The Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Plus Radioisotope Method Compared With the Radioisotope-Only Method for Breast Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Center Phase 2 Trial.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification rates for breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) between the dual method (DM) of indocyanine green fluorescence (ICG-F) plus a radioisotope (RI) and RI alone. METHODS: This randomized study enrolled 130 patients who received NAC for breast cancer and 122 patients who received SLN biopsy (SLNB) using either DM (n = 58) or RI only (n = 64). The study compared the identification rate, number of SLNs, and detection time of SLNB. RESULTS: Among the 122 patients, 113 (92.6%) were clinically node-positive before NAC. The SLN identification rate was 98.3% in the DM group and 93.8% in the RI group (p = 0.14). The DM group and the RI group were similar in the average number of SLNs (2.2 ± 1.13 vs. 1.9 ± 1.33; p = 0.26) and the time to detection of the first SLN (8.7 ± 4.98 vs. 8.3 ± 4.31 min; p = 0.30). In the DM group, transcutaneous lymphatic drainage was visualized by fluorescence imaging for 65.5% (38 of 58) of the patients. The SLN identification rate was 94.7% using ICG-F and 93% using RI (p = 0.79). During and after the operation, no complications, including allergic reactions or skin necrosis, occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first randomized trial to use ICG-F for SLNB in breast cancer patients after NAC. The DM including ICG-F could be a feasible and safe method for SLNB in initially node-positive breast cancer patients with NAC.

Comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy guided by the multimodal method of indocyanine green fluorescence, radioisotope, and blue dye versus the radioisotope method in breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the identification rate and surgery time of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) by a multimodal method (MMM) using a mixture of indocyanine green (ICG), radioisotope (RI), and blue dye (BD) compared with the RI alone. METHODS: In this phase II randomized study, 86 patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer were enrolled and received SLNB with either MMM or RI. We compared the identification rate, number of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), and detection time of SLNB and evaluated the safety. RESULTS: The mean age of the MMM group and RI group was 48.2 and 51.0 years (p = 0.12), respectively. There were no differences in histopathologic factors, including tumor size, node positivity, and hormone receptor positivity between groups. SLNs were identified in all patients of both groups (100 % in the MMM group and 100 % in the RI group). The average number of SLNs in the MMM group was more than that in the RI group (3.4 ± 1.37 vs. 2.3 ± 1.04, respectively; p < 0.001). The time to detect the first sentinel lymph node was similar in each group (6.5 ± 5.16 vs. 8.0 ± 4.35 min; p = 0.13). In the MMM group, percutaneous lymphatic drainage was visualized by fluorescent imaging in 90.7 % (39 of 43 patients). During and after the operation, there were no complications, including allergic reactions, skin staining, or necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first randomized trial that compared MMM using ICG, RI, and BD and the conventional RI method for SLNB. MMM is a feasible and safe method for SLNB.

Delayed treatment with lidocaine reduces mouse microglial cell injury and cytokine production after stimulation with lipopolysaccharide and interferon γ.

BACKGROUND: Neuroinflammation is an important pathological process for almost all acquired neurological diseases. Microglial cells play a critical role in neuroinflammation. We determined whether lidocaine, a local anesthetic with anti-inflammatory property, protected microglial cells and attenuated cytokine production from activated microglial cells. METHODS: Mouse microglial cultures were incubated with or without 1 µg/mL lipopolysaccharide and 10 U/mL interferon γ (IFNγ) for 24 hours in the presence or absence of lidocaine for 1 hour started at 2, 3, or 4 hours after the onset of lipopolysaccharide and IFNγ stimulation. Lactate dehydrogenase release and cytokine production were determined after the cells were stimulated by lipopolysaccharide and IFNγ for 24 hours. RESULTS: Lidocaine dose-dependently reduced lipopolysaccharide and IFNγ-induced microglial cell injury as measured by lactate dehydrogenase release. This effect was apparent with lidocaine at 2 µg/mL (30.3% ± 5.8% and 23.1% ± 9.7%, respectively, for stimulation alone and the stimulation in the presence of lidocaine, n = 18, P = 0.025). Lidocaine applied at 2, 3, or 4 hours after the onset of lipopolysaccharide and IFNγ stimulation reduced the cell injury. This lidocaine effect was not affected by the mitochondrial K(ATP) channel inhibitor 5-hydroxydecanoate. Similar to lidocaine, QX314, a permanently charged lidocaine analog that usually does not permeate through the plasma membrane, reduced lipopolysaccharide and IFNγ-induced microglial cell injury. QX314 also attenuated the stimulation-induced interleukin-1ß production. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed treatment with lidocaine protects microglial cells and reduces cytokine production from these cells. These effects may involve action site(s) on the cell surface.

Transient unilateral lingual nerve injury following the use of laryngeal mask airway Supreme: a case report.

Lingual nerve injury rarely occurs after using the laryngeal mask airway (LMA). A 40-year-old woman with no comorbidities visited the hospital for left breast-conserving surgery. Anesthesia was performed using LMA Supreme™. She complained of decreased sensation in the right front part of the tongue postoperatively. She received prednisolone and tongue sensation returned on postoperative day 28. The lingual nerve could be damaged by the LMA, particularly the lateral edge of the tongue base and inner part of the mandible around the third molar. When using the LMA, it is necessary to check the cuff pressure to prevent lingual nerve damage.

Uncontrolled high blood pressure under total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Although propofol generally reduces blood pressure, rarely, it causes hypertension. However, the mechanism by which propofol increases blood pressure has not been established, and so far, there are only a few reported cases. CASE SUMMARY: A 46-year-old woman, diagnosed with thyroid cancer, was administered general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil for a thyroid lobectomy. An increase in the concentrations of intravenous anesthetics further increased her blood pressure. The blood pressure remained stable when anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil after the interruption of propofol administration. CONCLUSION: We concluded that propofol administration was the cause of increased blood pressure.

Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer: Combined Statistical Modeling Using Clinicopathological Factors and FDG PET/CT Texture Parameters.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop a combined statistical model using both clinicopathological factors and texture parameters from F-FDG PET/CT to predict responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 435 patients with breast cancer were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical and pathological data were obtained from electronic medical records. Texture parameters were extracted from pretreatment FDG PET/CT images. The end point was pathological complete response, defined as the absence of residual disease or the presence of residual ductal carcinoma in situ without residual lymph node metastasis. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed using clinicopathological factors and texture parameters as covariates. RESULTS: In the multivariable logistic regression model, various factors and parameters, including HER2, histological grade or Ki-67, gradient skewness, gradient kurtosis, contrast, difference variance, angular second moment, and inverse difference moment, were selected as significant prognostic variables. The predictive power of the multivariable logistic regression model incorporating both clinicopathological factors and texture parameters was significantly higher than that of a model with only clinicopathological factors (P = 0.0067). In subgroup analysis, texture parameters, including gradient skewness and gradient kurtosis, were selected as independent prognostic factors in the HER2-negative group. CONCLUSIONS: A combined statistical model was successfully generated using both clinicopathological factors and texture parameters to predict the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results suggest that addition of texture parameters from FDG PET/CT can provide more information regarding treatment response prediction compared with clinicopathological factors alone.