Degree of concordance between double-balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Capsule endoscopy is considered the diagnostic procedure of choice in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). Double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) offers both diagnostic and therapeutic potential, but is invasive, complex, and time-consuming. The aim was to evaluate diagnostic agreement between capsule endoscopy and DBE in patients with OGIB, and secondarily the diagnostic gain of DBE when capsule endoscopy detected only blood or clots in the small-bowel lumen. METHODS: Multicenter prospective study carried out at six institutions in Italy. RESULTS: 193 patients (119 men, mean age 61.6 +/- 16.2) first underwent capsule endoscopy and then DBE. The most frequent positive findings at capsule endoscopy were vascular lesions (74 patients, 38.3 %), blood or clot in the lumen (34, 17.6 %), and tumor mass (20, 10.4 %). The most frequent findings at DBE were vascular lesions (72 patients, 37.3 %), neoplasia (30, 15.5 %) and ulcers/inflammatory lesions (12, 6.2 %). Overall kappa coefficient was 0.46 (95 %CI 0.38 - 0.54), with maximum concordance for vascular (0.72 [95 %CI 0.59 - 0.84]) and inflammatory (0.78 [0.58 - 0.99]) lesions and minimum for polyps (0.46 [0.16 - 0.80]). Blood in the lumen was the only positive finding at capsule endoscopy in 34 cases; of these, 12 had negative DBE findings whereas 10 had vascular lesions, 6 neoplasia, 1 ulcer, and 5 diverticula. CONCLUSION: Capsule endoscopy and DBE have good agreement for vascular and inflammatory lesions but not for polyps or neoplasia. DBE provides valuable adjunctive information, particularly in patients with neoplasia or polyp at capsule endoscopy. DBE clarified the origin of bleeding in two-thirds of patients with capsule endoscopy showing only blood in the lumen.

Different effects of short-term omeprazole, lansoprazole or pantoprazole on the accuracy of the (13)C-urea breath test.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors may interfere with the accuracy of the (13)C-urea breath test, but little information is available on the effect of standard doses of various proton pump inhibitors on this test. AIM: To evaluate the effect of short-term standard doses of omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole on the accuracy of the standardized (13)C-urea breath test. METHODS: A total of 124 patients with Helicobacter pylori infection, diagnosed on the basis of gastric histology, rapid urease test and (13)C-urea breath test, were studied. These patients received omeprazole, 20 mg/day, lansoprazole, 30 mg/day, or pantoprazole, 40 mg/day, for 2 weeks according to a randomized protocol. (13)C-Urea breath test was repeated on days 4, 7 and 14 while on therapy and 7 days after proton pump inhibitor withdrawal. RESULTS: Of the patients receiving omeprazole and lansoprazole, 30% (12/40) and 20% (8/41), respectively, became (13)C-urea breath test negative during therapy, compared with none of the 42 patients treated with pantoprazole (P < 0.05). All the false negative (13)C-urea breath test results returned to positive within 1 week of drug withdrawal, with a mean recovery to 84.7 +/- 15.6% of baseline delta(13)CO(2). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term omeprazole and lansoprazole interfere with the 13C-urea breath test, although a return to positive test results invariably occurs within 1 week of proton pump inhibitor withdrawal. In contrast, the accuracy of the (13)C-urea breath test does not appear to be significantly impaired by short-term pantoprazole, which therefore may not necessarily be withdrawn before this test.

Is maintenance therapy always necessary for patients with ulcerative colitis in remission?

