Prolonged clinical remissions in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma treated with autologous stem cell transplantation incorporating rituximab.

Three sequential phase II trials were conducted with different immunotherapy approaches to enhance the outcome of autologous transplant (high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT)) for recurrent follicular lymphoma. Seventy-three patients were enrolled from 1996 to 2009. Patients received HDT/ASCT combined with (1) interferon-α 3 MU/m(2) subcutaneously (SC) three times per week (TIW) for 2 years post-ASCT, (2) rituximab (R) 375 mg/m(2) for in vivo purging 3-5 days pre-stem cell collection and 2 × 4 weekly R at 2 and 6 months post-ASCT, respectively, or (3) three infusions of R pre-stem cell collection followed by 6× R weekly and interferon-α 3 MU/m(2) SC TIW. Although not statistically significant, progression-free survival (PFS) for patients who received rituximab was 56.4 and 49.1% at 5 and 10 years compared to 36 and 21% in those who did not receive rituximab. Molecular relapse post-HDT/ASCT was the strongest predictor of PFS in a multivariate analysis. Molecular relapse was coincident with or preceded clinical relapses in 84% of patients who relapsed­median of 12 months (range 0-129 months). Adverse events included secondary malignancy, transformation to diffuse large B cell lymphoma, prolonged mostly asymptomatic hypogammaglobulinemia, and pulmonary fibrosis. The long-term toxicity profile must be considered when selecting patients for this treatment.

Bortezomib in multiple myeloma: systematic review and clinical considerations.

We conducted a systematic review to determine the appropriate use of bortezomib alone or in combination with other agents in patients with multiple myeloma (mm). We searched medline, embase, the Cochrane Library, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of included studies. We analyzed randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews if they involved adult mm patients treated with bortezomib and if they reported on survival, disease control, response, quality of life, or adverse effects. Twenty-six unique studies met the inclusion criteria. For patients with previously untreated mm and for candidates for transplantation, we found a statistically significant benefit in time to progression [hazard ratio (hr): 0.48, p < 0.001; and hr: 0.63, p = 0.006, respectively] and a better response with a bortezomib than with a non-bortezomib regimen (p < 0.001). Progression-free survival was longer with bortezomib and thalidomide than with thalidomide alone (p = 0.01). In non-candidates for transplantation, a significant benefit in overall survival was observed with a bortezomib regimen (hr compared with a non-bortezomib regimen: 0.61; p = 0.008), and in transplantation candidates receiving bortezomib, the response rate was improved after induction (p = 0.004) and after a first transplant (p = 0.016). In relapsed or refractory mm, overall survival (p = 0.03), time to progression (hr: 1.82; p = 0.000004), and progression-free survival (hr: 1.69; p = 0.000026) were significantly improved with bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (compared with bortezomib alone), and bortezomib monotherapy was better than dexamethasone alone (hr: 0.77; p = 0.027). Bortezomib combined with thalidomide and dexamethasone was better than either bortezomib monotherapy or thalidomide with dexamethasone (p < 0.001). In previously untreated or in relapsed or refractory mm patients, bortezomib-based therapy has improved disease control and, in some patients, overall survival.

Alemtuzumab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

QUESTIONS: With respect to outcomes such as survival, response rate, response duration, time to progression, and quality of life, is alemtuzumab a beneficial treatment option for patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (cll)?What toxicities are associated with the use of alemtuzumab?Which patients are more likely-or less likely-to benefit from treatment with alemtuzumab? PERSPECTIVES: Evidence was selected and reviewed by one member of the Hematology Disease Site Group (dsg) of Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care (pebc) and by methodologists. The practice guideline report was reviewed and approved by the Hema-tology dsg, which comprises hematologists, medical and radiation oncologists, and a patient representative. As part of an external review process, the report was disseminated to obtain feedback from practitioners in Ontario. OUTCOMES: Outcomes of interest were overall survival, quality of life, response rates and duration, and adverse event rates. METHODOLOGY: A systematic review of the medline, embase, HealthStar, cinahl, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to search for primary articles and practice guidelines. The evidence informed the development of clinical practice recommendations. The evidence review and recommendations were appraised by a sample of practitioners from Ontario, Canada, and were modified in response to the feedback received. The systematic review and modified recommendations were approved by a review body within the pebc. RESULTS: The literature review found no published randomized controlled trials (rcts) that evaluated alem-tuzumab alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of relapsed or refractory cll. One rct evaluated alemtuzumab administered to consolidate a complete or partial response to first-line fludarabine-containing chemotherapy. That study was stopped early because of excessive grades 3 and 4 infection-related toxicity in the alemtuzumab arm. Patients receiving alemtuzumab experienced significantly improved progression-free survival as compared with patients undergoing observation. Six single-arm studies evaluated disease response with administration of alemtuzumab as a single agent in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory cll post-fludarabine. The pooled overall response rate was 38% (complete response: 6%; partial response: 32%). Adverse events associated with the use of alemtuzumab were commonly reported and included serious infusion-related, hematologic, and infection-related toxicities. RECOMMENDATION: This evidence-based recommendation applies to adult patients with B-cell cll. Treatment with alemtuzumab is a reasonable option for patients with progressive and symptomatic cll that is refractory to both alkylator-based and fludarabine-based regimens. QUALIFYING STATEMENTS: The evidence supporting treatment with alemtuzumab comes principally from case series that evaluated disease response as the primary outcome measure. Patients should be informed that any possible beneficial effect of alemtuzumab on other outcome measures such as duration of response, quality of life, and overall survival are not supported in evidence and currently remain speculative. Treatment with alemtuzumab is associated with significant and potentially serious treatment-related toxicities. Patients must be carefully informed of the uncertain balance between potential risks of harm and the chance for benefit reported in studies. Given the current substantial uncertainty in this balance, patient preferences will likely play a large role in determining the appropriate treatment choice. Given the potential toxicities associated with alemtuzumab, and given the limited nature of the agent's testing in clinical trials in broad populations of patients with cll, the use of alemtuzumab in patients with important comorbidities may be associated with excessive risks.

Rituximab in Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia: A Practice Guideline.

Rituximab is the first monoclonal antibody to be approved for use by the US Food and Drug Administration in cancer. Its role in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), has evolved significantly. We aimed to systematically review and update the literature on rituximab in lymphoma and CLL, and provide evidence-based consensus guidelines for its rational use. Validated methodology from the Cancer Care Ontario Program in Evidence-based Care was used. A comprehensive literature search was completed by a methodologist from the Hematology Disease Site Group of Cancer Care Ontario. Data were extracted from randomised controlled trials of rituximab-containing chemotherapy regimens for patients with lymphoma or CLL. Fifty-six primary randomised controlled trials were retrievable and met all inclusion criteria. Clinically important benefits in progression-free survival or overall survival were seen in the following settings: (i) addition of rituximab to combination chemotherapy for initial treatment of aggressive B-cell lymphomas, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma and HIV-related lymphoma with CD4 count ≥50/mm3; (ii) addition of rituximab to combination chemotherapy for initial and subsequent treatment of follicular lymphoma and other indolent B-cell lymphomas; (iii) use of rituximab maintenance in patients with indolent B-cell lymphomas who have responded to chemoimmunotherapy; (iv) addition of rituximab to fludarabine-based chemotherapy or chlorambucil for initial treatment of CLL. The consensus opinion of the Hematology Disease Site Group is that rituximab is recommended for these indications.

Bortezomib in multiple myeloma and lymphoma: a systematic review and clinical practice guideline.

QUESTIONS: In patients with multiple myeloma, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, or lymphoma, what is the efficacy of bortezomib alone or in combination as measured by survival, quality of life, disease control (for example, time to progression), response duration, or response rate?What is the toxicity associated with the use of bortezomib?Which patients are more or less likely to benefit from treatment with bortezomib? PERSPECTIVES: Evidence was selected and reviewed by two members of the Hematology Disease Site Group and by methodologists from the Program in Evidence-based Care (pebc) at Cancer Care Ontario. The practice guideline report was reviewed and approved by the Hematology Disease Site Group, which comprises hematologists, medical and radiation oncologists, and a patient representative. As part of an external review process, the report was disseminated to practitioners throughout Ontario to obtain their feedback. OUTCOMES: Outcomes of interest were overall survival, quality of life, response rates and duration, and rates of adverse events. METHODOLOGY: A systematic search was conducted of the medline, embase, HealthStar, cinahl, and Cochrane Library databases for primary articles and practice guidelines. The resulting evidence informed the development of clinical practice recommendations. Those recommendations were appraised by a sample of practitioners in Ontario and modified in response to the feedback received. The systematic review and modified recommendations were approved by a review body w theithin pebc. RESULTS: The literature review found one randomized controlled trial (rct)-the only published rct of bortezomib in relapsed myeloma. A number of phase ii studies were also retrieved, including a randomized phase ii study. No randomized trials were retrieved for lymphoma. The rct found bortezomib to be superior to high-dose dexamethasone for median time to progression and 1-year survival in patients with relapsed myeloma, although grade 3 adverse events were more common in the bortezomib arm. Bortezomib is recommended as the preferred treatment option in patients with myeloma relapsing within 1 year of the conclusion of initial treatment; it may also be a reasonable option in patients relapsing at least 1 year after autologous stem-cell transplantation. PRACTICE GUIDELINE: This evidence-based series applies to adult patients with myeloma, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, or lymphoma of any type, stage, histology, or performance status. RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the results of a large well-conducted rct, which represents the only published randomized study in relapsed myeloma, the Hematology Disease Site Group (dsg) offers the following recommendations: For patients with myeloma refractory to or relapsing within 1 year of the conclusion of initial or subsequent treatment or treatments, including autologous stem-cell transplantation, and who are candidates for further chemotherapy, bortezomib is recommended as the preferred treatment option.Bortezomib is also a reasonable option for patients relapsing at least 1 year after autologous stem-cell transplantation. The dsg is aware that thalidomide, alkylating agents, or repeat transplantation may also be options for these patients. However, evaluation of these other options is beyond the scope of this practice guideline.For patients with myeloma relapsing at least 1 year after the conclusion of alkylating agent-based chemotherapy who are candidates for further chemotherapy, further treatment with alkylating agent-based chemotherapy is recommended.Evidence is insufficient to support the use of bortezomib in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma or Waldenström macroglobulinemia outside of clinical trials. QUALIFYING STATEMENTS: Limited evidence supports the appropriateness of a specific time-to-relapse period as being indicative of treatment-insensitive disease. The 1-year threshold provided in the foregoing recommendations is based on the opinion of the Hematology dsg. For specific details related to the administration of bortezomib therapy, the dsg suggests that clinicians refer to the protocols used in major trials. Some of those details are provided here for informational purposes. DOSAGE: Bortezomib 1.3,g/m(2) is given as a rapid intravenous bolus over 3-5 seconds on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle; a minimum of 72 hours between doses is required to allow for recovery of normal proteasome function. Vital signs should be checked before and after each dose. A complete blood count is recommended before each dose, with blood chemistries (including electrolyte and creatinine levels) monitored at a minimum on days 1 and 8 of each cycle. The dose of bortezomib should be reduced or held immediately upon development of painful neuropathy, as described in the product monograph; dose modification may also be required for peripheral sensory neuropathy without pain or for other toxicities. Most toxicities are reversible if dose modification guidelines are followed. RESPONSE TO TREATMENT: Responses are usually apparent by 6 weeks (2 cycles). For patients achieving complete remission (determined by negative electrophoresis and immunofixation), bortezomib should be given for 2 additional cycles beyond the date of confirmed complete remission. In patients with progressive disease after 2 cycles or stable disease after 4 cycles, dexamethasone added to the bortezomib regimen (20 mg by mouth the day of and the day after each bortezomib dose) may produce an objective response. Bortezomib (with or without dexamethasone) should be continued in patients showing benefit from therapy (excluding those in complete remission) unless disease progression or significant toxicity is observed. Therapy should be discontinued in patients who do not respond to bortezomib alone if disease progression is seen within 2 cycles of the addition of dexamethasone. The Hematology dsg recognizes that thalidomide is an active agent in multiple myeloma patients who have relapsed after autologous stem-cell transplantation or who are refractory to alkylating agent-based chemotherapy. To date, no reported rcts have evaluated thalidomide in this role, and specifically, no trials have compared thalidomide with bortezomib. Given these limitations, the members of the Hematology dsg regard thalidomide or bortezomib as therapy alternatives to dexamethasone.

Ovarian function after autologous bone marrow transplantation.

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency of return of ovarian function after autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT), and the major factors that predict recovery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of 200 consecutive women who underwent ABMT at the University of Toronto Autologous Blood and Marrow Program (Toronto, Canada) were reviewed. Seventeen patients met the inclusion criteria, which were (1) alive at the time of evaluation, (2) disease-free at least 18 months after transplantation, (3) age younger than 50 years at transplantation, and (4) premenopausal before transplantation. Recovery of ovarian function was determined by pregnancy or regular menses, with no menopausal symptoms and an estradiol level greater than 20 pmol/L off hormonal therapy. RESULTS: All 17 patients became menopausal immediately after ABMT. Five patients (29%) recovered ovarian function a median of 24 months post-ABMT (range, 6 to 48 months). The median age at transplantation of women with restored ovarian function was 19 years (range, 19 to 28 years) versus 30 years (range, 22 to 48 years) for those who did not regain function. Younger age at transplantation predicted ovarian recovery (P = .03) by means of a log-rank test. Only one of five women who regained ovarian function received total-body irradiation (TBI) compared with five of 12 women who did not. Univariate analysis suggested a trend for TBI to predict a sustained loss of ovarian function (P = .067). The number of regimens of induction or salvage chemotherapy that contained an alkylating agent ranged from none to five and was not predictive (P = .45). CONCLUSION: All women became menopausal after ABMT but 29% recovered ovarian function. Younger age at transplantation predicted return of ovarian function, whereas TBI may have had a negative effect.

Optimizing the CD34+ and CD34+Thy-1+ stem cell content of peripheral blood collections.

We have previously described a sensitive and specific CD34 enumeration assay and report here a prospective analysis of 25 myeloma patients undergoing PBSC mobilization using this assay to determine the optimal days for collection of CD34+ and CD34+Thy-1+ cells after chemotherapy and growth factor mobilization. Correlations between frequency of peripheral blood CD34+ cells, circulating white blood cell (WBC) count, apheresis CD34+ cell count, nucleated cell count (NCC), and numbers of apheresis colony-forming units granulocyte/macrophage (CFU-GM) were determined. To assess levels of the more primitive subsets of CD34+ cells in the PBSC collections, coexpression of the Thy-1 antigen (CDw90) on CD34+ cells was also assessed. Marked heterogeneity was noted between patients with apheresis samples containing a median NCC of 4.2 x 10(8)/kg (range 1.3-8.1), median CFU-GM 17 x 10(4)/kg (range 0.15-32 x 10(4)/kg), and median CD34+ cell count of 1.39 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.02-6.6). The frequency of CD34+ cells in PBSC collections coexpressing Thy-1 was also heterogenous (6.2-50% of CD34+ cells), median 21.6%, mean 24.7 +/- 2%. The apheresis CD34+ cell count correlated with the peripheral blood CD34+ cell percentage (r = 0.71, p < 0.0001) but only weakly with the peripheral WBC. Apheresis CD34+Thy-1+ cell numbers correlated strongly with the circulating CD34+ cell numbers (r = 0.80), but no correlation was noted between these candidate stem cells and the peripheral WBC. In contrast, apheresis CFU-GM levels correlated most strongly with the peripheral WBC count (r = 0.61, p < 0.0001). The apheresis CD34+ cell count correlated with apheresis CFU-GM (r = 0.75, p < 0.0001) but not with the apheresis NCC. Apheresis CD34+Thy-1+ counts significantly correlated only with the apheresis CD34+ cell count and not with the apheresis CFU-GM or NCC. A higher percentage of circulating and apheresis CD34+ cells expressing Thy-1 were found on day 1 of collection, and the percentage of CD34+ cells expressing Thy-1 decreased on each subsequent day of measurement: median of 22% day 1 vs. 16.6% day 4, p = 0.04. This study therefore confirms that accurate quantitation of circulating CD34+ cells best predicts the optimal day for apheresis collection of CD34+ and CD34+Thy-1+ cells and is superior to the WBC count in this regard. Furthermore, the candidate stem cell (CD34+Thy-1+) subset is most prevalent during the earliest phases of CD34+ cell mobilization.

Stem cell function and engraftment is not affected by "in vivo purging" with rituximab for autologous stem cell treatment for patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (Rituxan; IDEC Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA, and Genentech, Inc, San Francisco, CA) has recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as single-agent treatment of relapsed/refractory low-grade or follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Initial results from the pivotal clinical trial revealed that response rates to rituximab were higher in patients who previously had high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. We have initiated a clinical trial that combines the use of rituximab with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with chemosensitive relapsed follicular small cleaved or mantle cell lymphoma. A unique feature of this study is that in addition to eight maintenance infusions of rituximab after autologous stem cell transplantation, patients also received rituximab 375 mg/m2 2 days before a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized stem cell collection as "in vivo purge." We report on preliminary results demonstrating the safety and efficacy of the in vivo purge on 10 patients undergoing stem cell mobilization, nine of whom have already undergone transplantation. The peripheral blood CD34+ counts were 14.92 and 20 x 10(6)/L on day 4 and day 5, respectively, of the stem cell mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. This compares with 11.7 and 11.8 x 10(6)/L, respectively, for the control population. The median CD34 stem cell yield in the graft collection was 3.7 x 10(6)/kg in patients receiving rituximab in vivo purge compared with 3.1 x 10(6)/kg in the control population. The target stem cell collection was successfully collected in six of 10 patients in a 1-day single large-volume leukapheresis collection, while two patients required 2 days and the last two patients required 3 days. Functional assays revealed the stem cell colony-forming unit-granulocyte monocyte and burst-forming unit-erythrocyte to be 55 and 44 colonies per plate, respectively, for the patients receiving the in vivo rituximab purge. This compares favorably with 37 and 38.5 colonies per plate, respectively, for the control population. Neutrophil engraftment took a median of 11 days for both cohorts; platelet independence was achieved in 8 days compared with 10 days for the control population. The median number of platelet transfusions was two for patients receiving rituximab and 2.5 for the control group. Assessment of serum cytokines immediately before the rituximab infusion during the stem cell mobilization and immediately after revealed a twofold to sevenfold increase in interleukin-1beta, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interleukin-6. The polymerase chain reaction analysis for minimal residual disease in stem cell collections and in peripheral blood and bone marrow samples of these patients will help to determine the efficacy of rituximab in vivo purge on disease progression.

Peripheral neuropathy following high-dose etoposide and autologous bone marrow transplantation.

We investigated the incidence of peripheral neuropathy in 142 consecutive patients receiving high-dose etoposide between August 1988 and December 1991. A retrospective chart review was conducted. Six patients with hematologic malignancies presented with a new sensory polyneuropathy after receiving an intensive therapy regimen consisting of etoposide 60 mg/kg i.v. and melphalan 140-160 mg/m2 i.v. followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation. Neurologic symptoms began 2-8 weeks after transplant, were grade 2-3 in severity and pursued a chronic course with slow improvement over months. Electromyographic studies in three of the patients tested confirmed distal sensory polyneuropathy. All 6 patients had previously received vincristine 1-60 months prior to autotransplant. We conclude that peripheral neuropathy of moderate severity is a potential complication of high-dose etoposide therapy but appears to be self-limited.

New clonal karyotypic abnormalities acquired following autologous bone marrow transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia do not appear to confer an adverse prognosis.

We undertook a retrospective review of all 76 patients with AML transplanted between August 1986 and March 1995 at our center. All patients received melphalan (140-160 mg/m2), etoposide (60 mg/kg) and total body irradiation. All patients had bone marrow cytogenetic analysis at regular intervals following ABMT. The primary study end point was the development of the new cytogenetic abnormalities. Secondary end points were the development of myelodysplasia (MDS) or AML. Sixty-two of 77 patients were alive at least 6 months post transplant. Cytogenetic abnormalities developed in 7/62 patients (11%) following ABMT. No patients demonstrated MDS or AML. At a median of 30 months after development of the cytogenetic abnormality, only one patient developed features suggestive but not diagnostic of MDS. All seven patients remain alive and leukemia-free up to 70 months after detection of the abnormal clone. There was no increased incidence of cytogenetic abnormalities developing in patients receiving a purged autograft. New cytogenetic abnormalities are frequent following ABMT for AML but do not appear to predict development of myelodysplasia or acute myeloid leukemia. These abnormalities may relate to use of total body radiation as part of the high-dose therapy.

Effect of antimicrobial prophylaxis on hematopoietic recovery following autologous bone marrow transplantation: ciprofloxacin versus co-trimoxazole.

We evaluated the effect of oral ciprofloxacin on neutrophil recovery in 20 consecutive patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for malignant lymphoma and compared the results with a control group of 20 patients receiving co-trimoxazole and folinic acid. Both groups started the prophylactic antibiotic as well as granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) the day after marrow infusion and continued the former until the onset of febrile neutropenia (median duration of treatment 6 days for co-trimoxazole and 7 days for ciprofloxacin). The time of attain an absolute neutrophil count > or = 0.5 x 10(9)/L was significantly shorter in patients receiving ciprofloxacin (16 days vs 22 days; P = 0.006). There was no difference in time to attain a platelet count > or = 20 x 10(9)/L independent of transfusion or in time to the first febrile episode or incidence of bacteremia. We conclude that antibiotic prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin results in more rapid neutrophil recovery than prophylaxis with co-trimoxazole. This may result from a myelosuppressive effect of co-trimoxazole or an enhancement of neutrophil recovery by ciprofloxacin, or both.

Microbial contamination of harvested bone marrow and peripheral blood.

The incidence and clinical consequences of microbiological contamination of autologous bone marrow and peripheral blood progenitor cells are not well documented. We therefore retrospectively analysed our experience with bacterial or fungal contamination of harvested bone marrow and/or peripheral blood. From January 1987 to the end of January 1994, 499 patients were harvested or which 301 were transplanted. A total of 3910 specimens obtained during three stages in the processing were assessed for microbial contamination: (1) in the operating room immediately after harvesting (1662 bags) with 2.1% culture positivity, (2) after processing for cryopreservation (1039 bags) with a further 1.1% cultures positive, and (3) after thawing at the time of reinfusion (1209 bags) of which 2.2% were culture positive. There were no culture positive specimens obtained from any peripheral blood progenitor cell products. The vast majority of the 85 culture positive specimens obtained from marrow were skin flora (89%) and 35% of all positive harvest specimens remained positive following processing and freezing. At least 36% of culture positive specimens were thought to have arisen as a result of exogenous contamination of blood culture bottles. Potentially pathogenic enteric organisms were present in nine (0.2%) specimens and infusion of these organisms occurred in four cases. A further seven patients were reinfused with marrow culture positive for skin organisms. No adverse clinical sequelae were noted following infusion of any contaminated products. However, clinical decision making continues to be influenced by culture results and multistage microbial culture continues to be of value in the management of our marrow recipients.

Bcl-2 clearance: optimising outcomes in follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The long median survival time of patients with follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), means that the efficacy of new treatments are difficult to assess in the short term. Bcl-2 is an inhibitor of apoptosis and overexpression of the bcl-2 gene in the blood or bone marrow is a feature in up to 85% of patients with follicular NHL. Levels of bcl-2(+) cells in the peripheral blood or bone marrow therefore are a useful measure of disease status in such patients and can be detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Complete bcl-2 clearance from the bone marrow (molecular remission) following autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for follicular NHL is considered to be an important prognostic factor for disease-free survival. Tumour cell contamination of the stem cell grafts used in ASCT is commonly associated with relapse. This can be addressed by purging the stem cell harvest prior to transplantation. Various methods of in vitro purging after stem cell collection have been shown to reduce the level of contamination but yield is invariably reduced and grafts remain bcl-2 positive. However, in vivo purging with rituximab during the process of collection has been used to obtain bcl-2-negative stem cell harvests without compromising the yield. Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody licensed for treatment of relapsed and refractory low-grade or follicular NHL. Rituximab targets the CD20 antigen, which is found on cells of the B cell lineage. When used for in vivo purging it depletes the peripheral blood of CD20-positive cells and prevents contamination by lymphoma cells. Molecular remission, as measured by bone-marrow bcl-2 clearance, has been achieved in 7/7 patients with follicular NHL at 1 year after treatment with ASCT using rituximab as an 'in vivopurse', followed by rituximab maintenance. Early clinical outcomes are also encouraging.

Blood stem cell collection: factors influencing the recovery of granulocyte-macrophage colony forming cells.

We evaluated data from all blood cell (BC) collections performed in our institution between 1989 and 1995 to determine factors influencing the outcome of collection. One hundred and thirty-three collections were performed on 106 patients. Malignant diagnoses were: non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) in 35%, multiple myeloma in 31%, breast cancer in 26%, and Hodgkin's disease in 8%. Collections were obtained routinely in myeloma and breast cancer and due to bone marrow involvement with malignancy or inaspirable bone marrow in lymphoma patients. Collections were obtained on a Cobe Spectra or Baxter-Fenwall CS3000+. Engraftment potential was determined by methylcellulose colony assay (CFU-GM), with a target of > 10 x 10(4) CFU-GM/kg. Apheresis nucleated cell count correlated significantly, albeit weakly (r = 0.26), with CFU-GM with a cell count of > 5 x 10(8)/kg resulting in an adequate number of CFU-GM in 78% of patients. In univariant analysis outcome of collection was significantly influenced by the patients age (p = 0.01), malignant diagnosis (p < 0.001), reason for collection (p = 0.002), and the mobilization regimen (p = 0.01). The nature of the apheresis device used did not influence outcome. Only malignant diagnosis was significant (p < 0.001) in multivariate analysis. We conclude that the outcome of BC is most strongly influenced by patient factors such as malignant diagnosis. These factors must be considered when comparing the outcome of different mobilization regimens and when planning collection strategies.

Bone marrow mononuclear cell count does not predict neutrophil and platelet recovery following autologous bone marrow transplant: value of the colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) assay.

The common use of the marrow autograft mononuclear cell (MNC) count derives from positive correlative studies following allogeneic transplantation and from earlier conflicting data regarding the value of the bone marrow autograft colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) assay for prediction hematologic recovery after ABMT. We conducted a retrospective analysis at our institution to determine whether autograft CFU-GM levels predict engraftment of neutrophils and platelets after ABMT in heavily pretreated patients with hematologic malignancies. Between 1 January 1993 and 1 March 1995, 58 heavily pretreated patients received only marrow cells as the autograft product. Patients with Hodgkin's disease (n = 25), acute myeloid leukemia (n = 19), and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 14) underwent intensive therapy with etoposide and melphalan. Unpurged marrow containing a minimum of 1.5 x 10(8)/kg (range: 1.5-4.8) was infused. Median time to an absolute neutrophil count > or = 0.5 x 10(9)/L was 21 days (range 10-270) and median time to a platelet count > or = 20 x 10(9)/L independent of transfusions was 44 days (range 13-317). There was no correlation between autograft MNC count and neutrophil or platelet engraftment. However, a correlation between autograft CFU-GM and both platelet and neutrophil recovery was demonstrated with a threshold CFU-GM of 3 x 10(4)/kg; delayed neutrophil recovery was observed in 79% of patients below this threshold compared to only 9% in those with an autograft CFU-GM level of more than 3 x 10(4)/kg (p = 0.0001). Similarly, platelet recovery was delayed in 76% of patients below, and 20% of those above this threshold (p = 0.003). We conclude that marrow autograft CFU-GM is predictive of engraftment of both platelets and neutrophils in heavily pretreated patients after ABMT for hematological malignancies.

Outpatient supportive care following chemotherapy for acute myeloblastic leukemia.

Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) involves aggressive myelosuppressive chemotherapy that is generally administered on an inpatient basis. In our centre, AML therapy has been initiated in hospital and followed by early outpatient supportive care according to guidelines established in 1996. We conducted a review of all patients presenting with AML in our centre between January 1996 and July 1998 to evaluate the safety and feasibility of early outpatient supportive care. Nineteen consecutive patients treated with induction chemotherapy were analyzed. Patients were treated with cytosine arabinoside and an anthracycline as aggressive AML induction therapy with the intent for early discharge. Ten patients (53%) were discharged within 10 days of starting induction chemotherapy (median 4.5 days). Reasons for remaining in hospital included sepsis, serious medical complications, and social and geographic factors. Patients discharged early had a median of 1.5 readmissions (range 0-3), but had 30% fewer in-hospital days than inpatients (p = 0.03), and 57% fewer days of in-hospital antibiotic therapy (p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in transfusion requirements or episodes of febrile neutropenia between the two groups. Thirty-one cycles of consolidation therapy were administered to the 18 patients who survived induction. Early discharge from hospital was achieved for 30 cycles (97%). Nine cycles of consolidation chemotherapy were delivered using outpatient intravenous infusion pumps (29%). This study supports the feasibility and safety of early discharge and outpatient supportive care following chemotherapy for AML.

Fludarabine in alkylator-resistant follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Follicular small cell and follicular mixed small and large cell lymphoma (FL) are incurable with conventional chemotherapy, and generally follow a relapsing course, eventually becoming resistant to first-line therapy with alkylating agents. Fludarabine is a novel chemotherapeutic agent that is effective in FL, but its role in alkylator-resistant disease remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with alkylator-resistant FL treated with fludarabine. Patients were identified from pharmacy records and included if they fulfilled criteria for alkylator-resistant FL. Resistance was defined as failure to achieve a partial response, progression while on therapy, or relapse within six months of completing therapy. Seventeen patients met the criteria of alkylator-resistant FL and were included in the analysis. All patients received fludarabine 25 mg/m(2) for five days. A median of 2.5 courses of fludarabine was given. One patient had a complete remission and eight patients had partial remissions, for an overall response rate of 53%. Median progression-free survival was 5.4 months and median overall survival was 15.4 months for all patients. Four patients underwent subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation; all required additional salvage chemotherapy for post-fludarabine relapses. Three patients remain in remission more than 12 months post-transplantation. Fludarabine produces partial responses in patients with advanced refractory FL; however, the duration of the response limits its utility in alkylator-resistant disease.

The development of marked elevation in white blood cell count does not predict inferior outcome in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Although elevation of the white blood cell (WBC) count at diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) appears to predict shortened survival, its significance later in the course of the disease remains unclear. We reviewed all cases of CLL seen in our center between 1980 and 1999 to evaluate the frequency and clinical significance of WBC elevation > 100 x 10(9)/L. CLL was confirmed according to standard diagnostic criteria and data was collected from diagnosis, occurrence of WBC > 100 x 10(9)/L, and last follow-up. 235 consecutive patients with CLL were identified; 94 were excluded. 141 included patients had a median age of 61 years and median WBC 19.7 x 10(9)/L at diagnosis. Median follow-up for all patients was 56 months, and median survival was 104 months. 41 patients (29%) had > or = 1 episode of WBC > 100 x 10(9)1/L, occurring at a median of 38 months from diagnosis. Compared to controls matched for modified Rai stage, development of a WBC > 100 x 10(9)/L did not predict inferior survival (median 107 vs. 101 months, p = 0.72). We conclude that the occurrence of a WBC count > 100 x 10(9)/L in patients with CLL does not shorten the survival, and patients require therapy only if other indications for treatment are present.

A phase I study of interleukin-6 after autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with poor prognosis Hodgkin's disease.

We performed a pilot study of human recombinant IL-6 (SDZ ILs 969) in 6 patients with poor prognosis Hodgkin's disease following autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) to determine its safety and tolerability. IL-6 was administered the day following bone marrow infusion by subcutaneous injection once daily at a dose of 1 micro/kg/day to 3 patients and 2.5 microg/kg/day to 3 patients and was continued for 6 weeks or until platelet engraftment (>50 x 10(9)/L independent of transfusion). No severe or life threatening toxicities were seen at either dose level. A reversible elevation in alkaline phosphatase occurred in 4 patients and all patients complained of headache, myalgias, and fever. Gastrointestinal toxicity was low, grade 3-4 mucositis occured less frequently than in similarly-treated historical controls receiving GM-CSF. Serum concentrations of other cytokines such as IL-3 and G-CSF after ABMT differed from results obtained in transplant recipients given GM-CSF. The median time to an ANC >0.5 x 10(9)/L was 25.5 days and to a platelet count of >20 x 10(9)/L independat of transfusion was 35.5 days. Engraftment was no different from controls. Five patients relapsed at a median of 5 months post-ABMT and four remain alive at a median of 12 months post-ABMT. We conclude that IL-6 administration is safe and well tolerated in patients following ABMT. Further efforts to evaluate its effect on hematopietic recovery as well as relapse following transplantation in a larger patient series are warranted.

Malignant evolution of Schnitzler's syndrome--chronic urticaria and IgM monoclonal gammopathy: report of a new case and review of the literature.

Schnitzler's syndrome, initially described in 1974 is an uncommon condition defined by chronic urticaria and monoclonal IgM gammopathy. Additional features include fever of unknown origin, elevated ESR, bone pain and frequently a benign clinical course. We conducted a literature search of Medline, EMBASE and Cancerlit and found 56 cases of Schnitzler's syndrome reported to date. The absence of lymphoproliferative disease in this condition is typical, but nine patients have progressed to develop lymphoplasmacytic neoplasias, particularly Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM). Malignant evolution of Schnitzler's syndrome is a rare complication, but emphasizes the importance of long term follow-up and the need for these patients to undergo periodic assessment of the bone marrow and lymph nodes. Treatment of this condition is difficult, with varying response to corticosteroids and largely unsuccessful results with standard chemotherapy used for WM. We describe a case of Schnitzler's syndrome in a 50-year old man with lymphocytic aggregates in the bone marrow after 9 years of chronic urticaria, fever, arthralgias and bone pain. We review the clinical features and treatment, with emphasis on the hematologic aspects of this unusual condition.