmsted County, MN, for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma over a five-year period to assess changes after enactment of the smoke-free law. METHODS: We calculated the rates of ED visits in Olmsted County, MN, with a primary diagnosis of COPD and asthma in the five-year period from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2009. Analyses were performed using segmented Poisson regression to assess whether ED visit rates declined following enactment of the smoke free law after adjusting for potential underlying temporal trends in ED visit rates during this time period. RESULTS: Using segmented Poisson regression analyses, a significant reduction was detected in asthma-related ED visits (RR 0.814, p < 0.001) but not for COPD-related ED visits following the enactment of the smoke-free law. The reduction in asthma related ED visits was observed in both adults (RR 0.840, p = 0.015) and children (RR 0.751, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: In Olmsted County, MN, asthma-related ED visits declined significantly after enactment of a smoke-free law. These results add to the body of literature supporting community health benefits of smoke-free policies in public environments and their potential to reduce health care costs.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Respiration Disorders/epidemiology , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/prevention & control , Workplace/legislation & jurisprudence , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
4.
JAMA ; 311(2): 155-63, 2014 Jan 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24399554

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Combining pharmacotherapies for tobacco-dependence treatment may increase smoking abstinence. OBJECTIVE: To determine efficacy and safety of varenicline and bupropion sustained-release (SR; combination therapy) compared with varenicline (monotherapy) in cigarette smokers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trial with a 12-week treatment period and follow-up through week 52 conducted between October 2009 and April 2013 at 3 midwestern clinical research sites. Five hundred six adult (≥18 years) cigarette smokers were randomly assigned and 315 (62%) completed the study. INTERVENTIONS: Twelve weeks of varenicline and bupropion SR or varenicline and placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcome was abstinence rates at week 12, defined as prolonged (no smoking from 2 weeks after the target quit date) abstinence and 7-day point-prevalence (no smoking past 7 days) abstinence. Secondary outcomes were prolonged and point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at weeks 26 and 52. Outcomes were biochemically confirmed. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, 53.0% of the combination therapy group achieved prolonged smoking abstinence and 56.2% achieved 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence compared with 43.2% and 48.6% in varenicline monotherapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.05-2.12; P = .03 and OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.95-1.93; P = .09, respectively). At 26 weeks, 36.6% of the combination therapy group achieved prolonged and 38.2% achieved 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence compared with 27.6% and 31.9% in varenicline monotherapy (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.04-2.22; P = .03 and OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.91-1.91; P = .14, respectively). At 52 weeks, 30.9% of the combination therapy group achieved prolonged and 36.6% achieved 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence compared with 24.5% and 29.2% in varenicline monotherapy (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.93-2.07; P = .11 and OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.96-2.05; P = .08, respectively). Participants receiving combination therapy reported more anxiety (7.2% vs 3.1%; P = .04) and depressive symptoms (3.6% vs 0.8%; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among cigarette smokers, combined use of varenicline and bupropion, compared with varenicline alone, increased prolonged abstinence but not 7-day point prevalence at 12 and 26 weeks. Neither outcome was significantly different at 52 weeks. Further research is required to determine the role of combination therapy in smoking cessation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00935818.


Subject(s)
Benzazepines/administration & dosage , Bupropion/administration & dosage , Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Nicotinic Agonists/administration & dosage , Quinoxalines/administration & dosage , Smoking Cessation/methods , Tobacco Use Disorder/drug therapy , Adult , Delayed-Action Preparations , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Varenicline
5.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 15(12): 2037-44, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23873976

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Nicotine patch therapy has not been shown to be efficacious for increasing long-term (≥6 months) tobacco abstinence rates among smokeless tobacco (ST) users. Higher doses of nicotine patch therapy may be needed to increase tobacco abstinence rates in this population of tobacco users. METHODS: We randomized ST users who used ≥3 cans/pouches per week to either 8 weeks of high-dose nicotine patch therapy (42mg/day) or matching placebo patch. Subjects were followed for 6 months after randomization. RESULTS: Fifty-two subjects were randomized. Compared with placebo, high-dose nicotine patch therapy was associated with significantly higher prolonged tobacco abstinence at end-of-treatment (44% vs. 22%, odds ratio [OR] = 2.7, p = .050) and 3 months (40% vs. 19%, OR = 2.9, p = .047). High-dose nicotine patch therapy was associated with significant weight gain attenuation among tobacco abstinence subjects at 3 months (p = .013) and 6 months (p = .018). Compared with placebo, high-dose nicotine patch therapy was associated with nonsignificantly lower nicotine withdrawal scores. Adverse events were not significantly increased with high-dose nicotine patch therapy. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose nicotine patch therapy is safe and increases short-term tobacco abstinence rates among ST users who use ≥3 cans/pouches per week. High-dose nicotine patch therapy is associated with significant long-term attenuation of weight gain. Future studies to investigate the long-term efficacy of high-dose nicotine patch therapy and the comparative efficacy of this approach compared with standard nicotine patch doses for ST users seems warranted.


Subject(s)
Nicotine/administration & dosage , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices , Tobacco Use Disorder/drug therapy , Tobacco, Smokeless/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Behavior Therapy/methods , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Smoking/drug therapy , Smoking Cessation/methods , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Weight Gain , Young Adult
6.
Tob Control ; 21(3): 306-12, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21852413

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Indonesia is the world's fifth largest cigarette market in the world but for decades, transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) have had limited success infiltrating this market, due to their inability to compete in the kretek market. Kreteks are clove/tobacco cigarettes that most Indonesians smoke. OBJECTIVE: To determine how Phillip Morris International (PMI) and British American Tobacco (BAT) have now successfully achieved a substantial market presence in Indonesia. METHODS: We analyzed previously secret, tobacco industry documents, corporate reports on Indonesia operations, the Tobacco Trade press, Indonesia media, and "The Roadmap". RESULTS: Internal, corporate documents from BAT and PMI demonstrate that they had known for decades that kreteks are highly carcinogenic. Despite that knowledge, BAT and PMI now own and heavily market these products, as well as new more westernised versions of kreteks. BAT and PMI used their successful basic strategy of keeping cigarettes affordable by maintaining the social responsibility of smoking and opposing smoke-free workplace laws but in the 21st century, they added the acquisition of and westernisation of domestic kretek manufacturers as an additional strategy. These acquisitions allowed them to assert influences on health policy in Indonesia and to grow their business under current government policy embodied in the 2007-2020 Roadmap of Tobacco Products Industry and Excise Policy which calls for increased cigarette production by 12% over the next 15 years. CONCLUSION: PMI and Bat have successfully entered and are expanding their share in the Indonesia cigarette market. Despite the obvious and pervasive influence of the tobacco industry on policy decisions, the Indonesian government should ratify the FCTC and implement effective legislation to reduce tobacco consumption and exposure to tobacco smoke and revise the Roadmap to protect future generations of Indonesians.


Subject(s)
Smoking/epidemiology , Tobacco Industry , Economic Competition , Health Policy , Humans , Indonesia/epidemiology , Marketing/methods , Smoking/adverse effects
7.
Psychooncology ; 20(7): 724-9, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20878860

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The impact of social support on successful smoking cessation has been well documented. However, little is known about whether personal experience with cancer may motivate cancer survivors to support smoking cessation among their family members and friends. As a first step in this line of research, we sought to explore interest in playing a supportive role for smoking cessation as well as correlates of such interest among cancer survivors. METHODS: Cancer survivors undergoing radiation therapy (N=211) completed a 77-item pencil-paper questionnaire. A section of the survey assessed interest in helping a smoker quit and characteristics of the smoking social network member. Respondents provided information on their smoking status, medical status, and psychosocial and behavioral factors related to cigarette smoking. RESULTS: Over half of the respondents 114 (54%) reported having someone close to them (family member or friend) smoking cigarettes who they thought should quit. Of these respondents (44 females, 70 males) 78% (89/114) reported they were definitely or probably interested in helping a smoker quit. Nearly all respondents wanted to help a family member (typically an adult child). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest the potential feasibility of engaging cancer survivors to help family members quit smoking. Research is needed to determine the optimal methods and timing for engaging the cancer patient to maximize positive effects and minimize potential harms.


Subject(s)
Family , Neoplasms/psychology , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Data Collection , Family/psychology , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Smoking/psychology , Survivors/psychology , Young Adult
8.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 13(5): 301-12, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21385906

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Zebrafish are emerging as a powerful animal model for studying the molecular and physiological effects of nicotine exposure. The zebrafish have many advantageous physical characteristics, including small size, high fecundity rates, and externally developing transparent embryos. When combined with a battery of molecular-genetic tools and behavioral assays, these attributes enable studies to be conducted that are not practical using traditional animal models. METHODS: We reviewed the literature on the application of the zebrafish model as a preclinical model to study the biological effects of nicotine exposure. RESULTS: The identified studies used zebrafish to examine the effects of nicotine exposure on early development, addiction, anxiety, and learning. The methods used included green fluorescent protein-labeled proteins to track in vivo nicotine-altered neuron development, nicotine-conditioned place preference, and locomotive sensitization linked with high-throughput molecular and genetic screens and behavioral models of learning and stress response to nicotine. Data are presented on the complete homology of all known human neural nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in zebrafish and on the biological similarity of human and zebrafish dopaminergic signaling. CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco dependence remains a major health problem worldwide. Further understanding of the molecular effects of nicotine exposure and genetic contributions to dependence may lead to improvement in patient treatment strategies. While there are limitations to the use of zebrafish as a preclinical model, it should provide a valuable tool to complement existing model systems. The reviewed studies demonstrate the enormous opportunity zebrafish have to advance the science of nicotine and tobacco research.


Subject(s)
Nicotine/pharmacology , Zebrafish/physiology , Animals , Anxiety/chemically induced , Behavior, Addictive/chemically induced , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Learning/drug effects , Models, Animal , Nicotine/toxicity
9.
J Negat Results Biomed ; 10: 1, 2011 Jan 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21276244

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Methylphenidate blocks the re-uptake of dopamine by binding to the dopamine transporter in the presynaptic cell membrane and increases extracellular dopamine levels. Similarities in neuropsychologic effects between nicotine and methylphenidate make it an intriguing potential therapeutic option. Previous research of methylphenidate in smokers has suggested a possible beneficial effect for the relief of nicotine withdrawal symptoms, but showed no efficacy in helping smokers with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to stop smoking. METHODS: To investigate potential efficacy for relieving nicotine withdrawal symptoms and promoting smoking abstinence, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study of once-a-day osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate (OROS-MPH, Concerta®) at a target dose of 54-mg/day for 8 weeks compared with placebo in 80 adult cigarette smokers. RESULTS: Of the 80 randomized subjects and median smoking rate was 20 cigarettes per day. At the end of the medication phase, the biochemically confirmed 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence was 10% (4/40) for the placebo group and 2.5% (1/40) for the OROS-MPH group. Nicotine withdrawal was not found to differ significantly between treatment groups during the first 14 days following the start of medication prior to the target quit date (p = 0.464) or during the first 14 days following the target quit date (p = 0.786). CONCLUSION: We observed no evidence of efficacy of OROS-MPH to aid smokers to stop smoking. Although there are biologically plausible hypotheses that support the use of OROS-MPH for treating tobacco dependence, we found no evidence to support such hypotheses. In addition to no increase in smoking abstinence, we saw no effect of OROS-MPH for tobacco withdrawal symptom relief and no change in smoking rates was observed in the OROS-MPH group compared to the placebo group.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/complications , Methylphenidate/therapeutic use , Smoking/drug therapy , Tobacco Use Disorder/complications , Tobacco Use Disorder/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Methylphenidate/administration & dosage , Methylphenidate/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Nicotine/adverse effects , Pilot Projects , Placebos , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/complications , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
10.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse ; 37(5): 392-9, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21854282

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multisite trials, the gold standard for conducting studies in community-based settings, can mask variability across sites resulting in misrepresentation of effects in specific sites. In a placebo-controlled trial of osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate (OROS-MPH) as augmentation treatment for smokers with attention deficit hyperactivity/impulsivity disorder (ADHD), three types of sites were selected according to their clinical research specialty (ADHD, smoking cessation, and general mental health). OBJECTIVE: Analysis was conducted to determine if clinical outcomes, that is, reduction in ADHD symptoms and smoking cessation rates, and the effect of treatment on these outcomes would differ by type of site. METHOD: A total of 255 adult smokers diagnosed with ADHD were enrolled in three clinic types: 72 in ADHD, 79 in tobacco dependence, and 104 in the mental health clinics. RESULTS: The three site-types were similar in demographic characteristics, smoking history, baseline level of ADHD symptoms, and history of psychiatric illness. Site-type but not a site-type by treatment interaction predicted prolonged smoking abstinence. A significant three-way interaction of site-type, treatment, and time-predicted improvement in ADHD symptoms. Moderate to strong effects of OROS-MPH relative to placebo were observed in the mental health and the ADHD clinics; a weak effect was observed in the tobacco dependence clinics. CONCLUSION: OROS-MPH benefit varied by site for reducing ADHD symptoms but not for improving smoking abstinence. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Assessment of site-type effects can indicate the generalizability of findings from multisite trials and should be routinely incorporated in the design of multisite trials.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Methylphenidate/therapeutic use , Smoking Cessation/methods , Administration, Oral , Adult , Central Nervous System Stimulants/administration & dosage , Delayed-Action Preparations , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Methylphenidate/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Osmotic Pressure , Research Design , Smoking Prevention , Treatment Outcome
11.
Tob Control ; 19(1): 24-30, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19850551

ABSTRACT

While Spain's national tobacco control legislation prohibits smoking in many indoor public places, the law provides for an exception to the prohibition of smoking by allowing separate seating sections and ventilation options in certain public places such as bars and restaurants, hotels and airports. Accordingly, Spain's law is not aligned with Article 8 Guidelines of the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which requires parties to ensure universal protection against secondhand smoke exposure in all enclosed public places, workplaces and on all means of public transport. Spain's law is currently being promoted by the tobacco companies in other countries as a model for smoke-free legislation. In order to prevent weakening of smoke-free laws in other countries through industry-supported exceptions, we investigated the tactics used by the tobacco companies before the implementation of the new law and assessed the consequences of these actions in the hospitality sector. Internal tobacco industry documents made public through US litigation settlements dating back to the 1980s were searched in 2008-9. Documents show that tobacco companies sought to protect hospitality venues from smoking restrictions by promoting separate seating for smokers and ineffective ventilation technologies, supporting an unenforceable voluntary agreement between the Madrid local government and the hospitality industry, influencing ventilation standards setting and manipulating Spanish media. The Spanish National Assembly should adopt comprehensive smoke-free legislation that does not accommodate the interests of the tobacco industry. In doing so, Spain's smoke-free public places law would be better aligned with the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.


Subject(s)
Smoking/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Industry/organization & administration , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Inhalation Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Inhalation Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Policy Making , Public Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Public Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Restaurants/legislation & jurisprudence , Smoking Prevention , Spain , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/prevention & control , Workplace/legislation & jurisprudence , World Health Organization
12.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 11(5): 572-6, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19351781

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: A paucity of data exists regarding the safety and effectiveness of combination treatment with varenicline and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). METHODS: We reviewed the clinical experience of two groups of cigarette smokers enrolled in a residential tobacco treatment program: (a) patients receiving combination treatment with varenicline and NRT (N = 104) and (b) usual-care patients receiving treatment before the release of varenicline (N = 135). RESULTS: Demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. Among smokers receiving varenicline and NRT, 71% used the nicotine patch with a mean dose of 32 mg/day (SD = 14) and 73% used at least two types of NRT. Adverse events were experienced by 39% (95% CI = 31%-49%) of patients receiving varenicline and NRT and by 59% (95% CI = 51%-67%) of usual-care patients during the residential program. A total of five patients (5%) discontinued varenicline due to adverse events, compared with one patient in the usual-care group. We did not observe a significant difference in the 30-day point prevalence smoking abstinence rate at 6 months between patients treated with varenicline and NRT (54%; 95% CI = 44%-64%) and usual-care patients (59%; 95% CI = 50%-66%). DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that combination therapy with varenicline and NRT is safe and well tolerated among patients in a residential tobacco treatment program.


Subject(s)
Benzazepines/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Nicotine/therapeutic use , Nicotinic Agonists/therapeutic use , Quinoxalines/therapeutic use , Smoking Cessation/methods , Adult , Aged , Benzazepines/administration & dosage , Benzazepines/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nicotine/administration & dosage , Nicotine/pharmacology , Nicotinic Agonists/administration & dosage , Nicotinic Agonists/pharmacology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Quinoxalines/administration & dosage , Quinoxalines/pharmacology , Varenicline
13.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 11(3): 234-9, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19246427

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Varenicline and bupropion sustained release (SR) are both safe and effective for the treatment of tobacco dependence and have different mechanisms of action. Combination pharmacotherapy with these agents may increase long-term smoking abstinence rates above what is observed with single-agent therapy. METHODS: We enrolled cigarettes smokers in an open-label, one-arm, Phase II clinical trial to obtain preliminary data on the potential effectiveness and safety of combination therapy with varenicline and bupropion SR for the treatment of tobacco dependence. Eligible subjects received varenicline titrated to 1.0 mg by mouth twice daily and bupropion SR titrated to 150 mg by mouth twice daily for a total of 12 weeks along with behavioral therapy. Self-reported smoking abstinence was biochemically confirmed with expired carbon monoxide. A total of 38 smokers with a mean age of 49.1 years (SD = 12.4) who smoked an average of 19.9 cigarettes/day (SD = 7.8) for 30 years (SD = 12.3) were enrolled. RESULTS: Seven-day point-prevalent smoking abstinence rates were 71% (95% CI = 54%-85%) at 3 months and 58% (95% CI = 41%-74%) at 6 months. Mean weight change during the medication phase among smoking-abstinent subjects was 1.6 kg (SD = 2.4). For both medications, 74% of subjects took at least 90% of the prescribed doses. The most common side effects were sleep disturbance (26%) and nausea (24%). No increase in depressive symptoms was observed, and no subjects reported suicidal ideation. DISCUSSION: Combination therapy with varenicline and bupropion SR may be effective for increasing smoking abstinence rates above that observed with monotherapy.


Subject(s)
Benzazepines/therapeutic use , Bupropion/therapeutic use , Quinoxalines/therapeutic use , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Benzazepines/administration & dosage , Bupropion/administration & dosage , Delayed-Action Preparations , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quinoxalines/administration & dosage , Varenicline , Young Adult
14.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 11(7): 859-67, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19483180

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Studies examining the efficacy of tobacco dependence treatment among recovering alcoholic smokers have produced mixed findings. We set out to investigate this issue further by conducting a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of bupropion sustained-release (SR) for smoking relapse prevention among abstinent alcoholic smokers. METHODS: Participants (N = 195) met DSM-IV criteria for a history of alcohol abuse or dependence and had at least 1 year of continuous abstinence from alcohol and drugs. Open-label treatment with nicotine patch therapy was provided to all subjects for 8 weeks. The initial nicotine patch dose was determined by the subject's baseline serum cotinine concentration with an aim to achieve 100% cotinine replacement. All subjects who were confirmed abstinent from smoking throughout the final week of nicotine patch therapy (Week 8) were randomly assigned to receive bupropion SR 300 mg/day or placebo through Week 52. RESULTS: A total of 110 participants were randomized to the double-blind treatment. No significant difference was observed between the bupropion and placebo groups for rates of continuous smoking abstinence, 41.1% (95% CI = 28.1%-55.0%) versus 40.7% (95% CI = 27.6%-55.0%), respectively, p = 1.0, or point prevalence abstinence, 39.3% (95% CI = 26.5%-53.3%) versus 40.7% (95% CI = 27.6%-55.0%), respectively, p = 1.0, at the end of the treatment (Week 52). Relapse to alcohol occurred in 4% of subjects (n = 4) during the study. DISCUSSION: Treatment with bupropion SR among abstinent alcoholic smokers did not delay relapse or result in improved long-term smoking abstinence.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism/rehabilitation , Bupropion/administration & dosage , Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Smoking Cessation/methods , Tobacco Use Disorder/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Alcoholism/complications , Delayed-Action Preparations , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Secondary Prevention , Tobacco Use Disorder/complications , Treatment Outcome
15.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 11(8): 985-95, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19541948

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Depressive symptoms negatively impact smoking abstinence. However, few interventions have been targeted to smokers with current depression. Exercise improves mood and may benefit depressed smokers. This pilot study investigated the feasibility of an exercise intervention for depressed female smokers (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale [CES-D] score > or =16). METHODS: Participants (M = 41 years, 98% White) were randomized to 10 weeks of individually delivered exercise counseling (n = 30) or a health education contact control condition (n = 30). All participants received nicotine patch therapy and behavioral counseling for smoking cessation. RESULTS: The intervention was feasible as indicated by ability to recruit participants, exercise counseling session attendance (M = 7.6 of 10 sessions attended), and significant increase in exercise frequency and stage of change from baseline to end of treatment (EOT) (Week 10). Participant attrition rate was 35% by Week 10 but did not differ significantly between groups. Smoking abstinence rates at Week 10, using intention-to-treat analysis, were 17% for exercise counseling participants and 23% for health education participants (p = .75). DISCUSSION: An exercise counseling intervention was found to be feasible for depressed women smokers. More intensive intervention may be needed to increase smoking abstinence rates, and methods should be refined to reduce participant burden and attrition.


Subject(s)
Counseling , Depression/complications , Exercise , Smoking/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Depression/physiopathology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Nicotine/administration & dosage , Patient Compliance , Smoking/physiopathology , Smoking Cessation/methods , Young Adult
16.
Breast J ; 15(5): 489-95, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19624417

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive value of smoking history on breast cancer diagnosis in a referral clinic population. We conducted a case-control study using clinical data collected on 8,097 female patients (1,225 breast cancer cases and 6,872 controls) seen in the Mayo Clinic Breast Clinic between August 1, 1993 and November 31, 2003. Breast cancer patients and noncancer patients significantly differed with respect to age at time of the index visit (p < 0.001), number of pregnancies (p = 0.006), number of live births (p = 0.002), vital status at last known follow-up (p < 0.001), current menstruation (p < 0.001), age at menopause (p < 0.001), history of hysterectomy (p < 0.001), use of oral contraception (p = 0.05), duration of oral contraception use (p = 0.001), use of other exogenous hormones (p < 0.001), duration of exogenous hormone use (p = 0.05), breast pain at time of index visit (p = 0.002), smoking status (p < 0.001), and use of five or more alcoholic beverages per week (p = 0.002). After adjustment for these baseline characteristics, having a personal history of smoking was found to be predictive of breast cancer diagnosis (odds ratios [OR] = 1.25, p = 0.004). Other positive predictors for breast cancer diagnosis were: age (OR = 1.02, p < 0.001), history of hysterectomy (OR = 0.66, p < 0.001), prior use of oral contraception for more than 11 years (OR = 2.10, p < 0.001), and prior use of other exogenous hormones/estrogen (OR = 1.81, p < 0.001). In this referral practice having a personal history of smoking is predictive of breast cancer diagnosis. Further studies are needed to further explore this relationship.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Smoking/adverse effects , Abortion, Induced/statistics & numerical data , Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Chi-Square Distribution , Cohort Studies , Contraceptives, Oral/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Predictive Value of Tests , Pregnancy , Young Adult
17.
PLoS Med ; 5(12): 1729-69, 2008 Dec 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19108603

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Each year, 540 million Chinese are exposed to secondhand smoke (SHS), resulting in more than 100,000 deaths. Smoke-free policies have been demonstrated to decrease overall cigarette consumption, encourage smokers to quit, and protect the health of nonsmokers. However, restrictions on smoking in China remain limited and ineffective. Internal tobacco industry documents show that transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) have pursued a multifaceted strategy for undermining the adoption of restrictions on smoking in many countries. METHODS AND FINDINGS: To understand company activities in China related to SHS, we analyzed British American Tobacco's (BAT's) internal corporate documents produced in response to litigation against the major cigarette manufacturers to understand company activities in China related to SHS. BAT has carried out an extensive strategy to undermine the health policy agenda on SHS in China by attempting to divert public attention from SHS issues towards liver disease prevention, pushing the so-called "resocialisation of smoking" accommodation principles, and providing "training" for industry, public officials, and the media based on BAT's corporate agenda that SHS is an insignificant contributor to the larger issue of air pollution. CONCLUSIONS: The public health community in China should be aware of the tactics previously used by TTCs, including efforts by the tobacco industry to co-opt prominent Chinese benevolent organizations, when seeking to enact stronger restrictions on smoking in public places.


