Sustained Virologic Response of Patients Hospitalized Compared With Those Not Hospitalized During Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus With Direct-Acting Antivirals.

BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) have resulted in great success through high attainment of sustained virologic response (SVR). Risk factors for DAA treatment failure are important to identify because of worsened outcomes with failure and high treatment cost. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify whether hospitalization during treatment affects SVR. The primary outcome was the difference in SVR at 12 weeks after treatment. METHODS: This multicenter, single health system retrospective cohort review compared achievement of SVR between patients hospitalized during DAA treatment for HCV with those not hospitalized during treatment. RESULTS: Patients in the hospitalized cohort (n = 94) had more severe disease at baseline than nonhospitalized patients (n = 167) as indicated through higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores, Fibrosis-4 scores, and imaging-suggested or biopsy-confirmed cirrhosis. Patients hospitalized during treatment had lower SVR rates compared with those not hospitalized (87.2% vs 95.2%; P = 0.043) but failed to reach significance when inpatient mortality was excluded on secondary analysis (91.1% vs 95.2%; P = 0.195). Patients who were hospitalized and did not achieve SVR had higher MELD scores, were more likely to have intensive care unit stay, and had longer hospital stay compared with those who achieved SVR. Of 94 patients, 93 provided home supply of DAAs during hospitalization. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Patients hospitalized during DAA treatment for HCV had reduced rates of SVR. This reduced SVR rate may be driven by inpatient mortality and severity of liver disease. Patient education to bring home supply of medication for use during admission is an effective intervention.

Predictors of hypogammaglobulinemia and serious infections among patients receiving ocrelizumab or rituximab for treatment of MS and NMOSD.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ocrelizumab and rituximab are monoclonal antibodies targeting the CD20 marker on B lymphocytes. The enhanced efficacy of B lymphocyte depleting therapies poses a greater risk of decreased immunoglobulin (Ig) levels. The rate and risk factors of hypogammaglobulinemia in MS and NMOSD patients treated with anti-CD20 therapies are unknown. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted among patients who received anti-CD20 therapy for the treatment of MS, NMOSD, and other related neurological disorders. The goal was to determine the incidence and risk factors of hypogammaglobulinemia and serious infections in patients receiving ocrelizumab versus rituximab. The secondary goals were to determine the rates of lymphopenia, neutropenia, and early B cell repopulation among patients on anti-CD20 therapy. RESULTS: Overall, 184 patients (mean age 48.4 ± 13.7, 66.8% female) met inclusion criteria; 152 patients received ocrelizumab and 32 patients received rituximab. A total of 22 patients (12%) developed hypogammaglobulinemia. Patients who developed hypogammaglobulinemia were more likely to have been ≥50 years of age (p = .0275) with lower baseline IgG (p = .001) and IgA (p = .0038) levels. Serious infections were observed in 21 patients (11%) and seen more commonly in those that developed total lymphopenia (<1.0 × 109/L) and had longer duration of B-cell therapy. Multivariate analysis identified age ≥ 50 years, white race, and rituximab as independent predictors of hypogammaglobulinemia, and absolute lymphopenia as an independent risk factor for serious infections. DISCUSSION: Among patients receiving anti-CD20 therapy, 12% of patients experienced hypogammaglobulinemia which was seen more commonly in white patients, at least 50 years old, with lower baseline IgG and IgA levels and in those treated with rituximab. Serious infections were seen more commonly in patients with total lymphopenia and longer exposure to anti-CD20 therapy.

Prevalence of iatrogenic CNS inflammation at a tertiary neuroimmunology clinic.

BACKGROUND: Various vaccines, tumor-necrosis-factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFAIs), immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and other immunomodulators have been linked to inflammatory CNS events. The prevalence of iatrogenic events in the neuroimmunology clinic is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of iatrogenic CNS inflammation in a tertiary neuroimmunology clinic. METHODS: We analyzed 422 consecutive patients seen over five years at a tertiary neuroimmunology clinic who were systematically screened for exposure to vaccines, TNFAIs, ICIs, or other immunomodulators. In patients with suspected iatrogenic events, the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale was used to score the probability of iatrogenicity. RESULTS: In total, 27 potential iatrogenic events were observed, accounting for 6.4% of all new referrals. The average Naranjo score was 5.78 +/- 1.65 with 74% of the cases scored as probable and 26% scored as possible. The clinical phenotypes included MS relapses (37%); autoimmune encephalitis (30%); NMOSD attacks (15%); transverse myelitis (11%); optic neuritis (4%); and MOGAD attacks (4%). A monophasic course was observed in 44% of cases while 41% had a relapsing course. All patients stopped or interrupted treatment with the offending agent. In addition, 41% of the iatrogenic events were fully responsive to corticosteroids; 22% were partially responsive; and 15% resolved spontaneously. The most common potential triggers were vaccines (37%) followed by TNFAIs (33%) then ICIs (26%). A significantly higher number of probable iatrogenic events were observed among the ICI and vaccine groups compared to a higher number of possible events among the TNFAI group. The latter group also had a significantly longer interval since exposure. The ICI group was more likely to present with monophasic autoimmune encephalitis. CONCLUSION: Iatrogenic CNS inflammation is rare and typically involves steroid-responsive monophasic events. A subset of iatrogenic events can unmask or worsen relapsing disorders. The probability of iatrogenicity was higher in vaccine and ICI-related events compared to TNFAI-related events.

The humoral response to SARS-COV-2 vaccines in MS patients: A case series exploring the impact of DMT, lymphocyte count, immunoglobulins, and vaccine type.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Certain disease modifying therapies may negatively impact the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Many MS related clinical, demographic, and immunological characteristics can also affect vaccine response but those have not been fully explored. This study aimed to investigate potential correlations between clinical, demographic, and immunological variables in MS patients to post-vaccination spike protein antibody positivity rates and levels. METHODS: Patients with MS and related neuroimmunological disorders who requested verification of the immune response to the SARS-COV-2 vaccine were tested for the spike protein antibody from January to October 2021. We performed an exploratory analysis to compare patients with positive versus negative spike protein antibody. RESULTS: Fifty patients (mean age 53 ±12, 78% females) were included. There were 29 patients with positive post-vaccination spike protein antibody (58%) and 21 with negative antibody (42%). Patients with negative antibody were more likely to have been on B-cell therapy (86% vs 31%, P=.001) while positive patients were more likely to have been on a fumarate (31% vs 4.8%, P=.03). Thirty percent of positive patients on fumarate therapy had mild lymphopenia. No differences existed between groups in gender, age, race, disease phenotype, vaccine brand, and lymphocyte counts. Among patients on B-cell therapy, 33% had a positive spike protein antibody. There was an association between detectable CD19 cells at time of vaccination and positive humoral response to vaccination (P=0.049). There was no relationship between subgroups in terms of vaccine timing relative to B-cell therapy dose. Hypogammaglobulinemia was not associated with seroconversion rates, however it was associated with decreased quantitative spike protein antibody levels (p=0.045). DISCUSSION: B-cell therapy is associated with a negative humoral response to SARS-COV-2 vaccines. Patients on B-cell depleting therapy with detectable CD19 counts at the time of vaccination were associated with a positive humoral response. There was no relationship between hypogammaglobinemia and seroconversion rate, however it was associated with decreased spike protein antibody levels. The fumarates are associated with positive humoral response even in the presence of mild lymphopenia.