Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 53(3): 616-625, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34586572

ABSTRACT

The decision by pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs) to utilize anticoagulation (AC) with or without systemic thrombolysis (ST) or catheter-directed therapies (CDT) for pulmonary embolism (PE) is a balance between the desire for a positive outcome and safety. Our primary aim was to develop a predictive model of in-hospital mortality for patients with high- or intermediate-risk PE managed by PERT while externally validating this model. Our secondary aim was to compare the relative safety and efficacy of ST and CDT in this cohort. Consecutive patients hospitalized between June 2014 and January 2020 at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation and The University of Rochester with acute high- or intermediate-risk PE managed by PERT were retrospectively evaluated. Groups were stratified by treatment strategy. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcome was major bleeding. A logistic regression model to predict the primary outcome was built using the derivation cohort, with 100-fold bootstrapping for internal validation. External validation was performed and the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was calculated. Of 549 included patients, 421 received AC alone, 71 received ST, and 64 received CDT. Predictors of major bleeding include ESC risk category, PESI score, hypoxia, hemodynamic instability, and serum lactate. CDT trended towards lower mortality but with an increased risk of bleeding relative to ST (OR = 0.42; 95% CI [0.15, 1.17] and OR = 2.14; 95% CI [0.9, 5.06] respectively). In the multivariable logistic regression model in the derivation institution cohort, predictors of in-hospital mortality were age, cancer, hemodynamic instability requiring vasopressors, and elevated NT-proBNP (AUC = 0.86). This model was validated using the validation institution cohort (AUC = 0.88). We report an externally-validated model for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with PE managed by PERT. The decision by PERT to initiate CDT or ST for these patients had no impact on mortality or major bleeding, yet the long-term efficacy of these interventions needs to be elucidated.


Subject(s)
Pulmonary Embolism , Thrombolytic Therapy , Catheters/adverse effects , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Humans , Prognosis , Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapy , Pulmonary Embolism/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Thrombolytic Therapy/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
2.
Vasc Med ; 26(6): 626-632, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34010070

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 is an ongoing viral pandemic marked by increased risk of thrombotic events. However, the role of platelets in the elevated observed thrombotic risk in COVID-19 and utility of antiplatelet agents in attenuating thrombosis is unknown. We aimed to determine if the antiplatelet effect of aspirin may mitigate risk of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and venous thromboembolism in COVID-19. We evaluated 22,072 symptomatic patients tested for COVID-19. Propensity-matched analyses were performed to determine if treatment with aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) affected thrombotic outcomes in COVID-19. Neither aspirin nor NSAIDs affected mortality in COVID-19. Thus, aspirin does not appear to prevent thrombosis and death in COVID-19. The mechanisms of thrombosis in COVID-19, therefore, appear distinct and the role of platelets as direct mediators of SARS-CoV-2-mediated thrombosis warrants further investigation.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Aspirin/administration & dosage , COVID-19/complications , Inpatients , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Aspirin/adverse effects , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Thrombosis/virology
3.
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci ; 55(2S): S64-S80, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38553298

ABSTRACT

State of the art of cardiac SPECT imaging continues to advance. Contemporary clinical applications of cardiac SPECT are reviewed and illustrated. Beyond traditional stress and rest myocardial perfusion imaging, the role of digital SPECT technology, ultra low dose imaging with efficient stress first / stress only if normal imaging, deep learning algorithms relative to coronary angiography and SPECT CT, sourceless emission attenuation correction, myocardial blood flow and blood flow reserve to assess ischemic jeopardy, culprit ischemic territories, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy, advanced methods of SPECT detection of amyloid cardiomyopathy, resting MPI to define pre-operative regional scar prior to operative ablation, parametric radionuclide ventriculography to quantify dyssynchrony and benefit of biventricular pacing, assessment of treatment response of RV and LV function in patients with pulmonary hypertension, dual isotope MIBG imaging to assess cardiac risk, and the value proposition of real world effectiveness of SPECT cardiac imaging are illustrated.


Subject(s)
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon , Humans , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon/methods , Myocardial Perfusion Imaging/methods , Heart/diagnostic imaging , Heart Diseases/diagnostic imaging
4.
ACG Case Rep J ; 9(6): e00782, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35677812

ABSTRACT

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated smooth muscle tumors (SMT) have been described in immunosuppressed states, including in post-transplant patients. Here, we discuss a heart-liver transplant recipient who was found to have multifocal hepatic EBV-SMT. His immunosuppression was initially transitioned from tacrolimus to sirolimus because of the proposed benefits of the mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors on EBV-SMT. Unfortunately, he suffered acute rejection of his liver allograft while on sirolimus therapy, which ultimately led to consideration of retransplantation.

5.
Transplant Proc ; 54(10): 2688-2691, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35999107

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation (HT) recipients infected with COVID-19 may be at an increased risk of severe illness due to chronic immunosuppression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult HT patients hospitalized with COVID-19 at the Cleveland Clinic between March 2020 and March 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort analysis. Twenty-four HT cases were matched to 96 non-HT controls, similarly hospitalized with COVID-19, out of 11,481 patients based on different baseline characteristics. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, vasopressor need, dialysis, pneumonia, and 90-day readmission. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the time from transplantation (within 1 year of transplantation and greater than 1 year since transplantation). RESULTS: Both primary and secondary outcomes were not significant. Subgroup analysis did not show a significant difference in mortality (P = .355) or 30-day readmission (P = .841) between patients who were within 1 year of transplantation and remote transplantation beyond 1 year. Univariable analysis of immunosuppressant continuation, dose-reduction, or discontinuation did not significantly affect HT mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limited sample size, our results suggest that HT patients do not show worse outcomes after acquiring COVID-19, whether in the first year of transplantation or after a remote transplantation procedure. Future studies with multicenter data that incorporate the subsequent COVID-19 variants (eg, Delta and Omicron), the impact of long COVID-19, and assessing full vs reduced immunosuppression regimens would add insights to this patient population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Heart Transplantation , Adult , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , Hospitalization , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects
6.
Am J Cardiol ; 183: 85-92, 2022 11 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36031412

ABSTRACT

Among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with a significantly higher rate of mortality. We aimed to evaluate whether diffuse myocardial fibrosis, determined using native T1 mapping, has prognostic utility in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization, in patients with CKD and severe AS who are evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Cardiac magnetic resonance with T1 mapping using the modified Look-Locker inversion recovery technique was performed in 117 consecutive patients with severe AS and CKD (stage ≥3). Patients were followed up to determine the occurrence of MACE. The mean age of the 117 patients in the cohort was 82 ± 8 years. Native T1 was 1,055 ms (25th- to 75th percentiles 1,031 to 1,078 ms), which is higher than previously reported in healthy controls. Patients with higher T1 times were more likely to have higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels (4,122 [IQR 1,578 to 7,980] pg/ml vs 1,678 [IQR 493 to 2,851] pg/ml, p = 0.005) and a history of heart failure (33% vs 9%, p = 0.034). After median follow-up of 3.4 years, MACE occurred in 71 patients (61%). The Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality score (hazard ratio [HR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 1.12, p = 0.006), native T1 >1,024 ms (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.06, p = 0.028), and New York Heart Association class (HR 1.56, 95% 1.09 to 2.34, p = 0.016) were independent predictors of MACE. Longer native T1 was associated with MACE occurrence in patients with CKD and severe AS.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Heart Failure , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Fibrosis , Heart Failure/complications , Humans , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain , Predictive Value of Tests , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Risk Factors
7.
Open Heart ; 8(2)2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34785587

ABSTRACT

Vitamin K2 serves an important role in cardiovascular health through regulation of calcium homeostasis. Its effects on the cardiovascular system are mediated through activation of the anti-calcific protein known as matrix Gla protein. In its inactive form, this protein is associated with various markers of cardiovascular disease including increased arterial stiffness, vascular and valvular calcification, insulin resistance and heart failure indices which ultimately increase cardiovascular mortality. Supplementation of vitamin K2 has been strongly associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes through its modification of systemic calcification and arterial stiffness. Although its direct effects on delaying the progression of vascular and valvular calcification is currently the subject of multiple randomised clinical trials, prior reports suggest potential improved survival among cardiac patients with vitamin K2 supplementation. Strengthened by its affordability and Food and Drug Adminstration (FDA)-proven safety, vitamin K2 supplementation is a viable and promising option to improve cardiovascular outcomes.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Vascular Stiffness/drug effects , Vitamin K 2/pharmacology , Cardiovascular Diseases/physiopathology , Disease Progression , Humans , Vitamins/pharmacology
8.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 10(18): e019849, 2021 09 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34482705

ABSTRACT

Background Certain echocardiographic parameters may serve as early predictors of adverse events in patients with hemodynamically compromising pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods and Results An observational analysis was conducted for patients with acute pulmonary embolism evaluated by a Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) between 2014 and 2020. The performance of clinical prediction algorithms including the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index and Carl Bova score were compared using a ratio of right ventricle and left ventricle hemodynamics by dividing the pulmonary artery systolic pressure by the left ventricle stroke volume. The primary outcome of in-hospital mortality, cardiac arrest, and the need for advanced therapies was evaluated by univariate and multivariable analyses. Of the 343 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 215 had complete data. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure/left ventricle stroke volume was a clear predictor of the primary end point (odds ratio [OR], 2.31; P=0.005), performing as well or better than the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (OR, 1.43; P=0.06) or the Bova score (OR, 1.28; P=0.01). Conclusions This study is the first study to demonstrate the utility of early pulmonary artery systolic pressure/left ventricle stroke volume in predicting adverse clinical events in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure/left ventricle stroke volume may be a surrogate marker of ventricular asynchrony in high-risk pulmonary embolism and should be prognostically evaluated.


Subject(s)
Pulmonary Embolism , Ventricular Dysfunction, Right , Acute Disease , Heart Ventricles/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Pulmonary Artery/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/etiology
9.
Res Sq ; 2020 Dec 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33398263

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 is an ongoing viral pandemic marked by increased risk of thrombotic events. However, the role of platelets in the elevated observed thrombotic risk in COVID-19 and utility of anti-platelet agents in attenuating thrombosis is unknown. We aimed to determine if human platelets express the known SARS-CoV-2 receptor-protease axis on their cell surface and assess whether the anti-platelet effect of aspirin may mitigate risk of myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in COVID-19. Expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 on human platelets were detected by immunoblotting and confirmed by confocal microscopy. We evaluated 22,072 symptomatic patients tested for COVID-19. Propensity-matched analyses were performed to determine if treatment with aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) affected thrombotic outcomes in COVID-19. Neither aspirin nor NSAIDs affected mortality in COVID-19. However, both aspirin and NSAID therapies were associated with increased risk of the combined thrombotic endpoint of (MI), (CVA), and (VTE). Thus, while platelets clearly express ACE2-TMPRSS2 receptor-protease axis for SARS-CoV-2 infection, aspirin does not prevent thrombosis and death in COVID-19. The mechanisms of thrombosis in COVID-19, therefore, appears distinct and the role of platelets as direct mediators of SARS-CoV-2-mediated thrombosis warrants further investigation.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL