ABSTRACT
Further research is needed to help improve both the standard of care and the outcome for patients with treatment-resistant depression. A particularly critical evidence gap exists with respect to whether pharmacological or non-pharmacological augmentation is superior to antidepressant switch, or vice-versa. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of augmentation with aripiprazole or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus switching to the antidepressant venlafaxine XR (or duloxetine for those not eligible to receive venlafaxine) for treatment-resistant depression. In this multi-site, 8-week, randomized, open-label study, 278 subjects (196 females and 82 males, mean age 45.6 years (SD 15.3)) with treatment-resistant depression were assigned in a 1:1:1 fashion to treatment with either of these three interventions; 235 subjects completed the study. 260 randomized subjects with at least one post-baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating (MADRS) assessment were included in the analysis. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (score change (standard error (se)) = -17.39 (1.3) (p = 0.015) but not aripiprazole augmentation (score change (se) = -14.9 (1.1) (p = 0.069) was superior to switch (score change (se) = -13.22 (1.1)) on the MADRS. Aripiprazole (mean change (se) = -37.79 (2.9) (p = 0.003) but not repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation augmentation (mean change (se) = -42.96 (3.6) (p = 0.031) was superior to switch (mean change (se) = -34.45 (3.0)) on the symptoms of depression questionnaire. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation augmentation was shown to be more effective than switching antidepressants in treatment-resistant depression on the study primary measure. In light of these findings, clinicians should consider repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation augmentation early-on for treatment-resistant depression.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02977299.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Few studies have focused on medical students and residents' mental health impact on medical residency selection (MRS) performance. The authors evaluated the association of performance in MRS with depressive and anxiety symptoms and with a reported psychiatric diagnosis (rPD). METHODS: The authors enrolled candidates after the second round of MRS examinations at a Brazilian Medical School. Performance was assessed by final grade. Depressive and anxiety symptoms were assessed by the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The authors performed mediation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis to investigate the impact of rPD, state and trait anxiety, and depressive symptom severity on performance. RESULTS: 515 of the 643 MRS candidates (80.1%) participated in the study. Higher age, attending a preparatory course for MRS, rPD, and the number of MRS applications that year were associated with poorer performance. In mediation analysis, trait anxiety was associated with a direct effect on performance and an indirect effect mediated by rPD. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that psychiatric diagnosis is associated with poorer performance on MRS, regardless of current symptoms of anxiety and depression. Additionally, increased levels of trait anxiety may negatively impact performance, directly and indirectly.
ABSTRACT
Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) exhibit abnormality in their subjective perception of internal sensation, a process known as interoceptive sensibility (IS), as well as altered functioning of the insula, a key neural structure for interoception. We investigated the multivariate structure of IS in 77 OCD patients and 53 controls and examined associations of IS with resting-state functional connectivity (FC) of the insula within the OCD group. For each group, principal component analysis was performed on 8 subscales of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness assessing putatively "adaptive" and "maladaptive" aspects of IS. Associations between IS components and insula FC in the OCD group were evaluated using seed regions placed in each of 3 subdivisions of the insula (posterior, anterior dorsal, and anterior ventral). Behaviorally, controls showed a 2-component solution broadly categorized into "adaptive" and "maladaptive" IS, while OCD patients exhibited a 3-component solution. The general tendency to notice or be aware of sensation loaded onto an "adaptive" IS component in controls but loaded onto both "adaptive" and "maladaptive" IS components in OCD. Within OCD, insula FC was differentially associated with distinct aspects of IS, identifying network connections that could serve as future targets for the modulation of IS in OCD.
Subject(s)
Interoception , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/diagnostic imaging , Sensation , Brain Mapping , Neural Pathways/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Patients with bipolar disorder treated with lithium often require additional antipsychotics or anticonvulsants. However, the comparative effectiveness and safety of these agents as add-on to lithium has not been studied. METHODS: This secondary analysis combined two similar 24-week trials on outpatients with bipolar disorder randomized to lithium (target serum level 0.4-0.6 mEq/L). Guideline-based adjunctive antipsychotics (Li+AP) and anticonvulsants (Li+AC) could be used if clinically indicated and was assessed at every study visit. Response was measured on the Clinical Global Impression scale and we performed adjusted mixed effects linear regression analyses. Analysis of variance tests compared metabolic measures including a binary diagnosis of metabolic syndrome before and after 24 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Among 379 outpatients (57% female, mean age 38 years, mean Clinical Global Impression 4.4), users of Li+AP (N = 50, primarily quetiapine and aripiprazole) improved to a similar degree (mean Clinical Global Impression improvement = 1.6, standard deviation = 1.5) as those using lithium-only (i.e. without adjunctive antipsychotics or anticonvulsants, N = 149, mean Clinical Global Impression improvement = 1.7, standard deviation = 1.4) (p = 0.59). Users of Li+AC (N = 107, primarily lamotrigine and valproate, mean Clinical Global Impression improvement = 1.2, standard deviation = 1.3) and users of Li+AP+AC (N = 73, mean Clinical Global Impression improvement = 1.1, standard deviation = 1.3) showed worse response compared to lithium-only users (all p < 0.01). When comparing Li+AP to Li+AC, users of Li+AP improved slightly better on general (p = 0.05) and manic symptoms (p = 0.01), but showed a worse development of glucose, triglycerides, and metabolic syndrome. CONCLUSION: Despite treatment-by-indication confounding, these findings are relevant for real-world treatment settings and emphasize the need for randomized trials on this clinically important topic.
Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants , Antipsychotic Agents , Bipolar Disorder , Lithium , Metabolic Syndrome , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Antimanic Agents/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/chemically induced , Drug Therapy, Combination , Lithium/therapeutic use , Metabolic Syndrome/chemically induced , Metabolic Syndrome/drug therapy , Valproic Acid/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Childhood trauma affects the course of mood disorders. Researchers are now considering childhood trauma as an influential factor in the treatment of mood disorders. However, the role of childhood trauma in the treatment of bipolar disorder remains understudied. METHODS: The effect of childhood trauma on treatment outcomes was evaluated among participants randomised to treatment with lithium or quetiapine in the Clinical and Health Outcomes Initiatives in Comparative Effectiveness for Bipolar Disorder (Bipolar CHOICE) study by clinician assessment. Mixed effects linear regression models were used to analyse rates of improvement in symptom severity (assessed with the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Scale and the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Bipolar Disorder) and functional impairment (assessed with the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation-Range of Impaired Functioning Tool). RESULTS: A history of any childhood trauma was reported by 52.7% of the sample (N = 476). Although participants with a history of any childhood trauma presented with greater symptom severity and functional impairment at most study visits, participants with and without a history of any childhood trauma showed similar rates of improvement in symptom severity and functional impairment over the 24 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to explore the association between childhood trauma and treatment outcomes during treatment with lithium or quetiapine in the context of a randomised trial. In Bipolar CHOICE, a history of childhood trauma did not inhibit improvement in symptom severity or functional impairment. Nevertheless, these findings need replication across different settings.
Subject(s)
Adverse Childhood Experiences , Antipsychotic Agents , Bipolar Disorder , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Humans , Lithium/therapeutic use , Outpatients , Quetiapine Fumarate/therapeutic use , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Adiponectin, which is secreted from adipose tissue, is a protein hormone. Although a large body of studies have found that circulating adiponectin levels increase in anorexia nervosa (AN) and caloric restriction, the effect of subtypes of AN and modifiers of adiponectin in AN are not yet known. METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases was performed using the search terms "adiponectin," "anorexia nervosa," and "eating disorder" up to January 2021. All studies published in peer-reviewed journals, which included cases and control groups, were selected. The main outcome was the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) in adiponectin levels between cases and controls, using the random-effects model. Modifiers of SMD were tested via meta-regression. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies met all eligibility criteria. The total sample of AN participants (Hedges' g = .765, p < .0001), and specifically the binge-eating/purging (Hedges' g = 1.211, p < .00001) and restrictive subtypes (Hedges' g = .913, p < .00001) of AN have increased adiponectin plasma levels compared with healthy controls. Meta-regression determined that insulin, IGF-1, BMI, triglyceride, resistin, glucose, IL-6 levels are significant modifiers of adiponectin levels. DISCUSSION: Compared with controls, adiponectin levels are higher in AN overall, and specifically in the binge-eating/purging and the restrictive AN subtypes. Many of metabolic parameters of glucose metabolism and pro-inflammatory molecules modify the relationship between AN and adiponectin levels. Adipose tissue is important to maintain metabolic stability. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Anorexia nervosa is a psychiatric disorder associated with a severe decrease in body weight and multiple metabolic abnormalities, including an increase in the hormone adiponectin. In this paper, we used meta-analysis, a powerful statistical method, to aggregate data from 34 rigorously selected research reports. This enabled us to understand the value of adiponectin to differentiate clinical subtypes of anorexia nervosa and the relations between adiponectin and other important metabolic parameters.
OBJETIVO: La adiponectina, que es secretada del tejido adiposo, es una hormona proteica. Aunque una gran cantidad de estudios han encontrado que los niveles circulantes de adiponectina aumentan en la anorexia nerviosa (AN) y la restricción calórica, el efecto de los subtipos de AN y los modificadores de la adiponectina en la AN aún no se conocen. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática en bases de datos electrónicas utilizando los términos de búsqueda "adiponectina", "anorexia nerviosa" y "trastorno de la conducta alimentaria" hasta enero de 2021. Se seleccionaron todos los estudios publicados en revistas revisadas por pares, que incluían casos y grupos de control. El resultado principal fue la diferencia de medias estandarizada (DME) agrupada en los niveles de adiponectina entre los casos y los controles, mediante el modelo de efectos aleatorios. Los modificadores de DME se probaron mediante metarregresión. Se evaluaron la heterogeneidad y el sesgo de publicación. RESULTADOS: Treinta y cuatro estudios cumplieron todos los criterios de elegibilidad. La muestra total de sujetos con AN (g de Hedges = 0.765, p < 0.0001), y específicamente los subtipos de atracones/purgaciones (g = 1,211 de Hedges, p < 0.00001) y restrictivos (g = 0.913, p < 0.00001) de AN tienen incrementados los niveles plasmáticos de adiponectina en comparación con los controles sanos. La metarregresión determinó que los niveles de insulina, IGF-1, IMC, triglicéridos, resistina, glucosa, IL-6 son modificadores significativos de los niveles de adiponectina. DISCUSIÓN: En comparación con los controles, los niveles de adiponectina son más altos en la AN en general, y específicamente en los subtipos de atracones/purgaciones y AN restrictiva. Muchos de los parámetros metabólicos del metabolismo de la glucosa y las moléculas proinflamatorias modifican la relación entre los niveles de AN y adiponectina. El tejido adiposo es importante para mantener la estabilidad metabólica.
Subject(s)
Anorexia Nervosa , Bulimia , Adiponectin , Anorexia Nervosa/psychology , Glucose , Humans , Insulin , Insulin-Like Growth Factor I , Interleukin-6 , Resistin , TriglyceridesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sodium lactate (NaL) infusion and carbon dioxide (CO2) inhalation are proven to provoke acute panic attacks (PAs) in patients with panic disorder (PD). A systematic literature search and meta-analysis were performed to compare the effect sizes of these methods. METHODS: Odds ratios were calculated for each of the original studies and were pooled using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Either NaL or CO2 provocations significantly increased the rates of PAs in individuals with PD compared to those in healthy controls. However, the effect size of NaL infusion (OR=25.13, 95% CI=15.48-40.80) was significantly greater than that of CO2 inhalation (OR=10.58, 95%CI=7.88-14.21). CONCLUSION: The evidence for the efficacy of the two panic provocation tests is very strong. Yet, the results support the superiority of NaL infusion over CO2 inhalation challenge as a panic provocation test. Thus, lactate seems a much stronger stimulus than CO2 for the brain suffocation detector.
Subject(s)
Carbon Dioxide , Panic Disorder , Brain , Humans , Panic , Panic Disorder/chemically induced , Panic Disorder/diagnosis , Sodium LactateABSTRACT
Numerous placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated the ability of ketamine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, to induce rapid (within hours), transient antidepressant effects when administered intravenously (IV) at subanesthetic doses (0.5 mg/kg over 40 min). However, the optimal antidepressant dose remains unknown. We aimed to compare to active placebo the rapid acting antidepressant properties of a broad range of subanesthetic doses of IV ketamine among outpatients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). A range of IV ketamine doses were compared to active placebo in the treatment of adult TRD over a 3-day period following a single infusion over 40 min. This was an outpatient study conducted across six US academic sites. Outpatients were 18-70 years old with TRD, defined as failure to achieve a satisfactory response (e.g., less than 50% improvement of depression symptoms) to at least two adequate treatment courses during the current depressive episode. Following a washout period, 99 eligible subjects were randomly assigned to one of the five arms in a 1:1:1:1:1 fashion: a single intravenous dose of ketamine 0.1 mg/kg (n = 18), a single dose of ketamine 0.2 mg/kg (n = 20), a single dose of ketamine 0.5 mg/kg (n = 22), a single dose of ketamine 1.0 mg/kg (n = 20), and a single dose of midazolam 0.045 mg/kg (active placebo) (n = 19). The study assessments (HAM-D-6, MADRS, SDQ, PAS, CGI-S, and CGI-I) were performed at days 0, 1, 3 (endpoint), 5, 7, 14, and 30 to assess the safety and efficacy. The overall group × time interaction effect was significant for the primary outcome measure, the HAM-D-6. In post hoc pairwise comparisons controlling for multiple comparisons, standard dose (0.5 mg/kg) and high dose (1 mg/kg) of intravenous ketamine were superior to active placebo; a low dose (0.1 mg/kg) was significant only prior to adjustment (p = 0.02, p-adj = 0.14, d = -0.82 at day 1). Most of the interaction effect was due to differences at day 1, with no significant adjusted pairwise differences at day 3. This pattern generally held for secondary outcomes. The infusions of ketamine were relatively well tolerated compared to active placebo, except for greater dissociative symptoms and transient blood pressure elevations with the higher doses. Our results suggest that there is evidence for the efficacy of the 0.5 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg subanesthetic doses of IV ketamine and no clear or consistent evidence for clinically meaningful efficacy of lower doses of IV ketamine. Trial Registration: NCT01920555.
Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/drug therapy , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Ketamine/therapeutic use , Adult , Depression/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability worldwide, yet current treatment strategies remain limited in their mechanistic diversity. Recent evidence has highlighted a promising novel pharmaceutical target-the KCNQ-type potassium channel-for the treatment of depressive disorders, which may exert a therapeutic effect via functional changes within the brain reward system, including the ventral striatum. The current study assessed the effects of the KCNQ channel opener ezogabine (also known as retigabine) on reward circuitry and clinical symptoms in patients with MDD. Eighteen medication-free individuals with MDD currently in a major depressive episode were enrolled in an open-label study and received ezogabine up to 900 mg/day orally over the course of 10 weeks. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data were collected at baseline and posttreatment to examine brain reward circuitry. Reward learning was measured using a computerized probabilistic reward task. After treatment with ezogabine, subjects exhibited a significant reduction of depressive symptoms (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score change: -13.7 ± 9.7, p < 0.001, d = 2.08) and anhedonic symptoms (Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale score change: -6.1 ± 5.3, p < 0.001, d = 1.00), which remained significant even after controlling for overall depression severity. Improvement in depression was associated with decreased functional connectivity between the ventral caudate and clusters within the mid-cingulate cortex and posterior cingulate cortex (n = 14, voxel-wise p < 0.005). In addition, a subgroup of patients tested with a probabilistic reward task (n = 9) showed increased reward learning following treatment. These findings highlight the KCNQ-type potassium channel as a promising target for future drug discovery efforts in mood disorders.
Subject(s)
Carbamates/pharmacology , Carbamates/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Ion Channel Gating/drug effects , Phenylenediamines/pharmacology , Phenylenediamines/therapeutic use , Ventral Striatum/drug effects , Depressive Disorder, Major/metabolism , Female , Humans , KCNQ Potassium Channels/agonists , KCNQ Potassium Channels/metabolism , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Reward , Ventral Striatum/metabolismABSTRACT
Supplementary Figure 1 and Supplementary Tables 1-4 have been re-uploaded so as to reflect the versions supplied during proofs stage. The publisher apologizes for the error in versioning. The HTML version of the paper has been updated.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Adjunctive antidepressants are frequently used for bipolar depression but their clinical efficacy has been studied in few trials and little is known about how co-occurring manic symptoms affect treatment response. METHODS: Bipolar Clinical Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness (N = 482) and Lithium Treatment Moderate-Dose Use Study (N = 281) were similar comparative effectiveness trials on outpatients with bipolar disorder comparing four different randomized treatment arms with adjunctive personalized guideline-based treatment for 24 weeks. Adjunctive antidepressant treatment could be used if clinically indicated and was assessed at every study visit. Adjusted mixed effects linear regression analyses compared users of antidepressants to nonusers overall and in different subcohorts. RESULTS: Of the 763 patients, 282 (37.0%) used antidepressant drugs during the study. Antidepressant users had less improvement compared to nonusers on the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Bipolar Disorder and on measures of depression. This was particularly true among patients with co-occurring manic symptoms. Exclusion of individuals begun on antidepressants late in the study (potentially due to overall worse response) resulted in no differences between users and nonusers. We found no differences in treatment effects on mania scales. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of outpatients with bipolar disorder, clinically indicated and guideline-based adjunctive antidepressant treatment was not associated with lower depressive symptoms or higher mania symptoms. The treatment-by-indication confounding due to the nonrandomized design of the trials complicates causal interpretations, but no analyses indicated better treatment effects of adjunctive antidepressants.
Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Humans , OutpatientsABSTRACT
The efficacy of dopamine agonists in treating major depressive disorder has been hypothesized to stem from effects on ventrostriatal dopamine and reward function. However, an important question is whether dopamine agonists are most beneficial for patients with reward-based deficits. This study evaluated whether measures of reward processing and ventrostriatal dopamine function predicted response to the dopamine agonist, pramipexole (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02033369). Individuals with major depressive disorder (n = 26) and healthy controls (n = 26) (mean ± SD age = 26.5 ± 5.9; 50% female) first underwent assessments of reward learning behaviour and ventrostriatal prediction error signalling (measured using functional MRI). 11C-(+)-PHNO PET before and after oral amphetamine was used to assess ventrostriatal dopamine release. The depressed group then received open-label pramipexole treatment for 6 weeks (0.5 mg/day titrated to a maximum daily dose of 2.5 mg). Symptoms were assessed weekly, and reward learning was reassessed post-treatment. At baseline, relative to controls, the depressed group showed lower reward learning (P = 0.02), a trend towards blunted reward-related prediction error signals (P = 0.07), and a trend towards increased amphetamine-induced dopamine release (P = 0.07). Despite symptom improvements following pramipexole (Cohen's d ranging from 0.51 to 2.16 across symptom subscales), reward learning did not change after treatment. At a group level, baseline reward learning (P = 0.001) and prediction error signalling (P = 0.004) were both associated with symptom improvement, albeit in a direction opposite to initial predictions: patients with stronger pretreatment reward learning and reward-related prediction error signalling improved most. Baseline D2/3 receptor availability (P = 0.02) and dopamine release (P = 0.05) also predicted improvements in clinical functioning, with lower D2/3 receptor availability and lower dopamine release predicting greater improvements. Although these findings await replication, they suggest that measures of reward-related mesolimbic dopamine function may hold promise for identifying depressed individuals likely to respond favourably to dopaminergic pharmacotherapy.
Subject(s)
Depression/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Pramipexole/pharmacology , Reward , Adult , Depressive Disorder, Major/physiopathology , Dopamine/metabolism , Dopamine Agonists/pharmacology , Dopamine Antagonists/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Learning/drug effects , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is highly heterogeneous. While obsessions often involve fear of harm, many patients report uncomfortable sensations and/or urges that drive repetitive behaviors in the absence of a specific fear. Prior work suggests that urges in OCD may be similar to everyday "urges-for-action" (UFA) such as the urge to blink, swallow, or scratch, but very little work has investigated the pathophysiology underlying urges in OCD. In the current study, we used an urge-to-blink approach to model sensory-based urges that could be experimentally elicited and compared across patients and controls using the same task stimuli. OCD patients and controls suppressed eye blinking over a period of 60 s, alternating with free blinking blocks, while brain activity was measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging. OCD patients showed significantly increased activation in several regions during the early phase of eyeblink suppression (first 30 s), including mid-cingulate, insula, striatum, parietal cortex, and occipital cortex, with lingering group differences in parietal and occipital regions during late eyeblink suppression (last 30 s). There were no differences in brain activation during free blinking blocks, and no conditions where OCD patients showed reduced activation compared to controls. In an exploratory analysis of blink counts performed in a subset of subjects, OCD patients were less successful than controls in suppressing blinks. These data indicate that OCD patients exhibit altered brain function and behavior when experiencing and suppressing the urge to blink, raising the possibility that the disorder is associated with a general abnormality in the UFA system that could ultimately be targeted by future treatments.
Subject(s)
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/diagnostic imaging , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/psychology , Adult , Anxiety/diagnostic imaging , Anxiety/psychology , Blinking , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/physiopathology , Brain Mapping , Depression/diagnostic imaging , Depression/psychology , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Motivation , Neuroimaging , Repression, PsychologyABSTRACT
Previous studies have suggested that neuropeptide Y (NPY) levels may be altered in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and chronic stress. We investigated, through systematic review and meta-analysis, whether the mean levels of NPY are significantly different in patients with MDD, PTSD or chronic stress, compared to controls. The main outcome was the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals between cases and controls, using the random-effects model. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated. Thirty-five studies met eligibility criteria. Meta-regression determined that medication and sex could explain 27% of the between-study variance. Females and participants currently prescribed psychotropic medications had significantly higher levels of NPY. NPY levels were significantly lower in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in PTSD patients versus controls. Patients with MDD had significantly lower levels of NPY in plasma compared to controls, but not in the CSF. The magnitudes of the decrease in plasma NPY levels were not significantly different between PTSD and MDD. However, chronic stress patients had significantly higher plasma NPY levels compared to controls, PTSD or MDD. Our findings may imply a shared role of NPY in trauma and depression: nevertheless, it is not clear that the association is specific to these disorders. Psychotropic medications may help restore NPY levels. Further controlled studies are needed to better delineate the contribution of confounding variables such as type of depression, body mass index, appetite or sleep architecture.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major/blood , Neuropeptide Y/blood , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/blood , Stress, Psychological/blood , HumansABSTRACT
PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) and obesity commonly co-occur. We sought to assess the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the acute antidepressant effects of ketamine in patients with treatment-resistant depression. METHODS/PROCEDURES: Post hoc analyses were conducted from a multisite, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designed to assess the rapid-onset effects of intravenous ketamine. Patients (n = 99) were randomized to a single dose administration of ketamine 0.1 mg/kg (n = 18), ketamine 0.2 mg/kg (n = 20), ketamine 0.5 mg/kg (n = 22), ketamine 1.0 mg/kg (n = 20), or active placebo, midazolam 0.045 mg/kg (n = 19). Patients were stratified for BMI. For patients randomized to ketamine (n = 80), BMI was assessed as