Subject(s)
Public Health Practice/ethics , Public Policy , Tobacco Industry/ethics , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/legislation & jurisprudence , Advertising/methods , Air Pollution, Indoor , China , Conflict of Interest/legislation & jurisprudence , Disclosure/ethics , Disclosure/legislation & jurisprudence , Economic Competition/ethics , Ethics, Business , Health Promotion/methods , Humans , Liver Diseases/prevention & control , Public Health Practice/legislation & jurisprudence , Smoking Cessation/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence
18.
Am J Public Health ; 98(9): 1643-50, 2008 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18633078

ABSTRACT

The major tobacco manufacturers discovered that polonium was part of tobacco and tobacco smoke more than 40 years ago and attempted, but failed, to remove this radioactive substance from their products. Internal tobacco industry documents reveal that the companies suppressed publication of their own internal research to avoid heightening the public's awareness of radioactivity in cigarettes. Tobacco companies continue to minimize their knowledge about polonium-210 in cigarettes in smoking and health litigation. Cigarette packs should carry a radiation-exposure warning label.


Subject(s)
Information Dissemination , Nicotiana/chemistry , Polonium/adverse effects , Publishing , Research Support as Topic , Smoking/adverse effects , Tobacco Industry/ethics , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/adverse effects , Air Pollutants, Radioactive/adverse effects , Air Pollutants, Radioactive/analysis , Consumer Product Safety , Humans , Inhalation Exposure/adverse effects , Inhalation Exposure/analysis , Organizational Policy , Public Relations , Nicotiana/adverse effects , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Industry/organization & administration , United States
19.
Eur J Public Health ; 18(6): 622-5, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18676987

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2005, the Spanish parliament passed the Spanish anti-smoking law. This legislation restricted tobacco smoking in public places, including recreation venues (bars and restaurants), but smoking was not completely prohibited in bars and restaurants. The law was enforced in January 2006. With the objective of analysing the impact that this law has had on the general Spanish population, the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) designed and implemented a survey of a representative sample of the general Spanish population on two separate occasions: in 2005 and in 2007 (12 months after the ban came into effect). METHODS: Two epidemiological, observational and cross-sectional surveys were performed among a random and representative sample of the general Spanish population, using the Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview system. RESULTS: In the first survey, a total of 6533 subjects were interviewed, of whom 3907 (59.8%) were non-smokers and in the second, a total of 3289 subjects were interviewed, of whom 2174 (65.9%) were non-smokers. The overall prevalence of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) decreased from 49.5% in 2005 to 37.9% in 2007 (22% reduction). The greatest reduction in prevalence of ETS exposure was in workplaces (from 25.8% to 11%, a decrease of 58.8%). Smaller reductions occurred in the home (from 29.5% to 21.4%, a decrease of 27%) and in recreation venues (from 37.4% to 31.8%, a decrease of 8%). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the smoking ban resulted in a significant decrease in exposure to ETS.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Smoking/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/legislation & jurisprudence , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Prevalence , Restaurants , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Spain , Young Adult
20.
Matern Child Health J ; 12 Suppl 1: 30-6, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18340517

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the rate of tobacco use (cigarette smoking and smokeless tobacco [ST]) at three time points: during the 3 months before pregnancy, during pregnancy, and at 6 weeks postpartum among Alaska Native women residing in the Y-K Delta region of Western Alaska. METHODS: A retrospective, non-randomized observational cohort design was utilized. The sample consisted of 832 Alaska Natives (mean maternal age = 26.2 years, average length of gestation = 3.8 months) seen at their first prenatal visit and enrolled in the women, infant, and children (WIC) program at the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Regional Hospital in Bethel, Alaska, during a 2-year-period (2001-2002). Tobacco use was assessed using an interview format at the first prenatal and at the 6-week postpartum visits. RESULTS: The rates of any tobacco use were 48% (95% CI 45%, 52%) 3 months before pregnancy, 79% (95% CI 76%, 82%) during pregnancy, and 70% (95% CI 67%, 74%) at 6 weeks postpartum. The proportion of women using ST changed significantly (P < 0.001) over the three time points (14%, 60%, and 61%, respectively) as well as the proportion of women who smoked cigarettes (P < 0.001) (40%, 42%, and 19%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study documents the high rate of tobacco use, particularly ST use, during pregnancy among Alaska Native women. Development of tobacco use prevention and cessation interventions during pregnancy for Alaska Native women is warranted.


Subject(s)
Inuit/statistics & numerical data , Maternal Welfare/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Smoking Cessation/statistics & numerical data , Tobacco Use Disorder/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Alaska/epidemiology , Confidence Intervals , Databases as Topic , Female , Focus Groups , Food Services , Humans , Logistic Models , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL