ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate pre-analytical challenges related to high-volume central laboratory SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing with a prototype qualitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen immunoassay run on the automated Abbott ARCHITECT instrument. METHODS: Contrived positive and negative specimens and de-identified nasal and nasopharyngeal specimens in transport media were used to evaluate specimen and reagent on-board stability, assay analytical performance and interference, and clinical performance. RESULTS: TCID50/mL values were similar for specimens in various transport media. Inactivated positive clinical specimens and viral lysate (USA-WA1/2020) were positive on the prototype immunoassay. Within-laboratory imprecision was ≤0.10 SD (<1.00 S/C) with a ≤10% CV (≥1.00 S/C). Assay reagents were stable on board the instrument for 14 days. No high-dose hook effect was observed with a SARS-CoV-2 stock of Ct 13.0 (RLU>1.0 × 106). No interference was observed from mucin, whole blood, 12 drugs, and more than 20 cross-reactants. While specimen stability was limited at room temperature for specimens with or without viral inactivation, a single freeze/thaw cycle or long-term storage (>30 days) at -20 °C did not adversely impact specimen stability or assay performance. Specificity of the prototype SARS-CoV-2 antigen immunoassay was ≥98.5% and sensitivity was ≥89.5% across two ARCHITECT instruments. Assay sensitivity was inversely correlated with Ct and was similar to that reported for the Roche Elecsys® SARS-CoV-2 Ag immunoassay. CONCLUSIONS: The prototype SARS-CoV-2 antigen ARCHITECT immunoassay is sensitive and specific for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasal and nasopharyngeal specimens. Endogenous proteases in mucus may degrade the target antigen, which limits specimen storage and transport times and complicates assay workflow.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , Sensitivity and Specificity , COVID-19 Testing , ImmunoassayABSTRACT
Early detection of lung cancer allows for earlier stage treatment initiation and improved patient prognosis. This report focuses on utilization of combining patient demographic information with non-invasive biomarkers and their potential ability to predict risk of malignancy of nodules. A pilot study cohort of 141 subjects with IPNs (105 stage I cancer and 36 benign nodules) were collected by RUMC. The demographic variables of gender, age, sex, race, ethnicity, nodule size (mm), and smoking pack years, as well as the plasma levels of CA-125, SCC, CEA, HE4, ProGRP, NSE, Cyfra 21-1, hs-CRP, Ferritin, IgG, IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4, IgE, IgM, IgA, KFLC, and LFLC, were assessed for this cohort. Multivariable analyses of the previously aforementioned biomarkers and demographic variables yielded a reduced algorithm consisting of CA-125, total IgG, IgA, IgM, IgE, LFLC, nodule size, and smoking pack years with improved performance (AUC 0.82, 95 %CI 0.74-0.90) over the same analysis of the demographic variables (age, nodule size, and smoking pack years) alone (AUC 0.70, 95 %CI 0.61-0.78). This reduced algorithm of biomarkers and demographic variables may aid in assessing the risk of IPN malignancy which could be a useful stratification tool in early detection of lung cancer in high-risk subjects.
Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Multiple Pulmonary Nodules , Humans , Pilot Projects , Multiple Pulmonary Nodules/diagnosis , Algorithms , Biomarkers , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin A , Immunoglobulin E , Immunoglobulin MABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Periostin is being investigated as a potential biomarker for T-helper-2 (Th2)-driven asthma or eosinophilic inflammation and may help to identify patients more likely to benefit from interleukin-13-targeted treatments. We report the development and analytic performance of the investigational use only ARCHITECT Periostin Immunoassay, a new automated assay developed to detect serum periostin concentrations. METHODS: We assessed assay performance in terms of precision, sensitivity, linearity, interference from classical immunoassay interferents and representatives of common asthma medications, specimen handling, and isoform reactivity. The assay was also used to assess the biological variability of serum periostin concentrations in samples from healthy volunteers and from subjects with uncontrolled asthma (the intended use population). RESULTS: The percentage CVs for 5-day total precision, assessed using two instruments, was <6% across 2 controls and one serum-based panel. Limit of quantitation was 4ng/mL (dilution adjusted concentration), suiting the needs for this application. Dilution analysis yielded linear results and no endogenous sample or drug interferences were observed. All known periostin isoforms expressed in the mature human lung were detected by the assay. CONCLUSION: Our studies provide support that the ARCHITECT Periostin Immunoassay is a reliable and robust test for measuring serum periostin concentrations.
Subject(s)
Blood Chemical Analysis/methods , Cell Adhesion Molecules/blood , Immunoassay/methods , Adolescent , Asthma/blood , Automation , Biomarkers/blood , Blood Specimen Collection , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Limit of Detection , Linear Models , Male , TemperatureABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) may be a suitable biomarker to identify people with severe asthma who have greater activation of the interleukin-13 (IL-13) pathway and may therefore benefit from IL-13-targeted treatments. We report the analytical performance of an Investigational Use Only immunoassay and provide data on the biological range of DPP-4 concentrations. METHODS: We assessed assay performance, utilising analyses of precision, linearity and sensitivity; interference from common endogenous assay interferents, and from asthma and anti-diabetic medications, were also assessed. The assay was used to measure the range of serum DPP-4 concentrations in healthy volunteers and subjects with diabetes and severe, uncontrolled asthma. RESULTS: The total precision of DPP-4 concentration measurement (determined using percentage coefficient of variation) was ≤5% over 20 days. Dilution analysis yielded linear results from 30 to 1305 ng/mL; the limit of quantitation was 19.2 ng/mL. No notable endogenous or drug interferences were observed at the expected therapeutic concentration. Median DPP-4 concentrations in healthy volunteers and subjects with asthma or Type 1 diabetes were assessed, with concentrations remaining similar in subjects with diabetes and asthma across different demographics. CONCLUSION: These analyses indicate that the ARCHITECT DPP-4 Immunoassay is a reliable and robust method for measuring serum DPP-4 concentration.