Epidemiological and cohort study finds no association between COVID-19 and Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) have emerged during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This epidemiological and cohort study sought to investigate any causative association between COVID-19 infection and GBS. The epidemiology of GBS cases reported to the UK National Immunoglobulin Database was studied from 2016 to 2019 and compared to cases reported during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were stratified by hospital trust and region, with numbers of reported cases per month. UK population data for COVID-19 infection were collated from UK public health bodies. In parallel, but separately, members of the British Peripheral Nerve Society prospectively reported incident cases of GBS during the pandemic at their hospitals to a central register. The clinical features, investigation findings and outcomes of COVID-19 (definite or probable) and non-COVID-19 associated GBS cases in this cohort were compared. The incidence of GBS treated in UK hospitals from 2016 to 2019 was 1.65-1.88 per 100 000 individuals per year. GBS incidence fell between March and May 2020 compared to the same months of 2016-19. GBS and COVID-19 incidences during the pandemic also varied between regions and did not correlate with one another (r = 0.06, 95% confidence interval: -0.56 to 0.63, P = 0.86). In the independent cohort study, 47 GBS cases were reported (COVID-19 status: 13 definite, 12 probable, 22 non-COVID-19). There were no significant differences in the pattern of weakness, time to nadir, neurophysiology, CSF findings or outcome between these groups. Intubation was more frequent in the COVID-19 affected cohort (7/13, 54% versus 5/22, 23% in COVID-19-negative) attributed to COVID-19 pulmonary involvement. Although it is not possible to entirely rule out the possibility of a link, this study finds no epidemiological or phenotypic clues of SARS-CoV-2 being causative of GBS. GBS incidence has fallen during the pandemic, which may be the influence of lockdown measures reducing transmission of GBS inducing pathogens such as Campylobacter jejuni and respiratory viruses.

The emerging spectrum of COVID-19 neurology: clinical, radiological and laboratory findings.

Preliminary clinical data indicate that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is associated with neurological and neuropsychiatric illness. Responding to this, a weekly virtual coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) neurology multi-disciplinary meeting was established at the National Hospital, Queen Square, in early March 2020 in order to discuss and begin to understand neurological presentations in patients with suspected COVID-19-related neurological disorders. Detailed clinical and paraclinical data were collected from cases where the diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed through RNA PCR, or where the diagnosis was probable/possible according to World Health Organization criteria. Of 43 patients, 29 were SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive and definite, eight probable and six possible. Five major categories emerged: (i) encephalopathies (n = 10) with delirium/psychosis and no distinct MRI or CSF abnormalities, and with 9/10 making a full or partial recovery with supportive care only; (ii) inflammatory CNS syndromes (n = 12) including encephalitis (n = 2, para- or post-infectious), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (n = 9), with haemorrhage in five, necrosis in one, and myelitis in two, and isolated myelitis (n = 1). Of these, 10 were treated with corticosteroids, and three of these patients also received intravenous immunoglobulin; one made a full recovery, 10 of 12 made a partial recovery, and one patient died; (iii) ischaemic strokes (n = 8) associated with a pro-thrombotic state (four with pulmonary thromboembolism), one of whom died; (iv) peripheral neurological disorders (n = 8), seven with Guillain-Barré syndrome, one with brachial plexopathy, six of eight making a partial and ongoing recovery; and (v) five patients with miscellaneous central disorders who did not fit these categories. SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with a wide spectrum of neurological syndromes affecting the whole neuraxis, including the cerebral vasculature and, in some cases, responding to immunotherapies. The high incidence of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, particularly with haemorrhagic change, is striking. This complication was not related to the severity of the respiratory COVID-19 disease. Early recognition, investigation and management of COVID-19-related neurological disease is challenging. Further clinical, neuroradiological, biomarker and neuropathological studies are essential to determine the underlying pathobiological mechanisms that will guide treatment. Longitudinal follow-up studies will be necessary to ascertain the long-term neurological and neuropsychological consequences of this pandemic.

Inherited myotonias.

The inherited myotonias are a complex group of diseases caused by variations in genes that encode or modulate the expression of ion channels that regulate muscle excitability. These variations alter muscle membrane excitability allowing mild depolarization, causing myotonic discharges. There are two groups of inherited myotonia, the dystrophic and the nondystrophic myotonias (NDM). Patients with NDM have a pure muscle phenotype with variations in channel genes expressed in muscle. The dystrophic myotonias are caused by genes that alter splicing leading to more systemic effects with myotonia being one of a number of systemic symptoms. This chapter therefore focuses on the key aspects of the NDMs. The NDMs manifest with varying clinical phenotypes, which change from infancy to adulthood. The pathogenicity of different variants can be determined using heterologous expression systems to understand the alteration in channel properties and predict the likelihood of causing disease. Myotonia itself can be managed by lifestyle modifications. A number of randomized controlled trials demonstrate efficacy of mexiletine and lamotrigine in treating myotonia, but there is an evidence that specific variants may be more or less well-treated by the different agents because of how they alter the channel kinetics. More work is needed to develop more targeted genetic treatments.

Pediatric neuromuscular channelopathies.

Pediatric skeletal muscle channelopathies include a spectrum of conditions including nondystrophic myotonias and periodic paralyses. They are rare inherited conditions that can cause significant morbidity. They are characterized by episodic stiffness and weakness. While there is significant phenotypic variability, there are distinct diagnostic features. The nondystrophic myotonias encompass myotonia congenita, paramyotonia congenita, and sodium channel myotonia caused by mutations in chloride and sodium channels. The clinical manifestations vary across age groups and a small subset with sodium channel mutations may have severe presentation with fetal akinesia, laryngospasm, or congenital myopathy. The periodic paralyses include hypokalemic periodic paralysis, hyperkalemic periodic paralysis, and Andersen-Tawil syndrome. The phenotypic differences between the groups can be helpful in diagnosis. It is important to review the cardiac phenotype in Andersen-Tawil syndrome due to a risk of life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias. Early and accurate diagnosis utilizing clinical features aided by investigations is important across all the pediatric channelopathies, as effective symptomatic treatment is available and can substantially improve quality of life.

Mexiletine versus lamotrigine in non-dystrophic myotonias: a randomised, double-blind, head-to-head, crossover, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Non-dystrophic myotonias are skeletal muscle channelopathies caused by ion channel dysfunction. Symptom onset is frequently in the first decade of life, causing disability in a young cohort. Although there is no cure, symptomatic treatments exist. Previous trials provide evidence of the efficacy of mexiletine. More recently, lamotrigine has been shown to be effective. Both treatments have different profiles, including pharmacokinetics and adverse events. This trial aimed to investigate whether lamotrigine is non-inferior to mexiletine to directly inform clinical practice. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, crossover, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (London, UK). Participants (aged ≥18 years) who had genetically confirmed symptomatic non-dystrophic myotonia were randomly assigned (1:1), by means of a block randomisation schedule created by a computer program, to receive either mexiletine for 8 weeks followed by lamotrigine for 8 weeks, or lamotrigine followed by mexiletine, with a 7-day washout period in between. Investigators and participants were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure was the mean interactive voice response (IVR) diary stiffness score (0-9 scale) over the participant's final 2 weeks of diary reporting in each treatment period. Non-inferiority was assessed using a mixed-effects model with a predefined margin of 0·5 and included all randomly assigned participants who contributed at least 7 days of IVR-diary data in either treatment period. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05017155, and EudraCT, 2020-003375-17. FINDINGS: Between Aug 1, 2021, and Dec 12, 2022, of 60 participants were screened (24 females and 36 males) and randomly assigned between Aug 1, 2021 and Dec 12, 2022, to either the mexiletine-lamotrigine sequence (n=30) or the lamotrigine-mexiletine sequence (n=30). 53 participants contributed data to the primary analysis. The mean IVR stiffness score after treatment with mexiletine was 2·54 (95% CI 1·98 to 3·10) versus 2·77 (2·21 to 3·32) with lamotrigine (mean mexiletine-lamotrigine difference -0·23 [95% CI -0·63 to 0·17]). The most common adverse event with both treatments was indigestion-reflux (eight participants, 208 participant-days receiving mexiletine; seven participants, 130 participant-days receiving lamotrigine). No serious adverse events were reported. INTERPRETATION: We were unable to conclude that lamotrigine is non-inferior to mexiletine; however, improvements in all outcome measures from baseline were similar between lamotrigine and mexiletine. Lamotrigine is an important treatment consideration in non-dystrophic myotonias alongside mexiletine; we propose a treatment algorithm to guide clinical practice. FUNDING: Neuromuscular Study Group, Jon Moulton Charity Trust, UCLH BRC Fast Track Grant.