Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Am J Transplant ; 21(4): 1365-1375, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33251712

ABSTRACT

Islet allotransplantation in the United States (US) is facing an imminent demise. Despite nearly three decades of progress in the field, an archaic regulatory framework has stymied US clinical practice. Current regulations do not reflect the state-of-the-art in clinical or technical practices. In the US, islets are considered biologic drugs and "more than minimally manipulated" human cell and tissue products (HCT/Ps). In contrast, across the world, human islets are appropriately defined as "minimally manipulated tissue" and not regulated as a drug, which has led to islet allotransplantation (allo-ITx) becoming a standard-of-care procedure for selected patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. This regulatory distinction impedes patient access to islets for transplantation in the US. As a result only 11 patients underwent allo-ITx in the US between 2016 and 2019, and all as investigational procedures in the settings of a clinical trials. Herein, we describe the current regulations pertaining to islet transplantation in the United States. We explore the progress which has been made in the field and demonstrate why the regulatory framework must be updated to both better reflect our current clinical practice and to deal with upcoming challenges. We propose specific updates to current regulations which are required for the renaissance of ethical, safe, effective, and affordable allo-ITx in the United States.


Subject(s)
Biological Products , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Islets of Langerhans Transplantation , Costs and Cost Analysis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/surgery , Humans , Transplantation, Heterologous , United States
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 36(2): 201-6, 2003 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12522753

ABSTRACT

The design of clinical trials for new antiretroviral agents poses unique challenges, given the availability of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). These challenges include the selection of appropriate populations, the methods used to partition the effects of the study drug under observation from those of the other concurrently administered medications in early studies, performance of dose-ranging studies for disease states in which suboptimal drug exposure may lead to the development of viral resistance that limits future treatment options, and the need to fulfill the obligations of international regulatory agencies. Throughout, science and ethics are tightly woven elements in study designs for antiretroviral drug trials. Fast-track drug approval status and successful lobbying by advocates for patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome aimed at the US Food and Drug Administration, the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, university teaching centers, pharmaceutical companies, and members of Congress undoubtedly contributed to the development and swift regulatory approvals of the 17 antiretroviral medications now available in the United States for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials as Topic/ethics , Drugs, Investigational/therapeutic use , Ethics, Clinical , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Biomedical Research , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic/ethics , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic/methods , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic/ethics , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic/methods , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic/ethics , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic/methods , Humans , Research Design
3.
J Infect Dis ; 185(5): 599-607, 2002 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11865416

ABSTRACT

The safety and antiviral activity of lopinavir (Lpv), a protease inhibitor (PI) coformulated with ritonavir (Rtv) to enhance its pharmacokinetic properties, were evaluated in 70 patients with plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA levels of 1000-100,000 copies/mL on a first PI-containing regimen. Patients were randomized to substitute only the PI with Lpv/Rtv, 400/100 mg or 400/200 mg twice daily. On day 15, nevirapine (200 mg 2x/day) was added, and nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors were changed. Despite a >4-fold reduction in phenotypic susceptibility to the preentry PI in 63% of patients, mean plasma HIV-1 RNA levels declined by 1.14 log(10) copies/mL after 2 weeks of Lpv/Rtv. At week 48, 86% of subjects receiving treatment had plasma HIV-1 RNA levels of <400 copies/mL; 76% had levels <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL (intent-to-treat: 70% and 60%, respectively). Mean CD4 cell counts increased by 125 cells/muL. Three patients discontinued therapy for drug-related adverse events.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Pyrimidinones/therapeutic use , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacology , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Infections/virology , HIV-1/classification , HIV-1/drug effects , HIV-1/physiology , Humans , Lopinavir , Male , Middle Aged , Nevirapine/pharmacology , Nevirapine/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Pyrimidinones/pharmacology , RNA, Viral/blood , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Ritonavir/pharmacology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL