ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with left-sided colorectal cancer (L-CRC) are known to have a significantly better prognosis than those with right-sided CRC (R-CRC). It has been hypothesized that RAS, BRAF mutations, or deficient mismatch repair status (MMR) might be responsible for the prognostic effect of primary tumor location (PTL). This study aims to evaluate the prognostic effect of PTL in the Belgian population and to determine the role of biomarkers (MMR, BRAF, and RAS status) in this effect. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of Belgian Cancer Registry data. First, we studied the prognostic effect of PTL on 5-year relative survival of 91,946 patients diagnosed with CRC (all stages) from 2004-2015. Second, we investigated the interaction between biomarkers and the prognostic effect of PTL in 1818 patients diagnosed with stage IV CRC in 2014-2015. RESULTS: L-CRC was associated with a significantly better 5-year relative survival compared to R-CRC in all stages and ages combined (68.4%, 95% CI, 67.7-69.1% vs 65.6%, 95% CI, 64.7-66.4%). Also, when stratified by age, sex, and stage, the prognosis of L-CRC was better compared to R-CRC in most subgroups. Only in stage II and certain subgroups of elderly patients, the opposite was observed. Furthermore, our data showed that none of the biomarkers had a significant interaction with the effect of PTL on survival. CONCLUSION: This population-based study confirms that L-CRC is associated with significantly better relative survival compared to R-CRC, in all stages and ages combined. Furthermore, in stage IV L-CRC is associated with a longer survival than R-CRC, regardless of MMR, RAS, and BRAF status.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf , Humans , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Belgium/epidemiology , Prognosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , MutationABSTRACT
OPINION STATEMENT: One of the great challenges in digestive oncology is choosing the optimal therapy for RAS-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Even though the RAS genes and accompanying pathway were identified decades ago and extensive knowledge exists on their role in carcinogenesis, it has proven challenging to translate these insights into new therapies and clinical benefit for patients. However, recently, new drugs targeting this pathway (for example, KRASG12C inhibitors) have shown promising results in clinical trials, as monotherapy or in combination regimens. Although resistance remains an important issue, more knowledge on adaptive resistance and feedback loops in the RAS-pathway has led to strategical combination regimens to overcome this problem. In the past year, many encouraging results have been published or presented at conferences. Even though some of the data is still preliminary, these studies may bring practice-changing results and can lead to a clinical benefit for patients over the coming years. Because of these recent developments, the treatment of RAS-mutated mCRC has become a topic of great interest. Therefore, in this review, we will summarize the standard of care and discuss the most important emerging therapies for this patient population.
Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Mutation , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Biomarker discovery in colorectal cancer has mostly focused on methylation patterns in normal and colorectal tumor tissue, but adenomas remain understudied. Therefore, we performed the first epigenome-wide study to profile methylation of all three tissue types combined and to identify discriminatory biomarkers. RESULTS: Public methylation array data (Illumina EPIC and 450K) were collected from a total of 1 892 colorectal samples. Pairwise differential methylation analyses between tissue types were performed for both array types to "double evidence" differentially methylated probes (DE DMPs). Subsequently, the identified DMPs were filtered on methylation level and used to build a binary logistic regression prediction model. Focusing on the clinically most interesting group (adenoma vs carcinoma), we identified 13 DE DMPs that could effectively discriminate between them (AUC = 0.996). We validated this model in an in-house experimental methylation dataset of 13 adenomas and 9 carcinomas. It reached a sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 95%, respectively, with an overall accuracy of 96%. Our findings raise the possibility that the 13 DE DMPs identified in this study can be used as molecular biomarkers in the clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses show that methylation biomarkers have the potential to discriminate between normal, precursor and carcinoma tissues of the colorectum. More importantly, we highlight the power of the methylome as a source of markers for discriminating between colorectal adenomas and carcinomas, which currently remains an unmet clinical need.