a continuous variable and also categorically (obese, overweight, not obese/overweight [reference]). The primary outcome measure was the change on the 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 24 hours after treatment. Outcomes at day 3 were also assessed. FINDINGS/RESULTS: The 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale change scores at 24 hours were inversely associated with BMI (-0.28 ± 0.12, P = 0.02). With BMI operationalized categorically, both obese (-4.15 ± 1.41, P = 0.004) and overweight (-1.99 ± 1.14, P = 0.08) categories were inversely related to the 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale change score at 24 hours, statistically significant for the obese category, as compared with the reference group. Similar but weaker findings were observed at 72 hours after infusion. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Higher BMI and obesity were associated with a more robust acute antidepressant response to ketamine. This may have clinical relevance for a great number of patients who have both MDD and obesity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01920555.
Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Ketamine/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Depressive Disorder, Major/complications , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/complications , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/drug therapy , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/drug therapy , Overweight/complications , Overweight/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of high baseline anxiety on response to ketamine versus midazolam (active placebo) in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). METHODS: In a multisite, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 99 subjects with TRD were randomized to one of five arms: a single dose of intravenous ketamine 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0 mg/kg, or midazolam 0.045 mg/kg. The primary outcome measure was change in the six-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD6). A linear mixed effects model was used to examine the effect of anxious depression baseline status (defined by a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Anxiety-Somatization score ≥7) on response to ketamine versus midazolam at 1 and 3 days postinfusion. RESULTS: N = 45 subjects had anxious TRD, compared to N = 54 subjects without high anxiety at baseline. No statistically significant interaction effect was found between treatment group assignment (combined ketamine treatment groups versus midazolam) and anxious/nonanxious status on HAMD6 score at either days 1 or 3 postinfusion (Day 1: F(1, 84) = 0.02, P = 0.88; Day 3: F(1, 82) = 0.12, P = 0.73). CONCLUSION: In contrast with what is observed with traditional antidepressants, response to ketamine may be similar in both anxious and nonanxious TRD subjects. These pilot results suggest the potential utility of ketamine in the treatment of anxious TRD.
Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/complications , Anxiety/complications , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/complications , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/drug therapy , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Ketamine/therapeutic use , Adult , Depressive Disorder, Major/complications , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Midazolam/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although most studies have suggested that mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is more prevalent in patients with panic disorder (PD) than in healthy controls, there is a substantial uncertainty in the rates of MVP across studies. OBJECTIVE: To investigate, through systematic review and meta-analysis, the relative risk of MVP in patients with PD compared to controls. METHODS: Embase, Proquest, Pubmed, and Google Scholar electronic databases were searched up to September 2018. All studies published in peer-reviewed journals, which included both PD and controls groups, were selected. Events (presence of MVP) and nonevents (absence of MVP) in PD and control groups were recorded. The main outcome was the measure of relative risk (RR) pooled with 95% confidence intervals, using fixed-effects model. Heterogeneity, small publication effect, and publication bias were evaluated. RESULTS: Fourteen studies, including 1146 participants, met eligibility criteria. There was no significant heterogeneity or publication bias. The prevalence of MVP in PD and healthy controls was 27.20% and 9.21%, respectively. Patients with PD had a significantly increased relative risk of MVP compared to controls in the pooled sample (RRâ¯=â¯2.469, 95% confidence interval = 1.848-3.300). Age did not significantly modify the RR. CONCLUSIONS: MVP is significantly more prevalent in patients with PD than in controls. This meta-analysis of published studies is sufficient to establish an association between PD and MVP; nevertheless, it is not clear that the association is specific to PD. Patients with PD should be evaluated for MVP to decrease possible negative adverse consequences of MVP.
Subject(s)
Mitral Valve Prolapse/epidemiology , Mitral Valve Prolapse/psychology , Panic Disorder/epidemiology , Panic Disorder/psychology , Comorbidity , Humans , PrevalenceABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Transcranial photobiomodulation (t-PBM) consists of the delivery of near-infrared (NIR) or red light to the scalp designed to penetrate to subjacent cortical areas of the brain. NIR t-PBM has recently emerged as a potential therapy for brain disorders. This study assessed the efficacy of repeated sessions of NIR t-PBM on sexual dysfunction. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a double-blind clinical trial on t-PBM for major depressive disorder (MDD). Twenty individuals received NIR t-PBM (n = 9) or sham therapy (n = 11) twice a week for 8 weeks. Sexual desire, arousal, and orgasm were assessed using the Systematic Assessment for Treatment-Emergent Effects-Specific Inquiry (SAFTEE-SI). RESULTS: The mean improvement in sexual function (decrease in SAFTEE sex total score) in subjects receiving t-PBM in NIR-mode was significantly greater than in subjects receiving sham-mode in the whole sample (NIR [n = 9] -2.55 ± 1.88 vs. sham [n = 11] -0.45 ± 1.21; z = 2.548, P = 0.011]) and in the completers (NIR [n = 5] -3.4 ± 1.95 vs. sham [n = 7] -0.14 ± 1.21; z = 2.576, P = 0.010]). CONCLUSION: This exploratory study with a small sample size indicates that repeated sessions of NIR t-PBM may be associated with therapeutic effects on sexual dysfunction. The latter appeared unrelated to the antidepressant effect of t-PBM in our cohort. Lasers Surg. Med. 51:127-135, 2019. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Subject(s)
Brain/radiation effects , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Infrared Rays/therapeutic use , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is common. Despite numerous available treatments, many individuals fail to improve clinically. Diagnosis of MDD continues to be commonly accomplished via behavioral rather than biological methods. Biomarkers may provide objective diagnosis of MDD, and could include measurements of genes, proteins, and patterns of brain activity. Proteomic analysis and validation of biomarkers is less explored than other areas of biomarker research in MDD. Mass spectrometry (MS) is a comprehensive, unbiased means of proteomic analysis, which can be complemented by directed protein measurements, such as Western Blotting. Prior studies have focused on MS analysis of several human biomaterials in MDD, including human post-mortem brain, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), blood components, and urine. Further studies utilizing MS and proteomic analysis in MDD may help solidify and establish biomarkers for use in diagnosis, identification of new treatment targets, and understanding of the disorder. A biomarker or a biomarker signature that facilitates a convenient and inexpensive predictive test for depression treatment response is highly desirable.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers/analysis , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Mass Spectrometry , Proteome/analysis , Humans , ProteomicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Immune system markers may predict affective disorder treatment response, but whether an overall immune system marker predicts bipolar disorder treatment effect is unclear. METHODS: Bipolar CHOICE (N = 482) and LiTMUS (N = 283) were similar comparative effectiveness trials treating patients with bipolar disorder for 24 weeks with four different treatment arms (standard-dose lithium, quetiapine, moderate-dose lithium plus optimised personalised treatment (OPT) and OPT without lithium). We performed secondary mixed effects linear regression analyses adjusted for age, gender, smoking and body mass index to investigate relationships between pre-treatment white blood cell (WBC) levels and clinical global impression scale (CGI) response. RESULTS: Compared to participants with WBC counts of 4.5-10 × 109/l, participants with WBC < 4.5 or WBC ≥ 10 showed similar improvement within each specific treatment arm and in gender-stratified analyses. CONCLUSIONS: An overall immune system marker did not predict differential treatment response to four different treatment approaches for bipolar disorder all lasting 24 weeks.