Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Osteoporos Int ; 35(11): 1919-1930, 2024 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39042292

ABSTRACT

This 78-week (18-month) study conducted in 479 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis evaluated the efficacy, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of candidate biosimilar CT-P41 relative to US reference denosumab. CT-P41 had equivalent efficacy and pharmacodynamics to US-denosumab, with similar pharmacokinetics and comparable safety and immunogenicity profiles. PURPOSE: To demonstrate equivalence of candidate biosimilar CT-P41 and US reference denosumab (US-denosumab) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. METHODS: This 78-week (18-month), double-blind, randomized, active-controlled Phase 3 study (NCT04757376) comprised two treatment periods (TPs). In TPI, patients (N = 479) were randomized 1:1 to 60 mg subcutaneous CT-P41 or US-denosumab. At Week 52, those who had received CT-P41 in TPI continued to do so. Those who had received US-denosumab were randomized (1:1) to continue treatment or switch to CT-P41 in TPII. The primary efficacy endpoint was percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density at Week 52. Efficacy equivalence was concluded if associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) for least squares (LS) mean group differences fell within ± 1.503%. The primary pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoint was area under the effect curve for serum carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen through the first 26 weeks, with an equivalence margin of 80-125% (for 95% CIs associated with geometric LS mean ratios). RESULTS: Equivalence was demonstrated for CT-P41 and US-denosumab with respect to primary efficacy (LS mean difference [95% CI]: - 0.139 [- 0.826, 0.548] in the full analysis set and - 0.280 [- 0.973, 0.414] in the per-protocol set) and PD (geometric LS mean ratio [95% CI]: 94.94 [90.75, 99.32]) endpoints. Secondary efficacy, PD, pharmacokinetics, and safety results were comparable among all groups up to Week 78, including after transitioning to CT-P41 from US-denosumab. CONCLUSIONS: CT-P41 was equivalent to US-denosumab in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, with respect to primary efficacy and PD endpoints.


Subject(s)
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Bone Density , Denosumab , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal , Therapeutic Equivalency , Humans , Female , Denosumab/pharmacokinetics , Denosumab/therapeutic use , Denosumab/adverse effects , Denosumab/administration & dosage , Denosumab/pharmacology , Double-Blind Method , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/pharmacokinetics , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/adverse effects , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacokinetics , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology , Middle Aged , Aged , Bone Density/drug effects , Treatment Outcome , Injections, Subcutaneous , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL