ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: In academic breast surgery, ultrasound use tends to be limited to radiology departments, thus formal surgical resident training in breast ultrasound is sparse. Building on residents' ultrasound skills in our general surgery training program, we developed a novel curriculum to teach ultrasound-guided breast procedures (UGBPs), including core needle biopsy (CNB) and wire localization (WL). We hypothesized that learning UGBPs on cadavers would be preferred to learning with a breast phantom model using chicken breasts. METHODS: Residents received a 1-h lecture on breast CNB and WL followed by a 1-h hands-on laboratory session. Olives stuffed with red pimentos were used to replicate breast masses and implanted in chicken breasts and the breasts of lightly embalmed and unembalmed female cadavers. All residents practiced UGBPs with a course instructor on both models. Residents completed anonymous prelaboratory and postlaboratory surveys utilizing five-point Likert scales. RESULTS: A total of 35 trainees participated in the didactics; all completed the prelaboratory survey and 28 completed the postlaboratory survey. Participant clinical year ranged from 1 to 6. Residents' confidence in describing and performing CNBs and WLs increased significantly on postlaboratory surveys, controlling for clinical year (P < 0.001). Eighty-point seven percent preferred learning UGBPs on cadavers over phantoms most commonly citing that the cadaver was more realistic. CONCLUSIONS: Following a novel 2-h UGBP training curriculum using phantom and cadaveric models, resident confidence in describing and performing UGBPs significantly improved. Most favored the cadaveric model and reported that the course prepared them for real-life procedures.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive (MIS) cholecystectomies have become standard due to patient and hospital advantages; however, this approach is not always achievable. Acute and gangrenous cholecystitis increase the likelihood of conversion from MIS to open cholecystectomy. This study aims to examine patient and hospital factors underlying differential utilization of MIS vs open cholecystectomies indicated for acute cholecystitis. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational cohort study of patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent a cholecystectomy between 2016 and 2018 identified from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyze patient, geographic, and hospital variables as well as surgical approach. RESULTS: Our total cohort included 53,503 patients of which 98.4% (n = 52,673) underwent an initial minimally invasive approach and with a conversion rate of 3.3% (n = 1,759). On multivariable analysis advancing age increased the likelihood of either primary open (age 40 to < 65 aOR 2.17; ≥ 65 aOR 3.00) or conversion to open cholecystectomy (age 40 to < 65 aOR 2.20; ≥ 65 aOR 3.15). Similarly, male sex had higher odds of either primary open (aOR 1.70) or conversion to open cholecystectomy (aOR 1.84). Hospital characteristics increasing the likelihood of either primary open or conversion to open cholecystectomy included teaching hospitals (aOR 1.37 and 1.28, respectively) and safety-net hospitals (aOR 1.46 and 1.33, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: With respect to cholecystectomy, it is well-established that a minimally invasive surgical approach is associated with superior patient outcomes. Our study focused on the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis and identified increasing age as well as male sex as significant factors associated with open surgery. Teaching and safety-net hospital status were also associated with differential utilization of open, conversion-to-open, and MIS. These findings suggest the potential to create and apply strategies to further minimize open surgery in the setting of acute cholecystitis.