Male aging as a causative factor of detrimental changes in human conventional semen parameters and sperm DNA integrity.

The effect of male aging on fertility potential is controversial and difficult to predict. The aim of our study was to determine the associations between age, basic semen parameters, and sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF). Comparison of four age-dependent groups (men ≤29 years, 30-35 years, 36-40 years, and >40 years) revealed a significant fall in the basic semen characteristics and sperm genomic integrity with age. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis confirmed that men >29 years had lower semen quality. In the group of men >29 years, the prevalence of men with abnormal semen parameters was higher, and these men had over a threefold higher odds ratio (OR) for abnormal semen parameters. Next, ROC analysis revealed that a threshold of 18% SDF was optimal for discriminating between men with normal and abnormal standard semen parameters. The prevalence of men with >18% SDF was higher in the group of men >29 years than in men ≤29 years. Older men had an almost twofold higher risk for >18% SDF than younger men. Our results suggest that age >29 years may be a causative factor of detrimental changes in semen quality, which may raise the risk for disorders of male fertility potential.

Relationship between sperm morphology and sperm DNA dispersion.

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of teratozoospermia (<4% morphologically normal sperm cells) and the relationship between sperm morphological abnormalities and abnormal sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation, which are considered indicators of male fertility, have not been elucidated. Our research was designed to determine the prevalence of different sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) levels in men with teratozoospermia and to establish a discriminating threshold value for SDF in assessing sperm morphology. METHODS: Basic semen characteristics and detailed sperm morphological analysis (head, neck, midpiece, and tail defects and excess residual cytoplasm) (WHO, 2010), and the nuclear sperm DNA dispersion test were performed on semen samples obtained from 523 men with teratozoospermia (n=296) and those without teratozoospermia (n=227). RESULTS: Subjects with abnormal sperm morphology had not only lower results for standard sperm characteristics, including detailed sperm morphological abnormalities, but also a higher proportion of sperm cells with SDF vs. men with normal sperm morphology. Moreover, significantly fewer subjects with low SDF levels (≤15%), more subjects with high SDF levels (>30%) and a higher odds ratio (OR) for having high SDF levels were found in the group of men with teratozoospermia vs. men without teratozoospermia. However, the receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that a SDF >18% was a significant negative predictive value to distinguish between men with normal sperm morphology or men with abnormal sperm morphology. The optimal area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.746. In the group of men with teratozoospermia, a higher incidence of men with >18% SDF and a higher OR for having >18% SDF were observed. SDF negatively correlated with sperm number, morphologically normal sperm cells, sperm motility and sperm vitality but positively correlated with the teratozoospermia index (TZI) and detailed sperm morphological abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: The obtained findings demonstrated that: (I) detailed sperm structural defects coexist with abnormal nuclear sperm DNA dispersion, (II) men with teratozoospermia may have a higher risk for sperm DNA damage, (III) the calculated optimal SDF value of 18% measured by the DNA sperm dispersion test is the best criterion to predict normal and abnormal sperm morphology.