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of sulphasalazine and mesalazine in preventing relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis is well known. It is less clear how long such maintenance should be continued, and if the duration of disease remission is a factor that affects the risk of recurrence. AIM: To determine whether the duration of disease remission affects the relapse rate, by comparing the efficacy of a delayed-release mesalazine (Asacol, Bracco S.p.A., Milan, Italy) against placebo in patients with ulcerative colitis with short- and long-duration of disease remission. METHODS: 112 patients (66 male, 46 female, mean age 35 years), with intermittent chronic ulcerative colitis in clinical, endoscopic and histological remission with sulphasalazine or mesalazine for at least 1 year, were included in the study. Assuming that a lower duration of remission might be associated with a higher relapse rate, the patients were stratified according to the length of their disease remission, prior to randomization into Group A (Asacol 26, placebo 35) in remission from 1 to 2 years, or Group B (Asacol 28, placebo 23) in remission for over 2 years, median 4 years. Patients were treated daily with oral Asacol 1.2 g vs. placebo, for a follow-up period of 1 year. RESULTS: We employed an intention-to-treat analysis. In Group A, whilst no difference was found between the two treatments after 6 months, mesalazine was significantly more effective than placebo in preventing relapse at 12 months [Asacol 6/26 (23%), placebo 17/35 (49%), P = 0.035, 95% Cl: 48-2.3%]. In contrast, in Group B no statistically significant difference was observed between the two treatments, either at 6 or 12 months [Asacol 5/28 (18%), placebo 6/23 (26%), P = 0.35, 95% Cl: 31-14%] of follow-up. Patients in group B were older, and had the disease and remission duration for longer, than those in Group A. CONCLUSIONS: Mesalazine prophylaxis is necessary for the prevention of relapse by patients with ulcerative colitis in remission for less than 2 years, but this study casts doubt over whether continuous maintenance treatment is necessary in patients with prolonged clinical, endoscopic and histological remission, who are at very low risk of relapse.

Is routine histological evaluation an accurate test for Helicobacter pylori infection?

AIM: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of routine histology for Helicobacter pylori infection, with histology by an expert pathologist, and to compare histology with the rapid urease test (RUT), 13C-urea breath test, IgG serology and culture of antrum and corpus specimens, in a consecutive series of untreated patients presenting for upper oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred and fifteen consecutive patients underwent multiple tests for H. pylori infection: rapid urease test, 13C-urea breath test, IgG serology and histology and culture on antrum and corpus biopsy specimens. Histology was first evaluated by the pathologists in a routine examination, and then blindly reviewed by an expert pathologist with a special interest in gastrointestinal pathology. The patients were considered to be H. pylori-positive if two or more tests were positive. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients (70.4%) were found to be H. pylori positive. 13C-urea breath test and IgG serology showed the best sensitivity and specificity (100%). Both the antral and body cultures, and the rapid urease test had the highest specificity (100%). Histological diagnosis after re-evaluation by an expert pathologist showed a high sensitivity (98. 8%) and specificity (100%), and was better than routine histology (sensitivity 92.6%; specificity 90.3%). The accuracy of the rapid urease test was greater than that of routine histology, and the combination of these two tests improved the sensitivity of H. pylori detection to up to 100%. CONCLUSION: All diagnostic tests usually utilised in clinical practice have a sensitivity higher than 90%. In patients who were not pre-treated with antisecretory agents or antibiotics, the sensitivity of histological diagnosis, however, seems to be influenced by the accuracy of the histological examination. The sensitivity of routine histology, but not of revised histological diagnosis, is improved by an additional rapid urease test.

Prolonging proton pump inhibitor-based anti-Helicobacter pylori treatment from one to two weeks in duodenal ulcer: is it worthwhile?

AIMS: To compare the efficacy of one-week versus two-week treatment with lansoprazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin in inducing healing of Helicobacter pylori-positive duodenal ulcers as well as to investigate the role of several factors, determinant in the ulcer healing process. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-one active duodenal ulcer patients were randomised to receive one- or two-week treatment with lansoprazole (30 mg bid), clarithromycin (500 mg bid) and amoxycillin (1 g bid), not followed by any additional acid suppressive therapy. Ulcer healing and Helicobacter pylori infection were assessed by endoscopy and urea breath test 4 weeks after the end of treatment. Before entering the trial and four weeks after the end of treatment, dyspeptic symptoms were recorded and scored by a validated questionnaire. The potential effects of a number of clinical variables on the ulcer healing process were evaluated by means of univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Duodenal ulcer was healed in 80.5% patients treated for one week and in 91.4% patients treated for 2 weeks according to intention-to-treat analysis (p=NS). Ulcer healing was more frequent in the Helicobacter pylori cured patients compared to those with persisting infection (90.9% vs 68.5%; p=0.04). Multivariate analysis did not reveal any significant predictor of duodenal ulcer healing. CONCLUSIONS: Two-week treatment with lansoprazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin, without continuation of antisecretive therapy, is better, although the difference is not statistically significant, than one-week treatment in healing Helicobacter pylori-positive duodenal ulcer disease. The eradication of Helicobacter pylori is the most important factor related to ulcer healing.

Efficacy of pantoprazole in the prevention of peptic ulcers, induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of pantoprazole in preventing gastrointestinal lesions in patients with rheumatic diseases receiving continuous, long-term treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. MATERIAL: This was a prospective, randomised, double-blind, unbalanced, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. Outpatients (n= 104, age range 22-80 years, mean age 59.5) with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis, requiring chronic intake of NSAIDs (at least 8 weeks prior to the start of the study), were randomised and enrolled to receive either 40 mg pantoprazole (n=70) or placebo (n=34) once daily, for 12 weeks. Patients had endoscopically confirmed gastric and duodenal lesions grade 0, 1 or 2 (Lanza classification grade 0: normal to hyperaemic mucosa; grade 1: 1 to 3 erosions, submucosal haemorrhage or petechiae, grade 2: 4 to 10 erosions, submucosal haemorrhages or petechiae). Clinical and endoscopic evaluations were performed at baseline, after 4, and 12 weeks. The primary end-point of the study was the incidence of gastric or duodenal ulcers after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Patients (n=95) were evaluated: 65 in the pantoprazole group and 30 in the placebo group. When considering all patients (those with Lanza score grade 0, 1, 2 at baseline), the overall proportion of patients in remission was 82% and 77% after 4 weeks, and 72% and 59% after 12 weeks in pantoprazole and placebo groups, respectively (cumulative survival analysis according to Kaplan-Meier). The difference between the treatment groups was even more marked when only those patients with normal mucosa at baseline (grade 0) were considered. After 12 weeks, the proportion of patients in remission was 82% (95% confidence limits 70% - 94% in the pantoprazole and 55% (95% confidence limits 33% - 77%) in the placebo treatment group, p=O.036. Adverse events were reported in 4% and 6% of patients in pantoprazole and placebo treatment groups, respectively CONCLUSIONS: Pantoprazole 40 mg once daily was well tolerated and is more effective than placebo in the prevention of peptic ulcers in patients with rheumatic diseases who require continuous, long-term, treatment with NSAIDs.

Comparison between methotrexate and azathioprine in the treatment of chronic active Crohn's disease: a randomised, investigator-blind study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The efficacy of azathioprine in the treatment of chronic active Crohn's disease is well established. However, this drug has a long onset of action. Methotrexate has also been shown to be effective in chronic active Crohn's disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of methotrexate in comparison with azathioprine, and to establish whether methotrexate has a shorter onset of action in this setting. METHODS: Patients with chronic active Crohn's disease were admitted to this investigator-blind study. Chronicity was defined as the need for steroid therapy of > or = 10 mg/day for at least 4 months during the preceding 12 months, with at least one attempt to discontinue treatment. The disease had to be clinically active at entry, with a Crohn's Disease Activity Index of > or = 200. Six patients treated with azathioprine and methotrexate, respectively, were found to have enterocutaneous and perianal fistulas. At entry, all patients received prednisolone (40 mg once a day) which was tapered over a period of 12 weeks unless their clinical condition deteriorated. All patients were randomised to receive i.v. methotrexate 25 mg/week, or oral azathioprine 2 mg/kg per day, for a 6-month follow-up period. After the first 3 months, methotrexate was switched to oral administration maintaining the same dose. The primary efficacy outcome considered was the proportion of patients entering first remission after 3 and 6 months of therapy. Clinical remission was defined as the lack of need for steroid treatment and a Crohn's Disease Activity Index score of < or = 150 points at each scheduled visit. RESULTS: In the 54 patients (26 F, 28 M, mean age 34 years, range 18-60) randomly assigned to methotrexate (n=27) or azathioprine (n=27), no statistically significant difference was found between the two treatment regimens with respect to remission rate after 3 (methotrexate 44%, azathioprine 33%, p=0.28, (95% CI, 0.369-0.147), and 6 months (methotrexate 56%, azathioprine 63%, p=0.39, 95% CI, 0.187-0.335), respectively. Six patients withdrew from therapy due to adverse events: 3/27 (11%) in methotrexate and 3/27 (11%) in azathioprine. Drug-related adverse events (asthenia, nausea and vomiting) that did not require withdrawal from therapy were more frequent in the methotrexate group (azathioprine: 2/27 (7%); methotrexate: 12/27 (44%), p=0.00009). The frequency of these adverse events was comparable during the intravenous or oral administration of the drug. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that methotrexate is effective in inducing remission in patients with chronic active Crohn's disease, therapeutic efficacy being comparable, but not faster, than that of azathioprine.

[Efficacy of medical therapy in preventing the post-surgical recurrence in Crohn's disease]. / Efficacia della terapia medica nella prevenzione della recidiva post-chirurgica della malattia di Crohn.

Crohns Disease (CD) is a chronic intestinal inflammatory disease of unknown origins that cannot be definitely resolved with surgical intervention. Therefore, pharmacologic therapies are of great importance both in preventing relapses and by determining remissions. In this paper the authors analyse the different drugs available for the treatment of Crohns disease, and focus on their efficacy and tollerability.

Use of colonoscopy in the management of patients with Crohn's disease: appropriateness and diagnostic yield.

INTRODUCTION: Colonoscopy is a necessary tool in the management of Crohn's disease, but the benefit achieved by the procedure is a matter of debate. In the present study we evaluate the clinical impact of performing colonoscopy in Crohn's disease patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients with Crohn's disease undergoing colonoscopy were considered. The following issues were considered: appropriateness of indications; relevant findings able to change the management of the patients; the endoscopist's management decisions based on patient's clinical picture, i.e. increased, maintained or decreased treatment, compared with those selected after performing endoscopy. RESULTS: 204 patients (116 male/88 female, mean age 41 years) were included. Colonoscopy was judged indicated in 52.9% cases, according to current guidelines. In 54% of patients, endoscopy revealed a significant lesion, and this rate was significantly lower for non-indicated procedures (25.9%, p<0.0001). The endoscopic findings were in disagreement with symptoms in about 25% of cases, but the impact of the endoscopic findings on the endoscopist's decision was likely to be very small without any differences between appropriate and inappropriate procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopy is a potent tool in the management of Crohn's disease, if correctly used, but in the majority of cases a correct therapeutic decision may be established simply on the basis of clinical picture and non-invasive markers, whilst relevant endoscopic findings have a relatively low impact on the medical treatment.

Randomised controlled trial of azathioprine and 5-aminosalicylic acid for treatment of steroid dependent ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There are limited evidence based data concerning the use of azathioprine in ulcerative colitis. We aimed to compare the efficacy of azathioprine and oral 5-aminosalicylic acid in inducing remission of steroid dependent ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Seventy two patients with steroid dependent ulcerative colitis were admitted to this investigator-blind study. Steroid dependence was defined as a requirement for steroid therapy > or =10 mg/day during the preceding six months, with at least two attempts to discontinue the medication. The disease had to be clinically and endoscopically active at study entry, and all patients were taking systemic prednisolone (40 mg/day). Patients were randomised to receive azathioprine 2 mg/kg/day or oral 5-aminosalicylic acid 3.2 g/day, for a six month follow up period. The outcome of the treatment was defined as (1) success, indicating induction of clinical and endoscopic remission and steroid discontinuation, or (2) failure, indicating the absence of clinical and endoscopic remission and therefore the need for at least one further cycle of systemic steroids to control symptoms, apart from the initial one, or colectomy. RESULTS: Significantly more patients in the azathioprine than in the 5-aminosalicylic acid group had clinical and endoscopic remission, and discontinued steroid therapy, both in the intention to treat (azathioprine v 5-aminosalicylic acid: 19/36 patients (53%) v 7/36 (21%); odds ratio (OR) 4.78 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57-14.5)) and per protocol (azathioprine v 5-aminosalicylic acid: 19/33 patients (58%) v 7/34 (21%); OR 5.26 (95% CI 1.59-18.1)) analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Azathioprine is significantly more effective than 5-aminosalicylic acid in inducing clinical and endoscopic remission and avoiding steroid requirement in the treatment of steroid dependent ulcerative colitis.

Doppler ultrasound measurement of intestinal blood flow in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to assess the role of Doppler ultrasound (US) in detecting changes in the splanchnic hemodynamic variables measured in patients with active or quiescent inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and healthy subjects. METHODS: Sixty-five patients, 31 with Crohn's disease (CD), 24 with ulcerative colitis (UC), 10 with IBS, and 10 matched normal subjects were evaluated by means of Doppler US. The mean velocity of portal and mesenteric venous flow, the blood flow volume of portal and mesenteric veins, and the resistance index (RI) of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) were studied in all patients. RESULTS: Patients with active IBD had a splanchnic venous flow that was significantly higher, and an RI of the SMA significantly lower, than the IBS patients and healthy controls; however, a higher portal and mesenteric blood flow and lower RI of the SMA was documented in patients with active UC but not in those in whom the disease was quiescent. Patients with quiescent CD had significantly higher portal and mesenteric blood flow and lower RI of the SMA than IBS and healthy controls. No significant differences were found between IBS patients, quiescent UC patients, and healthy controls. CONCLUSION: This study shows that Doppler US can demonstrate splanchnic hemodynamic changes in active IBD patients and, in particular, can be used to differentiate between active and quiescent UC. However, the assessment of CD activity by means of Doppler US requires further investigation.

Low Pentasa dosage versus hydrocortisone in the topical treatment of active ulcerative colitis: a randomized, double-blind study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare a low dosage (1 g/day) rectal preparation of 5-aminosalicylic acid in slightly acidic, buffered suspension (Pentasa) with a hydrocortisone 100 mg/day enema (Cortenema). METHODS: Fifty-two patients with mild to moderate distal ulcerative colitis were randomized under double-blind conditions to receive a rectal preparation of either Pentasa (1 g/day) or Cortenema (100 mg/day) for 3 wk. RESULTS: After 3 wk, both types of treatment resulted in statistically significant improvements in clinical and endoscopic activity. No significant difference was observed between the two drugs in any of the parameters considered, although a statistical trend in favor of Pentasa was evident when analysis was limited to clinical activity (p = 0.07). No side effects were reported in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience confirms that short term topical treatment with a low dosage 5-aminosalicylic acid is at least as effective as 100-mg hydrocortisone enemas in treating mild to moderate distal ulcerative colitis and is generally well tolerated.

Gastroduodenal tolerability of nabumetone versus naproxen in the treatment of rheumatic patients.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this endoscopic, double-blind study was to evaluate the gastric tolerability of nabumetone, a novel nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, compared with naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Patients with definite or classic rheumatoid arthritis as defined by ACR criteria were eligible for entry into the study if an initial endoscopy was normal or showed the presence of only one erosion or one or two submucosal hemorrhages. After a 7-day washout period, the patients were randomized to receive either nabumetone, 1 g, or naproxen, 500 mg, b.i.d. Blinding was achieved by the use of double dummies. Endoscopy was repeated after 4 wk of treatment. The primary efficacy parameters were Ritchie articular index, duration of morning stiffness, and global assessments. RESULTS: Gastric mucosal lesions of different degrees were observed in 9% (2/22) of nabumetone-treated patients and in 40% (12/30) of those who received naproxen (p = 0.01). One duodenal ulcer was found in a patient treated with nabumetone, and this patient had a history of duodenal ulcer. In the naproxen group, six patients were found to have an ulcer. Clinical evaluation of rheumatological symptomatology showed no statistical difference in relieving symptoms between the two drugs in the primary efficacy assessments. However, six nabumetone-treated patients dropped out because of lack of efficacy, compared with one in the naproxen group. Side effects were noted in three patients treated with nabumetone and in 14 treated with naproxen (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: This study showed that nabumetone, 1 g daily, results in significantly less deterioration of gastric mucosa than naproxen, 500 mg daily, but the efficacy of naproxen, 1 g, appears to be more than that achieved with nabumetone, 1 g.

Role of Helicobacter pylori in ulcer healing and recurrence of gastric and duodenal ulcers in longterm NSAID users. Response to omeprazole dual therapy.

BACKGROUND: The relation between Helicobacter pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-associated peptic ulcers remains unclear; in particular, it is not known whether H pylori plays a part in the healing and recurrence of these ulcers. AIMS: To evaluate prospectively in a consecutive series of arthritis patients receiving longterm NSAID treatment the prevalence of peptic ulcer as well as the effect of H pylori eradication on the healing and recurrence of gastric and duodenal ulcer found. PATIENTS: Some 278 consecutive patients underwent gastroscopy with multiple biopsies of the gastric antrum and corpus for histological examination and rapid urease test. One hundred peptic ulcers (59 gastric ulcers, 39 duodenal ulcers, and two gastric ulcers concomitant with a duodenal ulcer) were found. Seventy per cent of these ulcers were H pylori positive. METHODS: According to their H pylori status, ulcer patients were randomised to one of the following treatments: H pylori negative ulcers received omeprazole 20 mg twice daily for four to eight weeks, whereas H pylori positive lesions were treated with omeprazole 20 mg twice daily plus amoxycillin 1 g twice daily (the second of these for the first two weeks) or omeprazole alone for four to eight weeks while continuing NSAID therapy. Patients with healed ulcers were endoscopically followed up for six months after stopping antiulcer therapy while continuing NSAIDs. RESULTS: Endoscopic healing rates for gastric and duodenal ulcers in the three different groups were similar both at four and eight weeks. H pylori eradication did not influence healing, which occurred in 14 of 20 (70%) of patients in whom H pylori was eradicated, compared with 14 of 17 (82%) of patients with persistent infection. Cumulative recurrence rates at six months did not statistically differ among the three different groups (27% in H pylori negative, 46% in H pylori positive, and 31% in those where H pylori was eradicated during the healing phase), although a numerical trend in favour of a higher recurrence rate in infected patients was evident. CONCLUSIONS: H pylori eradication does not confer any significant advantage on the healing of gastric and duodenal ulcers associated with longterm NSAID use. It remains to be established with certainty whether eradication may be helpful in the reduction of recurrence in a specific subset of NSAID associated ulcer.

Do some patients with Helicobacter pylori infection benefit from an extension to 2 weeks of a proton pump inhibitor-based triple eradication therapy?

OBJECTIVES: Seven-day proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapies are the first-line anti-Helicobacter pylori regimens; to date, however, there is still no agreement concerning all the predictors of H. pylori cure under these regimens. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether patients with certain pretreatment characteristics may benefit from an extension from 1 to 2 wk of treatment with lansoprazole, amoxycillin, and clarithromycin. METHODS: A total of 142 patients with H. pylori infection ascertained by means of gastric histopathology and 13C urea breath test (UBT) participated in this study. In all patients H. pylori density was determined at histology both on antral and corpus biopsies, and H. pylori culture with antibiotic susceptibility testing; IgG anti-H. pylori titers were also determined before therapy. Patients were randomized to receive 1-wk versus 2-wk of treatment with lansoprazole (30 mg b.i.d.), clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.), and amoxycillin (1 g b.i.d.). The association between eradication and potential predictors was analyzed by means of unconditional logistic regression models and stratified according to the duration of treatment. A stepwise regression analysis was performed to identify variables discriminated between subjects, using eradication status as the dependent variable. RESULTS: The overall eradication rates for 1- and 2-wk treatments were 74.6% and 85.9% (intention-to-treat analysis) and 81.5% and 89.1% (per-protocol analysis), respectively (p = NS). Multivariate discriminant analysis selected as the variables independently related to eradication cigarette smoking (OR = 3.98), delta of 13C-UBT higher than 35 (OR = 9.21) and IgG anti-H. pylori titer > or = 93 (OR = 0.24) for the whole series of subjects. Stratified analysis according to the duration of therapy selected H. pylori density as the only predictor of eradication in the group treated for 1 wk (OR = 8.11). In contrast, no significant predictors were found in the group treated for 2 wk. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a high intragastric bacterial load, as detected by histology (grade 3) or 13C-UBT (delta > 35) may benefit from an extension to 2 wk of triple therapy with lansoprazole, amoxycillin, and clarithromycin.

Azathioprine in steroid-resistant and steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis.

We evaluated, retrospectively, the outcome of 56 patients (39 male, 17 female; mean age, 34 years; age range, 14-65 years) who received azathioprine for either steroid-resistant (group A, n = 10) or steroid-dependent (group B, n = 46) ulcerative colitis. The patients were followed for a mean of 29 +/- 17 months (median, 27 months). Twenty-four had left-sided colitis, 5 had subtotal colitis, and 27 had total colitis. The mean duration of the disease was 51 months (range, 2-192 months). At the beginning of azathioprine treatment (time 0), all patients had clinically severe disease and were taking 40 mg prednisolone per day. Azathioprine was used in addition to steroid therapy at a dosage of 2 mg/kg. The need for steroids, expressed as the median cumulative steroid dose (mg/year), and the number of clinical relapses (requiring steroid therapy) in the 2 years before azathioprine treatment, were compared with those of the 3-year follow-up with azathioprine treatment. A positive response to azathioprine was defined as (a) avoidance of colectomy, (b) a significant decrease in the median cumulative steroid dose, and (c) a significant decrease in the number of clinical relapses (expressed as number/patient/year). One patient in group A withdrew due to painful dyspepsia, and two patients in group B were lost to follow-up. Remission with complete elimination of steroids was achieved in 36 of 53 (64%), 23 of 35 (66%), and 18 of 26 (69%) patients in the first, second, and third years, respectively, of azathioprine treatment. Compared with the 2 years before azathioprine treatment, a significant decrease was observed of about 75% both in steroid consumption and in the number of clinical relapses during the 3 years of azathioprine therapy. Two of nine patients in group A and 2 of 44 patients in group B had colectomy after mean periods of 15 months and 24 months, respectively. Azathioprine is effective and safe in avoiding colectomy in patients with steroid-resistant and steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis; its use decreases both steroid requirements and clinical relapses.

Factors affecting splanchnic haemodynamics in Crohn's disease: a prospective controlled study using Doppler ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: Current knowledge on splanchnic haemodynamics in Crohn's disease is limited. AIMS: To investigate which features of Crohn's disease affect splanchnic haemodynamics, and to establish whether portal vein (PV) and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) blood supply reflects clinical or biochemical activity of Crohn's disease. METHODS: Seventy nine patients with Crohn's disease and 40 controls were evaluated by Doppler ultrasound (US). The mean velocity of PV and SMA flow, the volume of blood flow of the PV and SMA, and the resistance index of SMA were studied. A series of clinical, biochemical, and US variables including Crohn's disease activity index, serum C reactive protein concentrations, disease duration and its anatomical location, smoking habits, abdominal complications, and current medical therapy, as well as the maximum bowel wall thickness as measured by US, were determined. The relation between PV and SMA blood flow and these variables was assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Patients with Crohn's disease had significantly higher PV and SMA flow and a lower SMA resistance index than controls. Stepwise multiple regression analysis identified bowel wall thickness and location of the disease as the main predictive variables of both PV and SMA blood flow variation, accounting for 36% and 45% of their variability, respectively. No relation was found between splanchnic haemodynamics and disease activity. CONCLUSION: A hyperdynamic mesenteric circulation does exist in Crohn's disease; however splanchnic blood flow does not reflect the clinical or biochemical activity of the disease, but seems to be linked more to other Crohn's disease characteristics, such as maximum bowel thickness and anatomical location.

Presence of gastric autoantibodies impairs gastric secretory function in patients with Helicobacter pylori-positive duodenal ulcer.

BACKGROUND: Although the association between Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric autoimmunity is now well established, to date little is known about the significance of anticanalicular autoantibodies in patients with duodenal ulcer (DU). We therefore investigated the prevalence of serum antiparietal cell autoreactivity in DU patients as well as the relationship between these autoantibodies, gastric histopathology and gastric secretory function in this setting. METHODS: Forty-one consecutive patients with H. pylori-positive DU were initially recruited. In all patients, basal (BAO) and pentagastrin stimulated acid output (PAO), fasting and meal-induced serum gastrin levels, as well as serum pepsinogen I concentrations, were measured. Antral and body gastritis was evaluated according to the Sydney system. Serum anticanalicular autoreactivity was determined by the indirect immunoperoxidase technique. RESULTS: Serum anticanalicular autoantibodies were found in 7 out of 34 patients (20%). The presence of these antibodies was associated with a significantly higher grade of body gastritis (activity: 1.9 versus 0.9) as well as with significantly higher fasting and meal stimulated gastrin levels (mean fasting gastrin, 76.4 (15.2) microg/ml versus 59.3 (20.5) microg/ml). In addition, PAO values were significantly lower in patients with gastric autoantibodies than in those without this autoreactivity (mean 0.35 (0.16) mmol kg(-1)h(-1) versus 0.49 (0.16)mmol kg(-1)h(-1)). In contrast, no significant differences were found between patients with and without anticanalicular autoantibodies as regards fasting serum pepsinogen I concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Serum anticanalicular autoantibodies can be detected in 20% of patients with DU and are associated with a more severe pattern of body gastritis, higher gastrin levels and decreased peak acid secretion values. Their presence could account for the normal or reduced acid output which can be seen in a subset of DU patients.