Subject(s)
Adenoma , Colorectal Neoplasms , Epigenome , DNA Methylation , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Adenoma/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Genome-Wide Association StudyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Analysis of methylation markers in liquid biopsies is a promising technique for the follow-up of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), because they can be used in all patients, regardless of their mutational status. Therefore, we studied the value of NPY methylation analysis in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for accurate response monitoring in patients with mCRC in the PANIB trial. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The PANIB trial was a randomized phase II trial designed to compare FOLFOX plus panitumumab and FOLFOX plus bevacizumab in patients with RAS wild-type unresectable mCRC. The results of sequential liquid biopsies were correlated with results of imaging. RESULTS: Forty patients were included from six Belgian hospitals. Analysis of the liquid biopsies revealed that higher baseline levels of methylated ctDNA was associated with a significantly shorter overall survival [HR, 1.015; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.005-1.025; P = 0.002]. Furthermore, 37 patients provided at least two liquid biopsies. Thirty-one of them showed a decrease in the methylation ratio after the start of therapy, which corresponded with stable disease or response on imaging at the first evaluation. When comparing the panitumumab and bevacizumab arm, significantly higher objective response and early tumor shrinkage rates were observed in the panitumumab arm (P = 0.048 and 0.015, respectively). However, due to a small study population, the trial was underpowered to detect a significant difference in survival. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm that baseline methylated ctDNA is a prognostic marker and indicate that NPY methylation is a promising marker for response monitoring in patients with mCRC.
Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Panitumumab , Bevacizumab , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Colonic Neoplasms/etiology , Rectal Neoplasms/etiology , Biomarkers , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Fluorouracil , LeucovorinABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) are two non-invasive imaging techniques used for the measurement of tumour thickness in corneal and bulbar conjunctival tumours. Histopathology (HP), however, remains the gold standard for the measurement of tumour thickness. The aim of this study was to determine whether AS-OCT and UBM are as accurate as HP for measuring tumour thickness. METHODS: Forty-two corneal and bulbar conjunctival tumours were imaged using AS-OCT and UBM. Images were assessed and tumour thickness was measured. Eleven patients subsequently underwent surgical excision. All specimens were measured during histopathological analysis. The correlation of the thickness measurement on HP to AS-OCT and UBM was then statistically analysed. In cases where the tumour was not excised, thickness measurement comparisons between AS-OCT and UBM were analysed. RESULTS: AS-OCT and UBM measurements of tumour thickness were found to be significantly positively correlated (p=<0.001), as were UBM and HP thickness measurements (p=0.031). HP and AS-OCT measurements, however, only showed a mild but non-significant positive correlation. CONCLUSION: Both AS-OCT and UBM are useful techniques to image and measure the thickness of corneal and conjunctival bulbar tumours. While AS-OCT provides better details than UBM, it was more limited in visualising the posterior boundary of the tumour, particularly in malignant tumours. While thickness measurements of both methodologies were correlated, neither should yet be considered as replacements to the gold standard of HP.
Subject(s)
Conjunctival Neoplasms , Microscopy, Acoustic , Conjunctival Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Conjunctival Neoplasms/surgery , Cornea/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Microscopy, Acoustic/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methodsABSTRACT
The involvement of genetic factors in the pathogenesis of KC has long been recognized but the identification of variants affecting the underlying protein functions has been challenging. In this study, we selected 34 candidate genes for KC based on previous whole-exome sequencing (WES) and the literature, and resequenced them in 745 KC patients and 810 ethnically matched controls from Belgium, France and Italy. Data analysis was performed using the single variant association test as well as gene-based mutation burden and variance components tests. In our study, we detected enrichment of genetic variation across multiple gene-based tests for the genes COL2A1, COL5A1, TNXB, and ZNF469. The top hit in the single variant association test was obtained for a common variant in the COL12A1 gene. These associations were consistently found across independent subpopulations. Interestingly, COL5A1, TNXB, ZNF469 and COL12A1 are all known Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) genes. Though the co-occurrence of KC and EDS has been reported previously, this study is the first to demonstrate a consistent role of genetic variants in EDS genes in the etiology of KC. In conclusion, our data show a shared genetic etiology between KC and EDS, and clearly confirm the currently disputed role of ZNF469 in disease susceptibility for KC.
Subject(s)
Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome/genetics , Keratoconus/genetics , Collagen Type II/genetics , Collagen Type V/genetics , Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome/diagnosis , Humans , Keratoconus/diagnosis , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Tenascin/genetics , Transcription Factors/geneticsABSTRACT
Context: Pembrolizumab (Keytruda; Merck Sharp & Dohme) is a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody used in cancer immunotherapy. It targets the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) receptor, which is important in maintaining self-tolerance. However, immune checkpoint blockade is associated with a risk for immune-related adverse events (irAEs) potentially affecting the endocrine organs. Type 1 diabetes mellitus is a rare irAE of PD-1 inhibitors, occurring in 0.2% of cases. Evidence Acquisition: Systematic search of four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) using the search terms "diabetes" or "ketoacidosis" and "pembrolizumab," "nivolumab," "PD-1 inhibitor," or "immunotherapy." Included were articles published in English between 1 January 2012 and 1 January 2018. The search was supplemented by bibliographic searches of the complete reference lists of all included papers. Evidence Synthesis: We provide an overview of all published cases (n = 42) of PD-1 inhibitor-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus to date, including a well-characterized case of islet cell antibody and glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody-positive diabetes mellitus, in a patient with a diabetes-prone HLA genotype. She presented with diabetic ketoacidosis during pembrolizumab therapy for a metastatic uveal melanoma. Furthermore, we discuss potential pathogenic mechanisms, clinical presentation, prognostic markers (ß-cell antibodies and HLA type), treatment, and a screening protocol. Conclusions: Because the use of immunotherapy will increase, it is essential that all clinicians are aware of diabetic ketoacidosis as a rare and life-threatening side effect of immunotherapy. Blood glucose monitoring during anti-PD-1 therapy is necessary.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/chemically induced , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/immunology , Female , Humans , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Melanoma/drug therapy , Prognosis , T-Lymphocytes/drug effects , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Uveal Neoplasms/drug therapyABSTRACT
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers worldwide. It has been reported that left- and right-sided CRC harbor varying disease characteristics, which leads to a difference in prognosis and response to therapy. Recently, there have been retrospective studies about tumor location in metastatic CRC (mCRC) and its potential to predict the effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) therapies. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the latest trials studying the predictive value of primary tumor location in mCRC and discuss biomarkers that might be associated with the differences in treatment response. Although data need to be interpreted with caution due to the absence of randomized trials stratified based on tumor location, patients with left-sided CRC seem to benefit more from anti-EGFR therapy than patients with right-sided CRC. Further clinical trials, stratified for tumor location, are warranted.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Colorectal Neoplasms/metabolism , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Purpose. To analyze and describe corneal and conjunctival tumor thickness and internal characteristics and extension in depth and size and shape measured by two noninvasive techniques, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). Design. Systematic review. Methods. This systematic review is based on a comprehensive search of 4 databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library). Articles published between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2015, were included. We searched for articles using the following search terms in various combinations: "optical coherence tomography", "ultrasound biomicroscopy", "corneal neoplasm", "conjunctival neoplasm", "eye", "tumor" and "anterior segment tumors". Inclusion criteria were as follows: UBM and/or AS-OCT was used; the study included corneal or conjunctival tumors; and the article was published in English, French, Dutch, or German. Results. There were 14 sources selected. Discussion. Several studies on the quality of AS-OCT and UBM show that these imaging techniques provide useful information about the internal features, extension, size, and shape of tumors. Yet there is no enough evidence on the advantages and disadvantages of UBM and AS-OCT in certain tumor types. Conclusion. More comparative studies are needed to investigate which imaging technique is most suitable for a certain tumor type.